Axial Disease in Psoriatic Arthritis: A Challenging Domain in Clinical Practice.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting about one-third of individuals with psoriasis. Defining axial involvement in PsA (axPsA) remains debated. While rheumatologists guide clinical practice, consensus on axPsA is still lacking. This paper explores historical and upcoming definitions from the Axial Involvement in Psoriatic Arthritis (AXIS) study, which aims to establish a validated axPsA definition. Epidemiological data reveal diverse axPsA prevalence rates, emphasizing its complex relationship with peripheral arthritis and enthesitis. Unique genetic, clinical, and radiological features differentiate axPsA from ankylosing spondylitis (AS), necessitating refined classification criteria. The recommendations from the Assessment of Spondylarthritis international Society (ASAS) provide valuable guidance due to the limited direct evidence. Emerging therapies, including interleukin-23 (IL-23) inhibitors or Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, are under investigation for axPsA. Currently, secukinumab, an interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitor, is an evidence-based option for axPsA management. However, given the variability in individual patient responses and disease manifestations, personalized, evidence-based treatment approaches remain essential for optimizing patient outcomes. In the final section, two real-life cases illustrate the challenges in managing axPsA, emphasizing the importance of tailored therapies. Achieving precision in defining axPsA remains a formidable task, making detailed criteria essential for effective strategies and improving patient outcomes.

Clinical and structural damage outcomes in axial spondyloarthritis patients receiving NSAIDs or advanced therapies: a description of a real-life cohort.

Introduction: This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics, disease activity, and structural damage in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who receive chronic treatment with nonsteroideal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or advanced therapies in a clinical setting. Methods: Cross-sectional study on axSpA patients consecutively recruited from the outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital. We collected data on clinical and demographic characteristics, as well as treatment patterns involving NSAIDs and advanced therapies. Structural damage was assessed using mSASSS. Results: Overall, data from 193 axSpA patients (83% ankylosing spondylitis) were gathered, with a mean disease duration of 21.4 years. Of these, 85 patients (44%) were exclusively taking NSAIDs, while 108 (56%) were receiving advanced therapies, with TNF inhibitors being the predominant choice (93 out of 108, 86.1%). Among patients using NSAIDs, 64.7% followed an on-demand dosing regimen, while only 17.6% used full doses. Disease activity was low, with a mean BASDAI of 3.1 and a mean ASDAS-CRP of 1.8. In comparison to patients under chronic NSAID treatment, those taking advanced therapies were primarily male (69.4% versus 51.8%, p = 0.025) and significantly younger (mean age of 49 versus 53.9 years, p = 0.033). Additionally, patients on advanced therapies exhibited lower ASDAS-CRP (p = 0.046), although CRP serum levels and BASDAI scores did not differ between the two groups. In the multivariable analysis, therapy (NSAID versus biological treatment) was not independently associated with ASDAS-CRP, BASDAI or mSASSS. Conclusion: This cross-sectional analysis of a real-world cohort of axSpA patients shows positive clinical and radiological outcomes for both NSAIDs and advanced therapies.

Neutrophilic Activity Biomarkers (Plasma Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and Calprotectin) in Established Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Biological or JAK Inhibitors: A Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study assesses the accuracy of neutrophil activation markers, including neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and calprotectin, as biomarkers of disease activity in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We also analyse the relationship between NETs and various types of therapies as well as their association with autoimmunity. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study of patients with RA receiving treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs or Janus kinase inhibitors (JAK-inhibitors) for at least 3 months. Plasma calprotectin levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test kit and NETs by measuring their remnants in plasma (neutrophil elastase-DNA and histone-DNA complexes). We also assessed clinical disease activity, joint ultrasound findings and autoantibody status [reumatoid factor (RF), anti-citrullinated peptide/protein antibodies (ACPAs) and anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP)]. Associations between neutrophilic biomarkers and clinical or ultrasound scores were sought using correlation analysis. The discriminatory capacity of both neutrophilic biomarkers to detect ultrasound synovitis was analysed through receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: One hundred fourteen patients were included. Two control groups were included to compare NET levels. The active control group consisted of 15 patients. The second control group consisted of 30 healthy subjects. Plasma NET levels did not correlate with clinical disease status, regardless of the clinic index analysed or the biological therapy administered. No significant correlation was observed between NET remnants and ultrasound synovitis. There was no correlation between plasma NET and autoantibodies. In contrast, plasma calprotectin positively correlated with clinical parameters (swollen joint count [SJC] rho = 0.49; P < 0.001, Clinical Disease Activity Index [CDAI] rho = 0.30; P < 0.001) and ultrasound parameters (rho > 0.50; P < 0.001). Notably, this correlation was stronger than that observed with acute phase reactants. CONCLUSION: While NET formation induced by neutrophils may play a role in RA pathogenesis, our study raises questions about the utility of NET remnants in peripheral circulation as a biomarker for inflammatory activity. In contrast, this study strongly supports the usefulness of calprotectin as a biomarker of inflammatory activity in patients with RA.

Thorough assessment of the effectiveness of belimumab in a large Spanish multicenter cohort of systemic lupus erythematosus patients.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview on the current use of belimumab (BLM) in SLE patients in clinical practice and to examine its efficacy in terms of standardized outcomes, drug survival, as well as patient and safety profiles. METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective multicentre cohort including SLE patients treated with BLM at 18 Spanish centers. Data was collected upon initiation of BLM, at 6 and 12 months after initiation, and at the last recorded visit. Changes in SLEDAI-2K, the proportion of patients who achieved LLDAS and DORIS 2021, and number of flares were compared between visits. Changes in damage, glucocorticoids use and employment status pre-BLM and post-BLM were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 324 patients were included with a mean follow-up of 3.8 (±2.7) years. LLDAS was attained by 45.8%, 62% and 71% of patients, and DORIS by 24%, 36.2% and 52.5% on successive visits, respectively. Twenty-seven-point two percent of patients were in DORIS ≥ 50% of the visits and a 46% in LLDAS-50. Flares and number of flares were significantly lower one year after treatment with BLM and no changes in damage accrual were observed. Mean (±SD) prednisone dose was significantly reduced over time, with 70 (24%) patients discontinuing GC. CONCLUSION: Our study not only demonstrates belimumab´s efficacy in attaining treat-to-target goals in SLE patients, but also confirms its GC-sparing effect, and its prevention of flares and organ damage accrual.

Satisfaction and effectiveness of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous belimumab treatment in daily clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: In 2017, belimumab (BEL) was approved in subcutaneous (SQ) administration. The effectiveness after switching from intravenous (IV) to SQ and patient satisfaction in daily clinical practice has not been studied. During the pandemic, patient follow-up and treatment were significantly affected, and some patients need a change from IV to SQ. Our aim was to evaluate daily clinical practice satisfaction to SQ BEL therapy in patients previously treated IV BEL. We hypothesized that SQ BEL in SLE patients previously treated with IV BEL was similar in effectiveness and conferred higher satisfaction. METHODS: Observational, multicenter study, conducted in 7 reference centers in Catalonia. We included stable SLE patients (EULAR/ACR 2019) on treatment with SQ BEL and previous use of IV BEL (at least 3 months on IV BEL before switching). Since there are no well-validated tools for SQ BEL treatment satisfaction, we used RASQ-SQ, validated in patients with lymphoma who switched from IV Rituximab to SQ treatment, and modified for BEL treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included. The more prevalent clinical manifestations observed were related to the skin and joints and the patients had a mean baseline SLEDAI of 2.96 (SD 2.4) and SLICC score of 0.67 (SD 0.88). The median time from treatment with IV BEL before switching to SQ was 21 months (range). 84% of patients reported confidence in SQ BEL. 85.2% felt that treatment with SQ BEL was convenient or very convenient. 85% felt they had gained time with the change. 89% would recommend the SQ injection to other patients. Disease activity (mean SLEDAI) and remission rates remain stable after switching. No major new adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Overall satisfaction, satisfaction with via of administration, and satisfaction with the time taken to receive BEL were higher for SQ BEL treatment. A switching SQ strategy is a reasonable alternative for BEL patients.

