Performance of the GHS Mixtures Equation for Predicting Acute Oral Toxicity.

Acute oral toxicity classifications are based on the estimated chemical dose causing lethality in 50 % of laboratory animals tested (LD50). Given the large number of pesticide registration applications that require acute toxicity data, an alternative to the in vivo test could greatly reduce animal testing. The United Nations Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Mixtures Equation estimates the acute toxicity of mixtures using the toxicities of mixture components. The goal of this study was to evaluate the concordance of LD50s predicted using the GHS Mixtures Equation and LD50s from the in vivo test results. Using the EPA classification system, concordance was 55 % for the full dataset (N = 671), 52 % for agrochemical formulations (N = 620), and 84 % for antimicrobial cleaning products (N = 51). Most discordant results were from substances LD50 > 2000 mg/kg (limit test) or 2000 < LD50 < 5000 mg/kg that were predicted as LD50 > 5000 mg/kg. A supplementary analysis combining all formulations with an LD50 > 500 mg/kg produced a concordance of 82 %. The lack of more toxic formulations in this dataset prevented a thorough evaluation of the GHS equation for such substances. Accordingly, our results suggest the GHS equation is helpful to predict the toxicity of mixtures, particularly those with lower toxicity.

Views of hypertension among young African Americans who vary in their risk of developing hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: To describe beliefs about hypertension and health education of young African American adults varying in their hypertension risk status. DESIGN: Fifty-eight African American young adults (17-20 years) were selected based on low and high risk criteria for hypertension assessed in earlier investigations of hemodynamic responses to stress. The sample included 15 high risk males, 13 low risk males, 14 high risk females, and 16 low risk females who were interviewed indepth about their hypertension beliefs and health education experiences. Variable-based matrices identified participants with similar responses. RESULTS: Overall, participants had a limited understanding of hypertension. For example, they linked the condition to eating a diet high in pork and fat and having a positive family history of hypertension with little acknowledgement of weight, smoking, race and sex as key contributors to hypertension onset. Distinctions were found between risk categories and along sex lines. Most high risk participants believed stress could cause hypertension. High risk females believed that they were at risk for developing hypertension but lacked prevention strategies. High risk males were generally uninformed about risk or prevention. More low risk females believed in prevention compared to few low risk males. Participants reported little formal health education about hypertension and recommended that hypertension education be improved through more effective and relevant approaches in high school health education classes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the need for comprehensive and revitalized hypertension prevention programs for young African Americans. Participant views varied with hypertension risk status and gender suggesting that targeted educational efforts should reflect these differences.