Symptoms and Severity of COVID-19 in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Experience of a University Medical Center.

Background: The pandemic situation of the novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)) and its associated disease (coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)) represents a challenging condition with a plethora of aspects. The course of COVID-19 in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID) such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rheumatic diseases (RD) is not well known. Our study is one step toward closing this gap by collecting data on vaccination rates, infection-free survival, and individual symptom severity. Methods: We conducted a prospective questionnaire-based study between April 2022 and October 2022 at our university hospital. Outward patients over the age of 18 years were screened for participation and reported about their infection/infection-free survival since the start of the pandemic. Results: Finally, 156 patients were included in the study, 117 (75.0%) of which had inflammatory bowel disease and 39 (25.0%) patients with rheumatic disease. Altogether, 143 (91.7%) persons had received at least one vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. A total of 153 patients provided information regarding their COVID-19 history: 81 patients (52.0%) self-reported about their SARS-CoV-2 infection. In general, courses of infection were mild: only two patients (2.5% of patients with reported COVID-19) were hospitalized due to COVID-19 with one (1.2%) of the two needing intensive care. Asymptomatic COVID-19 had been described by 7 persons (8.6% of patients with reported COVID-19). Acute COVID-19 was accompanied by fatigue/tiredness in 58 persons (71.6% of patients with history of COVID-19) as the most frequent symptom. Other complaints were common cold (55 patients = 67.9%), cough (51 patients = 63.0%), headache (44 patients = 54.3%), and fever (35 patients = 43.2%). Stratified by vaccination status (unvaccinated vs. at least once vaccinated), the time to infection differed significantly (logrank test: p = 0.04, Chi2 4.1). At least once vaccinated people had a median COVID-19-free survival of 28.5 months (confidence interval (CI): 23.6 months-not reached). Without any vaccination, the estimated time to infection was 25.1 months (CI: 23.6 months-not reached). Conclusion: Our IMID patients have a high rate of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. Data show a significantly longer infection-free survival in vaccinated IMID patients as compared to unvaccinated patients. Discrimination between symptoms of COVID-19 and a concomitant inflammatory disease is difficult as complaints might be overlapping. This trial is registered with DRKS00028880.

Submucosal Injection of the RNA Oligonucleotide GUT-1 in Active Ulcerative Colitis Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2a Induction Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carbohydrate sulfotransferase 15 [CHST15] biosynthesizes sulphated matrix glycosaminoglycans and is implicated in intestinal inflammation and fibrosis. Here, we evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double-stranded RNA oligonucleotide GUT-1, a specific blocker of CHST15, as induction therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis [UC]. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study, we enrolled endoscopically active UC patients, refractory to conventional therapy, in five hospital centres across Germany. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 using a block randomized technique to receive a single dosing of 25 nM GUT-1, 250 nM GUT-1, or placebo by endoscopic submucosal injections. The primary outcome measure was improvement of endoscopic lesions at weeks 2 or 4. The secondary outcome measures included clinical and histological responses. Safety was assessed in all patients who received treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were screened, 24 were randomized, and 21 were evaluated. Endoscopic improvement at weeks 2 or 4 was achieved by 71.4% in the GUT-1 250 nM, 0% in the GUT-1 25 nM, and 28.6% in the placebo group. Clinical remission was shown by 57.1% in the GUT-1 250 nM, 0% in the GUT-1 25 nM, and 14.3% in the placebo groups. Histological improvement was shown by 42.9% in the GUT-1 250 nM, 0% in the GUT-1 25 nM, and 0% in the placebo groups. GUT-1 250 nM reduced CHST15 expression significantly and suppressed mucosal inflammation and fibrosis. GUT-1 application was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Single dosing by submucosal injection of GUT-1 repressed CHST15 mucosal expression and may represent a novel induction therapy by modulating tissue remodelling in UC.