Synovial tissue features associated with poor prognosis in inflammatory arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory arthritis encompasses a group of immune-mediated diseases characterized by chronic joint inflammation. Despite having pathogenic mechanisms in common, the prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and undifferentiated arthritis (UA) could be different regarding progression to chronic, to erosive, or to self-limited disease. Our aim was to evaluate the potential association of synovial tissue (ST) inflammatory cell infiltrate, the presence of ectopic lymphoid neogenesis (LN +) structures, and poor prognosis factors (PPF) in patients with RA, PsA, and UA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including patients with active arthritis (RA, PsA, UA) who had ST obtained by rheumatological arthroscopy or ultrasound-guided biopsy. Clinical, demographic, and immunohistochemical data of the synovium was evaluated. Patients with biological therapy at the time of synovial biopsy were excluded. PPF in patients with RA and UA were defined by the presence of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies and/or rheumatoid factor, development of bone erosions, or requirement of biological therapy during the follow-up. PPF in patients with PsA were defined as the presence of high levels of acute-phase reactants (ESR/CRP), dactylitis or nail involvement at the time of biopsy, development of bone erosion, or requirement of biological therapy during the follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included: 26 RA, 33 PsA, and 29 UA. All patients were followed up for 5 years after the biopsy. Fourteen (53.84%) RA patients had PPF, and 17 (65.38%) had LN + . LN + was associated with PPF (p 0.038) and biologic therapy initiation (p 0.018). A total of 14 (43.75%) PsA patients had PPF. CD15 infiltrate (410.68 [SD 477.63] cells/mm2) was associated with PPF (p 0.008) in PsA patients. Sixteen (55.17%) patients with UA had PPF, and 13 (44.82%) had LN + . In this group, synovial CD68 + macrophages cells density was negatively correlated with DAS28-CRP (r = - 0.346, p 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of LN + and higher CD15 + polymorphonuclear cells infiltrate was associated with PPF in RA and PsA, respectively. No associations were found for UA. These findings suggest a great heterogeneity of the ST features and its pathogenic implications in the subtypes of inflammatory arthritis.

Neutrófilos, trampas extracelulares de neutrófilos y artritis reumatoide: una revisión actualizada para clínicos / Neutrophils, neutrophil extracellular traps, and rheumatoid arthritis: An updated review for clinicians

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of autoantibodies. Research on the pathogenic mechanisms involved in systemic autoimmune diseases has largely focused on the involvement of the adaptive immune system with dysregulated responses of T and B cells. However, in recent years, there is increasing evidence of the significant role played by the innate immune system, particularly neutrophils, in these diseases, particularly in RA. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are extracellular structures composed of remodeled and concentrated chromatin with DNA, histones, and neutrophil proteins, and were first described in 2004. It has been studied that NETs may play a pathogenic role in RA and could be a source of autoantigens, increasing the immune response in the form of autoantibodies in this disease. The possible role of NETs and other markers of neutrophil activation as biomarkers of activity in RA and other immune-mediated diseases has also been studied.This article reviews the role of NETs in RA. It discusses the role of neutrophils and the latest advances in NETs, especially their involvement in autoimmune phenomena in RA. Finally, a literature review is conducted on the determination of NETs in peripheral blood and their relationship as a biomarker of RA activity, as well as their potential role in disease monitoring.(AU)

