Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Infect ; : 106217, 2024 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38969238

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We studied the short- and long-term effects of imatinib in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Participants were randomised to receive standard of care (SoC) or SoC with imatinib. Imatinib dosage was 400mg daily until discharge (max 14 days). Primary outcomes were mortality at 30 days and 1 year. Secondary outcomes included recovery, quality of life and long COVID symptoms at 1 year. We also performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials studying imatinib for 30-day mortality in hospitalised COVID-19 patients. RESULTS: We randomised 156 patients (73 in SoC and 83 in imatinib). Among patients on imatinib, 7.2% had died at 30 days and 13.3% at 1 year and in SoC 4.1% and 8.2% (adjusted HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.47-3.90). At 1-year, self-reported recovery occurred in 79.0% in imatinib and in 88.5% in SoC (RR 0.91, 0.78-1.06). We found no convincing difference in quality of life or symptoms. Fatigue (24%) and sleep issues (20%) frequently bothered patients at one year. In the meta-analysis, imatinib was associated with a mortality risk ratio of 0.73 (0.32-1.63; low certainty evidence). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence raises doubts regarding benefit of imatinib in reducing mortality, improving recovery and preventing long COVID symptoms in hospitalised COVID-19 patients.

2.
Nat Commun ; 13(1): 6152, 2022 10 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36257950

ABSTRACT

We report the first long-term follow-up of a randomized trial (NCT04978259) addressing the effects of remdesivir on recovery (primary outcome) and other patient-important outcomes one year after hospitalization resulting from COVID-19. Of the 208 patients recruited from 11 Finnish hospitals, 198 survived, of whom 181 (92%) completed follow-up. At one year, self-reported recovery occurred in 85% in remdesivir and 86% in standard of care (SoC) (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.47-1.90). We infer no convincing difference between remdesivir and SoC in quality of life or symptom outcomes (p > 0.05). Of the 21 potential long-COVID symptoms, patients reported moderate/major bother from fatigue (26%), joint pain (22%), and problems with memory (19%) and attention/concentration (18%). In conclusion, after a one-year follow-up of hospitalized patients, one in six reported they had not recovered well from COVID-19. Our results provide no convincing evidence of remdesivir benefit, but wide confidence intervals included possible benefit and harm.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Humans , Alanine/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Finland/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
3.
Eur Urol Focus ; 7(6): 1222-1225, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34556452

ABSTRACT

ARTS will be the first trial to compare anticoagulation with a direct oral anticoagulant (apixaban) versus no anticoagulation among patients undergoing intra-abdominal, gynecologic, or urologic surgery at sufficiently similar risk of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and major bleeding.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants , Pulmonary Embolism , Venous Thromboembolism , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Female , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Pulmonary Embolism/prevention & control , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Venous Thromboembolism/etiology , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...