Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 64(2): 181-90, 2001 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11543988

ABSTRACT

We examined the relationship between patterns of alcohol consumption and health care costs among adult members of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program (KPMCP) in Northern California. A telephone survey of a random sample of the KPMCP membership aged 18 and over was conducted between June 1994 and February 1996 (n=10,175). The survey included questions on sociodemographic characteristics, general and mental health status, patterns of past and current alcohol consumption; inpatient and outpatient costs were obtained from Kaiser Permanentes cost management information system. Results showed that current non-drinkers with a history of heavy drinking had higher health costs than other non-drinkers and current drinkers. The per person per year costs for non-drinkers with a heavy drinking history were $2421 versus $1706 for other non-drinkers and $1358 for current drinkers in 1995 US dollars. A history of heavy drinking has a significant effect on costs after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, health status and health practices. Current drinkers have the lowest costs, suggesting that they may be more likely than non-drinkers to delay seeking care until they are sick and require expensive medical care.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Alcohol Drinking/adverse effects , Alcoholism/economics , Alcoholism/rehabilitation , Ambulatory Care/economics , California , Female , Health Status , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/economics
2.
Am J Prev Med ; 21(3): 170-6, 2001 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11567836

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Implementation of screening guidelines for domestic violence has been challenging. The multifaceted "systems model" may provide an effective means to improve domestic violence screening, identification, and intervention in the healthcare setting. METHODS: We developed: (1) a systems model approach using tools for effective referral, evaluation, and reporting of domestic violence; (2) materials for distribution to female patients; (3) training for social service and mental health clinicians to provide domestic violence evaluation; and (4) strong links to the community. SETTING: A nonprofit, managed care facility in Richmond, California. PARTICIPANTS: Staff and members of the managed care plan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Increased screening for domestic violence by clinicians; (2) increased awareness of the healthcare facility as a resource for domestic violence assistance; and (3) increased member satisfaction with the health plan's efforts to address domestic violence. RESULTS: The number of clinician referrals and patient self-referrals to an on-site domestic violence evaluator increased more than twofold. A pre-intervention and post-intervention phone survey of members seen for routine checkup showed an increase in member recall of being asked about domestic violence. After intervention, statistically significant increases were seen in members' perception that the health plan was concerned about the health effects of domestic violence (p<0.0001) and about members' satisfaction with the health plan's efforts to address this issue (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A systems model approach improved domestic violence services in a managed care health setting within 1 year and affected clinicians' behavior as well as health plan members' experience. This successful implementation makes it possible to address critical research questions about the impact of a healthcare intervention for victims of domestic violence in a managed healthcare setting.


Subject(s)
Domestic Violence/prevention & control , Managed Care Programs , Adolescent , Adult , Community-Institutional Relations , Data Collection/methods , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Models, Organizational , Patient Satisfaction , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Spouse Abuse/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Women's Health Services/organization & administration
3.
Med Care ; 39(8): 785-99, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11468498

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Late life depression can be successfully treated with antidepressant medications or psychotherapy, but few depressed older adults receive effective treatment. RESEARCH DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial of a disease management program for late life depression. SUBJECTS: Approximately 1,750 older adults with major depression or dysthymia are recruited from seven national study sites. INTERVENTION: Half of the subjects are randomly assigned to a collaborative care program where a depression clinical specialist supervised by a psychiatrist and a primary care expert supports the patient's regular primary care provider to treat depression. Intervention services are provided for 12 months using antidepressant medications and Problem Solving Treatment in Primary Care according to a stepped care protocol that varies intervention intensity according to clinical needs. The other half of the subjects are assigned to care as usual. EVALUATION: Subjects are independently assessed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months. The evaluation assesses the incremental cost-effectiveness of the intervention compared with care as usual. Specific outcomes examined include care for depression, depressive symptoms, health-related quality of life, satisfaction with depression care, health care costs, patient time costs, market and nonmarket productivity, and household income. CONCLUSIONS: The study blends methods from health services and clinical research in an effort to protect internal validity while maximizing the generalizability of results to diverse health care systems. We hope that this study will show the cost-effectiveness of a new model of care for late life depression that can be applied in a range of primary care settings.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/therapy , Disease Management , Health Services for the Aged/standards , Primary Health Care/standards , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Dysthymic Disorder/therapy , Female , Health Services for the Aged/economics , Humans , Inservice Training , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Care Team , Patient Education as Topic , Primary Health Care/economics , Software Design , United States
4.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res ; 25(1): 128-35, 2001 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11198708

