Safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab plus erlotinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Acquired resistance limits long-term epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) efficacy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in whom anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) efficacy is also limited. We hypothesized that combining atezolizumab with erlotinib could enhance antitumor immunity and extend efficacy in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label phase Ib trial was conducted in adults aged ≥18 years who had advanced, unresectable NSCLC. Stage 1 (safety evaluation) enrolled EGFR TKI-naive patients regardless of EGFR status. Stage 2 (expansion) enrolled patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC treated with ≤1 prior non-EGFR TKI therapy. Patients received 150 mg erlotinib orally once daily. After a 7-day erlotinib run-in, atezolizumab 1200 mg was administered intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the safety and tolerability of the combination in all patients; secondary endpoints included antitumor activity per RECIST 1.1 in stage 2 patients. RESULTS: At the data cut-off on 7 May 2020, 28 patients (8 in stage 1, 20 in stage 2) were assessable for safety. No dose-limiting toxicities or grade 4 or 5 treatment-related adverse events occurred. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 46% of patients; the most common were increased alanine aminotransferase, diarrhea, pyrexia, and rash (each in 7% of patients). Serious adverse events occurred in 50% of patients. Pneumonitis (grade 1) was reported in a single patient (4%). The objective response rate was 75% [95% confidence interval (CI) 50.9% to 91.3%]), median response duration was 18.9 months (95% CI 9.5-40.5 months), median progression-free survival was 15.4 months (95% CI 8.4-39.0 months), and median overall survival was not estimable (NE) (95% CI 34.6-NE). CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab combined with erlotinib demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and encouraging, durable clinical activity in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Cardiovascular adverse events are associated with usage of immune checkpoint inhibitors in real-world clinical data across the United States.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause life-threatening cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) that may not be attributed to therapy. The outcomes of clinical trials may underestimate treatment-related adverse events due to restrictive eligibility, limited sample size, and failure to anticipate selected toxicities. We evaluated the incidence and clinical determinants of CVAEs in real-world population on ICI therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 2 687 301 patients diagnosed with cancer from 2011 to 2018, 16 574 received ICIs for any cancer. Patients in the ICI and non-ICI cohorts were matched in a 1 : 1 ratio according to age, sex, National Cancer Institute comorbidity score, and primary cancer. The non-ICI cohort was stratified into patients who received chemotherapy (N = 2875) or targeted agents (N = 4611). All CVAEs, non-cardiac immune-related adverse events occurring after treatment initiation, baseline comorbidities, and treatment details were identified and analyzed using diagnosis and billing codes. RESULTS: Median age was 61 and 65 years in the ICI and non-ICI cohorts, respectively (P < 0.001). ICI patients were predominantly male (P < 0.001). Lung cancer (43.1%), melanoma (30.4%), and renal cell carcinoma (9.9%) were the most common cancer types. CVAE diagnoses in our dataset by incidence proportion (ICI cohort) were stroke (4.6%), heart failure (3.5%), atrial fibrillation (2.1%), conduction disorders (1.5%), myocardial infarction (0.9%), myocarditis (0.05%), vasculitis (0.05%), and pericarditis (0.2%). Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 increased the risk of heart failure [versus anti-programmed cell death protein 1; hazard ratio (HR), 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27-2.84] and stroke (HR, 1.7; 95% CI 1.3-2.22). Pneumonitis was associated with heart failure (HR, 2.61; 95% CI 1.23-5.52) and encephalitis with conduction disorders (HR, 4.35; 95% CI 1.6-11.87) in patients on ICIs. Advanced age, primary cancer, nephritis, and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 therapy were commonly associated with CVAEs in the adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the importance of risk stratification and cardiovascular monitoring for patients on ICI therapy.

Larotrectinib in adult patients with solid tumours: a multi-centre, open-label, phase I dose-escalation study.

