Does Freehand, Patient-specific Instrumentation or Surgical Navigation Perform Better for Allograft Reconstruction After Tumor Resection? A Preclinical Synthetic Bone Study.

BACKGROUND: Joint-sparing resection of periarticular bone tumors can be challenging because of complex geometry. Successful reconstruction of periarticular bone defects after tumor resection is often performed with structural allografts to allow for joint preservation. However, achieving a size-matched allograft to fill the defect can be challenging because allograft sizes vary, they do not always match a patient's anatomy, and cutting the allograft to perfectly fit the defect is demanding. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there a difference in mental workload among the freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation approaches? (2) Is there a difference in conformance (quantitative measure of deviation from the ideal bone graft), elapsed time during reconstruction, and qualitative assessment of goodness-of-fit of the allograft reconstruction among the approaches? METHODS: Seven surgeons used three modalities in the same order (freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation) to fashion synthetic bone to reconstruct a standardized bone defect. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) mental task load index questionnaires and procedure time were captured. Cone-beam CT images of the shaped allografts were used to measure conformance (quantitative measure of deviation from the ideal bone graft) to a computer-generated ideal bone graft model. Six additional (senior) surgeons blinded to modality scored the quality of fit of the allografts into the standardized tumor defect using a 10-point Likert scale. We measured conformance using the root-mean-square metric in mm and used ANOVA for multipaired comparisons (p < 0.05 was significant). RESULTS: There was no difference in mental NASA total task load scores among the freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation techniques. We found no difference in conformance root-mean-square values (mean ± SD) between surgical navigation (2 ± 0 mm; mean values have been rounded to whole numbers) and patient-specific instrumentation (2 ± 1 mm), but both showed a small improvement compared with the freehand approach (3 ± 1 mm). For freehand versus surgical navigation, the mean difference was 1 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5 to 1.1; p = 0.01). For freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation, the mean difference was 1 mm (95% CI -0.1 to 0.9; p = 0.02). For patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation, the mean difference was 0 mm (95% CI -0.5 to 0.2; p = 0.82). In evaluating the goodness of fit of the shaped grafts, we found no clinically important difference between surgical navigation (median [IQR] 7 [6 to 8]) and patient-specific instrumentation (median 6 [5 to 7.8]), although both techniques had higher scores than the freehand technique did (median 3 [2 to 4]). For freehand versus surgical navigation, the difference of medians was 4 (p < 0.001). For freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation, the difference of medians was 3 (p < 0.001). For patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation, the difference of medians was 1 (p = 0.03). The mean ± procedural times for freehand was 16 ± 10 minutes, patient-specific instrumentation was 14 ± 9 minutes, and surgical navigation techniques was 24 ± 8 minutes. We found no differences in procedures times across three shaping modalities (freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation: mean difference 2 minutes [95% CI 0 to 7]; p = 0.92; freehand versus surgical navigation: mean difference 8 minutes [95% CI 0 to 20]; p = 0.23; patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation: mean difference 10 minutes [95% CI 1 to 19]; p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: Based on surgical simulation to reconstruct a standardized periarticular bone defect after tumor resection, we found a possible small advantage to surgical navigation over patient-specific instrumentation based on qualitative fit, but both techniques provided slightly better conformance of the shaped graft for fit into the standardized post-tumor resection bone defect than the freehand technique did. To determine whether these differences are clinically meaningful requires further study. The surgical navigation system presented here is a product of laboratory research development, and although not ready to be widely deployed for clinical practice, it is currently being used in a research operating room setting for patient care. This new technology is associated with a learning curve, capital costs, and potential risk. The reported preliminary results are based on a preclinical synthetic bone tumor study, which is not as realistic as actual surgical scenarios. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgical navigation systems are an emerging technology in orthopaedic and reconstruction surgery, and understanding their capabilities and limitations is paramount for clinical practice. Given our preliminary findings in a small cohort study with one scenario of standardized synthetic periarticular bone tumor defects, future investigations should include different surgical scenarios using allograft and cadaveric specimens in a more realistic surgical setting.

