Non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for systemic artery evaluation in Kawasaki disease.

BACKGROUND: Kawasaki disease (KD) is a systemic vasculitis; systemic arteries other than the coronary arteries should therefore also be evaluated. This study investigated the feasibility of evaluating coronary aneurysms, systemic artery aneurysms (SAAs), and cerebrovascular diseases in patients with KD using non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (NC-MRA). METHODS: Coronary artery protocols, including coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and vessel wall imaging, were performed in 57 examinations of 28 patients. Systemic artery protocol, including SAA scans and head MRA, along with coronary artery protocol, were performed in 42 examinations of 42 patients. The image quality of the SAAs was evaluated on a 4-point scale. Examination time and sedation dosage were compared between the protocols. The presence of SAAs and cerebrovascular disease was also evaluated. RESULTS: The image quality score of SAAs was 4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 4-4) for the aorta, 4 (IQR: 3-4) for the subclavian artery, 4 (IQR: 3-4) for the renal artery, and 3 (IQR: 3-4) for the iliac artery. No differences were found between examination time (47.0 [IQR: 43.0-61.0] min vs. 51.0 [IQR: 45.0-60.0] min, p = 0.48) and sedative dose (4.63 [IQR: 3.93-5.79] mg/kg vs. 4.21 [IQR: 3.56-5.71] mg/kg, p = 0.37) between the protocols. Systemic artery protocol detected SAAs in three patients (7.1%), and cerebrovascular disease was not detected. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating the coronary and systemic arteries in patients with KD using NC-MRA on a single examination was possible without compromising examination time or sedation dose. The systemic artery protocol was useful in finding SAAs.

Contrast enhancement on 100- and 120 kVp hepatic CT scans at thin adults in a retrospective cohort study: Bayesian inference of the optimal enhancement probability.

PURPOSE: To assess the probability of achieving optimal contrast enhancement in 100 kVp and 120 kVp-protocol on hepatic computed tomography (CT) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 200 patients in a retrospective cohort study. Hundred patients were scanned with 120 kVp setting, and other 100 patients were scanned with 100 kVp setting. We measured the CT number in the abdominal aorta and hepatic parenchyma on unenhanced scans and hepatic arterial phase (HAP)-, and portal venous phase (PVP). The aortic enhancement at HAP and the hepatic parenchymal enhancement at PVP were compared between the two scanning protocols. Bayesian inference was used to assess the probability of achieving optimal contrast enhancement in each protocol. RESULTS: The Bayesian analysis indicated that when 100 kVp-rotocol was used, the probability of achieving optimal aortic enhancement (>280 HU) was 98.8% ±â€Š0.6%, whereas it was 88.7% ±â€Š2.5% when 120 kVp-protocol was used. Also, the probability of achieving optimal hepatic parenchymal enhancement (>50 HU) was 95.3% ±â€Š1.5%, whereas it was 64.7% ±â€Š3.8% when 120 kVp-protocol was used. CONCLUSION: Bayesian inference suggested that the post-test probability of optimal contrast enhancement at hepatic dynamic CT was lower under the 120 kVp than the 100 kVp-protocol.

[Usefulness of Fenestrated Catheters for i.v. Contrast Infusion Cardiac CT Angiography for Newborn Patients during the Congenital Heart Disease].

PURPOSE: A three-dimensional (3D) image from computed tomography (CT) angiography is a useful method for evaluation of complex anatomy such as congenital heart disease. However, 3D imaging requires high contrast enhancement for distinguishing between blood vessels and soft tissue. To improve the contrast enhancement, many are increasing the injection rate. However, one method is the use of fenestrated catheters, it allows use of a smaller gauge catheter for high-flow protocols. The purpose of this study was to compare the pressure of injection rate and CT number of a 24-gauge fenestrated catheter with an 22-gauge non-fenestrated catheter for i.v. contrast infusion during CT. METHODS: Between December 2014 and March 2015, 50 newborn patients were randomly divided into two protocols; 22-gauge conventional non-fenestrated catheter (24 newborn; age range 0.25-8 months, body weight 3.6±1.2 kg) and 24-gauge new fenestrated catheter (22 newborn; age range 0.25-12 months, body weight 3.3±0.9 kg). Helical scan of the heart was performed using a 64-detector CT (LightSpeed VCT, GE Healthcare) (tube voltage 80 kV; detector configuration 64×0.625 mm, rotation time 0.4 s/rot, helical pitch 1.375, preset noise index for automatic tube current modulation 40 at 0.625 mm slice thickness). RESULTS: We compared the maximum pressure of injection rate, CT number of aortic enhancement, and CT number of pulmonary artery enhancement between both protocols. The median injection rate, CT number of aortic enhancement, and CT number of pulmonary artery enhancement were 0.9 (0.5-3.4) ml/s, 455.5 (398-659) HU, and 500.0 (437-701) HU in 22-gauge conventional non-fenestrated catheter and 0.9 (0.5-2.0) ml/s, 436.5 (406-632) HU, and 479.5 (445-695) HU in the 24-gauge fenestrated catheter, respectively. There are no significantly different between a 24-gauge fenestrated catheter and 22-gauge non-fenestrated catheters at injection rate and CT number. Maximum pressure of injection rate was lower with 24-gauge non-fenestrated catheters (0.33 kg/cm2) than 22-gauge non-fenestrated catheters (0.55 kg/cm2) (p<0.01Conclusion: A 24-gauge fenestrated catheter performs similarly to an 22-gauge non-fenestrated catheter with respect to i.v. contrast infusion and aortic enhancement levels and can be placed in most subjects whose veins are deemed insufficient for an 22-gauge catheter.

Does the Tube Voltage Affect the Characterization of Coronary Plaques on 100- and 120-kVp Computed Tomography Scans.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 100- and 120-kVp coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CCTA) scans for the identification of coronary plaque components. METHODS: We included 116 patients with coronary plaques who underwent CCTA and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound studies. On 100-kVp scans, we observed 24 fibrous and 24 fatty/fibrofatty plaques; on 120-kVp scans, we noted 27 fibrous and 41 fatty/fibrofatty plaques. We compared the fibrous and the fatty/fibrofatty plaques, the CT number of the coronary lumen, and the radiation dose on scans obtained at 100 and 120 kVp. We also compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the coronary plaques on 100- and 120-kVp scans with their ROC curves on integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound images. RESULTS: The mean CT numbers of fatty and fatty/fibrofatty plaques were 5.71 ± 36.5 and 76.6 ± 33.7 Hounsfield units (HU), respectively, on 100-kVp scans; on 120-kVp scans, they were 13.9 ± 29.4 and 54.5 ± 22.3 HU, respectively. The CT number of the coronary lumen was 323.1 ± 81.2 HU, and the radiation dose was 563.7 ± 81.2 mGy-cm on 100-kVp scans; these values were 279.3 ± 61.8 HU and 819.1 ± 115.1 mGy-cm on 120-kVp scans. The results of ROC curve analysis identified 30.5 HU as the optimal diagnostic cutoff value for 100-kVp scans (area under the curve = 0.93, 95% confidence interval = 0.87-0.99, sensitivity = 95.8%, specificity = 78.9%); for 120-kVp plaque images, the optimal cutoff was 37.4 HU (area under the curve = 0.87, 95% confidence interval = 0.79-0.96, sensitivity = 82.1%, specificity = 85.7%). CONCLUSIONS: For the discrimination of coronary plaque components, the diagnostic performance of 100- and 120-kVp CCTA scans is comparable.

Effect of Patient Characteristics on Vessel Enhancement in Pediatric Chest Computed Tomography Angiography.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the effect of sex, age, height, cardiac output (CO), total body weight (TBW), body surface area (BSA), and lean body weight (LBW) on vessel enhancement of the ascending aorta in pediatric chest computed tomography angiography (c-CTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study received institutional review board approval; parental prior informed consent for inclusion was obtained for all patients. All 50 patients were examined using our routine protocol; iodine (600 mg/kg) was the contrast medium (CM). Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced scans were obtained. We calculated the CM volume per vessel enhancement and performed univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis of the relationship between CM volume per vessel enhancement and each of the body parameters. RESULTS: All patient characteristics were significantly related to CM volume per vessel enhancement (P < .05). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between CM volume per vessel enhancement and TBW, BSA, and LBW, but not the patient sex, age, CO, and height. The LBW model for CM volume per vessel enhancement yielded the highest determination coefficient (R2 = .913) and the lowest Akaike Information Criterion (400.324). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the delivery of an iodine dose adjusted to the LBW at c-CTA.

Usefulness of diluted contrast medium for test-scanning of infants scheduled for contrast-enhanced cardiovascular computed tomography angiography.

OBJECTIVE:: To compare the ability of test scans with undiluted and diluted contrast medium (CM) to predict contrast enhancement (CE) on cardiovascular CT angiography (CCTA) images of infants. METHODS:: We divided 120 consecutive infants who had undergone CCTA on a 64-MDCT scanner into two equal groups. In one group, the test bolus consisted of undiluted CM [protocol 1 (P1): injection volume = total body weight × 1.2 ml, injection time 5 s], in the other (P2) it was total body weight × 4.0 ml (CM 15%, saline 85%, injection time 16 s). CE on the test scans was recorded on a 3-point visual scale. We investigated the relation for CE in the pulmonary artery and ascending aorta between the P1 or P2 test scans and CCTA images. RESULTS:: While peak CE was observed on all test scans performed with P2, in approximately 10 % of test scans obtained under P1, peak CE was not visualized. There was a strong positive linear correlation for CE of the pulmonary artery and ascending aorta on P2 images (r = 0.61 and r = 0.63, p < 0.01); under P1 the correlation was weak (r = 0.26 and r = 0.33, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION:: Test-scanning with diluted CM revealed the optimal CE peak time and was useful for predicting CE on CCTA scans of the pulmonary artery and ascending aorta in infants with congenital heart disease. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: Diluted test scans help to select the optimal scan parameters for the CCTA study of infants by using contrast-to-noise-based scanning.

Machine-learning integration of CT histogram analysis to evaluate the composition of atherosclerotic plaques: Validation with IB-IVUS.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether machine learning with histogram analysis of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) yields higher diagnostic performance for coronary plaque characterization than the conventional cut-off method using the median CT number. METHODS: We included 78 patients with 78 coronary plaques who had undergone CCTA and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound (IB-IVUS) studies. IB-IVUS diagnosed 32 as fibrous- and 46 as fatty or fibro-fatty plaques. We recorded the coronary CT number and 7 histogram parameters (minimum and mean value, standard deviation (SD), maximum value, skewness, kurtosis, and entropy) of the plaque CT number. We also evaluated the importance of each feature using the Gini index which rates the importance of individual features. For calculations we used XGBoost. Using 5-fold cross validation of the plaque CT number, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the machine learning- (extreme gradient boosting) and the conventional cut-off method was compared. RESULTS: The median CT number was 56.38 Hounsfield units (HU, 8.00-95.90) for fibrous- and 1.15 HU (-35.8-113.30) for fatty- or fibro-fatty plaques. The calculated optimal threshold for the plaque CT number was 36.1 ±â€¯2.8 HU. The highest Gini index was the coronary CT number (0.19) followed by the minimum value (0.17), kurtosis (0.17), entropy (0.14), skewness (0.11), the mean value (0.11), the standard deviation (0.06), and the maximum value (0.05), and energy (0.00). By validation analysis, the machine learning-yielded a significantly higher area under the curve than the conventional method (area under the curve 0.92 and 95%, confidence interval 0.86-0.92 vs 0.83 and 0.75-0.92, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The machine learning-was superior the conventional cut-off method for coronary plaque characterization using the plaque CT number on CCTA images.

Development and Validation of Generalized Linear Regression Models to Predict Vessel Enhancement on Coronary CT Angiography.

Objective: We evaluated the effect of various patient characteristics and time-density curve (TDC)-factors on the test bolus-affected vessel enhancement on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We also assessed the value of generalized linear regression models (GLMs) for predicting enhancement on CCTA. Materials and Methods: We performed univariate and multivariate regression analysis to evaluate the effect of patient characteristics and to compare contrast enhancement per gram of iodine on test bolus (ΔHUTEST) and CCTA (ΔHUCCTA). We developed GLMs to predict ΔHUCCTA. GLMs including independent variables were validated with 6-fold cross-validation using the correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: In multivariate analysis, only total body weight (TBW) and ΔHUTEST maintained their independent predictive value (p < 0.001). In validation analysis, the highest correlation coefficient between ΔHUCCTA and the prediction values was seen in the GLM (r = 0.75), followed by TDC (r = 0.69) and TBW (r = 0.62). The lowest Bland-Altman limit of agreement was observed with GLM-3 (mean difference, -0.0 ± 5.1 Hounsfield units/grams of iodine [HU/gI]; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.1, 10.1), followed by ΔHUCCTA (-0.0 ± 5.9 HU/gI; 95% CI, -11.9, 11.9) and TBW (1.1 ± 6.2 HU/gI; 95% CI, -11.2, 13.4). Conclusion: We demonstrated that the patient's TBW and ΔHUTEST significantly affected contrast enhancement on CCTA images and that the combined use of clinical information and test bolus results is useful for predicting aortic enhancement.

Radiation Dose Reduction With a Low-Tube Voltage Technique for Pediatric Chest Computed Tomographic Angiography Based on the Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Index.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiation dose and image quality at low tube-voltage pediatric chest computed tomographic angiography (CTA) that applies the same contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) index as the standard tube voltage technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast-enhanced chest CTA scans of 100 infants were acquired on a 64-row multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scanner. In the retrospective study, we evaluated 50 images acquired at 120 kVp; the image noise level was set at 25 Hounsfield units. In the prospective study, we used an 80-kVp protocol; the image noise level was 40 Hounsfield units because the iodine contrast was 1.6 times higher than on 120-kVp scans; the CNR was as in the 120-kVp protocol. We compared the CT number, image noise, CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), and the dose-length product on scans acquired with the 2 protocols. A diagnostic radiologist and a pediatric cardiologist visually evaluated all CTA images. RESULTS: The mean CTDIvol and the mean dose-length product were 0.5 mGy and 7.8 mGy-cm for 80- and 1.2 mGy and 20.8 mGy-cm for 120-kVp scans, respectively (P < .001). The mean CTDIvol was 42% lower at 80 kVp than at 120 kVp, and there was no significant difference in the visual scores assigned to the CTA images (P = .28). CONCLUSIONS: With the CNR index being the same at 80-kVp and 120-kVp imaging, the radiation dose delivered to infants subjected to chest CTA can be reduced without degradation of the image quality.

Automated determination of cardiac rest period on whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography by extracting high-speed motion of coronary arteries.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to develop an automated system for determining the cardiac rest period during whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography (CMRA) examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten healthy male volunteers (25-51 years old, 50-77 beats/min heart rate) were enrolled in this prospective study. A motion area map was generated from a cine image set by extracting high-speed component of cardiac motion, and it was used to specify the rest period in the proposed CMRA. In conventional CMRA, the rest period was determined based on the visual inspection of cine images. Agreement of the start time, end time, and trigger time between the two methods was assessed by the Bland-Altman plot analysis. Two observers visually evaluated the quality of the curved planar reformation (CPR) image of the coronary arteries. RESULTS: The proposed method significantly prolonged the start time (mean systematic difference 37.7 ms, P < 0.05) compared with the conventional method. Good agreement was observed for the end time (mean systematic difference 8.9 ms) and trigger time (mean systematic difference -28.8 ms) between the two methods. A significantly higher image quality (P < 0.05) was provided for the left circumflex artery in the proposed CMRA (mean grading score 3.88) than in conventional CMRA (mean grading score 3.68). CONCLUSION: Our system enabled detection of the rest period automatically without operator intervention and demonstrated somewhat higher image quality compared with conventional CMRA. Its use may be useful to improve the imaging workflow for CMRA in clinical practice.