BACKGROUND: NTRK1, NTRK2 and NTRK3 gene fusions (NTRK gene fusions) occur in a range of adult cancers. Larotrectinib is a potent and highly selective ATP-competitive inhibitor of TRK kinases and has demonstrated activity in patients with tumours harbouring NTRK gene fusions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multi-centre, phase I dose escalation study enrolled adults with metastatic solid tumours, regardless of NTRK gene fusion status. Key inclusion criteria included evaluable and/or measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate organ function. Larotrectinib was administered orally once or twice daily, on a continuous 28-day schedule, in increasing dose levels according to a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme. The primary end point was the safety of larotrectinib, including dose-limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Seventy patients (8 with tumours with NTRK gene fusions; 62 with tumours without a documented NTRK gene fusion) were enrolled to 6 dose cohorts. There were four dose-limiting toxicities; none led to study drug discontinuation. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Larotrectinib-related adverse events were predominantly grade 1; none were grade 4 or 5. The most common grade 3 larotrectinib-related adverse event was anaemia [4 (6%) of 70 patients]. A dose of 100 mg twice daily was recommended for phase II studies based on tolerability and antitumour activity. In patients with evaluable TRK fusion cancer, the objective response rate by independent review was 100% (eight of the eight patients). Eight (12%) of the 67 assessable patients overall had an objective response by investigator assessment. Median duration of response was not reached. Larotrectinib had limited activity in tumours with NTRK mutations or amplifications. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed exposure was generally proportional to administered dose. CONCLUSIONS: Larotrectinib was well tolerated, demonstrated activity in all patients with tumours harbouring NTRK gene fusions, and represents a new treatment option for such patients. CLINCALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT02122913.

A Pharmacokinetic and Safety Study of Trebananib, an Fc-Fusion Peptibody, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Varying Degrees of Renal Dysfunction.

Clearance of trebananib (AMG 386), a 64-kD antiangiogenic peptibody, has been associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). We prospectively evaluated trebananib pharmacokinetics and safety/tolerability in advanced solid tumor patients with varying degrees of renal function. Patients were assigned to normal renal function, mild, moderate, or severe renal dysfunction cohorts based on eGFR, received trebananib 15 mg/kg i.v. weekly, and underwent week 1 and week 5 pharmacokinetic and weekly safety assessments. For 28 patients, trebananib clearance decreased from normal renal function (1.52 mL/hr/kg), to mild (1.20 mL/hr/kg), moderate (0.79 mL/hr/kg), and severe (0.53 mL/hr/kg) renal dysfunction (P ≤ 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events showed no association with clearance. Trebananib clearance was proportional to eGFR and unrelated to pretreatment protein excretion. These data confirm a role for renal clearance of a recombinant peptibody with molecular weight <69 kD and support a longer dosing interval for patients with severe renal dysfunction.

Clinical correlation of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer genomics.

BACKGROUND: Genomic studies in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) lag far behind those carried out in nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To date, most SCLC studies have evaluated patients with surgically resectable disease. Here we sought to evaluate the genomic mutation spectrum of 'every-day' SCLC patient tumors with extensive stage disease (ES-SCLC) and to correlate mutations with the main clinical outcomes of response to chemotherapy, progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 50 SCLC patient tumors were examined in this study; targeted exome sequencing was obtained on 42 patients and whole-exome sequencing on 8 patients. Mutated genes were correlated with clinical outcomes using Kaplan-Meier methods (PFS, OS) and logistic regression (chemo-response). RB1 protein expression was detected by either western blotting of cultured cell lysates or immunohistochemistry of tumor specimens. RESULTS: In all, 39 patients had ES-SCLC; 15 patients had either primary refractory/resistant disease and 21 patients had sensitive disease. The two most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (86%) and RB1 (58%); other frequently mutated genes (>10% patients) were involved in epigenetic regulation as well as the mTOR pathway. We identified a number of low-frequency, targetable mutations, including RICTOR, FGFR1, KIT, PTCH1 and RET. Using multivariate analysis, RB1 was the only significant factor (P = 0.038) in predicting response to first-line chemotherapy, with an odds ratio of 5.58 comparing mutant RB1 with wild-type. Patients with mutant RB1 had both better OS (11.7 versus 9.1 months P = 0.04) and PFS (11.2 versus 8.6 months, P = 0.06) compared with patients with wild-type RB1. Interestingly, ∼25% of SCLC cell lines and tumor specimens expressed RB1 protein, possibly representing the subgroup with wild-type RB1. CONCLUSIONS: We found that SCLC tumors harboring no mutation in RB1 had a poor response to chemotherapy.