Active surveillance of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors: A retrospective, multicenter cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumor (D-TGCT) is a mono-articular, soft-tissue tumor. Although it can behave locally aggressively, D-TGCT is a non-malignant disease. This is the first study describing the natural course of D-TGCT and evaluating active surveillance as possible treatment strategy. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included therapy naïve patients with D-TGCT from eight sarcoma centers worldwide between 2000 and 2019. Patients initially managed by active surveillance following their first consultation were eligible. Data regarding the radiological and clinical course and subsequent treatments were collected. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients with primary D-TGCT were initially managed by active surveillance. Fifty-nine patients had an MRI performed around first consultation: D-TGCT was located intra-articular in most patients (n = 56; 95 %) and extra-articular in 14 cases (24 %). At baseline, osteoarthritis was observed in 13 patients (22 %) on MRI. Most of the patients' reported symptoms: pain (n = 43; 70 %), swelling (n = 33; 54 %). Eight patients (13 %) were asymptomatic. Follow-up data were available for 58 patients; the median follow-up was 28 months. Twenty-one patients (36 %) had radiological progression after 21 months (median). Eight of 45 patients (18 %) without osteoarthritis at baseline developed osteoarthritis during follow-up. Thirty-seven patients (64 %) did not clinically deteriorate during follow-up. Finally, eighteen patients (31 %) required a subsequent treatment. CONCLUSION: Active surveillance can be considered adequate for selected therapy naïve D-TGCT patients. Although follow-up data was limited, almost two-thirds of the patients remained progression-free, and 69 % did not need treatment during the follow-up period. However, one-fifth of patients developed secondary osteoarthritis. Prospective studies on active surveillance are warranted.

Use of virtual reality for the management of phantom limb pain: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To summarize the research on the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) therapy for the management of phantom limb pain (PLP). METHODS: Three databases (SCOPUS, Ovid Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE) were searched for studies investigating the use of VR therapy for the treatment of PLP. Original research articles fulfilling the following criteria were included: (i) patients 18 years and older; (ii) all etiologies of amputation; (iii) any level of amputation; (iv) use of immersive VR as a treatment modality for PLP; (v) self-reported objective measures of PLP before and after at least one VR session; (vi) written in English. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were included for analysis. Fourteen studies reported decreases in objective pain scores following a single VR session or a VR intervention consisting of multiple sessions. Moreover, combining VR with tactile stimulation had a larger beneficial effect on PLP compared with VR alone. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current literature, VR therapy has the potential to be an effective treatment modality for the management of PLP. However, the low quality of studies, heterogeneity in subject population and intervention type, and lack of data on long-term relief make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions.IMPLICATION FOR REHABILITATIONVirtual reality (VR) therapy has emerged as a new potential treatment option for phantom limb pain (PLP) that circumvents some limitations of mirror therapy.VR therapy was shown to decrease PLP following a single VR session as well as after an intervention consisting of multiple sessions.The addition of vibrotactile stimuli to VR therapy may lead to larger decreases in PLP scores compared with VR therapy alone.

Reconstruction following oncological iliosacral resection.

Aims: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is the only mechanical connection between the axial skeleton and lower limbs. Following iliosacral resection, there is debate on whether reconstruction of the joint is necessary. There is a paucity of data comparing the outcomes of patients undergoing reconstruction and those who are not formally reconstructed. Methods: A total of 60 patients (25 females, 35 males; mean age 39 years (SD 18)) undergoing iliosacral resection were reviewed. Most resections were performed for primary malignant tumours (n = 54; 90%). The mean follow-up for surviving patients was nine years (2 to 19). Results: Overall, 27 patients (45%) were reconstructed, while 33 (55%) had no formal reconstruction. There was no difference in the use of chemotherapy (p = 1.000) or radiotherapy (p = 0.292) between the groups. Patients with no reconstruction had a mean larger tumour (11 cm (SD 5) vs 8 cm (SD 4); p = 0.014), mean shorter operating times (664 mins (SD 195) vs 1,324 mins (SD 381); p = 0.012), and required fewer blood units (8 (SD 7) vs 14 (SD 11); p = 0.012). Patients undergoing a reconstruction were more likely to have a deep infection (48% vs 12%; p = 0.003). Nine reconstructed patients had a hardware failure, with five requiring revision. Postoperatively 55 (92%) patients were ambulatory, with no difference in the proportion of ambulatory patients (89% vs 94%; p = 0.649) or mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (59% vs 65%; p = 0.349) score between patients who did or did not have a reconstruction. The ten-year disease-specific survival was 69%, with no difference between patients who were reconstructed and those who were not (78% vs 45%; p = 0.316). There was no difference in the rate of metastasis between the two groups (hazard ratio (HR) 2.78; p = 0.102). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that SIJ reconstruction is associated with longer operating times, greater need for blood transfusion, and more postoperative infections, without any improvement in functional outcomes when compared to patients who did not have formal SIJ reconstruction.

Open Versus Core Needle Biopsy in Lower-Extremity Sarcoma: Current Practice Patterns and Patient Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Historically, open biopsy (OB) was the gold standard for sarcoma diagnosis. Core needle biopsy (CNB) has become increasingly common. There are limited data evaluating how the type of biopsy impacts definitive surgical resection or postoperative outcomes. The aims of this study were to (1) characterize current international biopsy practice patterns, and (2) evaluate how the type of biopsy performed impacts the resection surgery, infection risk, oncological complications, and patient-reported functional outcome scores. METHODS: This study was a preplanned secondary analysis of the prospective, multicenter PARITY (Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery) study. Patients with a benign diagnosis, metastatic disease, or no biopsy prior to surgery were excluded. Prospectively collected demographic, biopsy, surgical, and outcome variables were analyzed, and differences between patients undergoing OB and CNB were assessed. Parametric and nonparametric tests were used to compare variables between groups, and the Cox proportional hazards method was used to compare infection-related and oncological outcomes at 1 year. Median functional outcome scores at 1 year were compared. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected from 48 sarcoma centers in 12 countries. CNB was the more utilized biopsy modality overall (57.5%). OB was more common in the U.S. and Canada. The median operative time was significantly longer for patients who underwent OB (324 versus 260 minutes; p < 0.001). Significantly more skin (p < 0.001) and fascial tissue (p < 0.001) were excised in the OB group, which also had a lower rate of primary closure (86.3% versus 92.9%; p = 0.03). There were no differences in surgical site infection or oncological outcomes between the groups at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: CNB was the more common biopsy modality in the PARITY study in most countries. However, OB was more common in the U.S. and Canada. Patients undergoing OB had longer operative times, more excised tissue, and lower rates of primary closure, but this did not translate to differences in infection rates or oncological outcomes, including local recurrence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Is a radiological score able to predict resection-grade chondrosarcoma in primary intraosseous lesions of the long bones?

Aims: The preoperative grading of chondrosarcomas of bone that accurately predicts surgical management is difficult for surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists. There are often discrepancies in grade between the initial biopsy and the final histology. Recent advances in the use of imaging methods have shown promise in the ability to predict the final grade. The most important clinical distinction is between grade 1 chondrosarcomas, which are amenable to curettage, and resection-grade chondrosarcomas (grade 2 and 3) which require en bloc resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a Radiological Aggressiveness Score (RAS) to predict the grade of primary chondrosarcomas in long bones and thus to guide management. Methods: A total of 113 patients with a primary chondrosarcoma of a long bone presenting between January 2001 and December 2021 were identified on retrospective review of a single oncology centre's prospectively collected database. The nine-parameter RAS included variables from radiographs and MRI scans. The best cut-off of parameters to predict the final grade of chondrosarcoma after resection was determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and this was correlated with the biopsy grade. Results: A RAS of ≥ four parameters was 97.9% sensitive and 90.5% specific in predicting resection-grade chondrosarcoma based on a ROC cut-off derived using the Youden index. Cronbach's α of 0.897 was derived as the interclass correlation for scoring the lesions by four blinded reviewers who were surgeons. Concordance between resection-grade lesions predicted from the RAS and ROC cut-off with the final grade after resection was 96.46%. Concordance between the biopsy grade and the final grade was 63.8%. However, when the patients were analyzed based on surgical management, the initial biopsy was able to differentiate low-grade from resection-grade chondrosarcomas in 82.9% of biopsies. Conclusion: These findings suggest that the RAS is an accurate method for guiding the surgical management of patients with these tumours, particularly when the initial biopsy results are discordant with the clinical presentation.

Immersive Virtual Reality and Cadaveric Bone are Equally Effective in Skeletal Anatomy Education: A Randomized Crossover Noninferiority Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Immersive virtual reality (IVR) technology is transforming medical education. Our aim was to compare the effectiveness of IVR with cadaveric bone models in teaching skeletal anatomy. DESIGN: A randomized crossover noninferiority trial was conducted. SETTING: Anatomy laboratory of a large medical school. PARTICIPANTS: Incoming first-year medical students. Participants were randomized to IVR or cadaveric groups studying upper limb skeletal anatomy, and then were crossed over to use the opposite tool, to study lower limb skeletal anatomy. Participants in both groups completed a pre-and postintervention knowledge test. The primary endpoint of the study was change in performance from the pre-to postintervention knowledge test. Surveys were completed to assess participant's impressions on IVR as an educational tool. RESULTS: Fifty first-year medical students met inclusion criteria and were randomized. Among all students, the average score on the preintervention knowledge test was 14.6% (standard deviation (SD) = 18.2%) and 25.0% (SD = 17%) for upper and lower limbs, respectively. Percentage increase in scores between pre-and postintervention knowledge test, was 15.0% in the upper limb IVR group, and 16.7% for upper limb cadaveric bones (p = 0.286). For the lower limb, score increase was 22.6% in the IVR and 22.5% in the cadaveric bone group (p = 0.936). 79% of participants found that IVR was most valuable for teaching 3-dimensional orientation, anatomical relationships, and key landmarks. Majority of participants were favorable towards combination use of traditional methods and IVR technology for learning skeletal anatomy (LSM>3). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial, there was no significant difference in knowledge after using IVR or cadaveric bones for skeletal anatomy education. These findings have further implications for medical schools that face challenges in acquiring human cadavers and cadaveric parts.

Giant cell tumour of bone.

