ABSTRACT
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN?: The nurse-patient relationship in mental health care is an important focus of mental health nursing theories and research. There is limited evidence about which factors influence nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship. This hinders the development, planning, delivering, and quality assurance of the nurse-patient relationship in nursing practice and nursing education. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: To our best knowledge, this is the first study to examine associations between nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship and a range of patient characteristics and relationship-contextual factors. In this study, we found that gender, age, hospital characteristics, nurse availability when needed, nurse contact, and nurse stimulation were associated with the scores on the nurse-sensitive patient outcome scale. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Having insight into the factors associated with nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship can help nurses, nursing students, nursing management and also patients to enhance the nurse-patient relationship, trying to influence outcomes of nursing care. ABSTRACT: Introduction The lack of evidence on patient characteristics and relational-contextual factors influencing nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of a nurse-patient relationship is a possible threat to the quality and education of the nurse-patient relationship. Aim To measure nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship and to explore the associations between nurse-sensitive patient outcomes and a range of patient characteristics and relational-contextual factors. Method In a multicenter cross-sectional study, 340 inpatients from 30 units in five psychiatric hospitals completed the Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome Scale. Descriptive, univariate and Linear Mixed Model analyses were conducted. Results Overall, patient-reported outcomes were moderate to good. Female participants, nurse availability when needed, more nurse contact and nurse stimulation were associated with higher outcomes. Age differences were observed for some of the outcomes. Outcomes also varied across hospitals but were not related to the number of times patients were hospitalized or to their current length of stay in the hospital. Discussion The results may help nurses to become more sensitive and responsive to factors associated with nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship. Implications The nurse-sensitive results can support nurses in designing future nurse-patient relationships.
Subject(s)
Nursing Staff, Hospital , Psychiatric Nursing , Humans , Female , Inpatients , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Nurse-Patient RelationsABSTRACT
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Psychiatric and/or mental health nurses are struggling to measure the outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship. Collecting nurse-sensitive patient outcomes is a strategy to provide outcomes of a nurse-patient relationship from patients' perspectives. Because there was no validated scale, the Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome-Scale (six-point Likert-scale) was recently developed and psychometrically evaluated. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: This is the first study using the Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome-scale to measure nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship in psychiatric hospitals. Moderate to good average scores for the MH-NURSE-POS total (4.42) and domains scores (≥4.09). are observed. Especially outcomes related to 'motivation' to follow and stay committed to the treatment received high average scores (≥4.60). Our results are consistent with the patient-reported effect(s) of relation-based nursing in qualitative research. The scores generate evidence to support the outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship and implicates that further investment in (re)defining and elaborating nurse-patient relationships in mental healthcare is meaningful and justified. More comparative patient-reported data can determine how nurse-sensitive patient outcomes are affected by the patient, nurse, and context. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Demonstrating patient-reported outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship can be important to enhance the therapeutic alliance between nurses and patients, organize responsive nursing care, and create nursing visibility in mental healthcare. Further nursing staff training on interpersonal competencies, such as self-awareness and cultural sensitivity, can be pivotal to achieving the patient-reported outcomes for inpatients with mental health problems. ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Identifying patient-reported outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship is a priority in inpatient mental healthcare to guide clinical decision-making and quality improvement initiatives. Moreover, demonstrating nurse-sensitive patient outcomes can be a strategy to avoid further erosion of the specialism of psychiatric and/or mental health nursing. AIM/QUESTION: To measure nurse-sensitive patient outcomes of the nurse-patient relationship. METHOD: In a multicentred cross-sectional study, 296 inpatients admitted to five psychiatric hospitals completed the recently developed and validated Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome-Scale (MH-NURSE-POS). The MH-NURSE-POS consists of 21 items (six-point Likert-scale) in four domains: 'growth', 'expression', 'control', and 'motivation'. RESULTS: Participants displayed moderate to good average scores for the MH-NURSE-POS total (4.42) and domain scores (≥4.09). Especially outcomes related to 'motivation' to follow and stay committed to the treatment received high average scores (≥4.60). DISCUSSION: The results demonstrate that patients perceive the nurse-patient relationship and the care given by psychiatric and/or mental health nurses as contributing to their treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICES: Patient-reported outcomes can guide nurses and managers to provide and organize nursing care and to build a nurse-patient relationship that has a positive impact on these outcomes. Additionally, outcomes can create nursing visibility as a profession in- and outside mental healthcare.
Subject(s)
Inpatients , Psychiatric Nursing , Humans , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitalization , Nurse-Patient Relations , Psychiatric Nursing/methods , Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: When patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder are suffering from acute mania (involuntary), hospitalization is often necessary. Patients are often quite disruptive, which makes it difficult to regulate their behavior and manage them in their current condition. The nursing team must also ensure the safety of the other patients on the ward. Nursing practice in this domain appears to draw primarily on tradition and experience. AIMS: To achieve consensus on a standard for nursing practice for patients suffering from mania who are admitted to a closed psychiatric ward. METHODS: Previously, professionals, patients, and informal caregivers in the Netherlands were interviewed about the nursing care and their lived experiences. Based on these findings and on the results of a literature review, 89 statements were formulated. A three-round Delphi study among professionals, patients, and informal caregivers was carried out. The accepted statements were summarized. RESULTS: In the first round, 71 statements were accepted, none were rejected, and for 18 statements, no consensus could be reached. These were reformulated and presented in a second round. Thirteen of these statements were accepted, none were rejected, and five statements needed to be reformulated and were presented in the third and final round of this Delphi study. In this final round, all statements were accepted. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was reached among professionals, patients, and informal caregivers in the Netherlands about essential and valuable components of nursing care for patients suffering from acute mania who are admitted to a closed psychiatric ward.
Subject(s)
Mania , Psychiatric Department, Hospital , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Humans , NetherlandsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: Although it has been suggested that pregnancy may influence the course of bipolar disorder (BD), studies show contradictory results. Until now, no studies included a finegrained validated method to report mood symptoms on a daily basis, such as the lifechart method (LCM). The aim of the present study is to investigate the course of BD during pregnancy by comparing LCM scores of pregnant and non-pregnant women. METHODS: Study design: Comparison of LCM scores of two prospective observational BD cohort studies, a cohort of pregnant women (n = 34) and a cohort of non-pregnant women of childbearing age (n = 52). Main study parameters are: (1) proportions of symptomatic and non-symptomatic days; (2) symptom severity, frequency, and duration of episodes; (3) state sequences, longitudinal variation of symptom severity scores. RESULTS: No differences in clinical course variables (symptomatic days, average severity scores, frequency, and duration of episodes in BD were found between pregnant and non-pregnant women. With a combination of State Sequence Analysis (SSA) and cluster analysis on the sequences of daily mood scores three comparable clusters were found in both samples: euthymic, moderately ill and severely ill. The distribution differences between pregnant and non-pregnant women were significant, with a majority of the pregnant women (68%) belonging to the moderately ill cluster and a majority of the non-pregnant women (46%) to the euthymic cluster. In pregnant women the average daily variation in mood symptoms as assessed with Shannon's entropy was less than in non-pregnant women (respectively 0.43 versus 0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of daily mood scores revealed no difference in overall course of BD in pregnant versus non-pregnant women, more pregnant than non-pregnant women belonged to the moderately ill cluster, and during pregnancy the variation in mood state was less than in non-pregnant women. Further research is necessary to clarify these findings.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Most patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) need lifelong cardiac follow-up. Transitioning to adulthood and transferring to adult-focused care are often challenging. We explored the experiences and needs of adolescents with CHD and parents during the entire transitional process, including the post-transfer period. DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed a qualitative study according to the phenomenological approach, focusing on adolescents with CHD and parents. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with patients (n = 9) and parents (n = 12) after being transferred to adult care facilities. Data were analyzed with inductive thematic analysis. Data collection and -analysis of both samples were done separately in a first step, after which results were merged to discover common themes. RESULTS: Five common themes were identified: 1) Having mixed feelings about leaving pediatric care; 2) Being prepared and informed; 3) Shifting responsibilities and roles; 4) Being accompanied during consultations; and 5) Gaining trust in new healthcare providers. CONCLUSION: Adolescents with CHD and parents express a need for adequate preparation and personalized guidance to reduce anxiety and uncertainty during transition. The process may benefit from focusing on improving the adolescents´ transitional skills and disease-related knowledge, which may, in turn, facilitate handing over responsibilities and adapting to new roles by the parents. Adolescents appreciate the presence of parents during the consultation, albeit with reduced input. Finally, a transition coordinator and a joint transfer consultation involving the pediatric cardiologist seem paramount for a fluent transitional process, especially in establishing new treatment relationships.
Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital , Transition to Adult Care , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Health Personnel , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Humans , Parents , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
Mental health nurses are struggling to describe their nursing identity as professional discipline in a changing mental health care. Measuring nurse-sensitive patient outcomes and demonstrating nursing's effect(s) experienced by patients contribute to (re)discover the specific nursing identity. However, a valid and reliable scale is currently lacking. The aim of this study was the development and psychometric evaluation of the Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome Scale (MH-NURSE-POS) for inpatient psychiatric hospital settings. This three-staged study resulted in a scale capturing how inpatients experience the contribution of nurses in their treatment in psychiatric hospitals. First, a draft questionnaire was developed based on a literature review, an independent expert's advice, and an experts panel. Second, the content validity was tested in a two-round Delphi-procedure and focus groups with patients. A pilot test, based on cognitive interviews, confirmed the feasibility of the questionnaire. Third, the psychometric properties of the mental health nurse-sensitive patient outcomes were determined in a sample of 353 patients. The cross-sectional study included a convenience sample of five psychiatric hospitals (Belgium). The factor structure (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy 0.924; Bartlett's test of sphericity χ2 = 4162.537; df = 231; P < 0.001), convergent validity by the Individualized Care Scale (Pearson correlation 0.660; P < 0.001), and reliability (Cronbach's Alpha 0.854) were evaluated. The factor analysis resulted in a four-factor solution representing growth, expression, control, and motivation. The Mental Health Nurse-Sensitive Patient Outcome Scale is a valid and reliable tool to measure the effectiveness of mental health nurses from the patient perspective.
Subject(s)
Hospitals, Psychiatric , Nurses , Belgium , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Inpatients , Mental Health , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Complementary interventions for persons with severe mental illness (SMI) focus on both personal recovery and illness self-management. This paper aimed to identify the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) associated with the most relevant and meaningful change in persons with SMI who attended the Illness Management and Recovery Programme (IMR). METHODS: The effect of the IMR was measured with PROMs concerning recovery, illness self-management, burden of symptoms and quality of life (QoL). From the QoL measures, an anchor was chosen based on the most statistically significant correlations with the PROMs. Then, we estimated the minimal important difference (MID) for all PROMs using an anchor-based method supported by distribution-based methods. The PROM with the highest outcome for effect score divided by MID (the effect/MID index) was considered to be a measure of the most relevant and meaningful change. RESULTS: All PROMs showed significant pre-post-effects. The QoL measure 'General Health Perception (Rand-GHP)' was identified as the anchor. Based on the anchor method, the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM) showed the highest effect/MID index, which was supported by the distribution-based methods. Because of the modifying gender covariate, we stratified the MID calculations. In most MIDs, the MHRM showed the highest effect/MID indexes. CONCLUSION: Taking into account the low sample size and the gender covariate, we conclude that the MHRM was capable of showing the most relevant and meaningful change as a result of the IMR in persons with SMI.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/psychology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Quality of Life/psychology , Humans , Male , Self-ManagementABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We conducted a trial to test the electronic Illness Management and Recovery (e-IMR) intervention to provide conclusions on the potential efficacy of eHealth for people with severe mental illness (SMI). In the e-IMR intervention, we used the standard IMR program content and methodology and combined face-to-face sessions with internet-based strategies on the constructed e-IMR internet platform. During the trial, the e-IMR platform was sparsely used. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the added value of the e-IMR intervention and the barriers and facilitators that can explain the low use of the e-IMR platform. METHODS: This process evaluation was designed alongside a multicenter, cluster randomized controlled trial. In this study, we included all available participants and trainers from the intervention arm of the trial. Baseline characteristics were used to compare users with nonusers. Qualitative data were gathered at the end of the semistructured interviews. Using theoretical thematic analyses, the data were analyzed deductively using a pre-existing coding frame. RESULTS: Out of 41 eligible participants and 14 trainers, 27 participants and 11 trainers were interviewed. Of the 27 participants, 10 were identified as users. eHealth components that had added value were the persuasive nature of the goal-tracking sheets, monitoring, and the peer testimonials, which had the potential to enhance group discussions and disclosure by participants. The low use of the e-IMR platform was influenced by the inflexibility of the platform, the lack of information technology (IT) resources, the group context, participants' low computer skills and disabilities, and the hesitant eHealth attitude of the trainers. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of eHealth readiness and correlations with vulnerabilities in persons with SMI need further investigation. This study shows that flexible options were needed for the use of e-IMR components and that options should be provided only in response to a participant's need. Use of the e-IMR intervention in the future is preconditioned by checking the available IT resources (such as tablets for participants) providing computer or internet guidance to participants outside the group sessions, evaluating the eHealth attitude and skills of trainers, and tailoring eHealth training to increase the skills of future e-IMR trainers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register NTR4772; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/4621. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1186/s12913-016-1267-z.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To explore the experiences of ambulance nurses in emergency care of patients with acute manic and/or psychotic symptoms. METHODS: In this qualitative study, 14 interviews were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis according to Braun and Clarke (2006). FINDINGS: Psychiatric emergency care causes stress and uncomfortable feelings for ambulance nurses due to a lack of information on the patients, being alone with the patient in a small place and the unpredictability of the situation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: More information about the specific patient, education, and good collaboration with other professionals could improve care.
Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Nurses , Ambulances , Humans , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Interpersonal trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in patients with severe mental illness (SMI) negatively affect illness course. Narrative exposure therapy (NET) is effective in vulnerable patient groups, but its efficacy and applicability has not been studied in out-patients with SMI. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and applicability of NET in SMI on changes in PTSD, dissociation, SMI symptoms, care needs, quality of life, global functioning and care consumption. METHOD: The study had a single-group, pre-test-post-test, repeated-measures design and was registered in The Netherlands National Trial Register (identifier TR571). Primary outcomes were assessed at pre-treatment (T0), 1 month post-treatment (T1) and 7 months' follow-up (T2), with a structured interview for PTSD and dissociation screening. Secondary outcomes followed routinely SMI measurements and medical data. Mixed models were used for data analysis. RESULTS: The majority of the 23 participants was female (82%). Mean age was 49.9 years (s.d. 9.8) and mean PTSD duration was 24.1 years (s.d. 14.5). Mean PTSD severity decreased from 37.9 at T0 to 31.9 at T1 (-6.0 difference, 95%CI -10.0 to -2.0), and decreased further to 24.5 at T2 (-13.4 difference, 95%CI -17.4 to -9.4). Dissociation, SMI symptoms, duration of contacts, and medication decreased; global functioning increased; and quality of life and perceived needs did not change. Eleven participants were in remission for PTSD at T2, of which five were also in remission for major depression. CONCLUSIONS: NET appeared efficacious and applicable to out-patients with SMI and PTSD, and was well tolerated.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psychoeducation (PE) for bipolar disorder (BD) has a first-line recommendation for the maintenance treatment phase of BD. Formats vary greatly in the number of sessions, whether offered individually or in a group, and with or without caregivers attending. Due to a large variation in formats in the Netherlands, a new program was developed and implemented in 17 outpatient clinics throughout the country. The current study investigated the feasibility of a newly developed 12-sessions PE group program for patients with BD and their caregivers in routine outpatient practice and additionally explored its effectiveness. METHODS: Participants in the study were 108 patients diagnosed with BD, 88 caregivers and 35 course leaders. Feasibility and acceptance of the program were investigated by measures of attendance, and evaluative questionnaires after session 12. Preliminary treatment effects were investigated by pre- and post-measures on mood symptoms, attitudes towards BD and its treatment, levels of self-management, and levels of expressed emotion. RESULTS: There was a high degree of satisfaction with the current program as reported by patients, caregivers, and course leaders. The average attendance was high and 83% of the patients and 75% of the caregivers completed the program. Analyses of treatment effects suggest positive effects on depressive symptoms and self-management in patients, and lower EE as experienced by caregivers. CONCLUSIONS: This compact 12-sessions psychoeducation group program showed good feasibility and was well accepted by patients, caregivers, and course leaders. Preliminary effects on measures of self-management, expressed emotions, and depressive symptoms were promising. After its introduction it has been widely implemented in mental health institutions throughout the Netherlands.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To examine the experiences of outpatients with bipolar disorder recording a 10-minute film to show their "being" in a euthymic mood state. DESIGN AND METHODS: A multicenter qualitative study, in the context of a feasibility study for a newly developed intervention. Data were analyzed using the Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method. FINDINGS: Participants experienced the recording as positive and valuable. Although camera anxiety was mentioned frequently, the overall conclusion is that recording a film in the context of a newly developed film intervention is valid. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Clear information and support for the patient should be provided during the preparatory conversation and recording.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Communication , Psychotherapy , Video Recording , Adult , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients/psychology , Qualitative Research , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To describe the experiences of patients with nursing care they had received when hospitalized for mania. DESIGN AND METHODS: Multicenter qualitative study using open interviews. Data were analyzed using the Stevick-Colaizzi-Keen method. FINDINGS: Sense of security is vital for the recovery of these patients, nurses can support and hinder this. Feelings of security are related to clear and calm communication, respect, recognizability of nurses, and daily structure. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Nurses should make sure that the patient recognizes them as nurses. Nurses should spend as much time as possible in the living room. Clear communication about treatment goals is important.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/nursing , Communication , Nurse-Patient Relations , Patient Satisfaction , Adult , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The development of de-hospitalization policies in mental health has resulted in a growing emphasis on self-management. In the chronic care model, self-management support is an essential element. Because of the episodic nature of severe mental illness (SMI) and its high relapse rates, we assume that the extent of self-management support needs of individuals with an SMI is considerable. However, a clear overview of the nature of the self-management support needs of persons with SMI is missing. AIMS: This study aimed to identify self-management support needs from the perspective of individuals with SMI. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted using the method of thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. After searching the databases MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and EMBASE, we screened the papers for the eligibility criteria: individuals with an SMI, adequately representing the voice of persons with SMI and describing their self-management support needs. Thirty-one papers were included. RESULTS: The main findings showed that participants in the studies described the need for informational support, emotional support, acknowledgment, encouragement, and guidance to make sense of their illness experiences, ease suffering, obtain validation and recognition, execute self-management tasks, and be led through unfamiliar territory. CONCLUSION: The perspectives of persons with SMI can provide a road map for constructing a self-management support intervention for persons with SMI. Important others have an essential role in fulfilling support needs. Independently managing an SMI is difficult. Therefore, it is preferable to let important others participate in self-management interventions and to introduce peer support.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/psychology , Needs Assessment , Self-Management , Severity of Illness Index , Social Support , Counseling , Humans , Qualitative ResearchABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mood disorders can be difficult to treat during pregnancy. There is still lack of evidence whether pregnancy influences their natural course and whether continuation of pharmacotherapy, despite potential risks for the unborn child, is beneficial in preventing recurrence of mood episodes during pregnancy. METHODS: Systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines, searching Pubmed, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane databases up till January 9th, 2018. Recurrence rates and various measures of risk were calculated. RESULTS: Out of 1387 articles from an initial search 22 studies met the inclusion criteria. Included studies reported a wide variation in the recurrence rate of bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder during pregnancy (BD: mean = 19%, range = 4%-73%; MDD: mean = 8%, range = 1%-75%). Observational data showed a relative risk reduction of maintenance therapy during pregnancy of 66% in women with BD and 54% for women with MDD, a significant difference (95% CI 9.4-14.6; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: heterogeneous samples, study designs, and reported outcomes in included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the importance of the topic there is a paucity of evidence on recurrence rates of mood episodes during pregnancy among women with MDD or BD. Unlike the impact of the postpartum period, it is still uncertain whether the course of mood disorders is influenced by pregnancy. Non-randomized studies show that maintenance pharmacotherapy during pregnancy in women with mood disorders significantly (p < 0.01) reduces the risk of recurrence.
Subject(s)
Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications/diagnosis , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Mood Disorders/drug therapy , Postpartum Period , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/drug therapy , Recurrence , Risk , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: E-mental health holds promise for people with severe mental illness, but has a limited evidence base. This study explored the effect of e-health added to face-to-face delivery of the Illness Management and Recovery Programme (e-IMR). METHOD: In this multi-centre exploratory cluster randomized controlled trial, seven clusters (n = 60; 41 in intervention group and 19 in control group) were randomly assigned to e-IMR + IMR or IMR only. Outcomes of illness management, self-management, recovery, symptoms, quality of life, and general health were measured at baseline (T0), halfway (T1), and at twelve months (T2). The data were analysed using mixed model for repeated measurements in four models: in 1) we included fixed main effects for time trend and group, in 2) we controlled for confounding effects, in 3) we controlled for interaction effects, and in 4) we performed sub-group analyses within the intervention group. RESULTS: Notwithstanding low activity on e-IMR, significant effects were present in model 1 analyses for self-management (p = .01) and recovery (p = .02) at T1, and for general health perception (p = .02) at T2, all in favour of the intervention group. In model 2, the confounding covariate gender explained the effects at T1 and T2, except for self-management. In model 3, the interacting covariate non-completer explained the effects for self-management (p = .03) at T1. In model 4, the sub-group analyses of e-IMR-users versus non-users showed no differences in effect. CONCLUSION: Because of confounding and interaction modifications, effectiveness of e-IMR cannot be concluded. Low use of e-health precludes definite conclusions on its potential efficacy. Low use of e-IMR calls for a thorough process evaluation of the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Dutch Trial Register ( NTR4772 ).
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/therapy , Telemedicine , Adult , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/surgery , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Brief admission (BA) is a widely used intervention for patients with a borderline personality disorder but it has not yet clearly defined and still lacks clear operational standards. To fully develop this intervention, the relevant components need to be identified and clearly documented. OBJECTIVE: To obtain consensus on the components of BA as a crisis intervention for patients with a borderline personality disorder. DESIGN: Modified Delphi study. RESULTS: Consensus of 100% was reached for the components: "BA plan must be developed together with the patient"; "The BA intervention should be mentioned in the care plan for the patient"; "Not all behavior on the part of the patient has to be accepted during a BA"; and "The BA can only be offered together with treatment by a community care professional." CONCLUSION: Consensus on the components of BA was reached for 82 of the 90 components. This indicates a substantial degree of agreement on what BA should entail.
Subject(s)
Borderline Personality Disorder/therapy , Crisis Intervention/methods , Delphi Technique , Hospitalization , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Patient Admission , Self-Injurious Behavior , Time , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To explore the lived experiences of patients with a psychotic or bipolar disorder and their families with emergency care during the first contact with a mobile crisis team. METHODS: Open individual interviews were held with ten patients and ten family members. Content data-analysis was conducted. FINDINGS: Communication and cooperation was difficult in several cases. Personal crisis plans were not always used. Stigma was felt, especially when police-assistance was needed. A calm, understanding attitude was appreciated. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Focus explicitly on communication with the patient, despite the acute condition, enhances the chance of cooperation. Taking time for contact is important.
Subject(s)
Communication , Crisis Intervention , Emergency Services, Psychiatric/organization & administration , Family/psychology , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Professional-Family Relations , Psychotic Disorders/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The Illness Management and Recovery scales (IMRS) can measure the progress of clients' illness self-management and recovery. Previous studies have examined the psychometric properties of the IMRS. AIMS: This study examined the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the IMRS. METHOD: Clients (n = 111) and clinicians (n = 40) completed the client and clinician versions of the IMRS, respectively. The scales were administered again 2 weeks later to assess stability over time. Validity was assessed with the Utrecht Coping List (UCL), Dutch Empowerment Scale (DES), and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). RESULTS: The client and clinician versions of the IMRS had moderate internal reliability, with α = 0.69 and 0.71, respectively. The scales showed strong test-retest reliability, r = 0.79, for the client version and r = 0.86 for the clinician version. Correlations between client and clinician versions ranged from r = 0.37 to 0.69 for the total and subscales. We also found relationships in expected directions between the client IMRS and UCL, DES and BSI, which supports validity of the Dutch version of the IMRS. CONCLUSIONS: The Dutch version of the IMRS demonstrated good reliability and validity. The IMRS could be useful for Dutch-speaking programs interested in evaluating client progress on illness self-management and recovery.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/therapy , Psychometrics/methods , Disease Management , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health Recovery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Recovery of Function , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, most patients with severe mental illness (SMI) receive flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) provided by multidisciplinary community mental health teams. SMI patients with comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are sometimes offered evidence-based trauma-focused treatment like eye movement desensitization reprocessing or prolonged exposure. There is a large amount of evidence for the effectiveness of narrative exposure therapy (NET) within various vulnerable patient groups with repeated interpersonal trauma. Some FACT-teams provide NET for patients with comorbid PTSD, which is promising, but has not been specifically studied in SMI patients. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim is to evaluate NET in SMI patients with comorbid PTSD associated with repeated interpersonal trauma to get insight into whether (1) PTSD and dissociative symptoms changes and (2) changes occur in the present SMI symptoms, care needs, quality of life, global functioning, and care consumption. The second aim is to gain insight into patients' experiences with NET and to identify influencing factors on treatment results. METHODS: This study will have a mixed methods convergent design consisting of quantitative repeated measures and qualitative semi-structured in-depth interviews based on Grounded Theory. The study population will include adult SMI outpatients (n=25) with comorbid PTSD and receiving NET. The quantitative study parameters will be existence and severity of PTSD, dissociative, and SMI symptoms; care needs; quality of life; global functioning; and care consumption. In a longitudinal analysis, outcomes will be analyzed using mixed models to estimate the difference in means between baseline and repeated measurements. The qualitative study parameters will be experiences with NET and perceived factors for success or failure. Integration of quantitative and qualitative results will be focused on interpreting how qualitative results enhance the understanding of quantitative outcomes. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide more insight into influencing factors for clinical changes in this population.