ABSTRACT
Divalent metal-iron transporter 1 (DMT1) is a mammalian iron transporter encoded by the SLC11A2 gene. DMT1 has a vital role in iron homeostasis by mediating iron uptake in the intestine and kidneys and by recovering iron from recycling endosomes after transferrin endocytosis. Mutations in SLC11A2 cause an ultra-rare hypochromic microcytic anemia with iron overload (AHMIO1), which has been described in eight patients so far. Here, we report two novel cases of this disease. The first proband is homozygous for a new SLC11A2 splicing variant (c.762 + 35A > G), becoming the first ever patient reported with a SLC11A2 splicing mutation in homozygosity. Splicing studies performed in this work confirm its pathogenicity. The second proband harbors the previously reported DMT1 G75R mutation in homozygosis. Functional studies with the G75R mutation in HuTu 80 cells demonstrate that this mutation results in improper DMT1 accumulation in lysosomes, which correlates with a significant decrease in DMT1 levels in patient-derived lymphoblast cell lines (LCLs). We also suggest that recombinant erythropoietin would be an adequate therapeutic approach for AHMIO1 patients as it improves their anemic state and may possibly contribute to mobilizing excessive hepatic iron.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Hypochromic , Anemia , Iron Overload , Anemia/genetics , Anemia, Hypochromic/genetics , Animals , Humans , Iron/metabolism , Iron Overload/metabolism , Mammals/metabolism , MutationABSTRACT
INTRODUCCIÓN: La atención al final de la vida de los niños debe ser sensible a las necesidades del niño y de su familia. Necesitamos entender la enfermedad desde la perspectiva de los padres que se enfrentan a la muerte de su hijo, para poder mejorar la calidad y guiar el desarrollo de la atención al final de la vida en Pediatría. MÉTODO: Estudio observacional retrospectivo a través de cuestionario, para evaluar las necesidades, experiencias y satisfacción con la atención recibida, de una muestra de padres que perdieron un hijo por una causa previsible, entre junio de 2014 y junio de 2017. Diferenciamos tres grupos de estudio en función del equipo responsable de la atención al final de la vida, y las diferencias entre el grupo atendido por el equipo de cuidados paliativos pediátricos, el grupo atendido por pediatras no paliativistas y el grupo neonatal, son analizadas. RESULTADOS: De las 80 familias elegibles, 64 pudieron ser contactadas y 28 (43,8%) finalmente completaron el cuestionario. Nuestro estudio muestra experiencias positivas y alta satisfacción de los padres con la atención recibida al final de la vida de su hijo. Las puntuaciones más altas tanto en experiencias como en satisfacción, fueron otorgadas por los padres de los niños atendidos por el equipo de cuidados paliativos pediátricos con diferencias estadísticamente significativas en apoyo a la familia, comunicación, toma de decisiones compartida y atención en torno a la muerte (p < 0,05). CONCLUSIONES: Los padres están satisfechos con la atención recibida al final de la vida de sus hijos, pero la intervención de un equipo específico de cuidados paliativos pediátricos mejora la calidad de la atención al final de la vida en pediatría
INTRODUCTION: The care at the end of children's lives must be sensitive to the needs of the child and their family. An understanding of the illness is required from the perspective of parents faced with the death of their child, in order to improve quality and guide the development of end-of-life care in Paediatrics. METHOD: A retrospective observational study was conducted between June 2014 and June 2017 using a questionnaire, to assess the needs, experiences, and satisfaction with the care received, from a sample of parents who lost a child due to a foreseeable cause. Three different study groups were formed based on the team responsible for end-of-life care, and an analysis was carried out on the differences between the group treated by the paediatric palliative care team, the roup attended by non-palliative paediatricians, and the neonatal group. RESULTS: Of the 80 eligible families, 64 could be contacted, and 28 (43.8%) finally completed the questionnaire. Our study shows positive experiences and high satisfaction of parents with the care received at the end of their child's life. The highest scores in experiences and satisfaction were given by the parents of the children served by the paediatric palliative care team, with statistically significant differences in family support, communication, shared decision making, and bereavement support (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Parents are satisfied with the care received at the end of their children's lives, but the intervention of a specific paediatric palliative care team improves the quality of care at the end of life in paediatrics
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Attitude to Health , Palliative Care/standards , Parents/psychology , Patient Care Team/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Professional-Family Relations , Terminal Care/standards , Health Care Surveys , Needs Assessment , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Palliative Care/psychology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Pediatrics/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Terminal Care/methods , Terminal Care/organization & administration , Terminal Care/psychologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The care at the end of children's lives must be sensitive to the needs of the child and their family. An understanding of the illness is required from the perspective of parents faced with the death of their child, in order to improve quality and guide the development of end-of-life care in Paediatrics. METHOD: A retrospective observational study was conducted between June 2014 and June 2017 using a questionnaire, to assess the needs, experiences, and satisfaction with the care received, from a sample of parents who lost a child due to a foreseeable cause. Three different study groups were formed based on the team responsible for end-of-life care, and an analysis was carried out on the differences between the group treated by the paediatric palliative care team, the group attended by non-palliative paediatricians, and the neonatal group. RESULTS: Of the 80 eligible families, 64 could be contacted, and 28 (43.8%) finally completed the questionnaire. Our study shows positive experiences and high satisfaction of parents with the care received at the end of their child's life. The highest scores in experiences and satisfaction were given by the parents of the children served by the paediatric palliative care team, with statistically significant differences in family support, communication, shared decision making, and bereavement support (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Parents are satisfied with the care received at the end of their children's lives, but the intervention of a specific paediatric palliative care team improves the quality of care at the end of life in paediatrics.
Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Palliative Care/standards , Parents/psychology , Patient Care Team/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Professional-Family Relations , Terminal Care/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Palliative Care/psychology , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Pediatrics/methods , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , Terminal Care/methods , Terminal Care/organization & administration , Terminal Care/psychology , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Patients with Fanconi anaemia (FA), a rare DNA repair genetic disease, exhibit chromosome fragility, bone marrow failure, malformations and cancer susceptibility. FA molecular diagnosis is challenging since FA is caused by point mutations and large deletions in 22 genes following three heritability patterns. To optimise FA patients' characterisation, we developed a simplified but effective methodology based on whole exome sequencing (WES) and functional studies. METHODS: 68 patients with FA were analysed by commercial WES services. Copy number variations were evaluated by sequencing data analysis with RStudio. To test FANCA missense variants, wt FANCA cDNA was cloned and variants were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis. Vectors were then tested for their ability to complement DNA repair defects of a FANCA-KO human cell line generated by TALEN technologies. RESULTS: We identified 93.3% of mutated alleles including large deletions. We determined the pathogenicity of three FANCA missense variants and demonstrated that two FANCA variants reported in mutations databases as 'affecting functions' are SNPs. Deep analysis of sequencing data revealed patients' true mutations, highlighting the importance of functional analysis. In one patient, no pathogenic variant could be identified in any of the 22 known FA genes, and in seven patients, only one deleterious variant could be identified (three patients each with FANCA and FANCD2 and one patient with FANCE mutations) CONCLUSION: WES and proper bioinformatics analysis are sufficient to effectively characterise patients with FA regardless of the rarity of their complementation group, type of mutations, mosaic condition and DNA source.
