Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Article in English | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-58696

ABSTRACT

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To determine if there was an association between intrapartum stillbirths and both traveled distance for delivery and delivery care accessibility, assessing periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. This is a population-based cohort study. Patients had birth occurring after the onset of labor; the primary outcome was intrapartum stillbirth. City of residence was classified according to the ratio between deliveries performed and total births among its residents; values lower than 0.1 indicated low delivery care accessibility. Travel distance was calculated using the Haversine formula. Education level, maternal age, and birth sex were included. In each period, relative risk was assessed by generalized linear model with Poisson variance. Results. There were 2 267 534 deliveries with birth occurring after the onset of labor. Most patients were between age 20 and 35 years, had between 8 and 11 years of education, and resided in cities with high delivery care accessibility. Low delivery care accessibility increased risk of intrapartum stillbirth in the pre-pandemic (relative risk [RR] 2.02; 95% CI [1.64, 2.47]; p < 0.01) and the pandemic period (RR 1.69; 95% CI [1.09, 2.55]; p = 0.015). This was independent of other risk-increasing factors, such as travel distance and fewer years of education. Conclusions. Low delivery care accessibility is associated with the risk of intrapartum stillbirths, and accessibility reduced during the pandemic. Delivery of patients by family physicians and midwives, as well as official communication channels between primary care physicians and specialists, could improve patient health- care-seeking behavior.


[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Determinar si hubo una asociación entre la mortinatalidad durante el parto y la distancia recorrida o la accesibilidad de la atención para el parto, mediante la evaluación de un período anterior y de otro coin- cidente con la pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos. Se realizó un estudio de cohorte de base poblacional. Se incluyó a las pacientes que dieron a luz tras el inicio de un trabajo de parto; el criterio de valoración principal fue la mortinatalidad durante el parto. Se clasificaron las ciudades de residencia conforme al cociente entre el número de partos atendidos y el total de partos habidos entre sus residentes; los valores inferiores a 0,1 indican que la accesibilidad de la atención del parto es baja. La distancia recorrida para el parto se calculó utilizando la fórmula de Haversine. Se utilizaron datos del nivel de estudios y la edad de la madre y del sexo biológico neonatal. Para cada período, se evaluó el riesgo relativo mediante un modelo lineal generalizado con varianza de Poisson. Resultados. Hubo 2 267 534 partos que se produjeron tras el inicio de un trabajo de parto. La mayoría de las pacientes tenían edades comprendidas entre 20 y 35 años, tenían entre 8 y 11 años de estudios y residían en ciudades donde la accesibilidad de la atención del parto era alta. Una accesibilidad baja de la atención del parto se asoció a un aumento del riesgo de mortinatalidad durante el parto en el período prepandémico (riesgo relativo [RR] = 2,02; IC del 95% = [1,64, 2,47]; p < 0,01) y también durante la pandemia (RR = 1,69; IC del 95% = [1.09, 2.55]; p = 0,015). Este resultado fuer independiente de otros factores que incrementan el riesgo, como la distancia recorrida para dar a luz y un menor nivel de estudios. Conclusiones. Una accesibilidad baja de la atención del parto se asocia a un mayor riesgo de mortinatalidad durante el parto; y se observó una reducción de la accesibilidad durante la pandemia. Los partos asistidos por personal de medicina de familia o de partería y los canales de comunicación oficiales entre el personal médico de atención primaria y el especializado podrían mejorar el comportamiento de las pacientes a la hora de buscar atención de salud.


[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Determinar se existe alguma relação entre a morte fetal intraparto e dois fatores: a distância percorrida para o parto e o acesso à assistência ao parto, avaliando o período antes e durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos. Este é um estudo de coorte de base populacional. As pacientes tiveram parto após o início do trabalho de parto; o desfecho primário foi morte fetal intraparto. A cidade de residência foi classificada de acordo com a razão entre os partos realizados e o total de nascimentos entre os residentes; valores inferiores a 0,1 indicavam baixo acesso à assistência ao parto. A distância percorrida foi calculada usando a fórmula de Haversine. Foram incluídos o nível de escolaridade, a idade materna e o sexo de nascimento. Em cada período, o risco relativo foi avaliado usando um modelo linear generalizado com variância de Poisson. Resultados. Foram registrados 2 267 534 partos com nascimento após o início do trabalho de parto. A maioria das pacientes tinha entre 20 e 35 anos de idade, entre 8 e 11 anos de escolaridade e residia em cidades com alto nível de acesso à assistência ao parto. O baixo acesso à assistência ao parto aumentou o risco de morte fetal intraparto no período anterior à pandemia (risco relativo [RR]: 2,02; intervalo de confiança [IC] de 95%: 1,64–2,47; p < 0,01) e durante a pandemia (RR: 1,69; IC 95%: 1,09–2,55; p = 0,015). Isso ocorreu independentemente de outros fatores de aumento de risco, como a distância percorrida e menor escolaridade. Conclusões. O baixo acesso ao atendimento de parto está associado ao risco de morte fetal intraparto, e a acessibilidade diminuiu durante a pandemia. A realização do parto por médicos de família e obstetrizes, bem como a existência de canais oficiais de comunicação entre médicos de atenção primária e especialistas, poderiam melhorar o comportamento de busca de saúde por parte das pacientes.


Subject(s)
Travel , Health Services Accessibility , Time-to-Treatment , Fetal Mortality , Brazil , Travel , Health Services Accessibility , Time-to-Treatment , Fetal Mortality , Brazil , Travel , Health Services Accessibility , Time-to-Treatment , Fetal Mortality
2.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 47: e149, 2023. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1560357

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Objective. To determine if there was an association between intrapartum stillbirths and both traveled distance for delivery and delivery care accessibility, assessing periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. This is a population-based cohort study. Patients had birth occurring after the onset of labor; the primary outcome was intrapartum stillbirth. City of residence was classified according to the ratio between deliveries performed and total births among its residents; values lower than 0.1 indicated low delivery care accessibility. Travel distance was calculated using the Haversine formula. Education level, maternal age, and birth sex were included. In each period, relative risk was assessed by generalized linear model with Poisson variance. Results. There were 2 267 534 deliveries with birth occurring after the onset of labor. Most patients were between age 20 and 35 years, had between 8 and 11 years of education, and resided in cities with high delivery care accessibility. Low delivery care accessibility increased risk of intrapartum stillbirth in the pre-pandemic (relative risk [RR] 2.02; 95% CI [1.64, 2.47]; p < 0.01) and the pandemic period (RR 1.69; 95% CI [1.09, 2.55]; p = 0.015). This was independent of other risk-increasing factors, such as travel distance and fewer years of education. Conclusions. Low delivery care accessibility is associated with the risk of intrapartum stillbirths, and accessibility reduced during the pandemic. Delivery of patients by family physicians and midwives, as well as official communication channels between primary care physicians and specialists, could improve patient healthcare-seeking behavior.


RESUMEN Objetivo. Determinar si hubo una asociación entre la mortinatalidad durante el parto y la distancia recorrida o la accesibilidad de la atención para el parto, mediante la evaluación de un período anterior y de otro coincidente con la pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos. Se realizó un estudio de cohorte de base poblacional. Se incluyó a las pacientes que dieron a luz tras el inicio de un trabajo de parto; el criterio de valoración principal fue la mortinatalidad durante el parto. Se clasificaron las ciudades de residencia conforme al cociente entre el número de partos atendidos y el total de partos habidos entre sus residentes; los valores inferiores a 0,1 indican que la accesibilidad de la atención del parto es baja. La distancia recorrida para el parto se calculó utilizando la fórmula de Haversine. Se utilizaron datos del nivel de estudios y la edad de la madre y del sexo biológico neonatal. Para cada período, se evaluó el riesgo relativo mediante un modelo lineal generalizado con varianza de Poisson. Resultados. Hubo 2 267 534 partos que se produjeron tras el inicio de un trabajo de parto. La mayoría de las pacientes tenían edades comprendidas entre 20 y 35 años, tenían entre 8 y 11 años de estudios y residían en ciudades donde la accesibilidad de la atención del parto era alta. Una accesibilidad baja de la atención del parto se asoció a un aumento del riesgo de mortinatalidad durante el parto en el período prepandémico (riesgo relativo [RR] = 2,02; IC del 95% = [1,64, 2,47]; p < 0,01) y también durante la pandemia (RR = 1,69; IC del 95% = [1.09, 2.55]; p = 0,015). Este resultado fuer independiente de otros factores que incrementan el riesgo, como la distancia recorrida para dar a luz y un menor nivel de estudios. Conclusiones. Una accesibilidad baja de la atención del parto se asocia a un mayor riesgo de mortinatalidad durante el parto; y se observó una reducción de la accesibilidad durante la pandemia. Los partos asistidos por personal de medicina de familia o de partería y los canales de comunicación oficiales entre el personal médico de atención primaria y el especializado podrían mejorar el comportamiento de las pacientes a la hora de buscar atención de salud.


RESUMO Objetivo. Determinar se existe alguma relação entre a morte fetal intraparto e dois fatores: a distância percorrida para o parto e o acesso à assistência ao parto, avaliando o período antes e durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos. Este é um estudo de coorte de base populacional. As pacientes tiveram parto após o início do trabalho de parto; o desfecho primário foi morte fetal intraparto. A cidade de residência foi classificada de acordo com a razão entre os partos realizados e o total de nascimentos entre os residentes; valores inferiores a 0,1 indicavam baixo acesso à assistência ao parto. A distância percorrida foi calculada usando a fórmula de Haversine. Foram incluídos o nível de escolaridade, a idade materna e o sexo de nascimento. Em cada período, o risco relativo foi avaliado usando um modelo linear generalizado com variância de Poisson. Resultados. Foram registrados 2 267 534 partos com nascimento após o início do trabalho de parto. A maioria das pacientes tinha entre 20 e 35 anos de idade, entre 8 e 11 anos de escolaridade e residia em cidades com alto nível de acesso à assistência ao parto. O baixo acesso à assistência ao parto aumentou o risco de morte fetal intraparto no período anterior à pandemia (risco relativo [RR]: 2,02; intervalo de confiança [IC] de 95%: 1,64-2,47; p < 0,01) e durante a pandemia (RR: 1,69; IC 95%: 1,09-2,55; p = 0,015). Isso ocorreu independentemente de outros fatores de aumento de risco, como a distância percorrida e menor escolaridade. Conclusões. O baixo acesso ao atendimento de parto está associado ao risco de morte fetal intraparto, e a acessibilidade diminuiu durante a pandemia. A realização do parto por médicos de família e obstetrizes, bem como a existência de canais oficiais de comunicação entre médicos de atenção primária e especialistas, poderiam melhorar o comportamento de busca de saúde por parte das pacientes.

3.
An. bras. dermatol ; An. bras. dermatol;95(6): 724-727, Nov.-Dec. 2020. graf
Article in English | LILACS, Coleciona SUS | ID: biblio-1142124

ABSTRACT

Abstract Insect bites and bite wounds are quite common and most often have mild repercussions in humans. Statistics on the incidence of accidents caused by insects are not available, and the skin reactions after the bites are not always known. The authors present two cases of patients with hemorrhagic blisters on their hands after tabanidae bites and discuss the factors that cause the problem and the importance of the differential diagnosis of blisters with hemorrhagic content on human skin.


Subject(s)
Humans , Prurigo , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Insect Bites and Stings/diagnosis , Skin , Allergens
4.
An Bras Dermatol ; 95(6): 724-727, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33012570

ABSTRACT

Insect bites and bite wounds are quite common and most often have mild repercussions in humans. Statistics on the incidence of accidents caused by insects are not available, and the skin reactions after the bites are not always known. The authors present two cases of patients with hemorrhagic blisters on their hands after tabanidae bites and discuss the factors that cause the problem and the importance of the differential diagnosis of blisters with hemorrhagic content on human skin.


Subject(s)
Insect Bites and Stings , Prurigo , Skin Diseases, Vesiculobullous , Allergens , Humans , Insect Bites and Stings/complications , Insect Bites and Stings/diagnosis , Skin
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(4): e192036, 2019 04 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30977852

ABSTRACT

Importance: Despite its spread in much of the United States and increased international interest, the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) paradigm still lacks supporting evidence. The interrater reliability of the POLST form to translate patients' values and preferences into medical orders for care at the end of life remains to be studied. Objective: To assess the interrater reliability of the medical orders documented in POLST forms. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a public university hospital in southeastern Brazil. Two independent researchers interviewed the same patients or decision-making surrogates (n = 64) during a single episode of hospitalization within a time frame of 1 to 7 days. Eligible participants were hospitalized adults aged 21 years or older who were expected to remain hospitalized for at least 4 days and whose attending physician responded no to the question, Would I be surprised if this patient died in the next year? Data collection occurred between November 1, 2015, and September 20, 2016, and first data analyses were performed on October 3, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Interrater reliability as measured by κ statistics. Results: Of the 64 participants interviewed in the study, 53 (83%) were patients and 11 (17%) were surrogates. Patients' mean (SD) age was 64 (14) years, and 35 patients (55%) and 8 surrogates (73%) were women. Overall, in 5 cases (8%), disagreement in at least 1 medical order for life-sustaining treatment was found in the POLST form, changing from the first interview to the second interview. The κ statistic for cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.80-1.00); for level of medical intervention, 0.89 (95% CI, 0.76-1.00); and for artificially administered nutrition, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.83-1.00). Conclusions and Relevance: The high interrater reliability of the medical orders in POLST forms appears to offer further support for this advance care planning paradigm; in addition, the finding that this interrater reliability was not 100% underscores the need to ensure that patients or their surrogates have decision-making capacity and to confirm that the content of POLST forms accurately reflects patients' current treatment preferences.


Subject(s)
Advance Care Planning/standards , Attitude to Death , Life Support Care/psychology , Patient Preference/psychology , Terminal Care/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Decision Making , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Physicians/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Terminal Care/psychology , Translations
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL