Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Knee Surg Relat Res ; 26(2): 97-105, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24944975

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Proper femoral tunnel position is important for anatomical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the positions of femoral and tibial tunnels created using an accessory anteromedial portal technique in single bundle ACL reconstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The femoral tunnel was targeted at the mid-portion of the ACL bundles. We evaluated postoperative computed tomography scans of 32 patients treated by ACL reconstruction using a free-hand low accessory anteromedial portal technique. On the tibial side, the tunnel position was evaluated using Tsukada's method. On the femoral side, the position was evaluated using 1) the quadrant method, 2) Mochizuki's method, 3) Mochizuki's method, and 4) Takahashi's method. Tunnel obliquity was also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean tibial tunnel position was located at 44.6%±2.5% anterior from the anterior margin and 48.0%±3.0% in medial from the medial margin. The mean femoral tunnel position was located at the center between the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles: Quadrant method, 26.7%±2.7%/30.0%±2.9%; Watanabe's method, 37.7%±2.5%/26.6%±2.2%; Mochizuki's method, 38.7%±2.7%; Takahashi's method, 21.8%±2.2%. The mean femoral tunnel obliquity was 57.7°±6.2° in the sagittal plane and 49.9°±5.6° in the coronal plane. CONCLUSIONS: In anatomic single bundle ACL reconstruction, the low anteromedial portal technique can restore accurate position of the native footprint. Accurate femoral tunnel position facilitates recovery of stability and decreases graft failure rate.

2.
Orthopedics ; 37(3): e265-71, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24762154

ABSTRACT

Conventional operative treatments of patella fractures are frequently associated with implant failure or displacement. Recent biomechanical studies showed that the orientation of the wire loop and the site of the wire twist can affect the fixation strength. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of the tension band technique with loops in different orientations and different knot positions. For this retrospective study, 72 patella fractures (71 patients) were fixed with figure-of-eight configurations in combination with 2 K-wires. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the orientation of tension band construct. A total of 40 patella fractures were placed with figure-of-eight configurations in a vertical orientation either with 1 wire twist (group 1; 16 patella fractures) or with 2 wire twists at the adjacent corners (group 2; 24 patella fractures). Thirty-two patella fractures were placed with figure-of-eight configurations in a horizontal orientation with 2 wire twists at the adjacent corners (group 3). Range of motion, complication rates, and knee scoring scales (Hospital for Special Surgery and Lysholm) were assessed during serial follow-up. Satisfactory reductions were achieved in all groups, but functional results in the early stage were different. Group 3 had better Hospital for Special Surgery and Lysholm scores at 3 months postoperatively; however, at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively, all groups had similar scores. At the 1-year follow-up, all groups achieved acceptable flexion and range of motion. The overall complication rate was lower in the horizontal group (12.5%). Placing the figure-of-eight tension band construct in a horizontal orientation can provide functional benefits in the early stage after patella fractures.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws , Bone Wires , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Patella/injuries , Patella/surgery , Female , Fracture Healing , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patella/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Orthop Surg ; 5(3): 174-9, 2013 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24009902

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study examines the clinical and radiologic results of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasties with regard to wear, osteolysis, and fracture of the ceramic after a minimum follow-up of six years. METHODS: We evaluated the results of a consecutive series of 148 primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasties that had been performed between May 2001 and October 2005 in 142 patients. The mean age was 57.2 years (range, 23 to 81 years). The mean follow-up period was 7.8 years (range, 6.1 to 10.1 years). Preoperative diagnosis was avascular necrosis in 77 hips (52%), degenerative arthritis in 36 hips (24.3%), femur neck fracture in 18 hips (12.2%), rheumatoid arthritis in 15 hips (10.1%), and septic hip sequelae in 2 hips (1.4%). Clinical results were evaluated with the Harris hip score, and the presence of postoperative groin or thigh pain. Radiologic analysis was done with special attention in terms of wear, periprosthetic osteolysis, and ceramic failures. RESULTS: The mean Harris hip score improved from 58.3 (range, 10 to 73) to 92.5 (range, 79 to 100) on the latest follow-up evaluation. At final follow-up, groin pain was found in 4 hips (2.7%), and thigh pain was found in 6 hips (4.1%). Radiologically, all femoral stems demonstrated stable fixations without loosening. Radiolucent lines were observed around the stem in 25 hips (16.9%), and around the cup in 4 hips (2.7%). Endosteal new bone formation was observed around the stem in 95 hips (64.2%) and around the cup in 88 hips (59.5%). No osteolysis was observed around the stem and cup. There were 2 hips (1.4%) of inclination changes of acetabular cup, 2 hips (1.4%) of hip dislocation, 1 hip (0.7%) of ceramic head fracture, and 1 hip (0.7%) of squeaking. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate of the prostheses was 98.1% at postoperative 7.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: The ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty produced excellent clinical results and implant survival rates with no detectable osteolysis on a minimum six-year follow-up study. The ceramic-on-ceramic couplings could be a reasonable option of primary total hip arthroplasty for variable indications.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Ceramics , Hip Prosthesis , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hip Joint/diagnostic imaging , Hip Joint/surgery , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Prosthesis Failure , Radiography , Range of Motion, Articular
4.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 34(10): E380-3, 2009 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19404170

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: A case report of stress fracture of bilateral lumbar posterior facet after implantation of interspinous process device is reported and the literature reviewed. OBJECTIVE.: To report the rare case of stress fracture of bilateral lumbar posterior facet after implantation of interspinous process device. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A 64-year-old woman presented with severe back pain and radiating pain in both legs. In her history, she had undergone implantation of L4-L5 interspinous process device (Coflex, Paradigm Spine, Wurmlingen, Germany) for her neurogenic claudication at 6 years ago. Magnetic resonance image demonstrated signal change suggesting bilateral L4 inferior process. To the best of the authors' knowledge, there has been no report stress fracture of posterior facet after implantation of interspinous process device. METHODS: This study reviewed the patient's medical record, her imaging studies, and related literatures. RESULTS: In the reported case, stress fracture of bilateral posterior facet was documented with MRI and confirmed with surgical treatment for the surgical treatment of spinal stenosis. The involved facet joint was at the site affected by previously implanted interspinous process device. CONCLUSION: Posterior facet fracture can occur as a complication of interspinous process device.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Stress/etiology , Internal Fixators/adverse effects , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Spinal Fractures/etiology , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Zygapophyseal Joint/injuries , Back Pain/etiology , Causality , Female , Fractures, Stress/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Stress/pathology , Functional Laterality/physiology , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/etiology , Intermittent Claudication/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Middle Aged , Polyradiculopathy/etiology , Polyradiculopathy/physiopathology , Polyradiculopathy/surgery , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Prostheses and Implants/adverse effects , Radiography , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/pathology , Spinal Fusion/instrumentation , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Nerve Roots/injuries , Spinal Nerve Roots/pathology , Spinal Nerve Roots/physiopathology , Spinal Stenosis/complications , Spinal Stenosis/physiopathology , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , Stress, Mechanical , Weight-Bearing/physiology , Zygapophyseal Joint/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL