Early versus standard management of chimeric antigen receptor therapy toxicities and management's impact on safety and efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurologic syndrome (ICANS) are well-documented toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy. To mitigate excessive toxicity, our center has formulated treatment protocols (early vs. standard) for timely management of CRS and ICANS with tocilizumab and/or corticosteroids. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center analysis included patients treated with CAR T-cell therapy. The goal was to describe the association of two management protocols with toxicity and efficacy outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the 40 patients assigned to early management, out of which 5% and 9% developed grade 3+ CRS and ICANS, respectively. Seventy-seven percent and 41% of these patients received tocilizumab and corticosteroids, respectively. Forty-five percent of patients were stratified as standard management, out of which 0% and 11% developed grade 3+ CRS and ICANS, respectively. Seventeen percent and 28% of these patients received tocilizumab and corticosteroids, respectively. The day +90 overall response rate (ORR) for all patients was 63%, with an ORR of 89% for those managed per early management versus 50% for those managed per standard protocol. CONCLUSION: Early use of tocilizumab and corticosteroids is effective in preventing excessive CAR-T-related toxicities with no negative impact on efficacy.

Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost Implications of Outpatient Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (aHCT) has become standard care for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Outpatient aHCT with high-dose melphalan conditioning has reduced costs and length of hospital stay. This study aimed to highlight the effectiveness, safety, and cost implications of outpatient vs inpatient aHCT at a tertiary academic medical center, as well as the utility of growth factor use in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using an institutional HCT database, a total of 100 patients undergoing aHCT for MM were identified; 50 patients who underwent aHCT in the outpatient setting (chemotherapy and stem cell infusion followed by inpatient admission if needed) were compared with 50 patients in the inpatient setting (chemotherapy and stem cell infusion followed by discharge to outpatient setting). Patients were excluded if the melphalan dose was less than 200 mg/m2. Outcomes assessed through retrospective chart review included time to engraftment, incidence of infection, febrile neutropenia, growth factor use, and total length of inpatient stay through day +100. RESULTS: Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was shorter in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (14 vs 16 days and 19 vs 21 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Median length of hospital stay was also shorter in the outpatient group (8.5 vs 15.5 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Ninety percent of the outpatient group required admission for neutropenic fever, and 60% of these patients received growth factor support starting at a median of 9 days after stem cell infusion, for a median duration of 4 days. Compared to 16 patients who did not receive growth factor support, these patients had a significantly shorter time to neutrophil recovery (13 days with vs 15 days without growth factor, P = 0.02) and no difference in the total length of hospital stay (8 days with vs 10 days without growth factor, P = 0.43). CONCLUSION: For adult patients with MM undergoing aHCT, the outpatient setting is safe and reduces the total length of hospital stay and thus overall transplant costs. Growth factor support for patients with febrile neutropenia may not reduce length of stay for subsequent hospitalizations.

Fever Characteristics and Impact on Safety and Efficacy of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Fever is a hallmark symptom of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Fever characteristics and the impact of fever on safety and efficacy post CAR T are not well understood. We sought to explore the impact of fever and its characteristics on safety and efficacy post CAR T-cell therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 40 patients with various hematologic malignancies (non-Hodgkin lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, multiple myeloma) treated with CAR T-cell therapy between March 2019 and March 2022. We evaluated all patients who developed fever after CAR T infusion and analyzed the association of fever with toxicity (CRS and neurotoxicity) and efficacy (overall response (ORR) and complete response (CR) at day +90 post CAR T infusion). Fever was defined as per Lee criteria (equal to or greater than 38°C). CRS and immune-effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded using American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy grading system. RESULTS: Fever occurred in 75% (30/40) of patients. Rates of all grade and grade 3+ CRS and ICANS were 75%, 2%, 33% and 10%, respectively. Fever occurred within 24 and 72 hours after CAR T infusion in 40% and 53% of patients, respectively. Fifty percent of patients received tocilizumab (toci) for CRS. After the first dose of toci, fever recurred in 38% of the patients, of which 67% had recurrence within 24 hours. Day +90 CR rates were 43% and 10% in patients with and without fever, respectively (Table 3). CONCLUSION: While fever is common after CAR T-cell therapy, early-onset and higher magnitude do not appear to affect safety or efficacy of CAR T. Absence of fever may affect response to CAR T.

Evaluation of electronic health record implementation on pharmacist interventions related to oral chemotherapy management.

Background With the ever growing arsenal of oral chemotherapy agents now available, cancer treatment is being increasingly managed in the outpatient setting. However, oral chemotherapy use is often associated with several potential obstacles and complications. In order to provide optimal patient safety and oral chemotherapy monitoring, our institution implemented an oral chemotherapy program managed by clinical pharmacists electronically through Epic Beacon. Objective To describe implementation of a novel pharmacist-managed oral chemotherapy program and evaluate pharmacist interventions before and after implementation of an oral chemotherapy program. Methods This was a single-center retrospective chart review of documented pharmacy interventions for oral chemotherapy prescriptions during three months prior to as well as three months following Epic Beacon implementation. Time periods for data inclusion were October-December 2013 (pre-Beacon) and October-December 2014 (post-Beacon). Patients included in the study had one or more oral chemotherapy orders during the pre-Beacon period, the post-Beacon period, or both pre- and post-Beacon. Our analysis did not include oral chemotherapy orders that were placed outside of a treatment plan in the post-Beacon period. Results A total of 240 patients with 450 total oral chemotherapy orders were assessed over the duration of the study. Beacon implementation allowed a greater number of oral chemotherapy orders to be reviewed, with 134 oral chemotherapy orders reviewed in the study period prior to Beacon implementation and 316 orders reviewed in the post-Beacon period. Additionally, there were 660% more pharmacist interventions (89 interventions pre-Beacon versus 681 interventions post-Beacon), with an increased focus on coordination of care, chemotherapy calendar coordination, and assistance with treatment plans. Furthermore, implementation of Epic Beacon allowed identification of over 500% more chemotherapy order errors (41 total errors identified pre-Beacon versus 250 total errors identified post-Beacon). Pharmacists were also able to identify more significant, serious, or potentially lethal errors following implementation. The time associated with oral chemotherapy review and intervention also increased accordingly with number of orders reviewed. Conclusion Implementation of an electronic workflow for oral chemotherapy dramatically increased pharmacist review of orders, resulting in improved documentation of interventions and errors, decreased need for clarification of orders, as well as increased volume of prescriptions at our on-site pharmacy. This study demonstrates a comprehensive approach to maximize safety when oral chemotherapy is utilized as a component of the treatment regimen.

Similar dynamics of intraapheresis autologous CD34+ recruitment and collection efficiency in patients undergoing mobilization with or without plerixafor.

BACKGROUND: Compared with growth factor (G) alone, the combination of G with plerixafor (G + P) increases peripheral blood CD34+ count (PB-CD34+) and improves CD34+ collection yield (yCD34+) in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell (AHPC) mobilization. It is unknown whether the improved yCD34+ with G + P results entirely from expansion of PB-CD34+ or also from increased intraapheresis CD34+ recruitment and collection efficiency. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied 192 patients who underwent AHPC mobilization and collection with G (n = 73) or G + P (n = 119) to compare the adjusted relative efficiency (aRE), the proportion of the circulating CD34+ pool that is captured for each blood volume processed. Additionally, in a prospective cohort of nine patients mobilizing with G and 11 with G + P, PB-CD34+ after leukapheresis allowed calculation of the recruitment coefficient (RC), proportion of the initial CD34+ pool recruited from the marrow into peripheral blood for each blood volume processed. RESULTS: There was no difference in aRE between G and G + P (0.50 vs. 0.46; p = 0.37) and no substantial decline in aRE with higher blood volumes processed in either group. RC was also not different between G and G + P (median, 0.39 and 0.38, respectively; p = 0.7). Prediction of yCD34+ was determined essentially by PB-CD34+ and not affected independently by plerixafor. CONCLUSION: Kinetics of intraapheresis CD34+ recruitment and collection is proportional to PB-CD34+ but not influenced further by plerixafor.

Prediction of poor mobilization of autologous CD34+ cells with growth factor in multiple myeloma patients: implications for risk-stratification.

It is unknown whether clinical characteristics can successfully predict which multiple myeloma (MM) patients would be poor mobilizers with growth factor (GF) alone so they can be assigned to mobilization with chemotherapy + GF or GF + plerixafor. MM patients (N = 477) who underwent autologous mobilization with GF were retrospectively reviewed and assigned into training and validation cohorts. In multiple regression analysis, age, platelet count at time of mobilization, type of GF utilized, and extent of exposure to lenalidomide independently correlated with peripheral blood (PB)-CD34+ and were integrated in a predicting score (PS) for poor mobilizers, defined as PB-CD34+ < 20/mm(3) 4 days after initiation of GF. There was no correlation between institution, gender, time between diagnosis, and mobilization or plasma cells in the bone marrow at time of mobilization and PBCD34+. The PS cut-off found in the training cohort to have 90% sensitivity for prediction of poor mobilizers performed with 89.7% sensitivity but only 34.8% specificity in the validation cohort. Conversely, the PS cut-off developed to have 90% specificity performed with 86.9% specificity but only 37% sensitivity. We conclude that clinical characteristics identifiable before initiation of mobilization should not be used to stratify MM patients for different mobilization strategies.

Insulin pump therapy started at the time of diagnosis: effects on glycemic control and pancreatic ß-cell function in type 1 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: In the interest of preserving residual insulin secretory capacity present at the time of diagnosis with type 1 diabetes (T1D), we compared the efficacy of starting insulin pump therapy at diagnosis with standard multiple daily insulin injections (MDIs). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, pilot trial comparing MDI therapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin therapy (pump therapy) in 24 patients, 8-18 years old, with newly diagnosed T1D. Subjects were evaluated at enrollment and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after initial diagnosis of T1D. Preservation of insulin secretion, measured by mixed-meal-stimulated C-peptide secretion, was compared after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Between-group differences in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), continuous glucose sensor data, insulin utilization, anthropometric measures, and patient satisfaction with therapy were also compared at multiple time points. RESULTS: Initiation of pump therapy within 1 month of diagnosis resulted in consistently higher mixed-meal tolerance test-stimulated C-peptide values at all time points, although these differences were not statistically significant. Nonetheless, improved glycemic control was observed in insulin pump-treated subjects (more time spent with normoglycemia, better mean HbA1c), and pump-treated subjects reported comparatively greater satisfaction with route of treatment administration. CONCLUSIONS: Initiation of insulin pump therapy at diagnosis improved glycemic control, was well tolerated, and contributed to improved patient satisfaction with treatment. This study also suggests that earlier use of pump therapy might help to preserve residual ß-cell function, although a larger clinical trial would be required to confirm this.