ABSTRACT
Background: Multiple primary malignant tumors (MPMTs) pose a significant clinical challenge, denoting the occurrence of two or more distinct malignant tumors with differing histological characteristics, all diagnosed within a 6-month timeframe. MPMT is a rare condition and due to the unique treatment requirements for each specific cancer type, it is crucial for healthcare professionals to accurately differentiate between metastatic growth and distinct primary tumors. Case Description: In this case report, we present a 41-year-old female patient who received diagnoses of three separate synchronous primary tumors. The patient presented for evaluation of a right breast mass that had been present for 1 year. Initial diagnostic tests, including mammography and ultrasound, did not provide any conclusive results. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast prompted an ultrasound-guided biopsy which confirmed moderately differentiated invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). During pre-surgical testing, a suspicious opacity was detected on a chest X-ray, prompting further investigation with a computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest to distinguish between metastatic disease and a potential new primary tumor. Clinical and pathological examinations revealed the presence of bilateral masses originating from two different origins: invasive mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma in the left lower lobe and a neuroendocrine carcinoma in the right middle lobe of the lung. Conclusions: Cases of this nature present a complex challenge to physicians and underscore the critical importance of maintaining a high level of clinical suspicion to ensure the delivery of high-quality care. Effective management of such patients requires a multidisciplinary collaboration among breast surgeons, thoracic surgeons, and medical and radiation oncologists.
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Assessment and response to patients' spiritual concerns are crucial components of high-quality supportive care. Better measures of spiritual needs across the cultural spectrum may help direct necessary interventions. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess spiritual needs in a racially/ethnically and religiously mixed sample of hematology and oncology outpatients and examine the association between spiritual needs and perception of quality of care and satisfaction with care. METHODS: This is an observational study of 727 racially/ethnically and religiously diverse outpatients. Spiritual needs were measured using a validated, 23-item questionnaire, the Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients. Scales were administered in four languages. RESULTS: Forty-four percent were white, 13% Hispanic, 25% black, and 14% Asian. English was the primary language for 57%; 59% considered themselves "spiritual but not religious." At least one spiritual need was reported by 79%. Forty-eight percent were comfortable having their physician inquire about spiritual needs. Compared with English-speaking patients, Russian-speaking patients reported lower spiritual needs (P = 0.003). Patients who considered themselves "spiritual but not religious" (P = 0.006) reported a higher level of spiritual needs. Higher spiritual needs were associated with less satisfaction with care (P = 0.018) and lower perception of quality of care (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Spiritual needs are common in an ethnically, religiously, and linguistically diverse cancer patient population but may differ by cultural background. High levels of spiritual need are associated with lower levels of satisfaction and diminished perception of quality of care. Training clinicians to address patients' spiritual concerns, with attention to cultural differences, may improve patients' experiences of care.