Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Crit Care ; 33(4): 260-269, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38945818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Use of noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is debated. The COVID-19 pandemic posed challenges due to high patient volumes and worldwide resource strain. OBJECTIVES: To determine associations between use of noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, progression to intubation, and hospital mortality. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients in an institutional COVID-19 registry. Adult patients were included if they were admitted for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2022, and developed moderate to severe ARDS. Primary outcomes were progression to intubation and hospital mortality in patients who received noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation. A secondary outcome was successful treatment with noninvasive ventilation without intubation. RESULTS: Of 823 patients who met inclusion criteria, 454 (55.2%) did not receive noninvasive ventilation and 369 (44.8%) received noninvasive ventilation. Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation were more likely to require mechanical ventilation than were patients not receiving noninvasive ventilation. Among patients requiring endotracheal intubation, those receiving noninvasive ventilation had a higher likelihood of mortality. Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation had lower severity-adjusted odds of survival to discharge without intubation than did patients not receiving noninvasive ventilation. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with noninvasive ventilation had increased likelihood of progression to endotracheal intubation and hospital mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hospital Mortality , Noninvasive Ventilation , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/therapy , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Noninvasive Ventilation/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Aged , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Adult
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 80: 230.e1-230.e2, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693022

ABSTRACT

Erector spinae plane blocks (ESPB) have shown to provide meaningful chest wall anesthesia and reduce opioid consumption after thoracic surgery. Emergency physicians often use erector spinae plane blocks in the emergency department (ED) for rib fractures when acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID), and opioids fail to control pain. They have also demonstrated successful pain management for conditions like herpes zoster, renal colic, burns, and acute pancreatitis for ED patients. With low reported rates of complication and relatively easy landmarks to identify, erector spinae plane blocks are an appealing regional anesthetic technique for emergency physicians to utilize for uncontrolled pain. We present the case of a 58-year-old male presenting to the ED with chest pain from pneumonia which remained unmanageable after acetaminophen, NSAID, and opioid administration. An ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block was performed in the ED and the patient had a significant reduction in his chest pain.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain , Emergency Service, Hospital , Nerve Block , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Block/methods , Chest Pain/etiology , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Pneumonia/complications , Paraspinal Muscles/innervation , Paraspinal Muscles/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL