Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 21(3): 10-19, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31539193

ABSTRACT

X-ray regulations and room design methodology vary widely across Canada. The Canadian Organization of Medical Physicists (COMP) conducted a survey in 2016/2017 to provide a useful snapshot of existing variations in rules and methodologies for human patient medical imaging facilities. Some jurisdictions no longer have radiation safety regulatory requirements and COMP is concerned that lack of regulatory oversight might erode safe practices. Harmonized standards will facilitate oversight that will ensure continued attention is given to public safety and to control workplace exposure. COMP encourages all Canadian jurisdictions to adopt the dose limits and constraints outlined in Health Canada Safety Code 35 with the codicil that the design standards be updated to those outlined in NCRP 147 and BIR 2012.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Imaging/instrumentation , Diagnostic Imaging/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Canada , Health Physics , Humans , Radiation Protection/standards , Research Report , Surveys and Questionnaires , X-Rays
2.
Nucl Med Commun ; 23(9): 847-50, 2002 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12195088

ABSTRACT

A wealth of experience exists in brachytherapy delivered in a variety of methods. Both beta and gamma sources have been used in the form of wires, pellets and liquids introduced through specially designed catheters. In addition, stents have been used and work with radioactive gases proposed. A significant issue in such interventional work is dosimetry. Presently, many methods and systems are still under development undergoing clinical trials and refinement. There is considerable uncertainty in the determination of appropriate target volumes and dose prescriptions. It is not known whether treatment of only the lumen wall is sufficient, or whether the media and adventitia must also be irradiated. Clinical trials suggest success depends on delivering adequate dose to target tissues (8-20 Gy) while limiting normal tissue dose to 30-40 Gy. Some trials indicate that a mimimal dose of 8-10 Gy has to be given to the whole media and the upper limit is determined by the tolerance of the intima (localized doses of approximately 90 Gy have been applied without complications). The requirements for the source for endovascular brachytherapy and the small lumen diameters involved compound the problems of achieving accurate dosimetry. Discussion of the aspects of radiation physics and the sources of dosimetric uncertainty together with the methodology used to calculate the dose is presented.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Brachytherapy/standards , Coronary Restenosis/prevention & control , Coronary Restenosis/radiotherapy , Infusions, Intra-Arterial/methods , Radioisotopes/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Humans , Radiation Protection , Societies, Scientific , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL