ABSTRACT
Craniosacral treatment (CST) is an osteopathic technique grounded in the assumption that there is an intrinsic, fine movement of the cerebrospinal fluid. This rhythmic movement can be utilized for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes by palpation and manipulation of the skull, spine, and associated connective tissues. Therapeutic benefit is likely due to action on the autonomic nervous system (ANS), specifically through the vagus nerve. Current literature on the neurophysiological effects of CST is limited, which has contributed to controversy regarding its effectiveness. Heart rate variability (HRV) as a measure of cardiovascular stress and autonomic system activity is thus proposed as a tool to evaluate the neurophysiologic effects of CST. HRV can be analyzed in two different bands, high-frequency (HF) and low-frequency (LF) power associated with a parasympathetic and sympathetic response. In this meta-analysis, we provide a brief introduction to CST, analyze three primary studies, and summarize the therapeutic benefits and pitfalls of this alternative treatment on the ANS. A significant negative HF standardized mean difference after CST was observed; standardized mean difference = -0.46; 95% CI (-0.79,-0.14). No significant effect on LF power was observed. We conclude that CST does provide a moderate short-term increase in parasympathetic activity. These findings suggest that CST may be used to treat patients with an overactive sympathetic state. Further studies should be conducted for comparison against a control group to eliminate the possibility of a placebo effect and to elucidate long-term effects.
ABSTRACT
Hiatal hernias, protrusions of abdominal viscera through the esophageal hiatus, are classified into four types. Types I and II involve ascent of the stomach without affecting the gastroesophageal junction. Types III and IV involve the gastroesophageal junction. Type IV specifically may have stomach as well as other abdominal organ involvement, such as pancreas or omentum. Among these types, type IV is the most complex and rare form, accounting for only 0.1% of all cases of hiatal hernias. This report presents a case of a type IV hiatal hernia involving the lesser omentum and a significant portion of the stomach in an 86-year-old male cadaver with a history of mediastinal surgery. To our knowledge, this presentation in a cadaver has not previously been reported in the literature. This case highlights classification inconsistencies in the literature, particularly regarding type IV hiatal hernias. It is unclear given the current classification system, whether this presentation would be considered a type III or type IV hiatal hernia as it fits both criteria and there are several interpretations of the criteria of a type IV hiatal hernia. Inconsistencies in the classification system may impede standardization of care. This report highlights the need for a more precise classification system that better accounts for anatomical changes and clinical presentation.