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive lesion that is difficult to treat as salvaging the joint can be associated with a high rate of local recurrence (LR). We evaluated the risk factors for tumour relapse after treatment of a GCTB of the limbs. A total of 354 consecutive patients with a GCTB underwent joint salvage by curettage and reconstruction with bone graft and/or cement or en bloc resection. Patient, tumour, and treatment factors were analyzed for their impact on LR. Patients treated with denosumab were excluded. There were 53 LRs (15%) at a mean 30.5 months (5 to 116). LR was higher after curettage (18.4%) than after resection (4.6%; p = 0.008). Neither pathological fracture (p = 0.240), Campanacci grade (p = 0.734), soft-tissue extension (p = 0.297), or tumour size (p = 0.872) affected the risk of recurrence. Joint salvage was possible in 74% of patients overall (262/354), and 98% after curettage alone (262/267). Of 49 patients with LR after curettage, 44 (90%) underwent repeated curettage and joint salvage. For patients treated by curettage, only age less than 30 years (p = 0.042) and location in the distal radius (p = 0.043) predicted higher LR. The rate of LR did not differ whether cement or bone graft was used (p = 0.753), but may have been reduced by the use of hydrogen peroxide (p = 0.069). Complications occurred in 15.3% of cases (54/354) and did not differ by treatment. Most patients with a GCTB can undergo successful joint salvage by aggressive curettage, even in the presence of a soft-tissue mass, pathological fracture, or a large lesion, with an 18.4% risk of local recurrence. However, 90% of local relapses after curettage can be treated by repeat joint salvage. Maximizing joint salvage is important to optimize long-term function since most patients with a GCTB are young adults. Younger patients and those with distal radius tumours treated with joint-sparing procedures have a higher rate of local relapse and may require more aggressive treatment and closer follow-up.

One-Stage Synovectomies Result in Improved Short-Term Outcomes Compared to Two-Stage Synovectomies of Diffuse-Type Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumor (D-TGCT) of the Knee: A Multicenter, Retrospective, Cohort Study.

Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumors' (D-TGCTs) intra- and extra-articular expansion about the knee often necessitates an anterior and posterior surgical approach to facilitate an extensive synovectomy. There is no consensus on whether two-sided synovectomies should be performed in one or two stages. This retrospective study included 191 D-TGCT patients from nine sarcoma centers worldwide to compare the postoperative short-term outcomes between both treatments. Secondary outcomes were rates of radiological progression and subsequent treatments. Between 2000 and 2020, 117 patients underwent one-stage and 74 patients underwent two-stage synovectomies. The maximum range of motion achieved within one year postoperatively was similar (flexion 123-120°, p = 0.109; extension 0°, p = 0.093). Patients undergoing two-stage synovectomies stayed longer in the hospital (6 vs. 4 days, p < 0.0001). Complications occurred more often after two-stage synovectomies, although this was not statistically different (36% vs. 24%, p = 0.095). Patients treated with two-stage synovectomies exhibited more radiological progression and required subsequent treatments more often than patients treated with one-stage synovectomies (52% vs. 37%, p = 0.036) (54% vs. 34%, p = 0.007). In conclusion, D-TGCT of the knee requiring two-side synovectomies should be treated by one-stage synovectomies if feasible, since patients achieve a similar range of motion, do not have more complications, but stay for a shorter time in the hospital.

A Size-Based Criteria for Flap Reconstruction After Thigh-Adductor, Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Resection.

BACKGROUND: Resection of soft-tissue sarcomas from the adductor compartment is associated with significant complications. Free/pedicled flaps often are used for wound closure, but their effect on healing is unclear. We compared wound complications, oncologic, and functional outcomes for patients undergoing flap reconstruction or primary closure following resection of adductor sarcomas. METHODS: A total of 177 patients underwent resection of an adductor sarcoma with primary closure (PrC) or free/pedicled flap reconstruction (FR). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared, as well as wound complications, oncologic, and functional outcomes (TESS/MSTS87/MSTS93). To examine the relative benefit of flap reconstruction, number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated. RESULTS: In total, 143 patients underwent PrC and 34 had FR, 68% of which were pedicled. There were few differences in demographic, tumor, or treatment characteristics. No significant difference was found in the rate of wound complications. Length of stay was significantly longer in FR (18 days vs. PrC 8 days; p < 0.01). Oncologic and functional outcomes were similar over 5 years follow-up. Uncomplicated wound healing occurred more often in FR compared with PrC for tumors with ≥15 cm (NNT = 8.4) or volumes ≥ 800 ml (NNT = 8.4). Tumors ≤ 336 ml do not benefit from a flap, whereas those > 600 ml are 1.5 times more likely to heal uneventfully after flap closure. CONCLUSIONS: Although flap use prolonged hospitalization, it decreased wound healing complications for larger tumors, and in all sized tumors, it demonstrated similar functional and oncologic outcomes to primary closure. Our size-based treatment criteria can help to identify patients with large adductor sarcomas who could benefit from flap reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: (Retrospective cohort study).

Outcome After Surgical Treatment of Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans (DFSP): Does it Require Extensive Follow-up and What is an Adequate Resection Margin?

INTRODUCTION: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare cutaneous tumour of indeterminate malignant potential. The mainstay treatment for DFSP is surgical resection. Given the reported high local recurrence rate, the ideal resection margin for DFSP is unclear. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the local recurrence and metastatic rate of DFSP and DFSP with fibrosarcomatous degeneration (FS-DFSP), with specific attention to margin status in an attempt to address the issue of margin adequacy. METHODS: Patients treated for DFSP at a single sarcoma centre were identified from a prospective database. DFSP and FS-DFSP patients with and without prior surgery were included. Patients were followed after surgery to monitor complications, local recurrence and metastasis. RESULTS: The study included 200 patients: 166 patients with DFSP and 34 patients with FS-DFSP. In the DFSP group, nine patients (5.4%) had positive margins, one case (0.6%) developed local recurrence (LR) and no patients developed distant metastases. In the FS-DFSP group, seven patients (20.6%) had positive margins, six patients (17.6%) developed local recurrence (LR) and eight patients (23.5%) developed distant metastases, of which three (37.5%) were in the lungs, one (12.5%) in bone and four (50%) in other soft tissue sites. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Local recurrence and metastases are extremely rare in patients with DFSP. Achieving a negative as opposed to a wide surgical margin may be sufficient to avoid local recurrence of most DFSP. We suggest that no ongoing surveillance for local or systemic relapse is required for DFSP patients after negative margin resection. For FS-DFSP, we recommend the same surveillance schedule, based on tumour grade, as other soft tissue sarcoma.

LUMiC® endoprosthesis for pelvic reconstruction: A Canadian experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The LUMiC® prosthesis was introduced to reduce the mechanical complications encountered with periacetabular reconstruction after pelvic tumor resection. Few have evaluated the outcomes associated with its use. METHODS: A retrospective study from five Orthopedic Oncology Canadian centers was conducted. All patients with a LUMiC® endoprosthesis were included. Their charts were reviewed for surgical and functional outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were followed for 28 months (3-60). A total of 12 patients (75%) had a LUMiC® after a resection of a primary sarcoma. Mean surgical time was 555 min. Four patients (25%) had a two-stages procedure. MSTS score was 60.3 preoperatively and 54.3 postoperatively. Patients got a dual mobility bearing and the silver coated implant was used in 7 patients (43.7%). Five patients (31.3%) underwent capsular reconstruction using a fabric. Silver-coating was not found to reduce infection risk (p = 0.61) and capsuloplasty did not prevent dislocation (p = 0.6). Five patients had peroperative complications (31.3%). Eight patients (50%) had an infection including all four with two-stages surgery. Dislocation occurred in five patients (31.3%) whereas no cases of aseptic loosening were reported. A total of 10 patients (62.5%) needed a reoperation. CONCLUSION: LUMiC® endoprosthesis provides low rates of aseptic loosening on medium-term follow-up. Infection and dislocation are common complications but we were unable to show benefits of capsuloplasty and silver-coated implants.

Reconstructive Allograft Preparation for Long Bone Intercalary Segments After Tumor Resections: Toronto Sarcoma Protocol.

Background: The Reconstructive Allograft Preparation by Toronto Sarcoma (RAPTORS) protocol is reliable and reproducible without substantially adding to the surgical reconstruction time or cost. Our technique includes clearance of debris, lavage of the medullary canal, pressurized filling of the medullary canal with antibiotic-laden cement for its mechanical and antimicrobial properties, and insertion of cancellous autograft at the allograft-host junctional ends prior to dual-plate compression to fix the allograft into the defect1-3. Our experience with large intercalary allograft reconstruction has demonstrated high rates of long-term success and addresses the most common causes of large allograft failure (infection, fracture, and nonunion)4, as shown in our long-term outcome study1. Description: Once the tumor is resected, it is used as a template for cutting and shaping the allograft to fit the bone defect and to restore length and anatomy. The frozen allograft is thawed in a container with povidone iodine and bacitracin saline solution until it reaches room temperature. The allograft is size-matched, and clearance of its intramedullary marrow contents is performed with use of curets and intramedullary reamers7. If 1 end of the allograft includes the metaphysis and is covered by dense cancellous bone, we try not to ream through this end because maintaining this metaphyseal cancellous surface will expedite bone healing. The segment is then thoroughly lavaged with "triple wash" solutions to clear out any remaining marrow contents and to ensure sterilization of the allograft. This serial-wash technique involves the use of 3 discrete antiseptic modalities and has been utilized at our institution with low rates of allograft infection. These antiseptic modalities include 10% weight-per-volume povidone iodine diluted 1:1 with normal saline solution, 3% weight-per-volume hydrogen peroxide diluted 1:1 with normal saline solution, and 50,000 units of sterile bacitracin lyophilized powder dissolved in 500 mL of normal saline solution. Following the triple wash, the medullary canal is filled with antibiotic-laden methylmethacrylate bone cement. If both ends are open, the far end of the segment is first plugged with the surgeon's finger or with gauze, or if 1 end is covered with cancellous bone, then retrograde filling of the canal with cement is performed from the open end. The cement is then pressurized to ensure complete filling of the intramedullary space. Before it sets, 1 cm of cement is removed from each open end of the allograft to allow for packing of autograft bone cancellous chips and to ensure that cement does not impede anatomic reduction of the allograft-host bone junction. For this step, cancellous autograft from the iliac crest is harvested with use of a separate sterile surgical setup in order to prevent contamination of the autograft site by instruments used for tumor resection. The cancellous autograft is packed into the space created after recessing the cement at the end(s) of the allograft and, using a bone tamp, the autograft is compressed into this cavity and into the corresponding end of the host long bone in order to improve the healing potential at the allograft-host bone junction(s)8. Finally, a dual compression plate construct is utilized for upper as well as lower-extremity reconstructions in most cases. The cement in the allograft must be completely hardened before drilling into it. The allograft-host bone junctions are sequentially compressed at both the proximal and distal ends to allow for maximal apposition of the osseous surfaces. Only 1 or 2 unicortical screws are placed into the allograft to hold it in place and to facilitate maximal compression at both bone junctions. Patient compliance during postoperative rehabilitation is essential to optimize healing and provide reliable and durable outcomes. Postoperative care following the RAPTORS technique includes limited early rehabilitation and long periods of non-weight-bearing until radiographic union is noted across both bone junctions, followed by gradual resumption of weight-bearing and more aggressive physiotherapy. See the Appendix for further details regarding each step of the procedure. Alternatives: Intercalary reconstruction alternatives include various biological or endoprosthetic constructs. The other biological reconstruction options include the use of a free vascularized bone graft, distraction osteogenesis, combined vascularized fibula and allograft (i.e., the Capanna technique), or recycled tumor bones. Intercalary prostheses offer another reconstruction option for diaphyseal defects, but their feasibility is more limited in cases of periarticular segments with very short residual medullary canals. In such cases, there may be inadequate stem length for fixation, or the segment may require a custom implant that takes time to design and manufacture, which can be associated with high costs5. Rationale: Major factors limiting the widespread use of allografts include infection, graft fracture, graft nonunion, and, in some locations, availability4,6. Our technique of allograft preparation with dual compression plating and triple-washing to provide mechanical and antimicrobial protection as well as augmented healing has shown reproducible results with low complication rates compared with the literature. Expected Outcomes: There have been high rates of long-term allograft survival (84.4%) following intercalary long-bone reconstruction at our institution, with lower complication rates than those presented in the literature. Important Tips: Transverse osteotomies of the allograft, made perpendicular to the long axis of the diaphysis/anatomical axis, are important to replicate the resected host bone. Transverse osteotomies, while inherently less stable than step-cut ones, allow for adjusting the rotation of the allograft segment as needed for maximal contact and compression, as well as restoration of anatomical limb rotation.It is important to perform meticulous clearance of the intramedullary contents while preserving the endosteal bone and allograft integrity. We would utilize hand-reaming rather than a power drill device, in order to prevent overreaming or breaking through the allograft bone.Place as few unicortical screws as possible into the allograft-cement construct in order to maintain its structural strength and minimize potential sites for vascular ingrowth and bone resorption. Acronyms & Abbreviations: K-wires = Kirschner wiresW/V = weight per volume.

Surgical Outcomes of Primary Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: A Retrospective, Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a locally aggressive tumor with a low rate of metastatic disease. Previous series have shown a superiority of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) compared with wide local excision (WLE). Likewise, there is paucity of data examining the long-term follow-up of patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study was to examine the outcome of surgical treatment of primary DFSP of the trunk and extremities. METHODS: We reviewed 236 patients (115 females, 121 males, mean age 41 ± 15 years) undergoing MMS (n = 81, 34%) or WLE (n = 155, 66%) to treat a primary DFSP. Mean tumor size and follow-up was 4 ± 2 cm and 7 years, respectively. Final margins were negative in 230 (97%) patients. RESULTS: There was no difference (p > 0.05) in patient age, sex, tumor size, negative margin excision, or history of a previous inadvertent excision between patients who underwent WLE and those undergoing MMS. There were two cases of local recurrence and two cases of metastasis, with no difference in the 5-year local recurrence-free survival (98% vs. 99%, p = 0.69) or metastatic-free survival (98% vs. 100%, p= 0.27) between WLE and MMS. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in oncologic outcome comparing MMS with WLE for DFSP outside the head and neck. The goal of treatment for DFSP is to achieve a negative margin, regardless of surgical treatment modalities. A 'less is more' approach to follow-up can likely be taken for patients with completely resected DFSP in easy-to-examine anatomical areas. In these patients, no formal follow-up should be required.

How Do the Outcomes of Radiation-Associated Pelvic and Sacral Bone Sarcomas Compare to Primary Osteosarcomas following Surgical Resection?

Radiation-associated sarcoma of the pelvis and/or sacrum (RASB) is a rare but challenging disease process associated with a poor prognosis. We hypothesized that patients with RASB would have worse surgical and oncologic outcomes than patients diagnosed with primary pelvic or sacral bone sarcomas. This was a retrospective, multi-institution, comparative analysis. We reviewed surgically treated patients from multiple tertiary care centers who were diagnosed with a localized RASB. We also identified a comparison group including all patients diagnosed with a primary localized pelvic or sacral osteosarcoma/spindle cell sarcoma of bone (POPS). There were 35 patients with localized RASB and 73 patients with POPS treated with surgical resection. Patients with RASB were older than those with POPS (57 years vs. 38 years, p < 0.001). Patients with RASB were less likely to receive chemotherapy (71% for RASB vs. 90% for POPS, p = 0.01). Seventeen percent of patients with RASB died in the perioperative period (within 90 days of surgery) as compared to 4% with POPS (p = 0.03). Five-year disease-specific survival (DSS) (31% vs. 54% p = 0.02) was worse for patients with RASB vs. POPS. There was no difference in 5-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS) or metastasis free survival (MFS). RASB and POPS present challenging disease processes with poor oncologic outcomes. Rates of perioperative mortality and 5-year DSS are worse for RASB when compared to POPS.

ZFP64::NCOA3 gene fusion defines a novel subset of spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma.

Spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma represents a rare neoplasm characterized by monomorphic spindle cells with a fascicular architecture and variable skeletal muscle differentiation. Following incidental identification of a ZFP64::NCOA3 gene fusion in an unclassified spindle cell sarcoma resembling adult-type fibrosarcoma, we performed a retrospective archival review and identified four additional cases with a similar histology and identical gene fusion. All tumors arose in adult males (28-71 years). The neoplasms were found in the deep soft tissues, two were gluteal, and one each arose in the thigh, abdominal wall, and chest wall. Morphologically, the tumors were characterized by spindle cells with a distinctive herringbone pattern and variable collagenous to myxoid stroma. The nuclei were relatively monomorphic with variable mitotic activity. Three tumors had immunoreactivity for MyoD1, and four contained variable expression of desmin and smooth muscle actin. All cases tested for myogenin, CD34, S100, pankeratin, and epithelial membrane antigen were negative. Targeted RNA sequencing revealed a ZFP64::NCOA3 fusion product in all five tumors. Three patients developed distant metastases, and two ultimately succumbed to their disease within 2 years of initial diagnosis. This study suggests ZFP64::NCOA3 fusions define a novel subtype of rhabdomyosarcoma with a spindle cell morphology and aggressive clinical behavior. The potential for morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap with several other sarcoma types underscores the value of molecular testing as a diagnostic adjunct to ensure accurate classification and management of these neoplasms.

Expanding the spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms with NR1D1-rearrangement.

Undifferentiated mesenchymal neoplasms can be morphologically subclassified based on cell shape; epithelioid tumors may be diagnostically challenging, particularly since they can show morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap with epithelial neoplasms. Following the recent report of an NR1D1::MAML1 gene fusion in an undifferentiated pediatric neoplasm, we performed a retrospective archival review and identified four additional cases of undifferentiated mesenchymal neoplasms with NR1D1-rearrangement. All four tumors occurred in adult women. The tumors involved superficial and/or deep soft tissues of the extremities or abdomen. Morphologically, they showed a spectrum of overlapping features. In addition to epithelioid cells, two cases also had a prominent spindle cell component. Two cases also had admixed polygonal cells containing prominent cytoplasmic vacuoles with amorphous debris. The immunophenotype was nonspecific but all cases had at least focal keratin expression; this was extensive in two tumors. Targeted RNA-sequencing revealed two cases each with NR1D1::MAML1 and NR1D1::MAML2 gene fusions. One patient developed lung and liver metastases, and one patient required amputation due to multifocal disease and underlying bone involvement. This study confirms undifferentiated NR1D1-rearranged sarcoma represents a distinct mesenchymal neoplasm with an epithelioid morphology and potential for aggressive behavior. Further, we offer new insight into the spectrum of clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings possible in these rare neoplasms. An awareness of this entity is especially important given the potential for misclassification as a carcinoma.

