The patient undergoing implant therapy. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO Consensus Conference 2015.

INTRODUCTION: The assignment for this working group was to update the existing knowledge regarding factors considered being of special relevance for the patient undergoing implant therapy. This included areas where conflicting opinions exists since long or recently has been expressed, like the role of antibiotic prophylaxis in dental implant surgery and peri-implantitis. Also areas with growing interest and concern such as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and health-economy was included in this review. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature in the respective areas of interest (antibiotic prophylaxis, peri-implantitis, patient-reported outcome measurements and health-economic aspects) was searched using different strategies for the different papers. Search strategies ranged from a complex systematic review to systematic- and narrative reviews, depending on subject and available literature. All collected material was critically reviewed. Four manuscripts were subsequently presented for group analysis and discussion and plenum discussions and concensus approval. The selected areas were considered to be of key importance and relevance for the patient undergoing implant therapy. RESULTS: The results and conclusions of the review process are presented in the respective papers. The group's conclusions, identified knowledge gaps, directions for future research and concensus statements are presented in this article. The following reviews were available for group discussions and the foundation for subsequent plenary sessions: Lund B, Hultin M, Tranaeus S, Naimi-Akbar A, Klinge B. (2015) Perioperative antibiotics in conjunction with dental implant placement. A complex systematic review. Renvert S & Quirynen M. (2015) Risk indicators for peri-implantitis. A narrative review. De Bruyn H, Raes S, Matthys C, Cosyn J. (2015) The current use of patient centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry. A systematic review. Beikler T & Flemmig T.F. (2015) Economic evaluation of implant-supported prostheses. A narrative review.

Prevalence and predictive factors for peri-implant disease and implant failure: a cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term studies worldwide indicate that peri-implant inflammation is a frequent finding and that the prevalence of peri-implantitis correlates with loading time. Implant loss, although less frequent, has serious oral health and economic consequences. An understanding of predictive factors for peri-implant disease and implant loss would help providers and patients make informed decisions. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 96 patients with 225 implants that were placed between 1998 and 2003. Implant placement data were collected from patient records, and patients presented for a clinical and radiographic follow-up examination. Implant status and periodontal status were determined, the data were analyzed to determine the prevalence of peri-implant disease or implant loss, and a predictive model was tested. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time for the patients was 10.9 years. The implant survival rate was 91.6%. Peri-implant mucositis was found in 33% of the implants and 48% of the patients, and peri-implantitis occurred in 16% of the implants and 26% of the patients. Individuals with peri-implantitis were twice as likely to report a problem with an implant as individuals with healthy implants. Peri-implantitis is associated with younger ages and diabetes at the time of placement and with periodontal status at the time of follow-up. Implant loss is associated with diabetes, immediate placement, and larger-diameter implants. CONCLUSIONS: One in four patients and one in six implants have peri-implantitis after 11 years. The data suggest that periodontal and diabetes status of the patient may be useful for predicting implant outcomes.

Secondary trauma from occlusion and periodontitis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between secondary trauma from occlusion and the severity of periodontitis. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A total of 288 subjects with chronic periodontitis of varying severity and 93 healthy subjects were included in the study. Premature and balance contacts were identified by manual palpation and visualization of occlusal contacts during clenching in habitual intercuspation and lateral or protrusive movements of the mandible. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Spearman correlation tests. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences (P<.001) were found for all variables tested (ie, the total amount of trauma per patient and the number of premature and balance contacts increased significantly with the level of clinical attachment loss). The Spearman test showed a statistically significant correlation between the total amount of trauma per patient and the severity of periodontitis (P<.001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that secondary trauma from occlusion (ie, premature and balance contacts) is frequently seen in periodontally compromised patients and is positively correlated with the severity of attachment loss.

Protective effects and anti-inflammatory pathways of exogenous calcitonin gene-related peptide in severe necrotizing pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Microcirculatory disturbances are known to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of severe necrotizing pancreatitis (SNP). Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a vasodilatatory neuropeptide with potential anti-inflammatory effects. This study characterizes the protective effects and the anti-inflammatory pathway of exogenous CGRP in SNP. METHODS: SNP was induced in rats using the glycodeoxycholic acid model. CGRP was injected prophylactically before or therapeutically after initiation of the disease. Pancreatic damage was assessed using intravital microscopy, histology, NF-kappaB p50/p65 electrophoretic mobility shift assay, serum cytokine assay and ICAM-1 immunohistochemistry at 6 or 12 h after the onset of disease. RESULTS: Pancreatic microcirculatory disturbances, nuclear NF-kappaB levels and pancreatic ICAM-1 expression were increased in SNP compared to controls. After CGRP application, microcirculatory disturbances, NF-kappaB levels and pancreatic ICAM-1 expression were attenuated compared to pancreatitis alone. Moreover, pancreatic morphologic damage was significantly reduced by both prophylactic and therapeutic application of CGRP. CONCLUSIONS: CGRP is a neuropeptide that ameliorates the development of SNP in rats and may provide new treatment options. Its anti-inflammatory effects appear to be mediated by the modulation of pancreatic microcirculation and the inflammatory cascade.