Evaluation and 1-year follow-up of patients presenting at a Lyme borreliosis expertise centre: a prospective cohort study with validated questionnaires.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the course of symptoms reported by patients with symptoms attributed to Lyme borreliosis (LB) without being subsequently diagnosed with LB. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study with patients presenting at the outpatient clinic of two clinical LB centres. The primary outcome was the prevalence of persistent symptoms, which were defined as clinically relevant fatigue (CIS, subscale fatigue), pain (SF-36, subscale bodily pain), and cognitive impairment (CFQ) for ≥ 6 months and onset < 6 months over the first year of follow-up. Outcomes were compared with a longitudinal cohort of confirmed LB patients and a general population cohort. Prevalences were standardised to the distribution of pre-defined confounders in the confirmed LB cohort. RESULTS: Participants (n = 123) reported mostly fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia, and paraesthesia as symptoms. The primary outcome could be determined for 74.8% (92/123) of participants. The standardised prevalence of persistent symptoms in our participants was 58.6%, which was higher than in patients with confirmed LB at baseline (27.2%, p < 0.0001) and the population cohort (21.2%, p < 0.0001). Participants reported overall improvement of fatigue (p < 0.0001) and pain (p < 0.0001) but not for cognitive impairment (p = 0.062) during the follow-up, though symptom severity at the end of follow-up remained greater compared to confirmed LB patients (various comparisons p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with symptoms attributed to LB who present at clinical LB centres without physician-confirmed LB more often report persistent symptoms and report more severe symptoms compared to confirmed LB patients and a population cohort.

Ticking on Pandora's box: a prospective case-control study into 'other' tick-borne diseases.

BACKGROUND: Tick-borne pathogens other than Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato - the causative agent of Lyme borreliosis - are common in Ixodes ricinus ticks. How often these pathogens cause human disease is unknown. In addition, diagnostic tools to identify such diseases are lacking or reserved to research laboratories. To elucidate their prevalence and disease burden, the study 'Ticking on Pandora's Box' has been initiated, a collaborative effort between Amsterdam University Medical Center and the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment. METHODS: The study investigates how often the tick-borne pathogens Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Babesia species, Borrelia miyamotoi, Neoehrlichia mikurensis, spotted fever group Rickettsia species and/or tick-borne encephalitis virus cause an acute febrile illness after tick-bite. We aim to determine the impact and severity of these tick-borne diseases in the Netherlands by measuring their prevalence and describing their clinical picture and course of disease. The study is designed as a prospective case-control study. We aim to include 150 cases - individuals clinically suspected of a tick-borne disease - and 3 matched healthy control groups of 200 persons each. The controls consist respectively of a group of individuals with either a tick-bite without complaints, the general population and of healthy blood donors. During a one-year follow-up we will acquire blood, urine and skin biopsy samples and ticks at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. Additionally, participants answer modified versions of validated questionnaires to assess self-reported symptoms, among which the SF-36, on a 3 monthly basis. DISCUSSION: This article describes the background and design of the study protocol of 'Ticking on Pandora's Box'. With our study we hope to provide insight into the prevalence, clinical presentation and disease burden of the tick-borne diseases anaplasmosis, babesiosis, B. miyamotoi disease, neoehrlichiosis, rickettsiosis and tick-borne encephalitis and to assist in test development as well as provide recommendations for national guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL9258 (retrospectively registered at Netherlands Trial Register, trialregister.nl in in February 2021).

Validation of cellular tests for Lyme borreliosis (VICTORY) study.

BACKGROUND: Lyme borreliosis (LB) is a tick-borne disease caused by spirochetes belonging to the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species. Due to a variety of clinical manifestations, diagnosing LB can be challenging, and laboratory work-up is usually required in case of disseminated LB. However, the current standard of diagnostics is serology, which comes with several shortcomings. Antibody formation may be absent in the early phase of the disease, and once IgG-seroconversion has occurred, it can be difficult to distinguish between a past (cured or self-cleared) LB and an active infection. It has been postulated that novel cellular tests for LB may have both higher sensitivity earlier in the course of the disease, and may be able to discriminate between a past and active infection. METHODS: VICTORY is a prospective two-gate case-control study. We strive to include 150 patients who meet the European case definitions for either localized or disseminated LB. In addition, we aim to include 225 healthy controls without current LB and 60 controls with potentially cross-reactive conditions. We will perform four different cellular tests in all of these participants, which will allow us to determine sensitivity and specificity. In LB patients, we will repeat cellular tests at 6 weeks and 12 weeks after start of antibiotic treatment to assess the usefulness as 'test-of-cure'. Furthermore, we will investigate the performance of the different cellular tests in a cohort of patients with persistent symptoms attributed to LB. DISCUSSION: This article describes the background and design of the VICTORY study protocol. The findings of our study will help to better appreciate the utility of cellular tests in the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NL7732 (Netherlands Trial Register, trialregister.nl).

Detection of varicose vein recurrence by duplex ultrasound: intra- and interobserver reproducibility.

In a long-term follow-up study comparing saphenofemoral ligation and stripping with endovenous laser ablation, the groin is examined yearly by duplex ultrasound (DUS) to detect postoperative varicose vein recurrence. Clear criteria are needed for the uniformity of DUS observations. Physicians taking care of the follow-up were evaluated by an intra- and interobserver analysis. DUS films of 22 patients with no recurrence and 22 patients with recurrence of varicose veins were twice interpreted in two sessions. Observations were analysed by a kappa test. Interpretations of DUS by experienced observers show a kappa >7. Improved kappa results were measured over time in our physician in training. In conclusion, the reproducibility of DUS studies performed by the experienced observers of the study is excellent.

Randomised controlled trial comparing sapheno-femoral ligation and stripping of the great saphenous vein with endovenous laser ablation (980 nm) using local tumescent anaesthesia: one year results.

OBJECTIVES: Comparison of sapheno-femoral ligation and stripping (SFL/S) versus endovenous laser ablation (EVLA, 980-nm) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency, using local tumescent anaesthesia. DESIGN: Randomised, single centre trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with GSV incompetence and varicose veins were randomised to either SFL/S or EVLA. At days 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, and 14 post-treatment, patients completed questionnaires on pain and quality of life. Recurrent varicose veins were evaluated by Duplex ultrasound (DUS) performed at 1 and 6 weeks, and 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: 130 legs in 121 patients were treated by SFL/S (n=68) or EVLA (n=62). Significantly more post-treatment pain was noted after EVLA at days 7, 10 and 14 (p<0.01; p<0.01; p=0.01), more hindrance in mobility at days 7 (p<0.01) and 10 (p=0.01), and in self care (p=0.03) and daily activities (p=0.01) at day 7 compared to SFL/S. DUS at 1-year follow-up showed 9% recurrences (5/56) after EVLA and 10% (5/49) after SFL/S. CONCLUSION: Both SFL/S and EVLA, using local tumescent anaesthesia, were well tolerated, with no difference in short-term recurrence rate. In the second week after EVLA, patients experienced significantly more pain resulting in restricted mobility, self care and daily activity compared to SFL/S.

Exhaled nitric oxide predicts lung function decline in difficult-to-treat asthma.

A subset of patients with asthma is known to have progressive loss of lung function despite treatment with corticosteroids. The aim of the present study was to identify risk factors of decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma. In total, 136 nonsmoking patients with difficult-to-treat asthma were recruited between 1998 and 1999. Follow-up assessment was performed 5-6 yrs later in 98 patients. The predictive effect of clinical characteristics and inflammatory markers were analysed at baseline (asthma onset and duration, atopy, airway hyperresponsiveness, blood and sputum eosinophils, and the fraction of nitric oxide in exhaled air (F(eNO))) on subsequent decline in post-bronchodilator FEV(1). Patients with high F(eNO) (> or =20 ppb) had an excess decline of 40.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.3-73.2) mL.yr(-1) compared to patients with low F(eNO). F(eNO) > or =20 ppb was associated with a relative risk of 1.9 (95% CI, 1.1-2.6) of having an accelerated (> or =25 mL.yr(-1)) decline in FEV(1). In patients with baseline FEV(1) > or =80% of predicted, this relationship was even stronger: 90 versus 29% had accelerated decline in FEV(1) (F(eNO) > or =20 ppb versus F(eNO) <20 ppb respectively; relative risk 3.1 (95% CI, 1.7-3.4). Exhaled nitric oxide is a predictor of accelerated decline in lung function in patients with difficult-to-treat asthma, particularly if forced expiratory volume in one second is still normal.

Alveolar nitric oxide versus measures of peripheral airway dysfunction in severe asthma.