Effect of Patient Characteristics on Vessel Enhancement at Lower Extremity CT Angiography.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of patient characteristics on popliteal aortic contrast enhancement at lower extremity CT angiography (LE-CTA) scanning. Materials and Methods: Prior informed consent to participate was obtained from all 158 patients. All were examined using a routine protocol; the scanning parameters were tube voltage 100 kVp, tube current 100 mA to 770 mA (noise index 12), 0.5-second rotation, 1.25-mm detector row width, 0.516 beam pitch, and 41.2-mm table movement, and the contrast material was 85.0 mL. Cardiac output (CO) was measured with a portable electrical velocimeter within 5 minutes of starting the CT scan. To evaluate the effects of age, sex, body size, CO, and scan delay on the CT number of popliteal artery, the researchers used multivariate regression analysis. Results: A significant positive correlation was seen between the CT number of the popliteal artery and the patient age (r = 0.39, p < 0.01). A significant inverse correlation was observed between the CT number of the popliteal artery and the height (r = -0.48), total body weight (r = -0.52), body mass index (r = -0.33), body surface area (BSA) (r = -0.56), lean body weight (r = -0.56), and CO (r = -0.35) (p < 0.001 for all). There was no significant correlation between the enhancement and the scan delay (r = 0.06, p = 0.47). The BSA, CO, and age had significant effects on the CT number (standardized regression: BSA -0.42, CO -0.22, age 0.15; p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusion: The BSA, CO, and age are significantly correlated with the CT number of the popliteal artery on LE-CTA.

Radiation Dose Reduction at Low Tube Voltage CCTA Based on the CNR Index.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy on 120- and 100-kVp coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) scans whose contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was the same. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 1311 coronary artery segments from 100 patients. For 120-kVp scans, the targeted image level was set at 25 Hounsfield units (HU). For 100-kVp scans, the targeted noise level was set at 30 HU to obtain the same CNR as at 120 kVp. We compared the CNR and the radiation dose on scans acquired at 120 and 100 kVp. Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) images were evaluated by an interventional coronary angiography specialist, and CCTA images were evaluated by a radiologist. Coronary artery disease was defined as a luminal narrowing ≧50% for ICA and CCTA. With ICA considered the gold standard, the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) was analyzed on both 120- and 100-kVp CCTA images. We also compared the diagnostic accuracy for area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the ICA and CCTA performed at 120 and 100 kVp. Two blinded observers visually evaluated the septal branch. RESULTS: The mean dose-length product was 48% lower at 100 kVp than at 120 kVp (P < .01). Under the 120-kVp CCTA protocol, the area under the curve, 95% confidence interval, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.94%, 0.91%-0.96%, 94.0%, 93.0%, 82.3%, and 98.1%, respectively; at 100 kVp these values were 0.94%, 0.92%-0.97%, 96.1%, 92.0%, 85.2%, and 98.0%, respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two protocols (P = .87). CONCLUSIONS: At the same CNR, the 100-kVp CCTA protocol may help to reduce the radiation dose by approximately 50% compared to the 120-kVp protocol without degradation of diagnostic accuracy.