Comparison of Prophylactic Intravenous Antibiotic Regimens After Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Lower Extremity Bone Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The use of perioperative, prophylactic, intravenous antibiotics is standard practice to reduce the risk of surgical site infection after oncologic resection and complex endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower extremity bone tumors. However, evidence guiding the duration of prophylactic treatment remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a 5-day regimen of postoperative, prophylactic, intravenous antibiotics compared with a 1-day regimen on the rate of surgical site infections within 1 year after surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical superiority trial was performed at 48 clinical sites in 12 countries from January 1, 2013, to October 29, 2019. The trial included patients with a primary bone tumor or a soft tissue sarcoma that had invaded the femur or tibia or oligometastatic bone disease of the femur or tibia with expected survival of at least 1 year who required surgical management by excision and endoprosthetic reconstruction. A total of 611 patients were enrolled, and 7 were excluded for ineligibility. INTERVENTIONS: A 1- or 5-day regimen of postoperative prophylactic intravenous cephalosporin (cefazolin or cefuroxime) that began within 8 hours after skin closure and was administered every 8 hours thereafter. Those randomized to the 1-day regimen received identical saline doses every 8 hours for the remaining 4 days; patients, care providers, and outcomes assessors were blinded to treatment regimen. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome in this superiority trial was a surgical site infection (superficial incisional, deep incisional, or organ space) classified according to the criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention within 1 year after surgery. Secondary outcomes included antibiotic-related complications, unplanned additional operations, oncologic and functional outcomes, and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 604 patients included in the final analysis (mean [SD] age, 41.2 [21.9] years; 361 [59.8%] male; 114 [18.9%] Asian, 43 [7.1%] Black, 34 [5.6%] Hispanic, 15 [2.5%] Indigenous, 384 [63.8%] White, and 12 [2.0%] other), 293 were randomized to a 5-day regimen and 311 to a 1-day regimen. A surgical site infection occurred in 44 patients (15.0%) allocated to the 5-day regimen and in 52 patients (16.7%) allocated to the 1-day regimen (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.62-1.40; P = .73). Antibiotic-related complications occurred in 15 patients (5.1%) in the 5-day regimen and in 5 patients (1.6%) allocated to the 1-day regimen (hazard ratio, 3.24; 95% CI, 1.17-8.98; P = .02). Other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This randomized clinical trial did not confirm the superiority of a 5-day regimen of postoperative intravenous antibiotics over a 1-day regimen in preventing surgical site infections after surgery for lower extremity bone tumors that required an endoprosthesis. The 5-day regimen group had significantly more antibiotic-related complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01479283.

Preoperative Risk Factors for Fibrosarcomatous Transformation in Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Dermat of ibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a soft-tissue sarcoma with a high risk of local recurrence, though typically never metastasizes. DFSP can transform into high-grade fibrosarcoma (DFSP-FS), which has a risk of metastasis. Currently, treatment for DFSP includes Moh's micrographic surgery (MMS); however, this is not recommended for DFSP-FS. Often, the transformation to DFSP-FS is not recognized until the final histological diagnosis. At that point, wide local excision (WLE) of a previous MMS site can be morbid. As such, we analyzed patient risk factors to allow identification of DFSP-FS transformation at presentation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 368 (174 female, 194 male) patients with a mean age of 42 years from two sarcoma centers. A total of 319 (87%) patients had a history of DFSP and 49 (13%) had DFSP-FS. RESULTS: When comparing patients with a DFSP to those with a DFSP-FS, patients with a DFSP-FS were more likely (p<0.05) to be older, female and with larger tumors. A painful mass and rapidly enlarging mass were associated with DFSP-FS. CONCLUSION: Patients who presented with DFSP-FS were found to typically have a larger, painful, and growing mass. Patients with these features should be referred for WLE over MMS at presentation.

Radiological progression of extremity soft tissue sarcoma following pre-operative radiotherapy predicts for poor survival.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if radiological response to pre-operative radiotherapy is related to oncologic outcome in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). METHODS: 309 patients with extremity STS who underwent pre-operative radiation and wide resection were identified from a prospective database. Pre- and post-radiation MRI scans were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological response was defined by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. Local recurrence-free, metastasis-free (MFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared across response groups. RESULTS: Tumour volume decreased in 106 patients (34.3%; PR - partial responders), remained stable in 97 (31.4%; SD - stable disease), increased in 106 (34.3%; PD - progressive disease). The PD group were older (p = 0.007), had more upper extremity (p = 0.03) and high-grade tumours (p < 0.001). 81% of myxoid liposarcomas showed substantial decrease in size. There was no difference in initial tumour diameter (p = 0.5), type of surgery (p = 0.5), margin status (p = 0.4), or complications (p = 0.8) between the three groups. There were 10 (3.2%) local recurrences with no differences between the three response groups (p = 0.06). 5-year MFS was 52.1% for the PD group vs 73.8 and 78.5% for the PR and SD groups, respectively (p < 0.001). OS was similar (p < 0.001). Following multivariable analysis, worse MFS and OS were associated with higher grade, larger tumour size at diagnosis and tumour growth following pre-operative radiation. Older age was also associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION: STS that enlarge according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumour criteria following pre-operative radiotherapy identify a high risk group of patients with worse systemic outcomes but equivalent local control. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Post-radiation therapy, STS enlargement may identify patients with potential for worse systemic outcomes but equivalent local control. Therefore, adjunct therapeutic approaches could be considered in these patients.