Epidemiological pattern and management of dog bite injuries in Karachi, Pakistan: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Dog bite injuries are a common problem globally; however, little is known about the epidemiology of dog bite injury from a low-and-middle-income country like Pakistan. This study aims to determine the epidemiology of dog bite injuries among children and adults from a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study on dog bite patients visiting the emergency department from November 2015 to August 2016 of a major public tertiary care hospital. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire on demographic details, bite history, and management of dog bite victims. Descriptive analysis was reported. Chi-square test was applied to check the associations between age-specific dog bite cases and independent variables. RESULTS: 2178 participants were included in the analysis. 715 (38.8%) were children less than 18 years old, and 1463 (61.2%) were adults over 18 years. A majority of the patients were males (1909, 87.7%). Results show that most dog bite injuries (2052, 94.2%) tend to occur outside the house by stray dogs biting without provocation. People aged 18 years and above (61.2%) and males (children: 84.6%, adults: 89.1%) tend to be bitten more often. Lower limbs are most frequently bitten (children: 69.5%, adults: 85.8%). Free-roaming stray dogs (children: 73.4%, adults: 74.9%) were involved in reported biting cases. Many of the patients did not receive appropriate first aid and instead just washed the wound with soap and water (children: 45.1%, adults: 43.7%). 99% of the victims received Tetanus toxoid, Rabies vaccine, and immunoglobulins while in the emergency department. CONCLUSION: There is a high burden of dog bite injuries from stray dogs in Karachi, Pakistan. Efforts should be made to create awareness among the general public on the risks of dog bites and on seeking appropriate first aid and medical attention for a dog bite injury.

Prognostic implication of size on outcomes of pituitary macroadenoma: a comparative analysis of giant adenoma with non-giant macroadenoma.

BACKGROUND: Due to the differences in size and invasiveness when compared to non-giant macroadenomas (nGPAs), giant pituitary adenomas (GPAs) are considerably harder to resect. This study aimed to differentiate GPAs from nGPAs, based on the presenting complaints, surgical approaches, peri- and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed cases of pituitary macroadenomas that underwent surgical resection at a tertiary care hospital. GPAs were tumors greater than 4 cm in the largest dimension, while nGPAs were tumors smaller than 4 cm. 55 GPA patients and 70 nGPA patients from 2006 to 2017 were included. Demographic, perioperative, and post-operative outcomes were evaluated. Group comparisons for continuous variables were made using an independent t-test/Mann Whitney U test and categorical data was analyzed on Chi-square/Fisher exact test; a p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Visual deterioration was the most common complaint, reported by 61.4% of nGPA patients and 81.8% of GPA patients. The mean extent of gross total resection was 47.1% in nGPA patients and 18.2% in GPA patients (p = 0.001). After surgery, tumor recurrence was seen in 1.4% of nGPA patients and 18.2% of GPA patients (p = 0.001). First re-do surgery was required in 5.7% of nGPA patients and 25.5% of GPA patients (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Compared to nGPAs, GPAs are more likely to present with a higher number of preoperative symptoms, and lesser chances of gross total tumor resection. GPAs are also associated with a higher rate of recurrence, which results in more follow-up procedures. Larger, multi-center longitudinal studies need to be done to validate these findings.