[How I explore . HLA class II by ultrastructure in toxic epidermal necrolysis]. / Comment j'explore les HLA de classe II par ultrastructure dans la nécrolyse épidermique toxique.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN, Lyell syndrome) is a severe paroxystic drug reaction whose inductive mechanisms remain poorly understood. The HLA glycoproteins are possibly involved in the disease process. Such investigations rely on biomolecular methods, and suggest specific interactions between some drugs or their metabolites and some HLA groups according to ethnicity of the TEN patients. Electron microscopy following the immunogold method for revealing HLA-DR did not disclose any evidence for distinguishing distinct patterns on Langerhans cell membrane between the initial and the resolution phases of TEN.

La nécrolyse épidermique toxique (NET, syndrome de Lyell) est une toxidermie paroxystique grave dont les mécanismes inducteurs restent mal élucidés. Les glycoprotéines HLA ont été potentiellement impliquées dans ce processus. Leur étude a bénéficié des méthodes biomoléculaires qui suggèrent des interactions spécifiques entre certains médicaments ou leurs métabolites et certains HLA en fonction du groupe ethnique du patient atteint de NET. La microscopie électronique, par la méthode «immunogold¼ afin d'évaluer les HLA-DR, n'a pas révélé de différences notoires dans leur distribution sur la paroi de cellules de Langerhans entre la phase initiale et celle de résolution de 5 cas de NET.

Synergistic killing of human small cell lung cancer cells by the Bcl-2-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor disruptor BIRD-2 and the BH3-mimetic ABT-263.

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has an annual mortality approaching that of breast and prostate cancer. Although sensitive to initial chemotherapy, SCLC rapidly develops resistance, leading to less effective second-line therapies. SCLC cells often overexpress Bcl-2, which protects cells from apoptosis both by sequestering pro-apoptotic family members and by modulating inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R)-mediated calcium signaling. BH3-mimetic agents such as ABT-263 disrupt the former activity but have limited activity in SCLC patients. Here we report for the first time that Bcl-2-IP3 receptor disruptor-2 (BIRD-2), a decoy peptide that binds to the BH4 domain of Bcl-2 and prevents Bcl-2 interaction with IP3Rs, induces cell death in a wide range of SCLC lines, including ABT-263-resistant lines. BIRD-2-induced death of SCLC cells appears to be a form of caspase-independent apoptosis mediated by calpain activation. By targeting different regions of the Bcl-2 protein and different mechanisms of action, BIRD-2 and ABT-263 induce cell death synergistically. Based on these findings, we propose that targeting the Bcl-2-IP3R interaction be pursued as a novel therapeutic strategy for SCLC, either by developing BIRD-2 itself as a therapeutic agent or by developing small-molecule inhibitors that mimic BIRD-2.

Simpson's paradox - aggregating and partitioning populations in health disparities of lung cancer patients.

It is well known that non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous group of diseases. Previous studies have demonstrated genetic variation among different ethnic groups in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in NSCLC. Research by our group and others has recently shown a lower frequency of EGFR mutations in African Americans with NSCLC, as compared to their White counterparts. In this study, we use our original study data of EGFR pathway genetics in African American NSCLC as an example to illustrate that univariate analyses based on aggregation versus partition of data leads to contradictory results, in order to emphasize the importance of controlling statistical confounding. We further investigate analytic approaches in logistic regression for data with separation, as is the case in our example data set, and apply appropriate methods to identify predictors of EGFR mutation. Our simulation shows that with separated or nearly separated data, penalized maximum likelihood (PML) produces estimates with smallest bias and approximately maintains the nominal value with statistical power equal to or better than that from maximum likelihood and exact conditional likelihood methods. Application of the PML method in our example data set shows that race and EGFR-FISH are independently significant predictors of EGFR mutation.

