ABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDS: Patients with multiple myeloma have a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), especially during the induction chemotherapy. The aim of our observational study was to determine the impact of prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) on the incidence of thromboembolic complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the incidence of thromboembolic events in 258 patients treated with induction chemotherapy containing vincristin, doxorubicin or idarubicin, and dexamethasone, followed by stimulation chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF, and high-dose chemotherapy with melphalan. Two groups of these patients were compared based on the practice of thromboprophylaxis. Patients in the first group (Control, n = 140) were either not treated or treated with a short duration of anticoagulation therapy while the patients in the second group (Prophylactic, n = 118) underwent standard prophylaxis with LMWH throughout the entire period of induction chemotherapy. A total of 102 patients were selected for a close monitoring of the prophylactic effect of different LMWH doses and to be compared to patients without treatment. RESULTS: Standard prophylaxis with LMWH significantly (p < 0.007) lowered a risk of VTE when compared to patients without such prophylaxis (3.4% versus 12.9%, respectively). Furthermore, analysis of the subgroup of 102 patients revealed that higher LMWH doses (> 70 IU/kg per day) achieved full prophylaxis in 28 patients while lower doses were less effective leading to DVT in 3 (7.7%) out of 39 patients. In contrast, VTE was diagnosed in 5 (14.3%) out of 35 patients without any LMWH prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis with LMWH leads to a significant reduction of the risk of thromboembolic complications during the induction chemotherapy in patients suffering from MM. The prophylactic effect of LMWH is dose-dependent.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Venous Thrombosis/prevention & control , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Risk Factors , Venous Thrombosis/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the contribution of the whole body MRI (WB-MRI) in the diagnostics of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and initial, asymptomatic form of multiple myeloma (MM), as well as the evaluation of practical usefulness of the Durie-Salmon Plus staging system (D-S Plus). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analyzed 86-patient cohort consisted of 28 patients with MGUS and 54 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and 4 patients with solitary plasmocytoma (SP). WB-MRI was evaluated using Magnetom Avanto 1.5 T with the use of virtual whole body coil with sequential acquisition on 7 levels and 2 sequentions--T2 STIR and T1. Based on the number of lesions and the degree of diffuse involvement we assessed the D-S Plus stage, and compared it to the results of standard staging systems according to Durie Salmon (D-S) and International Staging System (ISS). Statistical estimation was done using the Cohen kappa test and McNemara-Bowker test at p < 0.05. RESULTS: In the group of 28 individuals with MGUS, there were 17 (61%) patients fulfilling the IMWG criteria and/orWB-MRI criteria of incipient MM. In 4/17 (23%) patients we described a more advanced stage when comparing D-S Plus to D-S. Nine out of fourteen (64%) patients with MGUS transforming into MM with negative radiological assessment had positive findings on WB-MRI. The character of WB-MRI findings lead in 9/17 (53%) of the patients to the initiation of induction treatment. Stratification according to D-S Plus divided the 54 newly diagnosed patients with MM into stage 1 (16.7%), stage 2 (33.3%) and stage 3 (50%). In 22% there was a shift into a higher stage using DS-Plus in comparison with D-S, in 9% of the patients the shift lead to downstaging. When comparing the results of ISS vs D-S Plus we found that the system based on WB-MRI showed in 41% of the patients higher stage and only in 9% of the patients lower stage. In 13% of MM patients we described extramedulary masses of the tumor, especially in paraspinal region. In 1 of the 4 SP patients the WB-MRI changed the diagnosis into multifocal plasmocytoma. CONCLUSION: WB-MRI is a very contributive imaging method with substantially higher resolution than conventional radiography. It is able to evaluate the grade and the extent of myeloma bone disease. It improves the diagnostic approach in the differentiation of stable MGUS from the phase of malignant transformation into MM. The D-S Plus system proved to be contributive and is competent to become a routine part of diagnostic and stratification algorithms in MGUS and MM.
Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Whole Body Imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/classification , Multiple Myeloma/classificationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was the evaluation of serum levels of 12 selected biomarkers in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and in initial, asyptomatic phase of multiple myeloma, especially from the view of potential differentiation of these conditions in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Analyzed group of 268 individuals consisted of 89 individuals with MGUS and 179 patients with MM examined in time of diagnosis before treatment initiation. For evaluation of serum levels were used following methods: radioenzymatic method (thymidinekinase), enzymatic immunoassay (beta2-M, IL-6R, ICAM-1, VCAM-1, ICTP, PINP and OPG) and quantitative sandwich enzymatic immunoassay (HGF, VEGF, syndecan-1/CD138 and Fas). Pearson's chi2-test and test according to Mann-Whitney were used for statistical evaluation (p < 0.05). Wide statistic differences in serum levels of analyzed markers in MGUS vs. MM were detected in case of beta2-M, TK, ICTP, OPG, HGF and syndecan-1 (p < 0.0001), lower differences in case of VCAM-1, PINP and VEGF (p = 0.003, 0.001 and 0.04), and without difference in case of Fas. Except for thymidinekinase (p = 0.014) and syndecan-1 (p = 0.001) was not detected statistically important contrast of measured values in MGUS individuals and in patients with initial, asymptomatic phase of MM (stage 1), but these markers cannot be used in clinical practice due to significant overlap of serum values. Continuous downgrade of serum values of VEGF due to degree of MM progression (stages 1-3 according to Durie-Salmon) was unexpected. RESULTS: Although the significant differences in 9 of 12 evaluated serum levels of selected biomarkers in groups of MGUS and MM were seen, the results revealed that these markers are unprofitable to bring discriminatory potential capable of being used to distinguish between MGUS and initial, asymptomatic phase of MM.
