Harmonizing the collection of solicited adverse events in prophylactic vaccine clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: During the clinical development of a vaccine, study participants are monitored for the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) over a defined period post-vaccination to assess the safety of prophylactic vaccines. Among the safety data collected, a standard practice in prophylactic vaccine clinical trials involves collecting reactogenicity data through daily AE solicitation of pre-defined sets of symptoms (i.e. solicited AEs). AREAS COVERED: This paper aims to propose recommendations to improve and harmonize the collection of active AE solicitation in prophylactic vaccine clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: We recommend using limited lists of solicited AEs adapted to the vaccine technology and target population. While the US Food and Drug Administration toxicity grading scale is commonly used in adolescents/adults, harmonizing grading criteria in infants/children would facilitate the comparison of vaccines' safety profiles. Solicited systemic AEs should not systematically be considered causally related to vaccination. Collection of solicited AEs should occur in cohorts of a maximum of 1,000 vaccinated participants, as larger cohort sizes do not improve substantially the precision of AE incidence. The incidence of daily solicited AEs should be compared with a control group for improved interpretations of their clinical relevance. These suggestions would improve the characterization of safety profiles of vaccines.

Scientific investigations into febrile reactions observed in the paediatric population following vaccination with a 2010 Southern Hemisphere Trivalent Influenza Vaccine.

During the 2010 Southern Hemisphere (SH) influenza season, there was an unexpected increase in the number of febrile reactions reported in the paediatric population in Australia shortly after vaccination with the CSL 2010 trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) compared to previous seasons. A series of scientific investigations were initiated to identify the root cause of these adverse events, including in vitro cytokine/chemokine assays following stimulation of adult and paediatric whole blood, as well as mammalian cell lines and primary cells, profiling of molecular signatures using microarrays, and in vivo studies in rabbits, ferrets, new born rats and rhesus non-human primates (NHPs). Various TIVs (approved commercial vaccines as well as re-engineered TIVs) and their individual monovalent pool harvest (MPH) components were examined in these assays and in animal models. Although the scientific investigations are ongoing, the current working hypothesis is that the increase in febrile adverse events reported in Australia after vaccination with the CSL 2010 SH TIV may be due to a combination of both the introduction of three entirely new strains in the CSL 2010 SH TIV, and differences in the manufacturing processes used to manufacture CSL TIVs compared to other licensed TIVs on the market. Identification of the causal component(s) may result in the identification of surrogate assays that can assist in the formulation of TIVs to minimise the future incidence of febrile reactions in the paediatric population.