Phase I study of weekly paclitaxel in combination with pazopanib and lapatinib in advanced solid malignancies.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the maximum tolerated regimen (MTR) and dose-limiting toxicities of pazopanib and lapatinib in combination with weekly paclitaxel, and the effect of pazopanib and lapatinib on paclitaxel pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Patients received intravenous paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle concurrently with daily pazopanib and lapatinib. Dose levels of paclitaxel (mg m(-2))/pazopanib(mg)/lapatinib(mg) were 50/400/1000, 50/800/1000, 80/800/1000, and 80/400/1000. At the MTR, additional patients were enrolled to further evaluate tolerability, and the potential effects of pazopanib and lapatinib, inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4, on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel, a CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 substrate. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities at the MTR (80/400/1000) included grade 4 thrombosis and grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase elevation. Other toxicities included diarrhoea, neutropenia, fatigue, and liver enzyme elevations. Coadministration of pazopanib 400 mg and lapatinib 1000 mg increased paclitaxel maximum plasma concentration (38%) and area under the curve (37%) relative to paclitaxel alone. One patient with a salivary gland tumour had a partial response; three patients had stable disease (⩾6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Pazopanib 400 mg per day and lapatinib 1000 mg per day can be combined with paclitaxel 80 mg m(-2) in 28-day cycles. Coadministration of pazopanib and lapatinib, weak inhibitors of CYP2C8 and CYP3A4, had an inhibitory effect on paclitaxel clearance.

Dual MET-EGFR combinatorial inhibition against T790M-EGFR-mediated erlotinib-resistant lung cancer.

Despite clinical approval of erlotinib, most advanced lung cancer patients are primary non-responders. Initial responders invariably develop secondary resistance, which can be accounted for by T790M-EGFR mutation in half of the relapses. We show that MET is highly expressed in lung cancer, often concomitantly with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), including H1975 cell line. The erlotinib-resistant lung cancer cell line H1975, which expresses L858R/T790M-EGFR in-cis, was used to test for the effect of MET inhibition using the small molecule inhibitor SU11274. H1975 cells express wild-type MET, without genomic amplification (CNV = 1.1). At 2 microM, SU 11274 had significant in vitro pro-apoptotic effect in H1975 cells, 3.9-fold (P = 0.0015) higher than erlotinib, but had no effect on the MET and EGFR-negative H520 cells. In vivo, SU11274 also induced significant tumour cytoreduction in H1975 murine xenografts in our bioluminescence molecular imaging assay. Using small-animal microPET/MRI, SU11274 treatment was found to induce an early tumour metabolic response in H1975 tumour xenografts. MET and EGFR pathways were found to exhibit collaborative signalling with receptor cross-activation, which had different patterns between wild type (A549) and L858R/T790M-EGFR (H1975). SU11274 plus erlotinib/CL-387,785 potentiated MET inhibition of downstream cell proliferative survival signalling. Knockdown studies in H1975 cells using siRNA against MET alone, EGFR alone, or both, confirmed the enhanced downstream inhibition with dual MET-EGFR signal path inhibition. Finally, in our time-lapse video-microscopy and in vivo multimodal molecular imaging studies, dual SU11274-erlotinib concurrent treatment effectively inhibited H1975 cells with enhanced abrogation of cytoskeletal functions and complete regression of the xenograft growth. Together, our results suggest that MET-based targeted inhibition using small-molecule MET inhibitor can be a potential treatment strategy for T790M-EGFR-mediated erlotinib-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. Furthermore, optimised inhibition may be further achieved with MET inhibition in combination with erlotinib or an irreversible EGFR-TKI.

Phase I trial of three-weekly docetaxel, carboplatin and oral lenalidomide (Revlimid) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory derivative of thalidomide with significantly greater in vitro activity and a different toxicity profile. In preclinical trials it has shown synergy with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated doses of docetaxel and carboplatin when combined with oral lenalidomide in a standard phase I study design. Between September 2004 and May 2005, 14 patients with pathologically proven solid tumors, < or =2 prior chemotherapy regimens, performance status ECOG 0/1, and adequate organ function were enrolled. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as > or = grade 3 non-hematological, or grade 4 hematological toxicity. No growth factors were used during cycle 1. RESULTS: Three of four patients treated at dose level 1, docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 on Day 1, and lenalidomide 10 mg orally daily on Days 1-14 of a 21 day cycle experienced DLT (grade 3 electrolyte changes in two patients, and grade 4 neutropenia in one patient). Ten patients were treated at dose level -1, docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 on Day 1, and lenalidomide 5 mg orally daily on Days 1-14 of a 21 day cycle with one DLT (Grade 4 neutropenia). There were no treatment-related deaths or irreversible toxicities. Of the 14 response-evaluable patients, five achieved a partial response (5 out of 9 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC 6 on Day 1, with lenalidomide 5 mg orally daily on Days 1-14 days of a 21 day cycle is the maximum tolerated dose without the use of prophylactic growth factors. This combination is active and further evaluation in a phase II trial is warranted.

