Real-world Outcomes and Factors Predicting Survival and Completion of Radium 223 in Metastatic Castrate-resistant Prostate Cancer.

AIMS: To analyse outcomes in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with radium 223 (Ra-223) across the Yorkshire and Humber Cancer Network. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A regional, multicentre, retrospective cohort study of 189 men undergoing Ra-223 for mCRPC between March 2014 and April 2017 was undertaken. Factors predicting overall survival and completion of planned treatment were assessed. RESULTS: The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 10.5 months. Those completing five to six cycles of Ra-223 had a higher overall survival of 18.6 months. On multivariable analysis, four factors remained independent significant predictors of overall survival: age (P = 0.005, hazard ratio 1.07 [1.02-1.12]); number of cycles of Ra-223: 5-6 versus 1-4 (P ≤ 0.001, hazard ratio 0.10 [0.005-0.20]); baseline alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.044, hazard ratio 1.06 [1.002-1.12]); neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.033, hazard ratio 1.19 [1.01-1.40]). Baseline performance status 0 versus 2 (P = 0.026, odds ratio 0.080 [0.001-0.74]) and higher baseline haemoglobin (P = 0.028, odds ratio 1.04 [1.004-1.074]) were independent predictors of the completion of five to six cycles of Ra-223. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, completion of five to six cycles of Ra-223, lower alkaline phosphatase and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio are predictors of overall survival. This is the first study to report neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent predictor of overall survival in a Ra-223 cohort. Good performance status and higher baseline haemoglobin predict the completion of five to six cycles of Ra-223.

The prevalence and outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a state of vulnerability to poor resolution of homeostasis following a stressor event, such as chemotherapy or cancer surgery. Better knowledge of the epidemiology of frailty could help drive a global cancer care strategy for older people. The aim of this review was to establish the prevalence and outcomes of frailty and pre-frailty in older cancer patients. METHODS: Observational studies that reported data on the prevalence and/or outcomes of frailty in older cancer patients with any stage of solid or haematological malignancy were considered. We searched Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, Allied and Complementary medicine, Psychinfo and ProQuest (1 January 1996 to 30 June 2013). The primary outcomes were prevalence of frailty, treatment-related side-effects, unplanned hospitalization and mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa checklist. RESULTS: Data from 20 studies evaluating 2916 participants are included. The median reported prevalence of frailty and pre-frailty was 42% (range 6%-86%) and 43% (range 13%-79%), respectively. A median of 32% (range 11%-78%) of patients were classified as fit. Frailty was independently associated with increased all-cause mortality [adjusted 5-year hazard ratio (HR) 1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36-2.57]. There was evidence of increased risk of postoperative mortality for both frailty (adjusted 30-day HR 2.67, 95% CI 1.08-6.62) and pre-frailty (adjusted HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.20-4.52). Treatment complications were more frequent in those with frailty, including intolerance to cancer treatment (adjusted odds ratio 4.86, 95% CI 2.19-10.78) and postoperative complications (adjusted 30-day HR 3.19, 95% CI 1.68-6.04). CONCLUSIONS: More than half of older cancer patients have pre-frailty or frailty and these patients are at increased risk of chemotherapy intolerance, postoperative complications and mortality. The findings of this review support routine assessment of frailty in older cancer patients to guide treatment decisions, and the development of multidisciplinary geriatric oncology services.