Obstetrical outcomes of labor with and without analgesia in Robson classification groups 1 and 2a: a single-center retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the effects of neuraxial analgesia on labor in women classified based on the Robson classification system. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of singleton cephalic nulliparous deliveries in labor at term between January 2018 and December 2021 and compared obstetrical outcomes between deliveries with and without neuraxial analgesia in women of Robson group 1 (spontaneous labor) and group 2a (induced labor). Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon ranked-sum test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression model. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: We identified 2726 deliveries during the period, of which 387 deliveries (215 with analgesia and 172 without analgesia) were in Robson group 1 and 502 deliveries (258 with analgesia and 244 without analgesia) in Robson 2a. In Robson group 1 pregnancies, the cesarean section (CS) rate was higher in those who received analgesia (15%) than in those who did not (3%) (p = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that labor with analgesia was a significant risk factor for CS (p < 0.0001). Similarly, in Robson group 2a pregnancies, we observed a higher CS rate in those with analgesia than in those without analgesia (18 vs. 11%, p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: A higher CS rate was observed in deliveries with analgesia than in those without analgesia both in the Robson group 1 and group 2a pregnancies.

Influences of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy According to Body Mass Index (Underweight, Normal Weight, Overweight, or Obese).

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of body mass index (BMI) on laparoscopic hysterectomy outcomes. DESIGN: This was retrospective study. SETTING: Minoh City Hospital, Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017, 183 patients underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) at our institution. INTERVENTION: Patients who underwent TLH were grouped according to BMI, as follows: underweight group (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), normal-weight group (18.5 ≤BMI <25 kg/m2), overweight group (25 ≤BMI <30 kg/m2), and obese group (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Information on patients' clinical characteristics and surgical results were collected retrospectively by medical record review. The severity of complications was graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. We assessed clinical characteristics, surgical results, and the perioperative complications in each BMI group. Surgical results included operation time, nonsurgical operating room time estimated blood loss, uterine weight, and postoperative hospital stay. Compared with the normal-weight group, the obese group had significantly more complications (P = 0.012) and longer operation time (P = 0.04). The underweight and overweight groups did not have significantly different surgical results than the normal-weight group. CONCLUSION: Underweight and overweight patients had no significant differences in surgical results, compared with patients of normal weight. Obese patients had significantly longer operation times and more perioperative complications than patients with normal weight. Laparoscopic hysterectomy has burdens and risks for obese patients. Our results suggest that appropriate weight control may decrease the risk of surgery for obese patients.