Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(1): 32-59, 2023 Dec 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37738678

ABSTRACT

Modern gamma-ray spectrometers based on solid-state scintillators are increasingly being used in fields where previously dosemeters were applied. From the spectra, precise fluence and dose information can be derived. The most important methods of doing this are investigated in detail; the conversion method, which is based on weighing functions; and unfolding, here using the GRAVEL algorithm. Both methods can be used to process any kind of spectra, regardless of the type of spectrometer employed. The GRAVEL algorithm is described in detail. The implementation of both methods is shown and results of examples are compared. Advantages and disadvantages of both techniques are discussed. For the first time, most precise conversion data up to 20 MeV are published, even extending the quantity H*(10) to this energy. They may serve for the improvement and harmonisation of dose rate measurements using scintillation spectrometers, e.g. those used in early warning systems.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Photons
2.
Health Phys ; 111(2): 100-5, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27356052

ABSTRACT

As a consequence of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant accident in 1986, all European countries have installed automatic dosimetry network stations as well as air sampling systems for the monitoring of airborne radioactivity. In Europe, at present, almost 5,000 stations measure dose rate values in nearly real time. In addition, a few hundred air samplers are operated. Most of them need extended accumulation times with no real-time capability. National dose rate data are provided to the European Commission (EC) via the EUropean Radiological Data Exchange Platform (EURDEP). In case of a nuclear emergency with transboundary implications, the EC may issue momentous recommendations to EU member states based on the radiological data collected by EURDEP. These recommendations may affect millions of people and could have severe economic and sociological consequences. Therefore, the reliability of the EURDEP data is of key importance. Unfortunately, the dose rate and activity concentration data are not harmonized between the different networks. Therefore, within the framework of the European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP), 16 European institutions formed the consortium MetroERM with the aim to improve the metrological foundation of measurements and to introduce a pan-European harmonization for the collation and evaluation of radiological data in early warning network systems. In addition, a new generation of detector systems based on spectrometers capable of providing both reliable dose rate values as well as nuclide specific information in real time are in development. The MetroERM project and its first results will be presented and discussed in this article.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Radioactive Hazard Release/statistics & numerical data , Research/organization & administration , Safety Management/organization & administration , Database Management Systems/organization & administration , Europe , Models, Organizational , Radioactive Pollutants/analysis
3.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 170(1-4): 82-5, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26759475

ABSTRACT

The European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) has been organising dosimetry intercomparisons for many years in response to an identified requirement from individual monitoring services (IMS) for independent performance tests for dosimetry systems. The participation in intercomparisons gives IMS the opportunity to show compliance with their own quality management system, compare results with other participants and develop plans for improving their dosimetry systems. In response to growing demand, EURADOS has increased the number of intercomparisons for external radiation dosimetry. Most of these fit into the programme of self-financing intercomparisons for dosemeters routinely used by IMS. This programme is being coordinated by EURADOS working group 2 (WG2). Up to now, this programme has included four intercomparisons for whole-body dosemeters in photon fields, one for extremity dosemeters in photon and beta fields, and one for whole-body dosemeters in neutron fields. Other EURADOS working groups have organised additional intercomparisons including events in 2014 for eye-lens dosemeters and passive area dosemeters for environmental monitoring. In this paper, the organisation and achievements of these intercomparisons are compared in detail focusing on the similarities and differences in their execution.


Subject(s)
Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Protection/methods , Environmental Monitoring/methods , Europe , Humans , International Cooperation , Neutrons , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Photons , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Dosimeters , Whole-Body Counting
4.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 152(4): 475-7; author's reply 477-8, 2012 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22668756
5.
Health Phys ; 102(4): 400-9, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22378201

ABSTRACT

To study discrepancies in retrospective Hiroshima dosimetry, the specific activity of (60)Co in 16 steel samples from Hiroshima was measured using gamma-ray spectrometry in underground laboratories. There is general agreement between these new activity measurements and the specific activities derived from previously calculated dose values on the one hand and former measurements of samples gathered at distances less than 1,000 m from the center of the explosion (< 1,000 m slant range) on the other. It was found that activities at long range (> 1,300 m slant range) were mainly cosmogenically induced. Furthermore, at long range, these results are in disagreement with older measurements whose specific activity values were 10 to 100 times higher than predicted by computer model calculations in DS86 and DS02. As a consequence, the previously reported discrepancy is not confirmed.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/analysis , Explosions , Explosive Agents/chemistry , Nuclear Weapons , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Steel/chemistry , Cobalt Radioisotopes/analysis , Environment , Gamma Rays , Japan , Neutrons , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL