Patient and Graft Survival Outcomes During 2 Eras of Immunosuppression Protocols in Kidney Transplantation: Indiana University Retrospective Cohort Experience.

BACKGROUND: Since 1964 when Indiana University performed its first kidney transplant, immunosuppression protocol was steroid-based until 2004 when steroid-free immunosuppression protocol was adopted. We describe clinical outcomes on our patients administered early steroid withdrawal (ESW) protocol (5 days) compared with our historical cohort (HC), who were on chronic steroid-based immunosuppression. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study evaluating kidney transplant recipients between 1993 and 2003 (HC, n = 1689) and between 2005 and 2016 (ESW cohort, n = 2097) at the Indiana University program, with a median follow-up of 10.5 years and 6.1 years, respectively. Primary outcomes were patient and death-censored graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years in both study cohorts. Secondary outcomes were 1-year rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection; graft function at 1, 3, and 5 years; and risk of post-transplant infection (BK virus and cytomegalovirus) in the ESW cohort. Cox proportional model and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate survival probabilities. Fisher exact tests were used to compare episodes of acute rejection in the ESW cohort. RESULTS: No difference was observed in patient survival between the ESW and HC cohorts (P = .13). Compared with the ESW cohort, death-censored graft survival was significantly worse in the HC (5 year: 86.4% vs 90.6%, log-rank P < .001). One-year acute rejection reported in the ESW cohort alone was 15.7% and significantly worse in Black patients and younger patients (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In this sizeable single-center cohort study with significant ethnic diversity, ESW is a viable alternative to steroid-based immunosuppression protocol in kidney transplant recipients.

Determinants of hospitalization in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes receiving a peer support intervention and JADE integrated care: the PEARL randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In a randomized controlled trial of 628 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multidisciplinary care in the Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation (JADE) Progam, 372 were randomized to receive additional telephone-based peer support (Peer Empowerment And Remote communication Linked by information technology, PEARL) intervention. After 12 months, all-cause hospitalization was reduced by half in the PEARL group especially in those with high Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS) scores. METHODS: We used stratified analyses, negative binomial regression, and structural equation modelling (SEM) to examine the inter-relationships between emotions, self-management, cardiometabolic risk factors, and hospitalization. RESULTS: Hospitalized patients were older, more likely to have heart or kidney disease, and negative emotions than those without hospitalization. Patients with high DASS score who did not receive peer support had the highest hospitalization rates. After adjustment for confounders, peer support reduced the frequency of hospitalizations by 48% with a relative risk of 0.52 (95% CI 0·35-0·79;p = 0·0018). Using SEM, improvement of negative emotions reduced treatment nonadherence (Est = 0.240, p = 0.034) and hospitalizations (Est=-0.218, p = 0.001). The latter was also reduced by an interactive term of peer support and chronic kidney disease (Est = 0.833, p = < 0.001) and that of peer support and heart disease (Est = 0.455, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In type 2 diabetes, improvement of negative emotions and peer support reduced hospitalizations, especially in those with comorbidities, in part mediated through improving treatment nonadherence. Integrating peer support is feasible and adds value to multidisciplinary care, augmented by information technology, especially in patients with comorbidities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00950716 Registered July 31, 2009.

Development of a scoring system from noncontrast computerized tomography measurements to improve the selection of upper ureteral stone for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

PURPOSE: We investigated the role of noncontrast computerized tomography in predicting the treatment outcome of shock wave lithotripsy on upper ureteral stones to formulate a clinical algorithm to facilitate clinical management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adult patients with upper ureteral stones confirmed by noncontrast computerized tomography and scheduled for primary in situ shock wave lithotripsy were prospectively recruited. Standardized treatment was performed on each patient. The primary end point was stone-free status at 3 months. Pretreatment noncontrast computerized tomography was assessed by a single radiologist blinded to the clinical parameters. Predictive values of computerized tomography measurements on the treatment outcome were then assessed. RESULTS: Between October 2004 and July 2007 a total of 94 patients (60 male and 34 female) were recruited for the study. Logistic regression showed that stone volume, mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance were potential predictors of successful treatment. From ROC curves the optimum cutoff for predicting treatment outcomes for stone volume, mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance was 0.2 cc, 593 HU and 9.2 cm, respectively. A simple scoring system was constructed based on the 3 factors of stone volume less than 0.2 cc, mean stone density less than 593 HU or skin-to-stone distance less than 9.2 cm. The stone-free rate for patients having 0, 1, 2 and 3 factors was 17.9%, 48.4%, 73.3% and 100%, respectively (linear-by-linear association test 22.83, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Stone volume, mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance were potential predictors of the successful treatment of upper ureteral stones with shock wave lithotripsy. A scoring system based on these 3 factors helps separate patients into outcome groups and facilitates treatment planning.