Diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy after the treatment of presumed benign fibroid disease with interventional radiology procedures: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the finding of future diagnosis of malignancy in women who undergo nonsurgical treatment for uterine fibroid disease with interventional radiology (IR) procedures. DESIGN: Mixed-methods retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two tertiary care academic hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts. PATIENT(S): A total of 491 women who underwent radiologic intervention for fibroids between 2006 and 2016. INTERVENTION(S): Uterine artery embolization or high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Subsequent surgical interventions and diagnosis of gynecologic malignancy after the IR procedure. RESULT(S): During the study period, 491 women underwent treatment of fibroids with IR procedures; follow-up information was available for 346 cases. The mean age was 45.3 ± 4.8 years, and 69.7% were between the ages of 40 and 49 years. Regarding ethnicity, 58.9% of patients were white, and 26.1% were black. The most common symptoms were abnormal uterine bleeding (87%), pelvic pressure (62.3%), and pelvic pain (60.9%). A total of 106 patients underwent subsequent surgical treatment of fibroids. Of the 346 patients who had follow-up, 4 (1.2%) were diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma after their interventional treatment for fibroids. An additional 2 cases of endometrial adenocarcinoma and 1 case of a premalignant lesion of the endometrium were noted. CONCLUSION(S): The proportion of patients who went on to be diagnosed with leiomyosarcoma after conservative IR treatments appears to be higher than previously reported. A thorough preprocedural workup and patient counseling regarding the possibility of underlying uterine malignancy should be undertaken.

Surgical Outcomes of a Combined Surgical Approach for Apical Prolapse Repair.

Introduction We aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and surgical outcomes of combined laparoscopic/vaginal prolapse repair by two surgeons. Material and Methods A retrospective chart review of all patients (n = 135) who underwent apical prolapse repair from February 2009 to December 2012 performed in a collaborative manner by a Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeon and a Urogynecologist. Demographic data (age, body mass index [BMI], race, gravidity, parity) and surgical information (estimated blood loss, operative time, intraoperative complications, readmission and reoperation rates, presence of postoperative infection) were collected. Results The majority of patients were postmenopausal (58.91%), multiparous (mean parity = 2.49) and overweight (mean BMI = 27.71). Nearly 20% had previous prolapse surgery. The most common surgical procedure was laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) with sacrocervicopexy (59.26%), and the most common vaginal repair was of the posterior compartment (78.68%). The median operative time was 149 minutes (82-302), and the estimated blood loss was 100 mL (10-530). Five intra-operative complications, five readmissions and four reoperations were noted. Performance of a concomitant hysterectomy did not affect surgical or anatomical outcomes. Conclusion Combination laparoscopic/vaginal prolapse repair by two separate surgeons seems to be an efficient option for operative management.

Surgical Outcomes of a Combined Surgical Approach for Apical Prolapse Repair / Resultados cirúrgicos de uma abordagem cirúrgica combinada para a correção do prolapso apical

Abstract Introduction We aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy and surgical outcomes of combined laparoscopic/vaginal prolapse repair by two surgeons. Material and Methods A retrospective chart review of all patients (n =135) who underwent apical prolapse repair from February 2009 to December 2012 performed in a collaborative manner by a Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgeon and a Urogynecologist. Demographic data (age, body mass index [BMI], race, gravidity, parity) and surgical information (estimated blood loss, operative time, intraoperative complications, readmission and reoperation rates, presence of postoperative infection) were collected. Results The majority of patients were postmenopausal (58.91%), multiparous (mean parity =2.49) and overweight (mean BMI =27.71). Nearly 20% had previous prolapse surgery. The most common surgical procedure was laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) with sacrocervicopexy (59.26%), and the most common vaginal repair was of the posterior compartment (78.68%). The median operative time was 149 minutes (82-302), and the estimated blood loss was 100 mL (10-530). Five intraoperative complications, five readmissions and four reoperations were noted. Performance of a concomitant hysterectomy did not affect surgical or anatomical outcomes. Conclusion Combination laparoscopic/vaginal prolapse repair by two separate surgeons seems to be an efficient option for operative management.

Resumo Introdução Objetivamos avaliar a segurança, eficácia e desfechos cirúrgicos da via laparoscópica e vaginal combinadas para a correção do prolapso feitos por dois cirurgiões. Métodos Um estudo retrospectivo com análise de prontuário foi realizado em todos os pacientes (n =135) que foram submetidos a correção de prolapso apical de fevereiro de 2009 a dezembro de 2012 de maneira concomitante por um laparoscopista e um uroginecologista. Dados demográficos (idade, índice de massa corporal [IMC], raça, número de gestações e partos) e cirúrgicos (perda sanguínea estimada, tempo operatório, complicações intraoperatórias, taxas de readmissão e reoperação, e presença de infecção pós-operatória) foram analisados. Resultados Operfil da paciente operada era pertencente à pós-menopausa (58,91%), ser multípara (paridade média =2,49) e com sobrepeso (IMC médio =27,71). Aproximadamente 20% havia feito cirurgia prévia para prolapso. O procedimento cirúrgico mais realizado foi a histerectomia supracervical laparoscópica (HSL) com sacrocervicopexia (59,6%); o reparo vaginal mais encontrado foi o para defeito de compartimento posterior (78,68%). O tempo operatório mediano foi de 149 minutos (82-302), e a perda sanguínea estimada foi de 100 ml (10-530). Cinco complicações pós-operatórias, cinco readmissões e quatro reoperações foram encontradas. A realização de uma histerectomia em concomitância aos demais procedimentos não afetou os desfechos cirúrgicos ou anatômicos. Conclusão O reparo combinado do prolapso pela via laparoscópica e vaginal por dois cirurgiões em concomitância aparenta ser uma opção eficiente para o manejo operatório.