Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Surg Case Rep ; 5(1): 17, 2019 Feb 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30715627

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Metastases to the stomach or gallbladder from any malignancy is rarely noted, and simultaneous metastases to both organs are atypical. We present a unique case of simultaneous multifocal metastases of the stomach and gallbladder from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). CASE PRESENTATION: The case involved a 60-year-old man, with a past history of RCC (clear cell type, G2, T1b N0 M0 Stage I) treated by a right nephrectomy. Three years after the nephrectomy, a routine gastrointestinal endoscopy found an ulcerative lesion in the greater curvature of the gastric body. The gastric tumor was pathologically proven to be a metastasis from RCC. Furthermore, computed tomography incidentally revealed a mass lesion in the fundus of the gallbladder, which was also diagnosed as a potential metastasis from RCC. As endoscopic ultrasonography of the gastric tumor suggested the tumor potentially invaded to the submucosal layer, gastric wedge resection via a laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) technique was applied to the gastric tumor, and laparoscopic cholecystectomy to the gallbladder tumor was simultaneously performed. Histological examination confirmed that the tumors of the stomach and gallbladder were both metastatic RCC. The hospitalization period after surgery was not eventful, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 7. Thereafter, the patient required examination every 3 months, did not use anticancer agents, and has survived without relapse to 9 months after the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with locally resectable RCC metastases, complete metastasectomy may bring long-term tumor control. Moreover, LECS for gastric metastasis is a reasonable approach for minimal invasiveness and an oncologically feasible outcome.

2.
Endosc Int Open ; 4(6): E608-9, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27556064

ABSTRACT

We report the case of a 55-year-old woman with a tumor in the greater curvature of the upper gastric body. The tumor was incidentally found on an upper gastrointestinal X-ray series performed during a routine medical examination. Whereas endoscopy revealed a gastric submucosal tumor (SMT), endoscopic ultrasonography demonstrated a heterogeneous tumor with small, cystic, hypoechoic spots originating from the second layer. The patient was clinically asymptomatic, with no contributory family history or abnormal laboratory data. The results of a physical examination, abdominal computed tomography, and plain chest radiography were all unremarkable. Although the endoscopic tumor type was determined to be SMT, the tumor was successfully resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and subsequently diagnosed as a gastric hamartomatous inverted polyp (GHIP). The findings of the present case highlight the importance of considering GHIP as a diagnosis and indicate the utility of en bloc resection of GHIP with ESD.

3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 20(4): 1119-22, 2014 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24574787

ABSTRACT

A 63-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for further examination because of an incidental finding of early gastric cancer. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was successfully performed for complete resection of the tumor. On the first post-ESD day, the patient suddenly complained of abdominal pain after an episode of vomiting. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed delayed perforation after ESD. The patient was conservatively treated with an intravenous proton pump inhibitor and antibiotics. On the fifth post-ESD day, CT revealed a gastric wall abscess in the gastric body. Gastroscopy revealed a gastric fistula at the edge of the post-ESD ulcer, and pus was found flowing into the stomach. An intradrainage stent and an extradrainage nasocystic catheter were successfully inserted into the abscess for endoscopic transgastric drainage. After the procedure, the clinical symptoms and laboratory test results improved quickly. Two months later, a follow-up CT scan showed no collection of pus. Consequently, the intradrainage stent was removed. Although the gastric wall abscess recurred 2 wk after stent removal, it recovered soon after endoscopic transgastric drainage. Finally, after stent removal and oral antibiotic treatment for 1 mo, no recurrence of the gastric wall abscess was found.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Abscess/therapy , Dissection/adverse effects , Drainage/methods , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Gastric Fistula/therapy , Gastroscopy/adverse effects , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Abdominal Abscess/diagnosis , Abdominal Abscess/etiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drainage/instrumentation , Female , Gastric Fistula/diagnosis , Gastric Fistula/etiology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Stents , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL