Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 36
Filter
1.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 2024 Apr 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662240

ABSTRACT

Modern electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and the approval of nasal esketamine for clinical use have significantly improved the approach to treatment-resistant depression (TRD), which is defined as non-response to at least two different courses of antidepressants with verified adherence to treatment, adequate dosage, and duration of treatment. The goal of this literature review is to present the newest evidence regarding efficacy and safety. Furthermore, we aim to provide an overview of future perspectives in this field of research, for example, regarding structural and molecular effects. Both treatment methods will be critically evaluated for their individual advantages, disadvantages, and response rates. Firstly, we will discuss the well-established method of ECT and its different treatment modalities. Secondly, we will discuss the properties of ketamine, the discovery of its antidepressive effects and the route to clinical approval of the esketamine nasal spray. We will comment on research settings which have evaluated intravenous ketamine against ECT. The decision-making process between esketamine nasal spray or ECT should include the assessment of contraindications, age, severity of disease, presence of psychotic symptoms, patient preference and treatment accessibility. We conclude that both treatment options are highly effective in TRD. If both are indicated, pragmatically esketamine will be chosen before ECT; however, ECT studies in ketamine non-responders are missing.

2.
Transl Psychiatry ; 14(1): 42, 2024 Jan 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38242882

ABSTRACT

Defying the COVID-19 pandemic required restriction measures of unprecedented scale, that may induce and exacerbate psychiatric symptoms across the population. We aimed to assess in vivo dynamic effects of mitigation strategies on human brain neurobiology, neuroplastic as well as psychometric parameters. Three structural magnetic resonance imaging measurements, serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (sBDNF) analyses, and psychometric assessments (Beck Depression Inventory-II and Perceived Stress Questionnaire-20) were performed in healthy individuals and patients with a recurrent major depressive disorder in the period from September 2020 to July 2021. Group differences and changes over time in structural imaging, neuroplastic and psychometric parameters were assessed with linear mixed models. Analysis of data from 18 patients with a recurrent major depressive disorder and 28 healthy individuals showed clinically relevant scores for depression and stress in the patient group as well as significant cross-sectional differences in depression scores (F = 30.89, p < 0.001) and three subscales of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (Worries: F = 19.19, p < 0.001, Tension: F = 34.44, p < 0.001, Joy: F = 12.05, p = 0.001). Linear mixed models revealed no significant changes over time in cortical thickness of the prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala (F = 0.29, p > 0.1) and no interaction with group (F = 0.28, p > 0.1). Further, analysis revealed no main effect of time and no interaction of time x group in depressive symptoms, perceived stress subscales, and sBDNF (all p > 0.1). Despite the limited sample size, the strength of this investigation lies in the multimodal assessment of peri-pandemic lockdown effects. Nine months of varying restrictions measures did not result in observable changes in brain morphology nor impact depressive symptoms in either psychiatric patients with a recurrent major depressive disorder or healthy individuals. While these neurobiological and psychometric data stand in contrast to initial expectations about the effects of restriction measures, they might inform future investigations of longitudinal effects of restriction measures on mental health.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Depressive Disorder, Major , Humans , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Pandemics , Psychometrics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Neurobiology , Communicable Disease Control , Depression/pathology
3.
N Engl J Med ; 389(14): 1298-1309, 2023 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37792613

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In treatment-resistant depression, commonly defined as a lack of response to two or more consecutive treatments during the current depressive episode, the percentage of patients with remission is low and the percentage with relapse is high. The efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray as compared with extended-release quetiapine augmentation therapy, both in combination with ongoing treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), in patients with treatment-resistant depression are unknown. METHODS: In an open-label, single-blind (with raters unaware of group assignments), multicenter, phase 3b, randomized, active-controlled trial, we assigned patients, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive flexible doses (according to the summary of product characteristics) of esketamine nasal spray (esketamine group) or extended-release quetiapine (quetiapine group), both in combination with an SSRI or SNRI. The primary end point was remission, defined as a score of 10 or less on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), at week 8 (scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression). The key secondary end point was no relapse through week 32 after remission at week 8. All patients were included in the analysis; patients who discontinued the trial treatment were considered as having had an unfavorable outcome (i.e., they were grouped with patients who did not have remission or who had a relapse). Analyses of the primary and key secondary end points were adjusted for age and number of treatment failures. RESULTS: Overall, 336 patients were assigned to the esketamine group and 340 to the quetiapine group. More patients in the esketamine group than in the quetiapine group had remission at week 8 (91 of 336 patients [27.1%] vs. 60 of 340 patients [17.6%]; P = 0.003) and had no relapse through week 32 after remission at week 8 (73 of 336 patients [21.7%] vs. 48 of 340 patients [14.1%]). Over 32 weeks of follow-up, the percentage of patients with remission, the percentage of patients with a treatment response, and the change in the MADRS score from baseline favored esketamine nasal spray. The adverse events were consistent with the established safety profiles of the trial treatments. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with treatment-resistant depression, esketamine nasal spray plus an SSRI or SNRI was superior to extended-release quetiapine plus an SSRI or SNRI with respect to remission at week 8. (Funded by Janssen EMEA; ESCAPE-TRD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04338321.).


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant , Ketamine , Quetiapine Fumarate , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors , Humans , Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Delayed-Action Preparations , Depression/drug therapy , Drug Therapy, Combination , Nasal Sprays , Quetiapine Fumarate/administration & dosage , Quetiapine Fumarate/adverse effects , Quetiapine Fumarate/therapeutic use , Recurrence , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/adverse effects , Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Ketamine/adverse effects , Ketamine/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy
4.
Front Psychiatry ; 14: 1204009, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37575586

ABSTRACT

The non-benzodiazepine hypnotic zolpidem is frequently administered as a short term psychopharmacotherapy for insomnia. Although it is well-established in a broad clinical routine and often well-tolerated, severe delirium and complex sleep behavior were reported in rare cases. Hereby, it remains unclear whether zolpidem's potential for delirium might be enhanced when combined with further psychopharmacotherapeutics. The present case report portrays a young male Caucasian inpatient with schizoaffective disorder, who was admitted due to severe hyperactive delirium after a single dose of zolpidem 10 mg that was administered in addition to already established psychopharmacotherapy including clozapine 200 mg/day, aripiprazole 15 mg/day and cariprazine 4.5 mg/day. In detail, disorientation, agitation, confabulations, bizarre behavior, and anterograde amnesia occurred shortly after ingestion of zolpidem and gained in intensity within a couple of hours. Once zolpidem was discontinued, the abovementioned symptoms subsided completely and did not reoccur. Since a clear temporal association could be drawn between the intake of zolpidem and the onset of hyperactive delirium, the present clinical experience should serve as a cautionary note for combining potent sedative-hypnotics and substances with anticholinergic properties, even in young adults in a good general condition. Moreover, our case argues for the necessity of further research into the pathomechanism of the interaction potential of non-benzodiazepines as zolpidem, especially with substances exerting anticholinergic properties, which are known for their potential to precipitate delirium. Therefore, the metabolic pathways of the concurrently administered substances should be further taken into account.

5.
Front Psychiatry ; 14: 1203497, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37465252

ABSTRACT

The second-generation anticonvulsant lamotrigine is widely used in the psychiatric field as a mood stabilizer or antidepressant augmentation therapy. Although particularly older anticonvulsants are known for their potential to cause hypersensitivity syndromes, newer antiepileptic drugs do hold a certain risk as well. Presenting a case of a 32-year-old male inpatient of African ethnicity suffering from a primary severe depressive episode in the course of a recurrent major depressive disorder, we report the occurrence of a rapid-onset drug-induced pneumonitis. Herewith, the interstitial pneumonitis occurred after the initiation of 25 mg lamotrigine as an augmentation therapy. Except for the clear temporal correlation between the administration of lamotrigine and the onset of pneumonitis, we did not reveal any further potentially causal diagnostic hints. Importantly, no relevant genetic variations of metabolizing enzymes or drug interactions resulting in lamotrigine overdosage as a potential cause of toxicity were identified. Our experience with a potentially life-threatening adverse drug reaction shortly after the initiation of the largely well-tolerated lamotrigine suggests a potential side effect under the second-generation anticonvulsant although similar adverse events are deemed to be very rare.

6.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 147(5): 506-515, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36441117

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Delirium is an acute and fluctuating change in attention and cognition that increases the risk of functional decline, institutionalisation and death in hospitalised patients. After delirium, patients have a significantly higher risk of readmission to hospital. Our aim was to investigate factors associated with hospital readmission in people with delirium. METHODS: We carried out an observational retrospective cohort study using linked mental health care and hospitalisation records from South London. Logistic regression models were used to predict the odds of 30-day readmission and Cox proportional hazard models to calculate readmission risks when not restricting follow-up time. RESULTS: Of 2814 patients (mean age 78.9 years SD ±11.8) discharged from hospital after an episode of delirium, 823 (29.3%) were readmitted within 30 days. Depressed mood (odds ratio (OR) 1.34 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08-1.66)), moderate-to-severe physical health problems (OR 1.67 (95% CI 1.18-2.2.36)) and a history of serious circulatory disease (OR 1.29 (95% CI 1.07-1.55)) were associated with higher odds of hospital readmission, whereas a diagnosis of delirium superimposed on dementia (OR 0.67 (95% CI 0.53-0.84)) and problematic alcohol/substance (OR 0.54 (95% CI 0.33-0.89)) use were associated with lower odds. Cox proportionate hazard models showed similar results. CONCLUSION: Almost one-third of patients with delirium were readmitted within a short period of time, a more detailed understanding of the underlying risk factors could help prevent readmissions. Our findings indicate that the aetiology (as alcohol-related delirium), the recognition that delirium occurred in the context of dementia, as well as potentially modifiable factors, as depressed mood affect readmission risk, and should be assessed in clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Delirium , Dementia , Aged , Humans , Delirium/diagnosis , Delirium/epidemiology , Delirium/prevention & control , Electronic Health Records , Patient Readmission , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
7.
Front Psychiatry ; 13: 825546, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35669269

ABSTRACT

QT interval prolongation and ventricular tachyarrhythmia are potential adverse effects of antidepressant (AD) and antipsychotic- (AP) agents, especially when overdosed. Since AD and AP agents are often prescribed to patients suffering from suicidal intentions, it is essential to estimate these risks in the context of intoxications. This retrospective and naturalistic one-year registry study included 105 patients treated for oral intoxication at the University Department of Emergency Medicine in Vienna, Austria. AD/AP intoxications were present in 26 patients, while in the control group (n = 79) non-AD/AP drugs (n = 54) and exclusively alcohol (n = 25) were the toxic agents. QT intervals, the necessity of intubation, the extent of conscious state, and the subsequent discharge management were compared. The mean age was 34.94 ± 14.6 years, 62 patients (59%) were female. There were no significant between-group differences regarding QT prolongation >470 ms using Bazett's correction (p = 0.178), or >440 ms using Fridericia's correction (p = 0.760). No significant group differences concerning the need for intubation were observed (p = 0.747). The AD/AP and the control group did not significantly differ regarding Glasgow Coma Scale scores (p = 0.439). Patients with AD/AP intoxication were significantly more often transferred to the psychiatric department, while discharge to home was more likely in the control group (p = 0.002). These results suggest that the risk of a potentially life-threatening outcome in cases of intoxication with AD/AP is not substantially higher than in other easily available toxic agents, in line with the advantageous risk/benefit ratio of newer ADs and APs.

8.
Brain Stimul ; 14(4): 927-937, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34119669

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Increases in the volume of the amygdala and hippocampus after electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) are among the most robust effects known to the brain-imaging field. Recent advances in the segmentation of substructures of these regions allow for novel insights on the relationship between brain structure and clinical outcomes of ECT. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence available on changes in brain structure after ECT, including recently published data on hippocampal subfields. METHODS: A meta-analysis of published studies was carried out using random-effects models of standardized mean change of regional brain volumes measured with longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging of depressive patients before and after a series of ECT. RESULTS: Data from 21 studies (543 depressed patients) were analysed, including 6 studies (118 patients) on hippocampal subfields. Meta-analyses could be carried out for seven brain regions for which data from at least three published studies was available. We observed increases in left and right hippocampi, amygdalae, cornua ammonis (CA) 1, CA 2/3, dentate gyri (DG) and subicula with standardized mean change scores ranging between 0.34 and 1.15. The model did not reveal significant volume increases in the caudate. Meta-regression indicated a negative relationship between the reported increases in the DG and relative symptom improvement (-0.27 (SE: 0.09) per 10%). CONCLUSIONS: ECT is accompanied by significant volume increases in the bilateral hippocampus and amygdala that are not associated with treatment outcome. Among hippocampal subfields, the most robust volume increases after ECT were measured in the dentate gyrus. The indicated negative correlation of this effect with antidepressant efficacy warrants replication in data of individual patients.


Subject(s)
Electroconvulsive Therapy , Amygdala/diagnostic imaging , Depression , Hippocampus/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging
9.
Depress Anxiety ; 38(9): 896-906, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34110066

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sex-related effects on the evolution and phenotype of major depressive disorder (MDD) were reported previously. METHODS: This European multicenter cross-sectional study compared sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment patterns between males and females in a real-world sample of 1410 in- and outpatients with current MDD. RESULTS: Male MDD patients (33.1%) were rather inpatients, suffered from moderate to high suicidality levels, received noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (ADs) as first-line AD treatment, generally higher mean AD daily doses, and showed a trend towards a more frequent administration of add-on treatments. Female MDD patients (66.9%) were rather outpatients, experienced lower suicidality levels, comorbid thyroid dysfunction, migraine, asthma, and a trend towards earlier disease onset. CONCLUSIONS: The identified divergencies may contribute to the concept of male and female depressive syndromes and serve as predictors of disease severity and course, as they reflect phenomena that were repeatedly related to treatment-resistant depression (TRD). Especially the greater necessity of inpatient treatment and more complex psychopharmacotherapy in men may reflect increased therapeutic efforts undertaken to treat suicidality and to avoid TRD. Hence, considering sex may guide the diagnostic and treatment processes towards targeting challenging clinical manifestations including comorbidities and suicidality, and prevention of TRD and chronicity.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male
10.
J Affect Disord ; 286: 149-157, 2021 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33725614

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While the association between relationship status and the development of depressive symptoms in the general population were reported previously, its relation to the severity and the course of major depressive disorder (MDD) as well as the treatment patterns and response rates needs to be elucidated. METHODS: The present international multicenter cross-sectional study performed by the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression (GSRD) investigated socio-demographic and clinical patterns of relationship status in a real-world sample of 1410 adult in- and outpatients with MDD as primary diagnosis. RESULTS: While 49.9% of all MDD patients were partnered, 25.4% were separated, and 24.8% were single. Single relationship status was linked to younger mean age, earlier mean age of onset, and current suicidal risk. Being separated was related to older mean age, unemployment, greater symptom severity, current suicidal risk, and add-on treatment strategies. Partnered relationship status was associated with less frequent current suicidal risk. LIMITATIONS: The retrospective assessment of treatment response that was exclusively based on psychopharmacotherapeutic strategies should be critically considered and weighed while interpreting the present results providing novel insights into the complex interaction of relationship status with the clinical phenotype of MDD. CONCLUSIONS: Although MDD patients living in relationships do not seem to be omitted from the evolution of MDD, they may be spared from chronicity and suicidality. Hence, being aware of the current relationship status might support clinicians in the diagnostic and therapeutic process towards optimized management of such challenging clinical phenomena and their negative consequences.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Humans , Outpatients , Retrospective Studies
11.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 41: 70-80, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046351

ABSTRACT

Since many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not satisfactorily respond to initial antidepressant monotherapy, add-on treatment strategies with other psychiatric compounds are often established. The present European multicenter cross-sectional study comprising 1410 MDD in- and outpatients investigated the prescription pattern of benzodiazepines as add-on treatment in the psychopharmacotherapy of MDD. Analyses of variance, chi-squared tests, and logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine differences in socio-demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics between benzodiazepine users and non-users. The prescription rate for adjunctive benzodiazepine treatment amounted to 31.35%. The most often administered benzodiazepines were lorazepam (11.13%), clonazepam (6.74%), and alprazolam (6.60%). Benzodiazepine users exhibited more severe depressive symptoms expressed by a higher mean Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score at study entry (26.92 ± 11.07 vs 23.55 ± 11.23, p<.0001) and at the beginning of the current major depressive episode (35.74 ± 8.08 vs 33.31 ± 7.40, p<.0001). Furthermore, they were characterized by a higher proportion of patients receiving additional augmentation/combination medications with antidepressants (40.95% vs 24.28%, p<.0001), antipsychotics (41.63% vs 18.39%, p<.0001), and low-potency antipsychotics (10.18% vs 4.75%, p<.0001). Moreover, benzodiazepine prescription was associated with older age, unemployment, inpatient treatment, suicide risk, psychotic and melancholic features, comorbid panic disorder, agoraphobia, social phobia, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Taken together, our findings indicate that benzodiazepine augmentation in MDD is first of all established in severe/difficult-to-treat conditions and serves as predictor for the use of additional augmentation/combination treatment strategies.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/administration & dosage , Benzodiazepines/administration & dosage , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Drug Therapy, Combination , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
12.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol ; 23(9): 571-577, 2020 12 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32885810

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The present multicenter study aimed at defining the clinical profile of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid migraine. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information for 1410 MDD patients with vs without concurrent migraine were compared by descriptive statistics, analyses of covariance, and binary logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The point prevalence rate for comorbid migraine was 13.5% for female and 6.2% for male patients. MDD + migraine patients were significantly younger, heavier, more likely female, of non-Caucasian origin, outpatient, and suffering from asthma. The presence of MDD + migraine resulted in a significantly higher functional disability. First-line antidepressant treatment strategy revealed a trend towards agomelatine. Second-generation antipsychotics were significantly less often administered for augmentation treatment in migraineurs. Overall, MDD + migraine patients tended to respond worse to their pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSION: Treatment guidelines for comorbid depression and migraine are warranted to ensure optimal efficacy and avoid possible pitfalls in psychopharmacotherapy, including serotonin syndrome.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant , Migraine Disorders , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Adult , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/physiopathology , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prevalence
14.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol ; 23(1): 20-25, 2020 03 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31740958

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment-resistant depression is among the most debilitating conditions in psychiatry. Recent studies have associated alterations in white matter microstructure measured with magnetic resonance imaging with poor antidepressant response. Therefore, the extent to which electroconvulsive therapy, the most effective therapeutic option for treatment-resistant depression, affects white matter microstructure warrants investigation. METHODS: A total 13 patients suffering from severe unipolar treatment-resistant depression underwent magnetic resonance imaging with a diffusion tensor imaging sequence before and after undergoing a series of right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy. Diffusivity metrics were compared voxel-wise using tract-based spatial statistics and repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS: A total 12 patients responded to electroconvulsive therapy and 9 were classified as remitters. An increase in axial diffusivity was observed in the posterior limb of the internal capsule of the right hemisphere (PFWE ≤ .05). The increase in this area was higher in the right compared with the left hemisphere (P < .05). No correlation of this effect with treatment response could be found. CONCLUSIONS: The strong lateralization of effects to the hemisphere of electrical stimulation suggests an effect of electroconvulsive therapy on diffusivity metrics which is dependent of electrode placement. Investigation in controlled studies is necessary to reveal to what extent the effects of electroconvulsive therapy on white matter microstructure are related to clinical outcomes and electrode placement.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/diagnostic imaging , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/therapy , Diffusion Tensor Imaging , Electroconvulsive Therapy , White Matter/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Internal Capsule/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult
16.
Compr Psychiatry ; 93: 20-26, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31280143

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this repeated cross-sectional study was to compare patients from a psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU) over ≫30 years regarding their diagnostic and therapeutic characteristics. METHOD: Three samples including 100 consecutive inpatients each from the Viennese PICU were submitted to a chart review: sample no. 1 from the years 1985/86, no. 2 from 1995/96 and no. 3 from 2007/08. RESULTS: Changes in referral modes were associated with a decrease of patients with substance induced disorders and an increase of patients with affective disorders over time. The rate of admissions after accidents and suicides was stable. The use of cranial MRI increased, while intravenous psychopharmacotherapy and parenteral nutrition decreased. Involuntary admission occurred in 43% and in 37% of patients physical restraints were necessary. We saw a shift from tricyclic antidepressants to SSRIs and SNRIs from sample 1 to 3. Likewise, we observed the emergence of atypical antipsychotics and a reduction of use of typical neuroleptics mainly from sample 2 to 3. The percentage of patients receiving benzodiazepines increased over time, while the mean dosage of benzodiazepines decreased. 7% of patients received electroconvulsive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The changes over time in our samples reflect the medical progress made during the last decades. Future studies should focus on evaluation of efficacy of psychiatric intensive care using standardized measurements.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Electroconvulsive Therapy/trends , Intensive Care Units/trends , Mental Disorders/therapy , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/trends , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Austria/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electroconvulsive Therapy/psychology , Female , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Inpatients/psychology , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Suicide/psychology , Suicide/trends , Time Factors , Young Adult , Suicide Prevention
17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31054944

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The major aim of this multicenter study of the European Group for the Study of Resistant Depression (GSRD) was to elucidate associations between major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid diabetes. METHODS: Demographic and clinical information of 1410 patients with a primary MDD diagnosis according to DSM-IV were retrieved cross-sectionally between 2012 and 2016. By applying descriptive statistics, analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) and binary logistic regression analyses, a comparison between patient characteristics with and without comorbid diabetes was performed. RESULTS: The point prevalence rate for comorbid diabetes across MDD patients was 6%. Individuals with MDD + comorbid diabetes were significantly older, heavier, more likely to be inpatient and diagnosed with additional comorbid chronic somatic diseases. In addition, current suicide risk was significantly increased and melancholic features were more likely pronounced. In general, patients in the MDD + diabetes group received a combination therapy with at least one additional antidepressant rather than various other augmentation strategies. CONCLUSION: Our analyses depict a lower prevalence rate of diabetes in MDD patients than previous studies. However, in light of the prevalence of diabetes in the geographical area of the study, we found an increased risk for individuals with depression compared to the general population. Current suicide risk is markedly elevated and has to be thoroughly assessed in every patient with comorbid diabetes. Depression severity and treatment response remained unaffected by concurrent diabetes in MDD.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
18.
Brain Stimul ; 12(4): 1041-1050, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31000384

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The induction of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) release and subsequent restoration of neuroplastic homeostasis may underlie the effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess serum and plasma BDNF levels during the course of acute ECT, as well as before and after subsequent continuation ECT, in patients with depression. METHODS: We included 24 patients with major depressive disorder (mean age ±â€¯SD: 54.5 ±â€¯13.7; f/m: 17/7; baseline 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of 26.79 ±â€¯4.01). Serum and plasma BDNF (sBDNF, pBDNF) levels were assessed at nine time-points before, during, and after acute ECT series. Data were analysed using linear regression and linear mixed models, which were adjusted for multiple comparisons via Bonferroni correction. Five patients received continuation ECT subsequent to the acute ECT series. In these patients, BDNF levels were assessed before and after each two continuation ECT sessions using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: Relative to baseline (mean ng/ml ±SD: 24.68 ±â€¯14.40), sBDNF levels were significantly higher 1 day (33.04 ±â€¯14.11, p = 0.013, corrected), 1 week (37.03 ±â€¯10.29, p < 0.001, corrected), and 1 month (41.05 ±â€¯10.67, p = 0.008, corrected) after the final ECT session, while pBDNF levels did not significantly differ (p > 0.1). Furthermore, our results indicated that sBDNF levels increased after each continuation ECT session. There was no significant association between sBDNF levels and clinical parameters or treatment response. CONCLUSION: The absence of an association between changes in sBDNF levels and depressive symptoms challenges the proposed concept of sBDNF/pBDNF as key markers of the effects of ECT.


Subject(s)
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor/blood , Depressive Disorder, Major/blood , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Electroconvulsive Therapy/methods , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Electroconvulsive Therapy/trends , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology , Treatment Outcome
19.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 29(6): 777-785, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31006562

ABSTRACT

The objective of the present multicenter study was to elucidate relevant associations between major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid hypertension that are known for their frequent co-occurrence and interaction with regard to functional disability. Demographic and clinical information of altogether 1410 patients were retrieved cross-sectionally. Consecutively, a comparison of patient characteristics between MDD subjects with and without comorbid hypertension were conducted by descriptive statistics, analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) and binary logistic regression analyses. The point prevalence rate for comorbid hypertension was 18.9%. Patients with MDD+comorbid hypertension were significantly older, heavier, more likely to be in a relationship, inpatient and diagnosed with further comorbid chronic somatic diseases including heart disease, diabetes and thyroid dysfunction. In addition, individuals with MDD and comorbid hypertension exhibited a higher score at the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) at onset of the current depressive episode. Melancholic features of depression showed a higher probability. The first line antidepressant treatment did not differ significantly between MDD subjects with versus without comorbid hypertension. Augmentation with pregabalin and combination with one additional antidepressant, however, were more common in the MDD+hypertension group. In conclusion, high blood pressure may influence illness severity and is associated with a distinct psychopathology in MDD patients. Patients with MDD and comorbid hypertension, that seems to be underdiagnosed in MDD patients compared to the general population, are subject to additional somatic diseases in almost 100 percent of the cases and hence, need to be screened and treated accordingly.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Hypertension/complications , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Body Weight , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Disability Evaluation , Drug Therapy, Combination , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Socioeconomic Factors
20.
Brain Stimul ; 12(3): 714-723, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30635228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) constitutes one of the most effective antidepressant treatment strategies in major depression (MDD). Despite its common use and uncontested efficacy, its mechanism of action is still insufficiently understood. Previously, we showed that ECT is accompanied by a global decrease of serotonin-1A receptors in MDD; however, further studies to investigate the involvement of the serotonergic system in the mechanism of action of ECT are warranted. The monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) represents an important target for antidepressant treatments and was found to be increased in MDD. Here, we investigated whether ECT impacts on MAO-A levels in treatment-resistant patients (TRD). METHODS: 16 TRD patients (12 female, age 45.94 ±â€¯9.68 years, HAMD 25.12 ±â€¯3.16) with unipolar depression according to DSM-IV were scanned twice before (PET1 and PET2, to assess test-retest variability under constant psychopharmacotherapy) and once after (PET3) completing a minimum of eight unilateral ECT sessions using positron emission tomography and the radioligand [11C]harmine to assess cerebral MAO-A distribution volumes (VT). Age- and sex-matched healthy subjects (HC) were measured once. RESULTS: Response rate to ECT was 87.5%. MAO-A VT was found to be significantly reduced after ECT in TRD patients (-3.8%) when assessed in 27 a priori defined ROIs (p < 0.001). Test-retest variability between PET1 and PET2 was 3.1%. MAO-A VT did not significantly differ between TRD patients and HC at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The small effect size of the significant reduction of MAO-A VT after ECT in the range of test-retest variability does not support the hypothesis of a clinically relevant mechanism of action of ECT based on MAO-A. Furthermore, in contrast to studies reporting elevated MAO-A VT in unmedicated depressed patients, MAO-A levels were found to be similar in TRD patients and HC which might be attributed to the continuous antidepressant pharmacotherapy in the present sample.


Subject(s)
Brain/diagnostic imaging , Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant/therapy , Electroconvulsive Therapy/adverse effects , Monoamine Oxidase/metabolism , Adult , Brain/metabolism , Brain/physiopathology , Electroconvulsive Therapy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Positron-Emission Tomography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL