Assessing the health literacy of caregivers in the pediatric intensive care unit: a mixed-methods study.

Background: Limited health literacy is associated with increased hospitalizations, emergency visits, health care costs, and mortality. The health literacy levels of caregivers of critically ill children are unknown. This mixed-methods study aims to quantitatively assess the health literacy of caregivers of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and qualitatively describe facilitators and barriers to implementing health literacy screening from the provider perspective. Methods: Caregivers of patients admitted to our large, academic PICU (between August 12, 2022 and March 31, 2023) were approached to complete a survey with the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), which is a validated health literacy screener offered in English and Spanish. We additionally conducted focus groups of interdisciplinary PICU providers to identify factors which may influence implementation of health literacy screening using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) framework. Results: Among 48 surveyed caregivers, 79% demonstrated adequate health literacy using the Newest Vital Sign screener. The majority of caregivers spoke English (96%), were mothers (85%), and identified as White (75%). 83% of caregivers were able to attend rounds at least once and 98% believed attending rounds was helpful. Within the PICU provider focus groups, there were 11 participants (3 attendings, 3 fellows, 2 nurse practitioners, 1 hospitalist, 2 research assistants). Focus group participants described facilitators and barriers to implementation, which were mapped to CFIR domains. Timing of screening and person administering screening were identified as modifiable factors to improve future implementation. Conclusion: We found the health literacy levels of PICU caregivers in our setting is similar to prior assessments of parental health literacy. Participation in morning rounds was helpful for developing understanding of their child's illness, regardless of health literacy status. Qualitative feedback from providers identified barriers across all CFIR domains, with timing of screening and person administering screening as modifiable factors to improve future implementation.

Practice what you teach: An approach to integrate airway education for experienced anesthesia clinicians.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted clinician education. To address this challenge, our divisional difficult airway program (AirEquip) designed and implemented small-group educational workshops for experienced clinicians. Our primary aim was to test the feasibility and acceptability of a small-group, flexible-curriculum skills workshop conducted during the clinical workday. Secondary objectives were to evaluate whether our workshop increased confidence in performing relevant skills and to assess the work-effort required for the new program. METHODS: We implemented a 1:1 and 2:1 (participant to facilitator ratio) airway skills workshop for experienced clinicians during the workday. A member of the AirEquip team temporarily relieved the attendee of clinical duties to facilitate participation. Attendance was encouraged but not required. Feasibility was assessed by clinician attendance, and acceptability was assessed using three Likert scale questions and derived from free-response feedback. Participants completed pre and postworkshop surveys to assess familiarity and comfort with various aspects of airway management. A work-effort analysis was conducted and compared to the effort to run a previously held larger-format difficult airway conference. RESULTS: Fifteen workshops were conducted over 7 weeks; members of AirEquip were able to temporarily assume participants' clinical duties. Forty-seven attending anesthesiologists and 17 CRNAs attended the workshops, compared with six attending anesthesiologists and five CRNAs who attended the most recent larger-format conference. There was no change in confidence after workshop participation, but participants overwhelmingly expressed enthusiasm and satisfaction with the workshops. The number of facilitator person-hours required to operate the workshops (105 h) was similar to that required to run a single all-day larger-format conference (104.5 h). CONCLUSION: It is feasible and acceptable to incorporate expert-led skills training into the clinical workday. Alongside conferences and large-format instruction, this modality enhances the way we are able to share knowledge with our colleagues. This concept can likely be applied to other skills in various clinical settings.

Red Blood Cell Transfusion After Stage I Palliation Is Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes.

Background Packed red blood cell transfusion may improve oxygen content in single-ventricle neonates, but its effect on clinical outcomes after Stage 1 palliation is unknown. Methods and Results Retrospective multicenter analysis of packed red blood cell transfusion exposures in neonates after Stage 1 palliation, excluding those with intraoperative mortality or need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Transfusion practice variability was assessed, and multivariable regression used to identify transfusion risk factors. After propensity score adjustment for severity of illness, clinical outcomes were compared between transfused and nontransfused subjects. Of 396 subjects, 323 (82%) received 930 postoperative red blood cell transfusions. Packed red blood cell volume (median 9-42 mL/kg [P<0.0001]), donor exposures (1-2 [P<0.0001]), transfusion number (1-3 [P<0.0001]), and pretransfusion hemoglobin (12.1-13 g/dL, P=0.0049) varied between sites. Cyanosis (P=0.02), chest tube output (P=0.0003), and delayed sternal closure (P=0.0033) increased transfusion risk. Transfusion was associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation (6 [interquartile range 4, 12] versus 3 [1, 5] days, P=0.02) and intensive care unit stay (19 [12, 33] versus 9 [6, 19] days, P=0.016). When stratified by number of transfusions (0, 1, or >1), duration of mechanical ventilation (3 [1, 5] versus 4 [3, 6] versus 9 [5, 16] days [P<0.0001]) and intensive care unit stay (9 [6, 19] versus 13 [8, 25] versus 21 [13, 38] days [P<0.0001]) increased for those transfused more than once. Most subjects who died were transfused, though the association with mortality was not significant. Conclusions Packed red blood cell transfusion after Stage 1 palliation is common, and transfusion practice is variable. Transfusion is a significant predictor of longer intensive care unit stay and mechanical ventilation. Further studies to define evidence-based transfusion thresholds are warranted.

Relocation of minimal luminal diameter after bare metal and drug-eluting stent implantation: incidence and impact on angiographic late loss.

Late loss (LL) has been a fundamental angiographic end-point in drug-eluting stents (DES) clinical trials. However, calculation of LL may be affected by a mismatch between post-procedure (PO) and follow-up (FU) sites of the minimal lumen diameter (MLD). Our aims were to investigate the incidence and methodological implications of the relocation of MLD after bare metal (BMS), sirolimus-eluting (SES), and paclitaxel-eluting (PES) stent implantation. Data from DIABETES I and II trials, which involved diabetic patients treated with BMS, SES, and PES, were analyzed. Angiographic data with matched projections between PO and 9-month angiographic FU were included. In-stent, in-lesion, and in-segment analyses included conventional and customized sub-segmental (5-mm/subsegment) methodology. MLD relocation was considered when the sites of MLD shifted a distance >> the intrinsic variability of the method. Conventional LL, site matched LL, maximal LL (MaxLL), and average LL (AvgLL) were calculated. Relationships between various LL and 1-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) were investigated. Post MLD was located distally, outside the stent, in > or =65% of the analyses. At FU, MLD relocation occurred in 70.5% (BMS), 40% (SES), and 35% (PES). MLD shifted > or =11 mm on average, mainly towards the stented segment. MLD relocation still occurred in 42.8% (BMS), 33.7% (SES), and 36.4% (PES), when analysis was restricted to in-stent segment. Among LL measurements, MaxLL showed the best association with TLR rates. Relocation of the MLD is a frequent phenomenon after both BMS and DES, and should be taken into account when calculating LL. Comprehensive LL analyses, including MaxLL and AvgLL, provides a better appraisal of the biological and clinical effectiveness of DES.