Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed ; 173: 77-85, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31046998

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Automated image analysis can make quantification of FISH signals in histological sections more efficient and reproducible. Current detection-based methods, however, often fail to accurately quantify densely clustered FISH signals. METHODS: We propose a novel density-based approach to quantifying FISH signals. Instead of detecting individual signals, this approach quantifies FISH signals in terms of the integral over a density map predicted by Deep Learning. We apply the density-based approach to the task of counting and determining ratios of ERBB2 and CEN17 signals and compare it to common detection-based and area-based approaches. RESULTS: The ratios determined by our approach were strongly correlated with results obtained by manual annotation of individual FISH signals (Pearson's r = 0.907). In addition, they were highly consistent with cutoff-scores determined by a pathologist (balanced concordance = 0.971). The density-based approach generally outperformed the other approaches. Its superiority was particularly evident in the presence of dense signal clusters. CONCLUSIONS: The presented approach enables accurate and efficient automated quantification of FISH signals. Since signals in clusters can hardly be detected individually even by human observers, the density-based quantification performs better than detection-based approaches.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/genetics , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Pattern Recognition, Automated , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Algorithms , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cluster Analysis , Deep Learning , Female , Humans , Regression Analysis , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...