ABSTRACT
Dobutamine is a weak beta-1 and a potent beta-2 adrenergic agonist commonly used to treat patients in cardiogenic shock. It enhances myocardial contractibility, increasing cardiac output. Myoclonus in patients receiving an infusion of dobutamine is rare and, although not fully understood, seems more common in patients with severe kidney failure. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of dobutamine-induced myoclonus in a patient with kidney failure receiving peritoneal dialysis. Only 7% of the 518,749 patients of the United States requiring kidney replacement therapy receive peritoneal dialysis, with only a small unknown number of those with advanced heart failure manage with an infusion of inotropic medication. The low prevalence of combined advanced heart failure and kidney failure could partly explain this condition's rarity. In this study, we report the case of a 64-year-old woman with kidney failure receiving peritoneal dialysis in whom myoclonus developed 3 weeks after starting a dobutamine infusion for advanced refractory heart failure. Infectious and other pharmacologic causes of myoclonus were ruled out. Initially, uremia was suspected; however, despite increasing her peritoneal dialysis dose, it was only after discontinuing the dobutamine infusion that her myoclonus resolved.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A kidney transplant candidate's social network serves as a pool of potential living donors. Sex and racial differences in network size, network strength, and living donor requests may contribute to disparities in living donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, we performed an egocentric network analysis via a telephone survey of 132 waitlisted candidates (53% female and 69% Black) to identify demographic and network factors associated with requesting living kidney donations. RESULTS: Female participants made requests to more network members than male participants: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.24-3.06], P < 0.01. Black participants tended to make more requests than whites (IRR 1.65, 95% CI [0.99-2.73], P = 0.05). The number of requests increased with the size of the network (IRR 1.09, 95% CI [1.02-1.16], P = 0.01); however, network size did not differ by sex or race. Network members who provided greater instrumental support to the candidates were most likely to receive a request: odds ratio 1.39, 95% CI [1.08-1.78], P = 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Transplant candidates' networks vary in size and in the number of requests made to the members. Previously observed racial and sex disparities in living donor kidney transplantation do not appear to be related to network size or to living donation requests, but rather to the network members themselves. Future living donor interventions should focus on the network members and be tailored to their relationship with the candidate.