ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Acute stroke often leads to dysphagia. In the oral stage of dysphagia, there is a potential for immediate benefit from using a palatal augmentation prosthesis (PAP). We investigated whether our quickly fabricated, simple, and expedited version of PAP would result in an immediate improvement in swallowing function after an acute stroke. METHODS: We analyzed the records of stroke patients that were hospitalized between October 2019 and March 2022 and met the following criteria: they had a rehabilitation prescription and had paralysis of facial or hypoglossal nerves and either repeated salivary swallowing test ≤2 times or modified water swallow test ≤3, they were fasting, were within 3 weeks of onset, and had a simple PAP made for them. Outcomes included with/without PAP, maximum tongue pressure, repeated salivary swallowing test, and modified water swallow test on the day after starting to wear PAP was started. In addition, within one week, a videofluoroscopic examination was performed to measure the oral transit time, pharyngeal transit time, and penetration aspiration scale. Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Fifteen patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. The mean age of the subjects was 76.9 ± 9.0 years. The use of PAP significantly increased maximum tongue pressure (P < 0.0001*) and shortened oral transit time (P < 0.0091*). There were no significant differences among the other items. CONCLUSIONS: Simple PAP immediately increased the maximum tongue pressure and improved swallowing function during the oral stage.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation using balloon ablation was developed as a technique for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). While most studies examined cryoballoon ablation (CBA), there have also been many reports on hot balloon ablation (HBA). We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes between HBA and CBA. METHODS: In a total of 103 consecutive patients with PAF who underwent catheter ablation, 60 propensity score-matched (30 CBA and 30 HBA) patients were enrolled. The procedural differences and clinical outcomes between the two groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The requirement for additional touch-up ablation was more frequent in the left superior pulmonary vein (LSP) in the HBA group than in the CBA group. Pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) images showed that a thicker left pulmonary vein ridge and larger cross-sectional area of the LSPV were significantly associated with residual PV potentials after HBA. However, post-procedural CT images showed that PV stenosis (> 25%) was higher in the HBA group (33%) than in the CBA group (0%). PV stenosis after HBA was observed most frequently in the right superior PV (50%). The atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia-free survival rate during follow-up (365 ± 102 days) was similar between the two groups (CBA vs. HBA, 83% vs. 90%). CONCLUSIONS: Although both balloon modalities can relieve atrial arrhythmia after the procedure, careful attention is required during HBA procedures, especially for the right superior PV, to avoid PV stenosis.