15-Gene Expression Profile and PRAME as Integrated Prognostic Test for Uveal Melanoma: First Report of Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study No. 2 (COOG2.1).

PURPOSE: Validated and accurate prognostic testing is critical for precision medicine in uveal melanoma (UM). Our aims were to (1) prospectively validate an integrated prognostic classifier combining a 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) and PRAME RNA expression and (2) identify clinical variables that enhance the prognostic accuracy of the 15-GEP/PRAME classifier. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 1,577 patients with UM of the choroid and/or ciliary body who were enrolled in the Collaborative Ocular Oncology Group Study Number 2 (COOG2) and prospectively monitored across 26 North American centers. Test results for 15-GEP (class 1 or class 2) and PRAME expression status (negative or positive) were available for all patients. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival (MFS). RESULTS: 15-GEP was class 1 in 1,082 (68.6%) and class 2 in 495 (31.4%) patients. PRAME status was negative in 1,106 (70.1%) and positive in 471 (29.9%) patients. Five-year MFS was 95.6% (95% CI, 93.9 to 97.4) for class 1/PRAME(-), 80.6% (95% CI, 73.9 to 87.9) for class 1/PRAME(+), 58.3% (95% CI, 51.1 to 66.4) for class 2/PRAME(-), and 44.8% (95% CI, 37.9 to 52.8) for class 2/PRAME(+). By multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, 15-GEP was the most important independent predictor of MFS (hazard ratio [HR], 5.95 [95% CI, 4.43 to 7.99]; P < .001), followed by PRAME status (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.42 to 2.33]; P < .001). The only clinical variable demonstrating additional prognostic value was tumor diameter. CONCLUSION: In the largest prospective multicenter prognostic biomarker study performed to date in UM to our knowledge, the COOG2 study validated the superior prognostic accuracy of the integrated 15-GEP/PRAME classifier over 15-GEP alone and clinical prognostic variables. Tumor diameter was found to be the only clinical variable to provide additional prognostic information. This prognostic classifier provides an advanced resource for risk-adjusted metastatic surveillance and adjuvant trial stratification in patients with UM.

Oral Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 2α Inhibitor Belzutifan in Ocular von Hippel-Lindau Disease: Subgroup Analysis of the Single-Arm Phase 2 LITESPARK-004 Study.

PURPOSE: To report the efficacy of the oral hypoxia-inducible factor 2α inhibitor belzutifan in participants with von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated retinal hemangioblastomas in the LITESPARK-004 study. DESIGN: Subgroup analysis of the phase 2, single-arm, open-label LITESPARK-004 study. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with 1 or more von Hippel-Lindau disease-associated measurable renal cell carcinoma tumors not requiring immediate surgical intervention were eligible. METHODS: Participants received oral belzutifan 120 mg once daily until disease progression or unacceptable treatment-related toxicity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy of belzutifan in retinal hemangioblastomas was a secondary end point, measured as response (improved, stable, or progressed) by independent reading center-certified graders based on color fundus imaging performed every 12 weeks using the investigator's preferred imaging standards. Additional assessments, where available, included OCT and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography. RESULTS: Among 61 participants in LITESPARK-004, 12 had 1 or more evaluable active retinal hemangioblastomas in 16 eyes at baseline per independent reading center. As of April 1, 2022, the median follow-up for participants with ocular von Hippel-Lindau disease at baseline was 37.3 months. All 16 eyes were graded as improved, with a response rate of 100.0% (95% confidence interval, 79.4%-100%). No new retinal hemangioblastomas or ocular disease progression were reported as of data cutoff date. Eight participants underwent additional multimodal eye assessments performed at the National Institutes of Health study site. Among this subgroup, 10 of 24 hemangioblastomas in 8 eyes of 6 participants measured 500 µm or more in greatest linear dimension at baseline and were analyzed further. All 10 hemangioblastomas had a mean area reduction of 15% or more by month 12 and of 30% or more by month 24. CONCLUSIONS: Belzutifan showed promising activity against ocular von Hippel-Lindau disease, including capacity to control retinal hemangioblastomas, with effects sustained for more than 2 years while treatment is ongoing. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Ophthalmoplegia Associated With Extramedullary Multiple Myeloma: Case Series From a Tertiary Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant disorder of plasma cells that results in tumor cells replacing the bone marrow. In extramedullary MM (EMM), however, tumor cells proliferate outside the bone marrow. EMM may produce ophthalmoplegia through direct invasion of the superior orbital fissure, cavernous sinus, and/or sphenoidal sinus. Several mechanisms have been proposed including cranial nerve palsies, direct infiltration of bone, extraocular muscle metastasis, myelomatous meningitis, and parenchymal or paraneoplastic effects. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 7 patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who suffered from ophthalmoplegia secondary to extramedullary MM between 2019 and 2021. We collected information regarding the symptoms, signs, radiographic and laboratory findings, management, complications, and prognosis of these patients throughout their disease course. RESULTS: Skull base MRI revealed 4 patients with ophthalmoplegias secondary to superior orbital fissure invasion, 2 patients with ophthalmoplegias secondary to cavernous sinus invasion, and 1 patient with ophthalmoplegia secondary to sphenoid sinus invasion. CONCLUSIONS: This is a case series describing 7 patients with ophthalmoplegias secondary to EMM. Our article is unique because of the size of the included cohort, which is large when compared with most English language publications detailing such ophthalmoplegias.

Consensus Guidelines for Ocular Surveillance of von Hippel-Lindau Disease.

PURPOSE: To develop guidelines for ocular surveillance and early intervention for individuals with von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease. DESIGN: Systematic review of the literature. PARTICIPANTS: Expert panel of retina specialists and ocular oncologists. METHODS: A consortium of experts on clinical management of all-organ aspects of VHL disease was convened. Working groups with expertise in organ-specific features of VHL disease were tasked with development of evidence-based guidelines for each organ system. The ophthalmology subcommittee formulated questions for consideration and performed a systematic literature review. Evidence was graded for topic quality and relevance and the strength of each recommendation, and guideline recommendations were developed. RESULTS: The quality of evidence was limited, and no controlled clinical trial data were available. Consensus guidelines included: (1) individuals with known or suspected VHL disease should undergo periodic ocular screening (evidence type, III; evidence strength, C; degree of consensus, 2A); (2) patients at risk of VHL disease, including first-degree relatives of patients with known VHL disease, or any patient with single or multifocal retinal hemangioblastomas (RHs), should undergo genetic testing for pathologic VHL disease gene variants as part of an appropriate medical evaluation (III/C/2A); (3) ocular screening should begin within 12 months after birth and continue throughout life (III/C/2A); (4) ocular screening should occur approximately every 6 to 12 months until 30 years of age and then at least yearly thereafter (III/C-D/2A); (5) ocular screening should be performed before a planned pregnancy and every 6 to 12 months during pregnancy (IV/D/2A); (6) ultra-widefield color fundus photography may be helpful in certain circumstances to monitor RHs, and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography may be helpful in certain circumstances to detect small RHs (IV/D/2A); (7) patients should be managed, whenever possible, by those with subspecialty training, with experience with VHL disease or RHs, or with both and ideally within the context of a multidisciplinary center capable of providing multiorgan surveillance and access to genetic testing (IV/D/2A); (8) extramacular or extrapapillary RHs should be treated promptly (III/C/2A). CONCLUSIONS: Based on available evidence from observational studies, broad agreement was reached for a strategy of lifelong surveillance and early treatment for ocular VHL disease. These guidelines were endorsed by the VHL Alliance and the International Society of Ocular Oncology and were approved by the American Academy of Ophthalmology Board of Trustees. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Multicentre analysis of nucleic acid quantification using aqueous humour liquid biopsy in uveal melanoma: implications for clinical testing.

OBJECTIVE: Uveal melanoma (UM) tumour biopsy is limited by size and intratumour heterogeneity. We explored the potential of aqueous humour (AH) liquid biopsy for UM by quantifying analytes in samples collected at diagnosis and after brachytherapy to look for clinical correlations with tumour features. DESIGN: Case-series study. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-six UM patients and 16 control subjects from a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: The study included 119 UM AH samples and 16 control samples analyzed for unprocessed analytes (i.e., dsDNA, miRNA, and protein) using Qubit fluorescence assays. RESULTS: Analytes were widely quantifiable among available UM AH samples (dsDNA: 94.1%; miRNA: 88.0%; protein: 95.2%) at significantly higher concentrations than among control samples (dsDNA, p = 0.008; miRNA, p < 0.0001; protein, p = 0.007). In samples taken at diagnosis, concentrations were higher at more advanced American Joint Cancer Commission stages; when comparing most advanced stage III with least advanced stage I, median dsDNA was 4 times greater (p < 0.0001), miRNA was 2 times greater (p = 0.001), and protein was 3 times greater (p < 0.0001). Analytes were quantifiable in >70% of diagnostic samples from eyes with tumours <2 mm tall. Height had a positive association with diagnostic analyte concentrations (dsDNA: R = 0.43, p = 0.0007; miRNA: R = 0.35, p = 0.01; protein: R = 0.39, p = 0.005). Samples taken after brachytherapy showed significantly higher concentrations than diagnostic samples (p < 0.01 for all). CONCLUSIONS: UM AH is a rich repository of analytes. Samples from eyes with more advanced stage and larger tumours had higher concentrations, though analytes also were quantifiable in eyes with smaller, less advanced tumours. Future analysis of AH analytes may be informative in the pursuit of personalized UM treatments.

Ocular Toxicity Profile of Targeted Cancer Therapy (TCT) at a US Tertiary Cancer Center.

PURPOSE:  Targeted cancer therapy (TCT) is a significant advancement in oncology with promising survival improvement in patients with cancer and remarkable effects on various cancers. There is evidence suggesting a connection between specific TCT classes and the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Our study aims to investigate the potential ocular toxicities of different classes of TCT, provide a better understanding of these toxicities, and aid in the future development of screening and management recommendations for ocular irAEs. DESIGN:  Retrospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS:  Only ocular immune-related AEs were included in the study; patients on TCT who received a new ophthalmic diagnosis were seen at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. METHODS:  Between 2010 and 2019, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 6,354 patients on TCT at a large US tertiary cancer center.  Results: The criteria for data analysis were met by 1861 patients. TCT was associated with a wide range of class-specific ocular irAEs. There was a statistically significant correlation between ocular toxicity with polytherapy with a p-value of <0.001. Furthermore, there was a statistically significant correlation between toxicity and BRAF, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and ICI <0.001, <0.001, and 0.006, respectively.  Conclusion: Our cohort is the most extensive case series in English literature, demonstrating the increased risk of class-specific ocular toxicity associated with TCT, which sheds some light on the importance of developing standardized grading criteria and management guidelines.

Association of choroidal invasion with retinoblastoma survival rates.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of varying levels of choroidal invasion on survival from retinoblastoma. METHODS: A retrospective nationwide analysis of retinoblastoma cases diagnosed between 2004-2016 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was conducted. Overall survival, cause-specific survival, and all-cause mortality risk were assessed as primary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 393 retinoblastoma patients were included, of whom 268 (68.2%) had no choroidal invasion, 91 (23.2%) had focal choroidal invasion, and 34 (8.7%) had massive choroidal invasion on enucleation. A total of 6 deaths occurred throughout an average follow-up period of 72.2 ± 47.1 months: 4 deaths were cancer related. Adjusted Cox regression demonstrated higher all-cause mortality in patients with massive choroidal invasion (HR, 41.29; 95% CI, 4.05-420.49; P = 0.002) relative to those without choroidal invasion; however, those with focal choroidal invasion (HR, 2.69; 95% CI, 0.17-43.09; P = 0.484) demonstrated no difference in all-cause mortality. On further stratification by level of optic nerve invasion (ONI), all cancer-related deaths (4/4) were found to have occurred in patients with massive choroidal invasion and concomitant postlaminar ONI (PLONI). Patients with massive choroidal invasion without PLONI demonstrated 5-year overall and cause-specific survival of 100%, whereas patients with massive choroidal invasion and PLONI demonstrated 5-year overall and cause-specific survival of 80.2%. CONCLUSIONS: All retinoblastoma-related deaths occurred in patients with both massive choroidal invasion and PLONI. These findings could not establish that massive choroidal invasion is an independent risk factor for poor outcome.

Highlights on Ocular Toxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors at a US Tertiary Cancer Center.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved prognosis in advanced malignancies; however, they may be associated with extensive ocular immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that are sight threatening. Our study aimed to identify the presentation, characteristics, management, and clinical outcomes of ocular irAEs. Methods: In this retrospective, observational case series, we reviewed the medical records of 1280 patients at a large US tertiary cancer center between 2010 and 2020. Results: We identified 130 patients who presented with ocular irAEs (10%) with 69 males (53%) and 61 females (47%). The mean time to toxicity was 6.1 months. Adverse events include corneal toxicity (31%), neuro-ophthalmic (14%), uveitis and scleritis (13%), retinopathy (13%), periocular disorders (11%), and others. IrAEs occurred most frequently with nivolumab (26%). Most ocular irAEs were treated with topical therapy. Advanced cases required systemic corticosteroids and even cessation of ICIs. Conclusion: Our cohort is a large case series highlighting the increased potential of ocular toxicity associated with ICIs. Prompt recognition and management of ocular irAEs can minimize their effect.

Second Primary Malignancies in Patients With Melanoma Subtypes: Analysis of 120,299 Patients From the SEER Database (2000-2016).

Purpose: Evaluate incidence of second primary malignancies (SPM) after non-acral cutaneous melanoma (NACM), acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM), mucosal melanoma (MM), and uveal melanoma (UM). Patients and Methods: First primary NACM, ALM, MM, and UM cases diagnosed 2000-2016 were extracted from SEER. Seer*Stat was used to calculate excess absolute risks (EAR) and standardized incidence ratios (SIR) of SPMs relative to a matched cohort from the general population. P-value of 0.05 determined significance. Results: Inclusion criteria was met by 109,385 patients with NACM, 2166 with ALM, 2498 with MM, and 6250 with UM. Increased incidence of malignancies occurred after NACM (SIR 1.51; 95%CI, 1.49-1.54), ALM (SIR 1.59; 95%CI, 1.40-1.81), MM (SIR 2.14; 95%CI, 1.85-2.45), and UM (SIR 1.24; 95%CI, 1.14-1.34) relative to the general population. Cutaneous melanoma occurred more frequently after NACM (SIR 9.54; 95%CI, 9.27-9.83), ALM (SIR 12.19; 95%CI, 9.70-15.14), MM (SIR 10.05; 95%CI, 7.18-13.68), and UM (SIR 2.91; 95%CI, 2.27-3.66). Patients with initial NACM (SIR 2.44; 95%CI, 1.64-3.51) and UM (SIR 44.34; 95%CI, 29.91-63.29) demonstrated increased incidence of eye and orbit melanoma. Renal malignancies occurred more frequently after NACM (SIR 1.24; 95%CI, 1.11-1.38), MM (SIR 3.54; 95%CI, 1.62-6.72) and UM (SIR 1.68; 95%CI, 1.09-2.48). Increased incidence of thyroid malignancies was observed after NACM (SIR 1.83; 95%CI, 1.61-2.06), ALM (SIR 3.74; 95%CI, 1.71-7.11), MM (SIR 4.40; 95%CI, 1.77-9.06), and UM (SIR 3.79; 95%CI, 2.52-5.47). Increased incidence of lymphoma was observed after NACM (SIR 1.20; 95%CI, 1.09-1.31) and ALM (SIR 2.06; 95%CI, 1.13-3.46). Conclusion: Patients with NACM, ALM, MM, and UM have increased incidence of SPMs compared to that expected from the general population. Each of these melanoma subtypes had increased occurrence of cutaneous melanoma and thyroid cancer; some, but not all, had increased occurrence of renal malignancies, eye and orbit melanoma, and lymphoma.

Phase I Trial of Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy and Trametinib for KRAS-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This phase I trial (NCT01912625) evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) and the radiosensitizer trametinib (MEK1/2 inhibitor) for KRAS-mutated nonmetastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients received cCRT (carboplatin/paclitaxel and 60 Gy/30 fractions radiotherapy); oral trametinib (7 days/week) commenced on day 1 and completed on the final day of radiotherapy. Dose-finding of trametinib was done using the time-to-event continual reassessment method (TiTE-CRM); dose levels were 0.5mg (level -1), 1mg (initial, level 1), 1.5mg (level 2), and 2mg (level 3). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were also recorded. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (stage III, variety of KRAS mutations) were treated, with 1/5/4/5 at dose levels -1/1/2/3, respectively. Five patients received dose reductions (n=2, levels 2 and 3; n=1, level 1). Twelve patients completed the full cCRT course. One patient (following 12d trametinib) was taken off protocol for an unrelated/unresolved grade 1 event and later experienced grade 5 sepsis/respiratory failure. There was one grade 4 retinal detachment; grade 3 events included skin rash (n=2) and ventricular dysfunction, pneumonitis, pain, fatigue, and diarrhea (n=1 each). The final dose selected by the TiTE-CRM of trametinib was 1.5 mg. Pharmacokinetic profiles were elucidated and extensively described. At median follow-up of 70 months, median PFS was 11 months and median OS was 38 months. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD for trametinib when combined with cCRT is 1.5 mg, with encouraging preliminary outcomes. This combination merits further study to combine with consolidation durvalumab in non-metastatic KRAS mutant NSCLC.

Reversible HER2 antibody-drug conjugate-induced ocular toxicity.

PURPOSE: To report 3 cases of reversible epitheliopathy induced by A166-a human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) therapy for resistant HER2 tumours. METHODS: Advanced HER2 tumour patients were enrolled in A166 phase I/II clinical trial using Bayesian logistic regression model dose escalation. Key exclusion criteria were ≥grade 2 (G2) corneal pathology, severe organ disease, and other cancer therapy within 4 weeks. Eye exams were performed at baseline, regularly scheduled intervals, and additionally upon A166-induced ocular symptoms. Topical therapy with autologous serum tears (ASTs) was implemented based on visual acuity, symptoms, and slit lamp exam. A166 was withheld if ≥G2 ocular toxicity developed; if status improved to ≤G1, A166 therapy was resumed. Visual acuity, corneal exam, and subjective comfort were recorded. RESULTS: After ≥2 cycles of A166, 6 eyes of 3/23 enrolled patients developed whorl pattern epitheliopathy suggestive of limbal stem cell (LSC) dysfunction requiring cessation of A166 despite positive tumour response. Patients 1 and 3 received 3.6 mg/kg A166 dose, and patient 2 received 3.0 mg/kg. Topical steroids (2/4 eyes) failed to improve epitheliopathy. Adding ASTs improved vision, ocular comfort, and whorl pattern epitheliopathy in 6/6 eyes within 3 weeks. Patient 1 continues to improve on ASTs; patient 2 withdrew from the study; and patient 3 resumed A166 therapy. CONCLUSION: A166 precipitates LSC dysfunction-like epitheliopathy. Combination therapy including aggressive lubrication, withholding drug, and ASTs help reverse toxicity. Recognizing that ADC-induced epitheliopathy can respond to ocular management may enable cancer patients to continue lifesaving therapy.

Metastatic Risk Factors Associated with Class 1A Uveal Melanoma Patients.

In uveal melanoma (UM), gene expression profiling (GEP) is commonly used to classify metastatic risk into three groups (Class 1A, 1B, and 2). Class 1A patients have a lower metastatic risk of 2% at 5 years compared to other groups. We aimed to describe clinical features associated with the development of metastasis in this low-risk group. This single-center IRB-approved retrospective case series review included all UM patients between February 2006 and March 2019 with an archived or fresh specimen classified as Class 1A. Cox regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses were used to identify factors associated with metastasis development and OS. Among 73 UM patients with Class 1A, the 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis was 4.2% and 17.0%, respectively. Stage III disease (HR 20.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.4-300.6; p = 0.0264) was found to be independently associated with metastatic recurrence, while primary therapy was associated with OS (enucleation vs. brachytherapy, HR 13.5; 95% CI 1.3-147.6; p = 0.0348). Combined clinical decision-making utilizing factors such as GEP class, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and COMS size could have a significant clinical impact by improving risk stratification and adapting follow-up intervals in UM Class 1A patients.

Overview of Ocular Side Effects of Selinexor.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this review is to elucidate the type and frequency of ocular adverse events associated with selinexor with a goal to quantify the occurrence of these events in our investigator-initiated trial. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 174 patients treated with at least one dose of selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents between July 2015 and July 2020 at a comprehensive cancer center in the U.S. All reported ocular adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 174 patient medical records were reviewed. All patients received at least one dose of selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents in our cohort of patients with advanced malignancies. A total of 34 (19.54%) patients experienced 37 ocular adverse events. The most frequently reported ocular symptom was blurred vision, which was reported in 22 (12.64%) patients. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event was dry eye syndrome reported in 21 (12.1%) patients, and 19 (10.9%) of them were diagnosed with mild dry eye. The second most common treatment-related adverse event was the progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis (cataract) reported in 7 (4.0%) patients. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight that ocular adverse events associated with oral selinexor were mild. The most frequently reported ocular treatment-related adverse events were mild dry eye and progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Patients receiving selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents were reviewed, with a total of 34 patients experiencing 37 ocular adverse events. Findings highlight that ocular adverse events associated with oral selinexor were mild. The most frequently reported ocular treatment-related adverse events were mild dry eye and progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation.

Response criteria for intraocular retinoblastoma: RB-RECIST.

Standardized guidelines for assessing tumor response to therapy are essential for designing and conducting clinical trials. The Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) provide radiological standards for assessment of solid tumors. However, no such guidelines exist for the evaluation of intraocular cancer, and ocular oncology clinical trials have largely relied on indirect measures of therapeutic response-such as progression-free survival-to evaluate the efficacy of treatment agents. Herein, we propose specific criteria for evaluating treatment response of retinoblastoma, the most common pediatric intraocular cancer, and emphasize a multimodal imaging approach for comprehensive assessment of retinoblastoma tumors in clinical trials.

Targeted Cancer Therapy and Its Ophthalmic Side Effects: A Review.

Targeted cancer therapy agents are the latest development in cancer therapeutics. Although the spectrum of their use continues to expand, ocular side effects are frequently encountered with the use of cancer therapeutics. This review describes the ocular side effects of targeted cancer therapy agents.

Immune-Related Oral, Otologic, and Ocular Adverse Events.

Emerging immunotherapeutic agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1), have revolutionized cancer treatment. The first immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) ipilimumab, an anti-CTLA-4, was approved in 2011. Since then, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved more than half a dozen immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat various malignancies. These agents are part of a broader class of chemotherapy agents termed immunotherapy, which selectively target different steps in the immune response cascade to upregulate the body's normal response to cancer. While the effects of traditional chemotherapy are well known, the toxicity profile of emerging immune therapies is not fully elucidated. They have been associated with atypical side effects labeled collectively as immune-related adverse events (irAEs).

Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Results From a Single-Arm Phase II Study.

PURPOSE: Metastatic uveal melanoma has poor overall survival (OS) and no approved systemic therapy options. Studies of single-agent immunotherapy regimens have shown minimal benefit. There is the potential for improved responses with the use of combination immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II study of nivolumab with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Any number of prior treatments was permitted. Patients received nivolumab 1 mg/kg and ipilimumab 3 mg/kg for four cycles, followed by nivolumab maintenance therapy for up to 2 years. The primary outcome of the study was overall response rate (ORR) as determined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 33 patients were evaluable for efficacy. The ORR was 18%, including one confirmed complete response and five confirmed partial responses. The median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.4 to 9.5 months), and the median OS was 19.1 months (95% CI, 9.6 months to NR). Forty percent of patients experienced a grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event. CONCLUSION: The combination regimen of nivolumab plus ipilimumab demonstrates activity in metastatic uveal melanoma, with deep and sustained confirmed responses.