[Effects of SARS-CoV-2 Infection on Symptoms and Therapy of Inflammatory Bowel Disease]. / Auswirkungen einer SARS-CoV-2-Infektion auf Symptomatik und Therapie chronisch-entzündlicher Darmerkrankungen.

INTRODUCTION: The influence of a SARS-CoV-2 infection on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not yet been well characterized and it is unclear whether this requires an adaptation of the immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: A national register was established for the retrospective documentation of clinical parameters and changes in immunosuppressive therapy in SARS-CoV-2 infected IBD patients. RESULTS: In total, only 3 of 185 IBD patients (1.6 %) were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection because of abdominal symptoms. In the course of COVID-19 disease, 43.5 % developed diarrhea, abdominal pain or hematochezia (risk of hospitalization with vs. without abdominal symptoms: 20.0 % vs. 10.6 %, p < 0.01). With active IBD at the time of SARS-CoV-2 detection, there was an increased risk of hospitalization (remission 11.2 %, active IBD 23.3 % p < 0.05). IBD-specific therapy remained unchanged in 115 patients (71.4 %); the most common change was an interruption of systemic therapy (16.2 %). DISCUSSION: New abdominal symptoms often appeared in SARS-CoV-2 infected IBD patients. However, these only rarely led to SARS-CoV-2 testing. A high IBD activity at the time of SARS-CoV-2 detection was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization.

Sonographic diagnosis and Endo-SPONGE assisted vacuum therapy of anastomotic leakage following posterior pelvic exenteration for ovarian cancer without using a protective stoma.

Anastomotic leakage is a very significant complication after posterior pelvic exenteration and a major cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality. We present a patient who underwent an optimal debulking surgery for an advanced stage ovarian cancer (FIGO IIIC). On postoperative day 12, transvaginal ultrasound revealed an anastomotic dehiscence following an unsuspicious computer tomography scan the day before. The patient was successfully managed by transanal vacuum therapy without re-laparotomy within a period of 4 weeks after diagnosis. We conclude that high-resolution transvaginal ultrasound is a crucial method in the management of complications after surgery and even allow diagnosing leakages of colorectal anastomosis. In selected cases characterized by a small leak size and a local peritonitis confined to the pelvis a transanal vacuum therapy may avoid both surgical re-intervention and creating a secondary diverting stoma.

Vaccination coverage in immunosuppressed patients: results of a regional health services research study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic inflammatory diseases are at elevated risk of infections that can be prevented by vaccination. This elevated risk is due not just to these patients' primary illnesses, but also to the immunosuppressive treatment that they often receive. We studied the vaccination rate in a random sample of patients with two types of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), namely, Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. In particular, we asked unvaccinated patients why they had re-fused the vaccine. METHODS: From April to September 2009, we gave a 38-item questionnaire to 203 consecutive patients with IBD (57% with Crohn's disease, 63% female, median age 36 years) who had not received vaccination counseling for at least one year, and inspected the patients' vaccination cards. We compared the findings to the current recommendations of the German Federal Standing Committee on Vaccination (Ständige Impfkommission). RESULTS: 83% of the patients had a vaccination card. Substantial deficiencies in vaccination were found. Only 67% of the patients had been immunized against tetanus in the previous 10 years, and only 21% against pertussis. Only 28% were vaccinated against seasonal influenza in 2008, and only 9% had ever received anti-pneumococcal vaccine. A subgroup analysis in which we compared 39 patients taking TNF-blockers to 67 patients who never had any type of immunosuppressive treatment revealed no difference in vaccination rates. 80% of all patients said they were willing to receive all of the officially recommended vaccinations. 22% of all patients said they avoided vaccinations for fear of side effects, while 15% said they did so because their immune system was supposedly "not intact", and 9% because they feared vaccination would worsen their IBD. CONCLUSION: In this random sample, the vaccination rate fell far behind the recommendations. In particular, there was a marked discrepancy between patients' willingness to be vaccinated and the actual provision of vaccination. These findings imply that physicians need to be more aware of the possibly inadequate vaccination state of their immunosuppressed patients.