ABSTRACT

This article represents the proceedings of a symposium at the 2000 RSA Meeting in Denver, Colorado. The chair was Michael E. Hilton. The presentations were (1) The effects of brief advice and motivational enhancement on alcohol use and related variables in primary care, by Stephen A. Maisto, Joseph Conigliaro, Melissa McNiel, Kevin Kraemer, Mary E. Kelley, and Rosemarie Conigliaro; (2) Enhanced linkage of alcohol dependent persons to primary medical care: A randomized controlled trial of a multidisciplinary health evaluation in a detoxification unit, by Jeffrey H. Samet, Mary Jo Larson, Jacqueline Savetsky, Michael Winter, Lisa M. Sullivan, and Richard Saitz; (3) Cost-effectiveness of day hospital versus traditional alcohol and drug outpatient treatment in a health maintenance organization: Randomized and self-selected samples, by Constance Weisner, Jennifer Mertens, Sujaya Parthasarathy, Charles Moore, Enid Hunkeler, Teh-Wei Hu, and Joe Selby; and (4) Case monitoring for alcoholics: One year clinical and health cost effects, by Robert L. Stout, William Zywiak, Amy Rubin, William Zwick, Mary Jo Larson, and Don Shepard.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/therapy , Primary Health Care/methods , Quality of Life , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/methods , Alcoholism/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/methods , Humans , Primary Health Care/economics , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/economics , Treatment Outcome
5.
Health Serv Res ; 35(4): 791-812, 2000 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11055449

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome and cost-effectiveness of the two primary addiction treatment options, day hospitals (DH) and traditional outpatient programs (OP) in a managed care organization, in a population large enough to examine patient subgroups. DATA SOURCES: Interviews with new admissions to a large HMO's chemical dependency program in Sacramento, California between April 1994 and April 1996, with follow-up interviews eight months later. Computerized utilization and cost data were collected from 1993 to 1997. STUDY DESIGN: Design was a randomized control trial of adult patients entering the HMO's alcohol and drug treatment program (N = 668). To examine the generalizability of findings as well as self-selection factors, we also studied patients presenting during the same period who were unable or unwilling to be randomized (N = 405). Baseline interviews characterized type of substance use, addiction severity, psychiatric status, and motivation. Follow-up interviews were conducted at eight months following intake. Breathanalysis and urinalysis were conducted. Program costs were calculated. DATA COLLECTION: Interview data were merged with computerized utilization and cost data. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among randomized subjects, both study arms showed significant improvement in all drug and alcohol measures. There were no differences overall in outcomes between DH and OP, but DH subjects with midlevel psychiatric severity had significantly better outcomes, particularly in regard to alcohol abstinence (OR = 2.4; 95% CI = 1.2, 4.9). The average treatment costs were $1,640 and $895 for DH and OP programs, respectively. In the midlevel psychiatric severity group, the cost of obtaining an additional person abstinent from alcohol in the DH cohort was approximately $5,464. Among the 405 self-selected subjects, DH was related to abstinence (OR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.3, 3.5). CONCLUSIONS: Although significant benefits of the DH program were not found in the randomized study, DH treatment was associated with better outcomes in the self-selected group. However, for subjects with mid-level psychiatric severity in both the randomized and self-selected samples, the DH program produced higher rates of abstention and was more cost-effective. Self-selection in studies that randomize patients to services requiring very different levels of commitment may be important in interpreting findings for clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/rehabilitation , Day Care, Medical/organization & administration , Health Maintenance Organizations/organization & administration , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/organization & administration , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Adult , Alcoholism/economics , California , Day Care, Medical/economics , Day Care, Medical/standards , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations/standards , Health Services Research , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Program Evaluation , Substance-Related Disorders/economics , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Subst Abuse Treat ; 19(2): 103-9, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10963921

ABSTRACT

The Addiction Severity Index (ASI) is a widely used interview among substance-dependent populations in treatment. Its value as a treatment planning and evaluation tool has been diminished by the lack of comparative data from nonclinical samples. The present study included four scales from the ASI collected on samples of adult subscribers to a large health maintenance organization (HMO) in northern California, as well as an adult clinical sample from the same geographic region with the same HMO insurance, thereby offering informative contrasts. Interviews (N = 9,398) of non-alcohol-dependent or abuse adults from a random sample of members of a large HMO were analyzed. We collected complete ASI data on the alcohol, drug, medical, and psychiatric composite scales and partial data on the employment scale. A sample of 327 adult members of the same HMO from one of the counties included in the survey, who were admitted to treatment for alcohol and/or drug addiction, was administered the same ASI items at treatment admission. Analyses compare problem severities in the two samples by age and gender. The general membership reported some problems in most of the ASI problem areas, although at levels of severity that were typically far below those seen in the clinical sample. General membership and clinical samples were somewhat similar in medical status and in employment. As expected, alcohol, drug, and psychiatric status were much more severe in the clinical sample. The data from the HMO general membership sample provide one potential comparison group against which to judge the severity of problems presented by drug- and alcohol-dependent patients at treatment admission and at posttreatment follow-up. The authors discuss the implications for treatment planning and the evaluation of treatment outcome.


Subject(s)
Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Middle Aged , Sex Factors
7.
Arch Fam Med ; 9(8): 700-8, 2000 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10927707

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Primary care treatment of depression needs improvement. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of 2 augmentations to antidepressant drug treatment. DESIGN: Randomized trial comparing usual care, telehealth care, and telehealth care plus peer support; assessments were conducted at baseline, 6 weeks, and 6 months. SETTING: Two managed care adult primary care clinics. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 302 patients starting antidepressant drug therapy. INTERVENTIONS: For telehealth care: emotional support and focused behavioral interventions in ten 6-minute calls during 4 months by primary care nurses; and for peer support: telephone and in-person supportive contacts by trained health plan members recovered from depression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For depression: the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory; and for mental and physical functioning: the SF-12 Mental and Physical Composite Scales and treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: Nurse-based telehealth patients with or without peer support more often experienced 50% improvement on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 6 weeks (50% vs 37%; P =.01) and 6 months (57% vs 38%; P =.003) and on the Beck Depression Inventory at 6 months (48% vs 37%; P =. 05) and greater quantitative reduction in symptom scores on the Hamilton scale at 6 months (10.38 vs 8.12; P =.006). Telehealth care improved mental functioning at 6 weeks (47.07 vs 42.64; P =.004) and treatment satisfaction at 6 weeks (4.41 vs 4.17; P =.004) and 6 months (4.20 vs 3.94; P =.001). Adding peer support to telehealth care did not improve the primary outcomes. CONCLUSION: Nurse telehealth care improves clinical outcomes of antidepressant drug treatment and patient satisfaction and fits well within busy primary care settings.


Subject(s)
Behavior Therapy , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Managed Care Programs , Nurses , Primary Health Care , Remote Consultation , Social Support , Adult , Aged , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , California , Combined Modality Therapy , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Satisfaction , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Behav Health Serv Res ; 27(1): 3-16, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10695237

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to examine the association of medical care use (outpatient visits and hospitalization) with alcohol drinking patterns in a large health maintenance organization (HMO). Data were gathered from a random sample of 10,292 adult respondents through a telephone survey conducted between June 1994 and February 1996. Findings indicate that current nondrinkers with no past history of drinking had higher rates of outpatient visits and hospitalizations than current drinkers. Among current drinkers, medical care use declined slightly as drinking levels increased. Among nondrinkers, those with a drinking history exhibited significantly higher use of outpatient visits and hospital care than nondrinkers with no drinking history and current drinkers. Controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors, health status, and common medical conditions in multivariate analyses suggests that nondrinkers with a drinking history use more services because they are sicker than other nondrinkers or current drinkers.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , California/epidemiology , Female , Health Status , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis
9.
J Stud Alcohol ; 61(1): 121-9, 2000 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10627105

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This article describes drinking patterns and examines the prevalence of heavy drinking and alcohol problems, and their association with other behavioral and social problems within the membership of a health maintenance organization, a setting in which increasing numbers of Americans receive services. METHOD: The sample is representative of the stably insured membership of the Northern California Region of Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program; i.e., those who have been insured continuously under that plan for 30 months or longer. A telephone survey of the adult membership (N = 10,292) was conducted between June 1994 and February 1996. RESULTS: As in other studies, health and mental health status and smoking were related to drinking levels, with symptoms higher for those in the heaviest drinking group. However, in contrast to studies of those using medical services, demographic characteristics (e.g., young age) were not associated with heavy drinking in this population. When controlling for drug use and drinking, however, women and those reporting any mental health symptom were more likely to report alcohol problems. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that in private managed care populations, particular behavioral indicators may be more important than demographic characteristics in screening for problem drinkers. The identification of individuals who report a mental health symptom, who drink a large number of drinks occasionally or who report any drug use may be important in a health maintenance approach to prevention and case finding.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/epidemiology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Alcohol-Related Disorders/psychology , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Sampling Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology
10.
Manag Care Interface ; Suppl B: 12-8, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11183020

ABSTRACT

Depression affects not only the patient and the provider, but the employer as well. Up to 25% of all women experience major depressive disorder, compared with perhaps as many as 12% of all men. It is highly prevalent in patients with other acute and chronic disease. On October 4, 1999, a panel of managed care medical directors, pharmacy directors, clinicians, researchers, and health economists was convened in San Diego to discuss the optimal treatment of the disorder. This roundtable discussion is presented in three parts. The first portion lays the clinical foundation for the management of this critical disorder.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/economics , Clinical Trials as Topic , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
11.
Manag Care Interface ; Suppl B: 26-32, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11183022

ABSTRACT

From the standpoint of managed care, the rising cost of depression can be addressed in multiple ways. In the final portion of the roundtable discussion, the faculty discuss not only disease management programs for depression, but other initiatives health plans (including at the pharmacy level) are undertaking to address the rising costs associated with depression. They also discuss the effect of mental health coverage "parity" laws, which can be expected to drive costs even higher.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/economics , Disease Management , Managed Care Programs/organization & administration , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Formularies as Topic , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/standards , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/economics
12.
Arch Intern Med ; 159(22): 2673-7, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10597757

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on a random sample of adult patients with hypertension in a large health maintenance organization to assess the feasibility of documenting blood pressure (BP) control and to compare different measures for defining BP control. METHODS: Three criteria for BP control were assessed: systolic BP less than 140 mm Hg; diastolic BP less than 90 mm Hg; and combined BP control, with systolic BP less than 140 mm Hg and diastolic BP less than 90 mm Hg. Four methods of assessing hypertension control by the above criteria were examined: proportion of patients with BP under control at 75% and 50% or more of their office visits; the mean of all pressures during the study period; and the BP from the last visit during the study period. RESULTS: The proportion of patients meeting each criterion for control was similar whether we used the mean BP for all visits, the last recorded BP, or control at 50% or more of visits. Control rates were substantially lower when the more stringent assessment, 75% of visits, was used. The proportion of patients with combined BP control at 75% or more of their visits was half that of the other methods. CONCLUSIONS: In this health maintenance organization population, results with the use of the simplest approach, the last BP measurement recorded, were similar to results with the mean BP. Our findings indicate that evaluation of BP control in a large health maintenance organization will find substantial room for improvement, and clinicians should be encouraged to be more aggressive in their management of hypertension, especially with regard to the systolic BP, which until recent years has been underemphasized.


Subject(s)
Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Hypertension/prevention & control , Aged , Blood Pressure Determination , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/ethnology , Male , Middle Aged , Random Allocation , Retrospective Studies
13.
Eval Program Plann ; 22(2): 233-43, 1999 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24011416

ABSTRACT

A psychiatric outcomes study that examined caseload attributes, patterns of treatment, and clinical outcomes in 950 adult outpatients was conducted as part of a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in a large HMO. Patients were assessed pre- and post-treatment with measures of symptomatology (SCL-90) and functioning (SF-36), plus pre-treatment measures of personality disorder, comorbid problems, and sociodemographic variables. Significant improvements in psychological functioning and symptomatology were seen for 39-50% of patients, while 4-11% had significantly worsened. The study not only provided the HMO with useful baseline information on the performance of its psychiatric services, but also provided important lessons in how to conduct outcomes projects relevant to QI efforts. The study should be seen as part of an early effort of a large organization to move from a paradigm of Quality Assurance to one of Quality Improvement in the area of mental health.

15.
J Ment Health Adm ; 24(1): 23-34, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9033153

ABSTRACT

This article uses Markov analysis to investigate patterns of treatment participation of 361 patients treated in the alcohol and drug abuse programs of a large group model Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) to examine how participation is related to abstinence. Findings indicate that 82% of the patients in treatment one month after intake were in treatment three months later, and treatment retention dropped to 46% by month 6. Findings also indicate that 74% of patients abstinent and in treatment at month 1 remained so at month 3. Abstinence at the first three-month interval was a strong predictor of abstinence at later time periods. A multivariate analysis showed that an expressed desire to stop alcohol use upon entry into treatment was the most consistent predictor of both treatment participation and abstinence at most time points. Treatment participation was also a significant predictor of abstinence.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism/therapy , Health Maintenance Organizations/organization & administration , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Compliance , Adolescent , Adult , Alcoholism/psychology , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , California , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Markov Chains , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis
16.
MD Comput ; 14(1): 24-30, 32-5, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9000846

ABSTRACT

Inefficiency in the work of health care providers is evident and contributes to health care costs. In the early 20th century, industrial engineers developed scientific methods for studying work to improve performance (efficiency) by measuring results--i.e., quality, cost, and productivity. In the mid-20th century, business managers developed ways to apply these methods to improve the work process. These scientific methods and management approaches can be applied to improving medical work. Fee-for-service practice has had incentives to maximize productivity, and prepaid practice has had incentives to minimize costs, but no sector of the health care system has systematically pursued the optimization of all performance variables: quality, cost, and productivity. We have reviewed evolving methods for the automation of continual assessment of performance in health care using touch screen and computer telephone, logging and scheduling software, appropriate combinations of generic or disease-specific health status questionnaires, physiologic measurements or laboratory assays from computerized records, and cost and productivity data from computerized registration logs. We propose that the results of outcome assessment be rapidly and continually transmitted to providers, patients, and managers so that health care processes can be progressively improved. The evolving systems we have described are the practical tools that can help us achieve our performance goals.


Subject(s)
Quality Assurance, Health Care , Automation , Biomedical Engineering , Cost Control , Efficiency , Health Status , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care/economics , Quality Assurance, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Therapeutics/standards
18.
HMO Pract ; 9(4): 162-7, 1995 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10170167

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an automated system of quality monitoring for psychiatric outpatients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Large outpatient psychiatry clinic in Kaiser Permanente--Northern California. PARTICIPANTS: Approximately 1500 new psychiatric patients and 20 clinicians. INTERVENTIONS: This system gave clinicians data on new patients from validated instruments before their intake interviews, measured outcomes for the depressed and panic-disordered patients, and monitored the clinic's case-mix. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinic case-mix: Axis II disorders (Personality Disorder Questionnaire--Revised); emotional, social and physical functioning (Health Status Questionnaire 2.0); Axis I symptoms (Symptom Checklist-90); depression and panic disorder (Health Outcomes Institute Modules). Clinician reaction to system (telephone interview). RESULTS: The study population was 62.4% female; 73.9% Caucasian; 70% employed; 15.9% had evidence of personality disorder; 63% reduced daily activities because of emotional problems; 18% had depression; 7% had panic disorder. Over 75% of clinicians used the data reports and found them helpful; criticism focused on questionnaire length, inadequate training, numerous false-positives, and insufficient administrative support. CONCLUSION: An automated patient monitoring system can be implemented; clinician involvement needs to be significant; more research is needed to establish the usefulness of standardized data and outcomes management.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care Information Systems , Health Maintenance Organizations/standards , Psychiatry/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Adult , California , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations/organization & administration , Health Services Research , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Monitoring, Physiologic , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Outpatients
19.
Behav Healthc Tomorrow ; 3(3): 23-9, 1994.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10141017

ABSTRACT

The Behavioral Health Outcomes Study is a partnership in conducting outcomes measurement involving a corporate healthcare purchaser, five managed behavioral healthcare organizations and academic researchers. The goals of this study are to: evaluate the feasibility of incorporating patient self-reported data in outcomes research; identify factors that may be predictors of outcome; and evaluate the effectiveness of an employee-sponsored aftercare program. The differing perspectives and needs of the three partners have created a number of challenges in the areas of goals, confidentiality, proprietary vs. open access issues and methodology. However, after the study's first year, it is clear not only that outcomes research can be conducted under such a partnership, but that the partnership generates a kind of synergy in problem-solving.


Subject(s)
Health Benefit Plans, Employee/standards , Health Care Coalitions , Mental Health Services/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/organization & administration , Confidentiality , Data Collection , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/organization & administration , Industry , Managed Care Programs , Mental Health Services/organization & administration , Organizational Culture , Research Design , United States , Universities
20.
Med Care ; 30(9): 855-65, 1992 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1518317

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine whether a hypertension management program in which patients monitor their own blood pressure (BP) at home can reduce costs without compromising BP control. The prospective, randomized, controlled 1-year clinical trial was conducted at four medical centers of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in the San Francisco Bay Area. Of 467 patients with uncomplicated hypertension who were referred by their physicians, 37 declined to participate in the study; 215 were randomly assigned to a Usual Care (UC) group and 215 to a Home BP group. Twenty-five UC patients and 15 Home BP patients did not return for year-end BP measurements. Patients in the UC group were referred back to their physicians. Patients in the Home BP group were trained to measure their own BP and return the readings by mail. Patients were given a standard procedure to follow in case of unusually high or low BP readings at home. The number and type of outpatient medical services used were obtained from patient medical records for the study year and the prior year. Costs of care for hypertension were calculated by assigning relative value units to each outpatient service. Trained technicians measured each patient's BP at entry into the study and 1 year later. Home BP patients made 1.2 fewer hypertension-related office visits than UC patients during the study year (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8, 1.7). Mean adjusted cost for physician visits, telephone calls, and laboratory tests associated with hypertension care was $88.76 per patient per year in the Home BP group, 29% less than in the UC group (95% CI: $16.11, $54.74). The annualized cost of implementing the home BP system was approximately $28 per patient during the study year and would currently be approximately $15. After 1 year, BP control in men in the Home BP group was better than in men in the UC group; BP control was equally good in women in both groups. Management of uncomplicated hypertension based on periodic home BP reports can achieve BP control with fewer physician visits, resulting in substantial cost savings.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/economics , Blood Pressure Monitors , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Hypertension/prevention & control , Self Care/economics , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , California , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Services/economics , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Physicians , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis , San Francisco , Self Care/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telephone
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...