Progression patterns, resistant mechanisms and subsequent therapy for ALK-positive NSCLC in the era of second-generation ALK-TKIs.

BACKGROUND: In the era of second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), there was a paucity of data regarding the progression patterns, resistant mechanisms, and subsequent therapeutic approaches for ALK-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC were retrospectively selected from our center. Cohort 1 consisted of patients who experienced disease progression after receiving first-line alectinib treatment (n = 20), while Cohort 2 included patients who progressed following sequential treatment with crizotinib and second-generation ALK-TKIs (n = 53). Oligo-progression was defined as the occurrence of disease progression in no more than three lesions. Symptomatic progression was determined when patients developed new symptoms or experienced worsening of pre-existing symptoms during radiological progression. RESULTS: The incidence of central nervous system (CNS) progression and symptomatic CNS progression was significantly lower in Cohort 1 compared to patients treated with crizotinib, with rates of 15.0% vs. 56.6% (p = 0.002) and 5.0% vs. 32.1% (p = 0.016), respectively. A total of 60.3% (44/73) patients underwent repeated biopsy and next-generation sequencing subsequent to the second-generation ALK-TKI resistance, with secondary mutation in ALK kinase domain emerging as the predominant mechanism of resistance (56.8%). Local therapy was applied to 50% of oligo-progression cases. Subsequent ALK-TKIs demonstrated significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (8.6 m vs. 2.7 m, p = 0.021, HR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.15-0.85) and long-term overall survival (OS) (NA vs. 11.9 m, p = 0.132, HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.18-1.25) in patients harboring ALK resistance mutations, compared to those without such mutations. For patients without ALK-resistant mutations following progression on second-generation ALK-TKIs, there was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between subsequent chemotherapy or alternative ALK-TKI treatments. CONCLUSIONS: First-line alectinib demonstrated superior efficacy in protecting the CNS compared to crizotinib. For patients with ALK-resistant mutations following the resistance to second-generation ALK-TKIs, appropriate sensitive ALK-TKI should be administered; for those without such mutations, the selection of chemotherapy or third-generation ALK-TKI should be based on the patient's overall physical health and personal preferences.

Efficacy of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced NSCLC with different T790M statuses tested via digital droplet polymerase chain reaction ddPCR and next-generation sequencing.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothesize that digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) would optimize the treatment strategies in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) relapsed patients. In this study, we compared the efficacy of third-generation TKIs with various T790M statuses via ddPCR and next-generation sequencing (NGS). METHODS: NGS was performed on blood samples of patients progressed from previous EGFR-TKIs for resistance mechanism. T790M-negative patients received further liquid biopsy using ddPCR for T790M detection. RESULTS: A cohort of 40 patients were enrolled, with 30.0% (12/40) T790M-positive via NGS (Group A). In another 28 T790M-negative patients by NGS, 11 (39.3%) were T790M-positive (Group B) and 17 (60.7%) were T790M-negative (Group C) via ddPCR. A relatively longer progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in group A (NR) and group B (10.0 months, 95% CI 7.040-12.889) than in group C (7.0 months, 95% CI 0.000-15.219), with no significant difference across all three groups (p = 0.196), or between group B and C (p = 0.412). EGFR-sensitive mutation correlated with inferior PFS (p = 0.041) and ORR (p = 0.326), and a significantly lower DCR (p = 0.033) in T790M-negative patients via NGS (n = 28). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that ddPCR may contribute as a supplement to NGS in liquid biopsies for T790M detection in EGFR-TKIs relapsed patients and help to optimize the treatment strategies, especially for those without coexistence of EGFR-sensitive mutation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05458726.

Longitudinal plasma proteomic profiling of EML4-ALK positive lung cancer receiving ALK-TKIs therapy.

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) has demonstrated remarkable therapeutic effects in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Identifying prognostic biomarkers can enhance the clinical efficacy of relapsed or refractory patients. METHODS: We profiled 737 plasma proteins from 159 pre-treatment and on-treatment plasma samples of 63 ALK-positive NSCLC patients using data-independent acquisition-mass spectrometry (DIA-MS). The consensus clustering algorithm was used to identify subtypes with distinct biological features. A plasma-based prognostic model was constructed using the LASSO-Cox method. We performed the Mfuzz analysis to classify the patterns of longitudinal changes in plasma proteins during treatment. 52 baseline plasma samples from another independent ALK-TKI treatment cohort were collected to validate the potential prognostic markers using ELISA. RESULTS: We identified three subtypes of ALK-positive NSCLC with distinct biological features and clinical efficacy. Patients in subgroup 1 exhibited activated humoral immunity and inflammatory responses, increased expression of positive acute-phase response proteins, and the worst prognosis. Then we constructed and verified a prognostic model that predicts the efficacy of ALK-TKI therapy using the expression levels of five plasma proteins (SERPINA4, ATRN, APOA4, TF, and MYOC) at baseline. Next, we explored the longitudinal changes in plasma protein expression during treatment and identified four distinct change patterns (Clusters 1-4). The longitudinal changes of acute-phase proteins during treatment can reflect the treatment status and tumor progression of patients. Finally, we validated the prognostic efficacy of baseline plasma CRP, SAA1, AHSG, SERPINA4, and TF in another independent NSCLC cohort undergoing ALK-TKI treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study contributes to the search for prognostic and drug-resistance biomarkers in plasma samples for ALK-TKI therapy and provides new insights into the mechanism of drug resistance and the selection of follow-up treatment.

Adjuvant and neo-adjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Current status and perspectives.

Surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for selected patients with early-stage or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, many of these patients still experience postoperative recurrence at 5 years. At present, peri-operative treatment methods are emerging to prevent early relapse, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Investigation on predictive biomarkers of responses to adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies is also continuously ongoing. Immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either by monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, has shown benefit in promoting pathological responses and prolonging survival for patients with NSCLC without oncogenic mutations. Exploratory studies have also provided evidence regarding the selection of patients who benefit from ICI-based perioperative treatment. This review focuses on the existing data of current clinical trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant strategies with ICIs in resectable NSCLC, the exploration of predictive biomarkers, and the perspectives and urgent challenges in the future.

Immunotherapy as a later-line option for HER2-altered advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: taxane might be a favorable partner.

Aim: To assess the effectiveness of different types of taxanes, including nab-paclitaxel, paclitaxel and docetaxel, and further compare the effectiveness of taxane-based chemotherapy, taxane-based chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors or taxane-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in HER2-altered non-small-cell lung cancer in the second- or third-line setting. Materials & methods: A total of 52 patients were included in the study. Progression-free survival was compared between subgroups. Results: A clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival was observed among patients in the nab-paclitaxel group compared with the docetaxel group. Taxane-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors achieved longer progression-free survival than taxane-based chemotherapy. There was no difference between taxane-based chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors and taxane-based chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors. Conclusion: Nab-paclitaxel appears to be a reasonable alternative to docetaxel. Chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors might yield more survival benefits than chemotherapy alone.

Pyrotinib plus antiangiogenic agents for HER2-altered advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective real-world study.

BACKGROUND: Although some targeted therapies have been shown to be effective in treating HER2-altered non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the survival demands have not yet been met due to the high cost and limited availability. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of pyrotinib plus antiangiogenic agents, including apatinib, anlotinib, and bevacizumab, in previously treated patients with HER2-altered advanced NSCLC. METHODS: In this retrospective real-world study, patients with HER2-altered NSCLC who received pyrotinib plus antiangiogenic agents as a second- or later-line treatment between November 2015 and January 2022 were reviewed. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles of patients were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included in the analysis, of which 59 patients (55.1%) had received at least two lines of prior chemotherapy or tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Most of them (87.9%) were identified as harboring HER2 exon 20 insertions. At the data cutoff date (May 13, 2022), the ORR, DCR, median PFS, and median OS were 19.6% (21/107), 94.4% (101/107), 7.13 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.26-8.01), and 19.50 months (95% CI: 12.83-26.17), respectively. There was no difference in the PFS between patients receiving apatinib or anlotinib/bevacizumab (median PFS, 7.13 vs. 6.27 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.87-2.54, p = 0.15). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was diarrhea (17.6%), followed by hypertension (11.0%) and nausea (3.3%). No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSION: In this study, pyrotinib plus antiangiogenic agents demonstrated promising efficacy and were tolerable in HER2-altered NSCLC patients.

Low TP53 variant allele frequency as a biomarker for anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 monotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: TP53 mutation heterogeneity should be considered when using TP53 as a predictive biomarker for anti-programmed death (ligand) 1 (PD-(L)1) monotherapy in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, whether TP53 variant allele frequency (VAF) should also be considered remains unknown. METHODS: Patients with LUAD from both published research and the local cohort were included to discover and validate the relationship between TP53 VAF and the efficacy of PD-(L)1 inhibitors. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) LUAD data were included for genomic, transcriptomic, and tumor microenvironment analysis. RESULTS: Among 159 patients in the discovery cohort, low TP53 VAF patients (VAF ≤ 25%) experienced significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than both high TP53 VAF (5.4 vs. 3.3 months; p = .021) and TP53-wild-type patients (5.4 vs. 2.5 months; p = .011). Multivariate Cox regression revealed low TP53 VAF as an independent biomarker of better efficacy. Among 50 patients in the combined validation cohort, median PFS of low TP53 VAF patients was also significantly longer than that of high TP53 VAF patients (12.0 vs. 2.1 months; p = .037). Analyzed with 469 TCGA LUAD samples, low TP53 VAF is associated with significantly higher PD-L1 expression, enrichment of gene sets related to T-cell activation, T cell-mediated immunity, and interferon-γ signaling pathways, and independently associated with more tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells compared with both high TP53 VAF and TP53-wild type. CONCLUSIONS: TP53 VAF should also be considered when using TP53 as a predictive biomarker. Only low TP53 VAF is independently associated with better efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy, which may result from higher PD-L1 expression and more tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells.

Influence of PD-L1 expression on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the influence of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is at variance. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the influence of PD-L1 expression on the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation. Clinical information was retrieved from electronic medical records. The patients were divided into three subgroups according to PD-L1 expression level: PD-L1 < 1% (negative), PD-L1 1%-49% and PD-L1 ≥ 50%. The clinicopathological features, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and comutation information were collected and compared between the three subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included. For PD-L1 < 1%, PD-L1 1%-49% and PD-L1 ≥ 50% group, there were 39 (33.3%), 51 (43.5%) and 27 (23.0%) patients respectively, and the ORR was 43.2%, 64.0%, and 51.9%, respectively (p = 0.162), and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 22.0 months (95% CI: 14.0-29.9 months), 15.4 months (95% CI: 8.9-21.8 months) and 13.0 months (95% CI: 10.6-15.3 months), respectively (log-rank, p = 0.01). The mPFS was negatively correlated with PD-L1 expression level (r = -0.264, p = 0.041) and PD-L1 expression was an independent risk factor for worse PFS of EGFR-TKIs in multivariate Cox regression. Patients with concurrent TP53 mutation had shorter PFS (p = 0.039) and the patients harboring both mutant TP53 and positive PD-L1 had the shortest PFS (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of EGFR-TKIs was influenced by the baseline PD-L1 expression. Higher PD-L1 expression was associated with shorter PFS. The combined indicators of TP53 and PD-L1 identified subgroups showing divergent benefits from EGFR-TKIs.

Efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel or combined nab-paclitaxel and immune checkpoint inhibitors in relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) experience disease progression after first-line chemotherapy. Notably, nab-paclitaxel monotherapy has antitumor activity in relapsed SCLC. Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined of nab-paclitaxel and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in relapsed SCLC. Design: We retrospectively analyzed patients with relapsed SCLC who received nab-paclitaxel or combined nab-paclitaxel and ICIs (anti-programmed death-1, PD-1 or anti-programmed cell death 1 ligand, PD-L1) between February 2017 and September 2021. Methods: Efficacy and safety data were collected from electronic health records. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a standard log-rank test. Results: We included 56 patients with relapsed SCLC, of which 29 received nab-paclitaxel alone (Group A), and 27 received combined nab-paclitaxel and ICIs (Group B). Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Group B had a numerically higher objective response rate than Group A (40.7% versus 17.2%; p = 0.052). However, combined nab-paclitaxel and ICIs failed to demonstrate survival superiority over nab-paclitaxel monotherapy [median PFS: 3.2 months versus 2.8 months (p = 0.5225); median OS: 11.0 months versus 9.3 months (p = 0.7298)]. The safety profiles of Groups A and B were both tolerable. Conclusion: This study indicated that compared with nab-paclitaxel monotherapy, combined nab-paclitaxel and ICIs failed to improve survival in relapsed SCLC.

Effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients: Real-world data of a retrospective, dual-center study.

Background: Studying the application of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) in the real world and evaluating its effectiveness and safety in comparison with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) are critically important. Methods: This study included the II-IIIB stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving NCT with or without PD-1 inhibitors and undergoing surgery after neoadjuvant treatments between January 2019 to August 2022. The clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. Results: A total of 66 patients receiving NICT and 101 patients receiving NCT were included in this study. As compared to NCT, NICT showed similar safety while not increasing the surgical difficulty. The ORR in the NICT and NCT groups was 74.2% and 53.5%, respectively, P = 0.009. A total of 44 patients (66.7%) in the NICT group and 21 patients (20.8%) in the NCT group showed major pathology response (MPR) (P <0.001). The pathology complete response (pCR) rate was also significantly higher in NICT group than that in NCT group (45.5% vs. 10.9%, P <0.001). After Propensity Score Matching (PSM), 42 pairs of patients were included in the analysis. The results showed no significant difference in the ORR between the two groups (52.3% vs. 43.2%, P = 0.118), and the proportions of MPR (76.2%) and pCR (50.0%) in NICT group were significantly higher than those of MPR (11.9%) and pCR (4.7%) in the NCT group (P <0.001). The patients with driver mutations might also benefit from NICT. Conclusions: As compared to NCT, the NICT could significantly increase the proportions of patients with pCR and MPR without increasing the operation-related bleeding and operation time.

Detection of MET Polysomy by Next-generation Sequencing and Its Clinical Relevance for MET Inhibitors.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has failed to detect mesenchymal epithelial transition factor gene (MET) polysomy in previous studies. We included three non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cohorts in this retrospective study to establish new criteria for detecting MET polysomy and to explore the clinical relevance of MET polysomy. Cohort 1 included 53 patients whose tissues were available for both FISH and NGS assays. Paired plasma and tissue samples were obtained from 261 patients with NSCLC as cohort 2. Cohort 3 included 46 patients with metastatic NSCLC, who presented with MET copy-number gain assessed by NGS. ROC analysis demonstrated that a cut-off point of 2.3 copies achieved the maximum Youden index in discriminating polysomy from normal copy number. Compared with the FISH test for MET polysomy, the sensitivity, specificity, and agreement of NGS were 90%, 90%, and 96.2%, respectively. Following optimization using maximum somatic allele frequency, the sensitivity and specificity of NGS for defining polysomy using plasma samples according to different circulating tumor DNA mutation frequencies were 42% and 63%. The concordance rate between tissue and plasma samples for detecting polysomy was 85%. Regarding the response to MET inhibitor, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of the MET amplification group was significantly higher than that of the polysomy group. The median PFS was similar between the polysomy and normal groups. Our results indicated that NGS may serve as an alternative method for detecting MET polysomy in NSCLC tissues. Moreover, patients with MET polysomy may not benefit from MET inhibitors. Significance: In this study, we established a methodology to differentiate polysomy from normal copy numbers and amplification using NGS. Moreover, this study suggests that it is critical to discriminate MET polysomy from amplification, for the former may dilute the clinical benefit of MET inhibitors.

Intracranial efficacy and safety of furmonertinib 160 mg with or without anti-angiogenic agent in advanced NSCLC patients with BM/LM as salvage therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases including brain metastases (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are frequent in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and are correlated with poor outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of single-agent furmonertinib 160 mg or combining with anti-angiogenic agent in NSCLC patients who had developed BM/LM progression from previous tyrosine kinase inhibior (TKI) treatment. METHODS: EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who developed BM (the BM cohort) or LM progression (the LM cohort) were included, having received furmonertinib 160 mg daily as second-line or later treatment, with or without anti-angiogenic agents. The intracranial efficacy was evaluated by intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). RESULTS: Totally 12 patients in the BM cohort and 16 patients in the LM cohort were included. Almost one half of patients in the BM cohort and a majority in the LM cohort had a poor physical status, with a Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) ≥2. The administration of single-agent furmonertinib or combination treatment achieved a median iPFS of 3.6 months (95%CI 1.435-5.705) in the BM cohort, and 4.3 months (95%CI 2.094-6.486) in the LM cohort. Subgroup and univariate analysis has shown that a good ECOG-PS correlated with a favorable efficacy of furmonertinib in the BM cohort (median iPFS = 2.1 with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 vs. 14.6 months with ECOG-PS < 2, P < 0.05). Overall, any grade of adverse events (AEs) occured in 46.4% of patients (13/28). Among them, 14.3% of patients (4 of 28) had grade 3 or higher AEs, and were all under control, led to no dose reductions or suspension. CONCLUSION: Single-agent furmonertinib 160 mg or in combination of anti-angiogenic agent is an optional salvage therapy for advanced NSCLC patients who developed BM/LM progression from prior EGFR-TKI treatment, with a promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile, and is worth of further exploration.

Efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib (WX-0593) in ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients: a single-arm, multicenter phase II study (INTELLECT).

BACKGROUND: Iruplinalkib (WX-0593) is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Here we reported the single-arm, phase II study (INTELLECT) results of the efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib for ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC patients aged ≥18 years, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. Patients received iruplinalkib 180 mg orally once daily for a 21-day cycle with a 7-day lead-in phase at 60 mg orally once daily. The primary endpoint was the independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: From August 7, 2019, to October 30, 2020, 146 patients were included. As of the data cut-off date on November 30, 2021, the median follow-up time was 18.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8-18.8). IRC-assessed ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 69.9% (95% CI 61.7-77.2%) and 96.6% (95% CI 92.2-98.9%), respectively. Investigator-assessed ORR and DCR were 63.0% (95% CI 54.6-70.8%) and 94.5% (95% CI 89.5-97.6%), respectively. Investigator-assessed median duration of response and progression-free survival (the same as median time to progression) were 13.2 months (95% CI 10.4-17.7) and 14.5 months (95% CI 11.7-20.0), respectively. Corresponding IRC-assessed results were 14.4 months (95% CI 13.1-not evaluable [NE]), 19.8 months (95% CI 14.5-NE), and NE (95% CI 14.5-NE), respectively. Investigator-assessed intracranial ORRs were 46% (41/90, 95% CI 35-56%) in patients with central nervous system metastases and 64% (27/42, 95% CI 48-78%) in patients with measurable intracranial lesions. Overall survival data were immature. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 136/146 (93.2%) patients. The most common TRAEs were aspartate aminotransferase increased (63 [43.2%]), alanine aminotransferase increased (54 [37.0%]), and blood creatine phosphokinase increased (51 [34.9%]). Dose interruption, reduction, and discontinuation due to TRAEs occurred in 21 (14.4%), 16 (11.0%), and four (2.7%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, iruplinalkib (WX-0593) demonstrated favorable efficacy and manageable safety profiles in patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC. Iruplinalkib could be a new treatment option for this patient population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Center for Drug Evaluation of National Medical Products Administration of China: CTR20190789, registered on April 28, 2019; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04641754, registered on November 24, 2020.

First-line immunotherapy or angiogenesis inhibitor combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertions: Real-world evidence from China.

BACKGROUND: Currently, survival benefit of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) is controversial, though it generally indicates poor response and activity. Compared with standard chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab, first-line chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in advanced NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins remains elusive and lacks real-world evidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective real-world study was conducted to evaluate clinical outcomes of chemotherapy alone (C), chemotherapy plus ICI (C + I), or chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors (C + A) as first-line strategies for advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins. Investigator-assessed response and survival outcomes were compared between subgroups. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis was conducted to reveal concomitant alterations and explore the molecular landscape of ex20ins. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients were screened, identifying 35 kinds of ex20ins, and 122 cases treated with C, C + I, and C + A were finally included in the first-line analysis. C + A achieved much better objective response rate (ORR, 38.1% vs. 18.2%) and significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit compared with C (median, 7.73 vs.5.93 months, HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.40-0.90, p = 0.014), and it showed similar ORR (38.1% vs. 40.0%), but higher disease control rate (DCR, 96.8% vs. 80.0%) and numerically longer median PFS (7.73 vs. 6.53 months, HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.44-1.56, p = 0.30) than C + I. There was no PFS difference between C + I and C, despite of PD-L1 expression or tumor mutational burden. KEGG analysis revealed concomitant upregulation of PI3K/AKT signaling might mediate intrinsic resistance to ICI in ex20ins. CONCLUSION: First-line chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors might yield more survival benefits than chemotherapy alone for NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins, whereas, it suggests that chemotherapy in combination with ICI might not obtain a better survival benefit for this subset of patients. Activation of PI3K/AKT signaling might mediate intrinsic immunosuppression in NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins.

Evolutionary Characteristics and Immunologic Divergence of Lung and Brain Metastasis Lesions in NSCLC.

Brain metastases (BM) is one of the main reasons for lung cancer-related deaths but lack prediction methods. Many patients with BMs do not benefit from immunotherapy. A comprehensive genomic analysis of matched primary tumors (PT) and their BM lesions may provide new insight into the evolutionary and immune characteristics. To describe evolutionary features and immune characteristic differences, we analyzed whole-exome sequencing data for 28 paired PT and BM samples from 14 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. In addition, we used another 26 matched PT and BM samples as a validation cohort. We found that total mutational signatures were relatively consistent between paired primary and brain metastatic tumors. Nevertheless, the shared mutations of the two lesions were fewer than the mutations present in each of the lesions alone. In the process of BM, driver genes undergo evolutionary branches. Typical driver genes, including EGFR and TP53, appear relatively conserved throughout evolution; however, specific signals are enriched in BM lesions. We found several main characteristics of lung cancer BMs that were different from primary lung cancer, such as genomic instability, novel driver genes, tumor mutation burden, and BM lesion private neoantigens. In addition, the estimated timing of dissemination showed that BMs might occur early in lung cancer. IMPLICATIONS: Mechanistic insight from this study provides new insight into the biology of the metastatic brain process and a new beneficial approach for preventing and treating lung cancer BMs.

Efficacy and safety of brigatinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Brigatinib is a central nervous system-active second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor that targets a broad range of ALK rearrangements in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current study aimed to analyze the pooled effects and adverse events of brigatinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. Methods: The pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with DerSimonian-Laird method and the random effect model. Results: The pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of brigatinib were 64% (95% CI 45%-83%) and 88% (95% CI 80%-96%), respectively. The pooled mPFS was 10.52 months (95% CI 7.66-13.37). In the subgroup analyses by treatment line, the highest mPFS was reached in first-line treatment (24.00 months, 95% CI 18.40-43.20), followed by post-crizotinib second-line treatment (mPFS=16.26 months, 95% CI 12.87-19.65), and second-line with any prior ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mPFS=12.96 months, 95% CI 11.14-14.78). Among patients with any baseline brain metastases, the pooled intracranial ORR (iORR) was estimated as 54% (95% CI 35%-73%) for any treatment line, and 60% (95% CI 39%-81%) for first-line treatment. Intracranial PFS (iPFS) reached 19.26 months (95% CI 14.82-23.70) in patients with any baseline brain metastases. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increased (44%, 95% CI 26%-63%), diarrhea (37%, 95% CI 27%-48%), and nausea (28%, 95% CI 17%-39%) of any grade were the most common adverse events. Conclusion: Brigatinib is effective in the treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, particularly showing robust intracranial PFS. Brigatinib used as first-line treatment yielded superior PFS compared with brigatinib used as other treatment lines. These results suggested a benefit of using brigatinib earlier in the patient's management. All adverse events are manageable, with CPK increased and gastrointestinal reactions found to be the most common types. Systematic Review Registration: https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-3-0142/, identifier (INPLASY202230141).

Afatinib and Dacomitinib Efficacy, Safety, Progression Patterns, and Resistance Mechanisms in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Carrying Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Comparative Cohort Study in China (AFANDA Study).

(1) Background: Afatinib has been approved for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying major uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutations. Dacomitinib, another second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has also shown promising potential for uncommon EGFR mutations. However, no comparative study has been conducted. (2) Methods: Two cohorts were employed: the AFANDA cohort, an ambispective cohort including 121 patients with uncommon EGFR mutations admitted to two tertiary hospitals in China, and an external validation afatinib cohort (ex-AC), extracted from the Afatinib Uncommon EGFR Mutations Database (N = 1140). The AFANDA cohort was divided into an afatinib cohort (AC) and a dacomitinib cohort (DC) for internal exploration. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed for comparison. Progression patterns and resistance mechanisms were explored. (3) Results: In total, 286 patients with advanced NSCLC carrying uncommon EGFR mutations treated with afatinib or dacomitinib were enrolled, including 79 in the AFANDA cohort (44 in the DC, 35 in the AC) and 207 in the ex-AC. In internal exploration, the ORR of the DC was significantly higher than that of the AC (60.5 vs. 26.7%, p = 0.008), but there was no significant difference in median PFS between the DC and the AC (12.0 months vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.305). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent favorable effect of dacomitinib on PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.909; p = 0.047). In external validation, multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic role of dacomitinib in PFS (HR, 1.953; p = 0.029). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed the superiority of dacomitinib over afatinib in terms of PFS in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Toxicity profiling analysis suggested more G1 (p = 0.006), but fewer G3 (p = 0.036) AEs in the DC than in the AC. Progression patterns revealed that the incidence of intracranial progression in the AC was significantly higher than that in the DC (50 vs. 21.1%, p = 0.002). Drug resistance analysis indicated no significant difference in the occurrence of T790M between the AC and the DC (11.8 vs. 15.4%, p = 0.772). (4) Conclusions: Compared with afatinib, dacomitinib demonstrated a more favorable activity with manageable toxicity and different progression patterns in patients with NSCLC carrying uncommon EGFR mutations.

Treatment patterns and outcomes of immunotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer based on real-world practice.

BACKGROUND: The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents a breakthrough in the current landscape for the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but the real-world outcome is limited. This study aimed to investigate the treatment options and efficacy evaluation of first-line, second-line, and subsequent-line immunotherapy in routine practice. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ES-SCLC patients treated with ICIs was conducted between May 2016 and September 2021. Objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were assessed between groups to explore the value of ICIs at different treatment time periods. PFS1 and PFS2 were defined as the duration from initial therapy to disease progression or death in first-line or second-line treatment. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients with ES-SCLC were included. PFS1 was prolonged in patients treated with first-line ICIs-combined therapy (median PFS1 7.20 months vs. 5.30 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-087, p = 0.0085). For patients who progressed after first-line ICIs treatment (N = 22), PFS1 + PFS2 was longer in the second-line ICIs continuation group with no significant difference (median PFS1 + PFS2 11.27 months vs. 7.20 months, HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.14-1.51, p = 0.19). For patients who experienced a progression event after first-line chemotherapy (N = 50), PFS2 and PFS1 + PFS2 were prolonged in patients who accepted second-line ICIs-combined therapy without significant difference (median PFS2 4.00 months vs. 2.43 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.33-1.05, p = 0.070; median PFS1 + PFS2 11.30 months vs. 8.70 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.98, p = 0.056). CONCLUSION: First-line ICIs plus chemotherapy should be applied in the clinical practice of ES-SCLC. If patients did not receive ICIs plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment, therapies that include ICIs in second-line treatment should be considered.

EGFR uncommon alterations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer and structural insights into sensitivity to diverse tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Background: Approximately 10% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic responses and predict the binding activity of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR uncommon alterations. Methods: Between May 2014 and June 2021, clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR uncommon alterations who received diverse treatment modalities: first-generation (1G) EGFR-TKI, second-generation (2G) EGFR-TKI afatinib, chemotherapy, and 1G TKI in combination with chemotherapy as the initial therapy were retrospectively analyzed, and structural analysis for the binding activity of major uncommon subtypes G719A, S768I, and L861Q to different TKIs were predicted. Results: A total of 102 NSCLC patients harboring EGFR uncommon alterations with treatment and survival outcomes were included and analyzed. The majority of patients presented compound mutations (54.9%), and G719X plus S768I was the predominant subtype (n = 33, 32.3%). There was a significant difference in median progression-free survival (mPFS) between therapeutic patterns (p = 0.015) and EGFR alteration subtypes (p = 0.017). Rather than almonertinib and furmonertinib, afatinib, dacomitinib and osimertinib revealed favorable binding activity to G719A mutation. In contrast, S768I and L861Q mutation indicated an unaffected binding activity to these diverse kinds of EGFR TKIs. Conclusion: Together with afatinib, 1G-TKIs combined with chemotherapy might be another effective option for NSCLC patients harboring EGFR uncommon alterations. Based on computational findings, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib might confer favorable activity to G719A, S768I, and L861Q, whereas almonertinib and furmonertinib revealed less activity to G719A.