La artritis reumatoide (AR) es una enfermedad autoinmune sistémica caracterizada por la presencia de autoanticuerpos. Las investigaciones sobre los mecanismos patogénicos implicados en las enfermedades autoinmunes sistémicas se centran en gran medida en la participación del sistema inmunitario adaptativo con las respuestas desreguladas de las células T y B. Sin embargo, en los últimos años, ha aumentado la evidencia del importante papel que juega el sistema inmunitario innato, en particular los neutrófilos, en estas enfermedades, particularmente en la AR. Las trampas extracelulares de neutrófilos (NET) son estructuras extracelulares compuestas por cromatina remodelada y concentrada con ADN, histonas y proteínas de los neutrófilos y son un mecanismo de acción de los neutrófilos que se describió por primera vez en 2004. Se ha estudiado que pueden desempeñar un papel patogénico en la AR y podrían ser fuente de autoantígenos e incrementar la respuesta inmunológica en forma de autoanticuerpos en esta enfermedad. También se ha estudiado el posible papel de las NET y otros marcadores de activación neutrofílica como biomarcadores de actividad en la AR y otras enfermedades inmunomediadas.En el presente artículo se revisa el papel de las NET en la AR. Se revisa el papel del neutrófilo y los últimos avances en NET, especialmente en su participación en los fenómenos de autoinmunidad en la AR. Por último, se hace una revisión de la literatura sobre la determinación de NET en sangre periférica y su relación como biomarcador de actividad de la AR y su posible papel para monitorizar la enfermedad.(AU)

Neutrophils, neutrophil extracellular traps, and rheumatoid arthritis: An updated review for clinicians.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by the presence of autoantibodies. Research on the pathogenic mechanisms involved in systemic autoimmune diseases has largely focused on the involvement of the adaptive immune system with dysregulated responses of T and B cells. However, in recent years, there is increasing evidence of the significant role played by the innate immune system, particularly neutrophils, in these diseases, particularly in RA. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are extracellular structures composed of remodeled and concentrated chromatin with DNA, histones, and neutrophil proteins, and were first described in 2004. It has been studied that NETs may play a pathogenic role in RA and could be a source of autoantigens, increasing the immune response in the form of autoantibodies in this disease. The possible role of NETs and other markers of neutrophil activation as biomarkers of activity in RA and other immune-mediated diseases has also been studied. This article reviews the role of NETs in RA. It discusses the role of neutrophils and the latest advances in NETs, especially their involvement in autoimmune phenomena in RA. Finally, a literature review is conducted on the determination of NETs in peripheral blood and their relationship as a biomarker of RA activity, as well as their potential role in disease monitoring.

Calprotectin in Patients with Rheumatic Immunomediated Adverse Effects Induced by Checkpoints Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: this is an exploratory study to evaluate calprotectin serum levels in patients with rheumatic immune-related adverse events (irAEs) induced by immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. METHODS: this is a retrospective observational study including patients with irAEs rheumatic syndromes. We compared the calprotectin levels to those in a control group of patients with RA and with a control group of healthy individuals. Additionally, we included a control group of patients treated with ICI but without irAEs to check calprotectin levels. We also analysed the performance of calprotectin for the identification of active rheumatic disease using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). RESULTS: 18 patients with rheumatic irAEs were compared to a control group of 128 RA patients and another group of 29 healthy donors. The mean calprotectin level in the irAE group was 5.15 µg/mL, which was higher than the levels in both the RA group (3.19 µg/mL) and the healthy group (3.81 µg/mL) (cut-off 2 µg/mL). Additionally, 8 oncology patients without irAEs were included. In this group, calprotectin levels were similar to those of the healthy controls. In patients with active inflammation, the calprotectin levels in the irAE group were significantly higher (8.43 µg/mL) compared to the RA group (3.94 µg/mL). ROC curve analysis showed that calprotectin had a very good discriminatory capacity to identify inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatic irAEs (AUC of 0.864). CONCLUSIONS: the results suggest that calprotectin may serve as a marker of inflammatory activity in patients with rheumatic irAEs induced by treatment with ICIs.

Importancia de los títulos de anticuerpos antifosfolípidos no criterio entre pacientes con síndrome antifosfolípido primario y pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico / Relevance of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies titers among patients with antiphospholipid syndrome and patients with systemic lupus erythematosus

Antecedentes: Hay un interés creciente en el estudio de los anticuerpos antifosfolípidos (aPL) no criterio, incluyendo anticuerpos contra el dominio 1 de la B2 glicoproteína 1 (anti-D1 B2GP1) y anticuerpos antifosfatidilserina/protrombina (PS/PT). Objetivos: Nuestro objetivo fue analizar un panel de aPL convencionales y no criterio en una cohorte de pacientes con lupus eritematoso sistémico (LES) y síndrome antifosfolípido primario (SAF), para describir si hay diferencias en los títulos de aPL entre los grupos, y evaluar asociaciones clínicas incluyendo el riesgo de eventos recurrentes con aPL novedosos. Metodología: Estudio observacional que evaluó los anticuerpos anti-D1 B2GP1 y anti-PS/PT de manera basal. Los anticuerpos anti-D1 B2GP1 se evaluaron a través de inmunoanálisis por quimioluminiscencia. Los anticuerpos anti-PS/PT, anticardiolipinas (aCL) y anti-B2GP1 fueron evaluados por técnicas de ELISA. Finalmente, los pacientes fueron seguidos en el tiempo para identificar nuevos eventos trombóticos. Resultados: Se incluyeron 133 pacientes con LES y 23 pacientes con SAF primario. Las principales manifestaciones de SAF fueron TVP (27%), morbilidad obstétrica (22%) y trombosis arterial (10,1%). Los títulos de anticuerpos anti-PS/PT IgM fueron 46,5 (20,6-127) vs. 21,9 (11,2-39,2) U/ml, p<0,001, en pacientes con SAF primario vs. LES con SAF secundario, respectivamente. Los anti-D1 B2GP1, anti-PS/PT IgG e IgM se asociaron con manifestaciones trombóticas y no trombóticas. Durante el seguimiento, los anticuerpos IgG B2GP1 se relacionaron con un riesgo acumulativo significativo de trombosis. Conclusiones: Se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en títulos séricos de aPL no criterio en pacientes con SAF primario vs. pacientes con LES y SAF secundario. Si los títulos de aPL no criterio son útiles para diferenciar entre SAF primario y SAF secundario, se requieren más análisis en otras poblaciones para poder confirmar si los títulos de aPL no criterio.

Background: There is an increasing interest in the study of non-criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) including antibodies targeting domain 1 of the B2 glycoprotein 1 (anti-D1 B2GP1) and antibodies anti phosphatidylserine/ prothrombin (PS/PT). Objectives: Our aim was to analyze a panel of conventional and non-criteria aPL in a cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), to describe if there are differences in aPL titers among groups, to evaluate clinical associations including risk of recurrent events of novel aPL. Methods: Observational study that evaluated at baseline antibodies against anti-D1 B2GP1 and anti PS/PT. Anti-D1 B2GP1 antibodies were tested using a chemiluminescent immunoassay. IgG and IgM anti PS/PT, aCL and anti B2GP1 by ELISA techniques. Therefore, patients were followed in order to identify new thrombotic events. Results: 133 patients with SLE and 23 with primary APS patients were included. Main APS manifestations were DVT (27%), obstetric morbidity (22%) and arterial thrombosis (10.1%). IgM anti PS/PT antibodies levels were (20.6 - 127) vs 21.9 (11.2 - 39.2) U/ml, p<0.001 in primary APS vs SLE with APS, respectively. Anti-D1 B2GP1, IgG and IgM anti PS/PT were associated with thrombotic and non-thrombotic manifestations. During follow-up, IgG B2GP1 were related with a significant cumulative risk of thrombosis. Conclusions: We found significant differences in serum titers of non-criteria aPL among patients with primary APS vs SLE with APS. Whether non-criteria aPL antibodies titers are useful to differentiate patients with primary and secondary APS requires further analysis in other populations.(AU)