CT Angiography of Suspected Peripheral Artery Disease: Comparison of Contrast Enhancement in the Lower Extremities of Patients Undergoing and Those Not Undergoing Hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare contrast enhancement on CT angiography (CTA) images of the lower extremity in patients with suspected peripheral artery disease who did not undergo hemodialysis (HD) and patients who were scanned before or after HD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We divided 287 consecutive patients who underwent CTA of the lower extremity on a 64-MDCT scanner into three groups: group 1 patients (n = 151) were not dependent on HD, group 2 patients (n = 70) were dependent on HD and underwent HD less than 24 hours after CTA, and group 3 (n = 66) were dependent on HD and underwent HD less than 24 hours before CTA. We then compared the CT number in the popliteal artery at the level of the patella on all CTA images. A cardiologist and a radiology technologist visually evaluated the depiction of the descending genicular artery (DGA) on the CTA images and assigned a visualization score. RESULTS: The median CT number was lowest in group 2 patients (373 HU vs 429 [group 1] and 418 [group 3] HU). The score for visualization of the DGA was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 (p = 0.02) and group 3 (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: At CTA, arterial enhancement decreases with the passage of time after HD likely because of the increase in intravascular volume. CTA that is performed within 24 hours after HD generates higher-quality images of the lower extremities than CTA that is performed within 24 hours before HD.

Aortic and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement During Hepatic-Arterial and Portal Venous Phase Computed Tomography Scanning: Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis Using Age, Sex, Total Body Weight, Height, and Cardiac Output.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the effect of the age, sex, total body weight (TBW), height (HT) and cardiac output (CO) of patients on aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement during hepatic-arterial phase (HAP) and portal venous phase (PVP) computed tomography (CT) scanning. METHODS: This prospective study received institutional review board approval; prior informed consent to participate was obtained from all 168 patients. All were examined using our routine protocol; the contrast material was 600 mg/kg iodine. Cardiac output was measured with a portable electrical velocimeter within 5 minutes of starting the CT scan. We calculated contrast enhancement (per gram of iodine: [INCREMENT]HU/gI) of the abdominal aorta during the HAP and of the liver parenchyma during the PVP. We performed univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis between all patient characteristics and the [INCREMENT]HU/gI of aortic- and liver parenchymal enhancement. RESULTS: Univariate linear regression analysis demonstrated statistically significant correlations between the [INCREMENT]HU/gI and the age, sex, TBW, HT, and CO (all P < 0.001). However, multivariate linear regression analysis showed that only the TBW and CO were of independent predictive value (P < 0.001). Also, only the CO was independently and negatively related to aortic enhancement during HAP and to liver parenchymal enhancement when the contrast material injection protocol was adjusted for the TBW (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: By multivariate linear regression analysis only the TBW and CO were significantly correlated with aortic and liver parenchymal enhancement; the age, sex, and HT were not. The CO was the only independent factor affecting aortic and liver parenchymal enhancement at hepatic CT when the protocol was adjusted for the TBW.

Radiation dose reduction based on CNR index with low-tube voltage scan for pediatric CT scan: experimental study using anthropomorphic phantoms.

BACKGROUND: To figure out the relationship between image noise and contrast noise ratio (CNR) at different tube voltages, using anthropomorphic new-born and 1-year-old phantoms, and to discuss the feasibility of radiation dose reduction, based on the obtained CNR index from image noise. We performed helical scans of the anthropomorphic new-born and 1-year-old phantoms. The CT numbers of the simulated aorta and image noise of the simulated mediastinum were measured; then CNR was calculated on 80, 100, and 120-kVp images reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR). We also measured the center and surface dose in the case of CNR of 14 using radio-photoluminescence glass dosimeters. RESULTS: The CT number of the simulated aorta was increased with decreasing tube voltage from 120 to 80 kVp (362.5-535.1 HU for the new-born, 358.9-532.6 HU for the 1-year-old). At CNR of 14, the center dose was 0.4, 0.6 and 0.9 mGy at FBP and 0.5, 0.6 and 0.9 mGy at IR and with the new-born phantom acquired at 80, 100 and 120 kVp, respectively. The center dose for FBP image was reduced by 56% at 80 kVp, 34% at 100 kVp for the new-born and 36% at 80 kVp, 22% at 100 kVp for the 1-year-old compared with that at 120 kVp. We obtained a relationship between image noise and CNR at different tube voltages using the anthropomorphic new-born and 1-year-old phantoms. CONCLUSION: The use of index of CNR with low-tube voltage may achieve further radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT examination.

Vessel Visibility Assessment of Low Tube Voltage Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Determined with Contrast-to-Noise Ratio.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of vessel visibility and radiation dose using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) method with low tube voltage in coronary computed tomography angiography (c-CTA). METHODS: We performed electrocardiogram-gated scan of 2.0-mm diameter simulated vessel in the center of the cardiac phantom by the use of a 64-detector CT scanner. Reference CNR was calculated from the target coronary CT number (CTnumberA; 350 Hounsfield units [HU]), epicardial fat CT number (CTnumberB; -100 HU), and target epicardial fat standard deviation (SD) number (SDB; 25 HU) at the 120 kV. We obtained the tube current at low tube voltage (100 and 80 kV) to perform the similar reference CNR at 120 kV. The full widths at half maximum from axial images were evaluated with quantitative evaluation and three types of visualizations of the vessel phantom were evaluated with the qualitative evaluations. RESULTS: CTnumberA of 100 and 80 kV were increased by 26% and 50%, respectively, compared with 120 kV (P<0.01). SDB was also increased by a similar ratio (P<0.01). CTDIvol of 100 and 80 kV were decreased by 39% and 51%, respectively, compared with 120 kV (P<0.05). There were no significant voltage differences among three tubes in quantitative and qualitative evaluations at the same CNR (P> 0.05). CONCLUSION: In this phantom study, these results show that the CNR method with low tube voltage achieves radiation dose reduction without decreasing the image quality.

[Study of CT Automatic Exposure Control System (CT-AEC) Optimization in CT Angiography of Lower Extremity Artery by Considering Contrast-to-Noise Ratio].

PURPOSE: To evaluate the image quality and effect of radiation dose reduction by setting for computed tomography automatic exposure control system (CT-AEC) in computed tomographic angiography (CTA) of lower extremity artery. METHODS: Two methods of setting were compared for CT-AEC [conventional and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) methods]. Conventional method was set noise index (NI): 14and tube current threshold: 10-750 mA. CNR method was set NI: 18, minimum tube current: (X+Y)/2 mA (X, Y: maximum X (Y)-axis tube current value of leg in NI: 14), and maximum tube current: 750 mA. The image quality was evaluated by CNR, and radiation dose reduction was evaluated by dose-length-product (DLP). RESULTS: In conventional method, mean CNRs for pelvis, femur, and leg were 19.9±4.8, 20.4±5.4, and 16.2±4.3, respectively. There was a significant difference between the CNRs of pelvis and leg (P<0.001), and between femur and leg (P<0.001). In CNR method, mean CNRs for pelvis, femur, and leg were 15.2±3.3, 15.3±3.2, and 15.3±3.1, respectively; no significant difference between pelvis, femur, and leg (P=0.973) in CNR method was observed. Mean DLPs were 1457±434 mGy⋅cm in conventional method, and 1049±434 mGy·cm in CNR method. There was a significant difference in the DLPs of conventional method and CNR method (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: CNR method gave equal CNRs for pelvis, femur, and leg, and was beneficial for radiation dose reduction in CTA of lower extremity artery.

Delivering the Saline Chaser Via a Spiral Flow-Generating Tube Improves Arterial Enhancement for Computed Tomography Angiography of the Lower Extremities.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We delivered the saline chaser via a spiral flow-generating tube or a conventional connecting tube and compared arterial enhancement at computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lower extremities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned 100 patients whose ankle bronchial pressure index or clinical symptoms were suspect of peripheral arterial disease to a spiral flow-generating tube (protocol A) or a conventional connecting-tube protocol (protocol B) and performed CTA of the lower extremities. The test bolus was delivered under protocol A or B, and the CT numbers recorded for each protocol were compared. Two radiological technologists visually evaluated the descending genicular artery. RESULTS: In the test injection, the median CT number for the popliteal artery was significantly higher with protocol A than B (204.5 HU vs. 170.5 HU, P = 0.03). For CTA of the lower extremities, the median CT number for the popliteal artery at the level of the patella was 436.1 HU (range, 259-608 HU) under protocol A; with protocol B, it was 382.9 HU (range, 244-564 HU) (P = 0.02). The visual score assigned in the descending genicular artery was statistically significantly higher under protocol A than B (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the spiral flow-generating tube increased the effect of the saline chaser and significantly improved arterial enhancement from the abdominal aorta to the arteries of the foot at CTA of the lower extremities.

Prediction of aortic enhancement on coronary CTA images using a test bolus of diluted contrast material.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of our study was to compare test bolus techniques using undiluted or diluted contrast material for their ability to predict aortic enhancement on coronary computed tomographic angiography (c-CTA) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We divided 200 consecutive patients who underwent c-CTA on a 64-MDCT scanner into two groups. In group A (n = 100), we used a test bolus of undiluted contrast material and in group B (n = 100), the contrast material was diluted. The injection volume was body weight × 0.2 (contrast material 100%) in group A and body weight × 0.7 (contrast material 30%, saline 70%) in group B. We then compared the CT number in the ascending aorta on c-CTA images obtained with undiluted and diluted contrast media to the CT number on c-CTA images. RESULTS: The mean CT number in the ascending aorta was significantly higher in group B than group A (217.1 vs. 157.4 HU, P < .001). There was a significant difference in the correlation between the CT number of the ascending aorta on c-CTA images and on images acquired with the test bolus using undiluted or diluted test bolus (P < .001). In group B, the correlation had a strong positive linear relationship (r = 0.72, P < .001), whereas in group A the positive linear relationship was weak (r = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: The test bolus with diluted contrast material was useful for predicting aortic enhancement before c-CTA scanning.

[Usefulness of subtraction computed tomography angiography employing orbital synchronized helical scanning for diagnosis of lower extremity arteries with vessel wall calcification].

PURPOSE: Massive calcification complicates the diagnosis of the blood vessel lumen in computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the arteries of the lower extremities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate subtraction CTA with the use of orbital synchronized helical scanning (OS-SCTA). METHOD: Phantom study: We performed OS-SCTA and non-OSCTA of a calcified vessel phantom (ψ2.5 mm), and compared them with a non-calcified vessel phantom as the reference by full width at half maximum (FWHM) and full width at tenth maximum (FWTM) of maximum intensity projection (MIP) images. Clinical study: 58 patients with peripheral artery disease who were referred for angiography also underwent OS-SCTA. OS-SCTA was produced using MIP images. Findings were graded according to three categories: (1) stenosis greater than 50% or occluded; (2) stenosis less than 50%; (3) not detected due to insufficient image quality. OS-SCTA findings were compared with the angiographic findings for each arterial segment. RESULTS: In the phantom study, FWHM showed no significant difference between OS-SCTA and the reference (P=0.135), whereas FWTM showed a significant difference (P<0.001). FWHM and FWTM showed a significant difference between non-OS-SCTA and the reference (P<0.001), due to misregistration with helical artifacts. In a clinical study comparing OS-SCTA with angiography, the sensitivity and specificity were 93.3% and 95.1% in calcified segments, 91.8% and 93.9% in non-calcified segments, and 92.2% and 94.6% in all segments. There was no significant difference between calcified segments and non-calcified segments (sensitivity: P=0.568, specificity: P=0.549). CONCLUSION: OS-SCTA is beneficial for the diagnosis of lower extremity arteries with vessel wall calcification, since it shows detection accuracy comparable to that of angiography.