Sequential tumor biopsies in early phase clinical trials of anticancer agents for pharmacodynamic evaluation.

PURPOSE: In the setting of target-based anticancer drug development, it is critical to establish that the observed preclinical activity can be attributed to modulation of the intended target in early phase trials in human subjects. This paradigm of target modulation allows us to determine a Phase II or III dose (optimal biochemical/biological modulatory dose) that may not necessarily be the maximum tolerated dose. A major obstacle to target-based (often cytostatic) drug development has been obtaining relevant tumor tissue during clinical trials of these novel agents for laboratory analysis of the putative marker of drug effect. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: From 1989 to present, we have completed seven clinical trials in which the end point was a biochemical or biological modulatory dose in human tumor tissues (not surrogate tissue). Eligibility enrollment required that patients have a biopsiable lesion either with computerized tomography (CT) guidance or direct visualization and consent to sequential (pre and posttreatment) biopsies. RESULTS: A total of 192 biopsies were performed in 107 patients. All but 8 patients had sequential pre and posttreatment biopsies. Seventy-eight (73%) of the 107 patients had liver lesion biopsies. In eight patients, either one or both biopsies contained insufficient viable tumor tissue or no tumor tissue at all for analysis. Of a total of 99 patients in whom we attempted to obtain paired biopsies, a total of 87 (88%) were successful. Reasons for failure included patient refusal for a second biopsy (n = 2), vasovagal reaction with first biopsy precluding a second biopsy (n = 1), subcapsular hepatic bleeding (n = 1), and most commonly obtaining necrotic tumor, fibrous, or normal tissue in one of the two sequential biopsies (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first and largest reported series demonstrating that with adequate precautions and experience, sequential tumor biopsies are feasible and safe during early phase clinical trials.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of rebeccamycin analog NSC 655649 given daily for five consecutive days.

PURPOSE: Rebeccamycin analog (NSC 655649) is active against a variety of both solid and nonsolid tumor cell lines. We performed a phase I trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of rebeccamycin analog when given on a daily x 5 schedule repeated every 3 weeks, characterize the toxicity profile using this schedule, observe patients for antitumor response, and determine the pharmacokinetics of the agent and pharmacodynamic interactions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty assessable patients received a total of 153 cycles according to the following dose escalation schema: 60, 80, 106, 141, and 188 mg/m(2)/d x 5 days. RESULTS: Grade 2 phlebitis occurred in all patients before the use of central venous access, placed at dose level 4 and higher. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), grade 4 neutropenia, occurred at 188 mg/m(2)/d x 5 days in both previously treated and chemotherapy-naive patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a three-compartmental model of drug elimination and a long terminal half-life (154 +/- 55 hours). The percentage drop in absolute neutrophil count correlates with the area under the curve infinity. The presence of a second peak during the elimination phase as well as a high concentration of NSC 655649 in biliary fluid compared with the corresponding plasma measurement (one patient) is suggestive of enterohepatic circulation. Two partial responses, two minor responses, and six prolonged (> 6 months) cases of stable disease were observed. Of these, three patients with gallbladder cancer and one patient with cholangiocarcinoma experienced either a minor response or a significant period of freedom from progression. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II dose for NSC 665649 on a daily x 5 every 3 weeks schedule is 141 and 165 mg/m(2)/d for patients with prior and no prior therapy, respectively, with DLT being neutropenia. During this phase I trial, encouraging antitumor activity was been observed.

Paclitaxel added to the cisplatin/etoposide regimen in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer -- the use of complete response rate as the primary endpoint in phase II trials.

Obtaining a complete response (CR) is the most powerful predictor of survival in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Improvements in long-term survival in extensive-stage SCLC can be made if the proportion of complete responders to induction therapy can be increased. We performed a phase II trial of the feasibility of adding paclitaxel to standard cisplatin/etoposide (EP regimen) in extensive-stage SCLC. The primary endpoint for this trial is the proportion of patients (pts) obtaining a CR rather than overall response. The null hypothesis for this trial consists of the absence of a CR rate >20%. Paclitaxel was given at doses of 135 (3 pts) or 170 mg/m(2) i.v. over 3 h on day 1. Cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) was given on day 1. On days 1-3 etoposide 80 mg/m(2) per day i.v. was given. G-CSF was used from days 5 to 14 of each cycle. Cycles were repeated q21 days. A two-stage design was used for patient accrual, based on the occurrence of complete responses. Initially, 16 patients were to be accrued. If more than three complete responses were to occur, a further 20 patients would be accrued to the study (Simon's optimal two stage design). Sixteen patients were enrolled. Two patients had a CR (13%) and nine patients had a partial response (56%) for an overall response rate of 69%. The trial was suspended due to the low CR rate. Review of the literature for paclitaxel based front-line treatment combined with EP therapy, in extensive stage SCLC, consistently shows a CR rate <20% but high overall response rate is maintained (thus most responses are partial). As virtually all long-term survivors in extensive-disease SCLC have had a CR to induction therapy and CR remains the strongest predictor of survival for this disease, this may suggest that paclitaxel added to standard EP may improve progression-free survival (and possibly median survival) but is unlikely to significantly improve long-term survival. Initial randomized phase III data confirm the absence of impact on survival for this triple-drug regimen compared to EP therapy alone. Furthermore, other regimens comparing favorably to the EP regimen have all shown consistent CR rates >20% in the phase II setting. In conclusion, consideration should be given to the use of CR rate as a phase II endpoint to determine if a particular regimen should be compared to the standard in a phase III setting for extensive-stage SCLC. A two-stage phase II design based on a minimum required completed responses for further patient accrual is recommended.

Phase II and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic trial of sequential topoisomerase I and II inhibition with topotecan and etoposide in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: In vitro and in vivo preclinical models have demonstrated synergistic activity when topoisomerase I and II inhibitors are administered sequentially. Topoisomerase I inhibitors increase topoisomerase II levels and increase cell kill induced by topoisomerase II poisons. We evaluated this hypothesis in a cohort of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A group of 19 patients with advanced NSCLC (70% adenocarcinoma) received topotecan at a dose of 0.85 mg/m2 per day as a continuous 72-h infusion from days 1 to 3. Etoposide was administered orally at a dose of 100 mg twice daily for 3 days on days 7-9 (schedule and dose derived from prior phase I trials). Total and lactone topotecan concentrations were measured at the end of the 72-h infusion. Blood samples were obtained immediately after each 72-h topotecan infusion in order to measure the mutational frequency at the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT) locus in peripheral lymphocytes. RESULTS: A total of 55 cycles were administered. Toxicity was mainly hematologic with grade 4 neutropenia occurring in 7% of courses. Only one partial response and two stable diseases were observed. The 1-year survival rate was 33%. There was a statistically significant difference between steady-state lactone concentrations between cycle 1 and cycle 2 with decreasing concentrations with cycle 2 (P = 0.02). This was explained by a statistically significant increase in the clearance of topotecan lactone during cycle 2 (P = 0.03). Total but not lactone concentrations correlated with nadir WBC, ANC and platelet levels. Steady-state plasma lactone levels correlated with the mutational frequency at the HPRT locus (P = 0.06). In the one patient with a partial response a sixfold increase in HPRT mutational frequency was observed, which was not seen in patients with progressive disease. CONCLUSION: The combination of topotecan and etoposide in this schedule of administration has minimal activity in adenocarcinoma of the lung. This lack of activity may be due to the delay in administration of etoposide after the topotecan as studies have shown that the compensatory increase in topoisomerase II levels after treatment with topoisomerase I inhibitors is shortlived (<24 h). The HPRT mutational frequency results suggest that the lack of clinical response may be associated with failure to achieve sufficient cytotoxic dose as indicated by a lack of increase in mutational frequency in those patients with progressive disease. HPRT mutational frequency may correlate with plasma steady-state topotecan lactone levels. Future studies should be directed toward earlier administration of topoisomerase II inhibitors after topoisomerase I inhibition.

Multi-institutional phase I/II trial of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and etoposide with concurrent radiation for limited-stage small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of adding paclitaxel to standard cisplatin/etoposide (EP) and thoracic radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled onto this study. During the phase I section of this study, the dose of paclitaxel was escalated in groups of three or more patients. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. For cycles 1 and 2, paclitaxel was administered according to the dose-escalation schema at doses of 100, 135, or 170 mg/m(2) intravenously over 3 hours on day 1. Once the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel (for cycles 1 and 2, concurrent with radiation) was determined, that dose was used in all subsequent patients entered onto the phase II section of this study. For cycles 3 and 4, the paclitaxel dose was fixed at 170 mg/m(2) in all patients. On day 2, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) was administered for all cycles. On days 1, 2, and 3, etoposide 60 mg/m(2)/d (cycles 1 and 2) or 80 mg/m(2)/d (cycles 3 and 4) was administered. Chest radiation was given at 9 Gy/wk in five fractions for 5 weeks beginning on day 1 of cycle 1. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors were used during cycles 3 and 4 only. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were assessable. The MTD of paclitaxel was 135 mg/m(2), with the dose-limiting toxicity being grade 4 neutropenia. Cycles 1 and 2 were associated with grade 4 neutropenia in 32% of courses, with fever occurring in 7% of courses and grade 2/3 esophagitis in 13%. Cycles 3 and 4 were complicated by grade 4 neutropenia in 20% of courses, with fever occurring in 6% of courses and grade 2/3 esophagitis in 16%. The overall response rate was 96% (complete responses, 39%; partial responses, 57%). After a median follow-up period of 23 months (range, 9 to 40 months), the median survival time was 22.3 months (95% confidence interval, 15.1 to 34.3 months) CONCLUSION: The MTD of paclitaxel with radiation and EP treatment is 135 mg/m(2) given over 3 hours. In this schedule of administration, a high response rate and acceptable toxicity can be anticipated.

Evaluation of interleukin-6 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and serum of patients with lung cancer.

Increased levels of serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) are found in patients with lung cancer, and it has been shown that this is part of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. This study was designed to measure IL-6 levels in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid of patients with lung cancer and to describe the relationship of BAL fluid IL-6 to the known systemic increase in IL-6. Increased levels of BAL fluid IL-6 can be found in patients with lung cancer as compared with patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who have acute infection (P = .007). In patients with cancer, no correlation between BAL fluid IL-6 and serum IL-6 was found (P = .8). BAL fluid IL-6 did not correlate with the number of lymphocytes or macrophages found in this fluid. BAL fluid IL-6 does not correlate with tumor size. Although serum IL-6 was higher in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer as compared with levels in patients with limited stage disease (P = .06), their corresponding BAL fluid levels were not different (P = .9). Serum IL-6 correlated with other acute phase reactants. This study thus demonstrates the feasibility of utilizing BAL fluid analysis for local cytokine/tumor marker production in lung carcinoma. It also shows that a local increase in IL-6 in the BAL fluid is independent of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, whereas the serum increase in IL-6 is part of this syndrome.

Rates of initial and recurrent thromboembolic disease among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy. Risk analysis using Medicare claims data.

Although the association between malignancy and thromboembolic disease is well established, the relative risk of developing initial and recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) among patients with malignancy versus those without malignancy has not been clearly defined. The Medicare Provider Analysis and Review Record (MEDPAR) database was used for this analysis. Patients hospitalized during 1988-1990 with DVT/PE alone, DVT/PE and malignancy, malignancy alone, or 1 of several nonmalignant diseases (other than DVT/PE) were studied. The association of malignancy and nonmalignant disease with an initial episode of DVT/PE, recurrent DVT/PE, and mortality were analyzed. The percentage of patients with DVT/PE at the initial hospitalization was higher for those with malignancy compared with those with nonmalignant disease (0.6% versus 0.57%, p = 0.001). The probability of readmission within 183 days of initial hospitalization with recurrent thromboembolic disease was 0.22 for patients with prior DVT/PE and malignancy compared with 0.065 for patients with prior DVT/PE and no malignancy (p = 0.001). Among those patients with DVT/PE and malignant disease, the probability of death within 183 days of initial hospitalization was 0.94 versus 0.29 among those with DVT/PE and no malignancy (p = 0.001). The relative risk of DVT/PE among patients with specific types of malignancy is described. This study demonstrates that patients with concurrent DVT/PE and malignancy have a more than threefold higher risk of recurrent thromboembolic disease and death (from and cause) than patients with DVT/PE without malignancy. An alternative management strategy may be indicated for such patients.