Alveolar nitric oxide (NO) is a measure of peripheral airway inflammation in asthma, potentially associated with disease severity. The relationship between alveolar NO and physiological tests of peripheral airway (dys)function has not been investigated. The present authors hypothesised that peripheral airway inflammation and dysfunction are inter-related and associated with asthma severity. Alveolar NO was compared between 17 patients with mild-to-moderate asthma and 14 patients with severe asthma and related to total lung capacity (TLC), residual volume (RV)/TLC, thoracic gas volume (FRC), slope of the single breath nitrogen washout curve (dN2), closing capacity (CC)/TLC and fall in forced vital capacity at the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second. In patients with severe asthma, strong correlations were found between alveolar NO and RV/TLC % pred, FRC % pred, dN2, and CC/TLC. Patients with oral steroid-dependent asthma had higher alveolar NO levels (2.7 ppb) compared with the other patients with severe (0.6 ppb) and mild-to-moderate asthma (0.3 ppb). The present authors conclude that alveolar nitric oxide is closely related to parameters of peripheral airway dysfunction in patients with severe asthma, and that oral steroid-dependent asthmatics have more peripheral airway disease than nonsteroid-dependent asthmatics. This suggests that patients on chronic oral steroid treatment have more extensive disease and require additional anti-inflammatory treatment to better target the peripheral airways.

Efficacy of the novel phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor BAY 19-8004 on lung function and airway inflammation in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Selective inhibitors of phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibit the hydrolysis of intracellular cAMP, which may result in bronchodilation and suppression of inflammation. We examined the effect of 1 week treatment with BAY 19-8004 (5 mg once daily), a novel orally administered PDE4 inhibitor, on trough FEV1 and markers of inflammation in induced sputum in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Seven patients with asthma (mean [SD] FEV1 69.5 [9.3]% predicted; reversibility in FEV1 26.2 [10.1]%; all non-smokers) and 11 patients with COPD (FEV1 58.6 [8.3]% predicted; reversibility in FEV1 6.5 [4.7]%; median [range] 44 [21-90] pack years of smoking) were included in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. FEV1 was measured before and after 1 week of treatment; sputum was induced by 4.5% saline inhalation on the last day of treatment. FEV1 did not improve during either treatment in both patient groups (p>0.2). Sputum cell counts were not different following placebo and BAY 19-8004 treatment in asthma and COPD patients (p>0.2). However, only in patients with COPD, small but significant reductions in sputum levels of albumin and eosinophil cationic protein were observed (p<0.05). In conclusion, 1 week of treatment with the selective PDE4 inhibitor BAY 19-8004 does not affect FEV1 and sputum cell numbers in patients with asthma or COPD. However, such treatment does seem to reduce levels of albumin and eosinophil cationic protein in sputum samples obtained from patients with COPD.

Does a single dose of the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, cilomilast (15 mg), induce bronchodilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

Maintenance treatment with PDE(4) inhibitor cilomilast improves FEV(1) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. We investigated the acute bronchodilating effects of a single dose of cilomilast with or without concomitant administration of inhaled salbutamol and/or ipratropium bromide in 21 patients with COPD (mean (SD) age 64 (8.1) y, post-salbutamol FEV(1) 47.7 (13.2) %predicted). FEV(1) was measured before and up to 8 hourly intervals after intake of placebo, cilomilast, or cilomilast in combination with inhaled salbutamol 400 microg and/or ipratropium bromide 80 microg. Maximum increase in FEV(1) from pre-dose baseline was calculated after each treatment and differences between treatment arms were analyzed by ANOVA. The mean (SEM) maximum increase in FEV(1) was 139.6 (18.5) ml following cilomilast and 151.5 (18.5) ml following placebo (95% C.I. for mean difference between cilomilast and placebo: -67.3, 43.6 ml). Furthermore, combined treatment of cilomilast with salbutamol or ipratropium resulted in a maximum increase in FEV(1) of 280.7 (25.6) and 297.0 (25.9) ml, respectively, while this was 379.0 (24.6) ml following cilomilast with both salbutamol and ipratropium (p < 0.01). We conclude that a single dose of cilomilast does not produce acute bronchodilation in patients with COPD who otherwise respond to inhaled bronchodilators. Our results implicate that the change in lung function seen after long-term treatment with cilomilast is not the result of acute bronchodilation in patients with COPD.