Adaptation of a eukaryote-like ProRS to a prokaryote-like tRNAPro.

Prolyl-tRNA synthetases (ProRSs) are unique among aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) in having two distinct structural architectures across different organisms: prokaryote-like (P-type) and eukaryote/archaeon-like (E-type). Interestingly, Bacillus thuringiensis harbors both types, with P-type (BtProRS1) and E-type ProRS (BtProRS2) coexisting. Despite their differences, both enzymes are constitutively expressed and functional in vivo. Similar to BtProRS1, BtProRS2 selectively charges the P-type tRNAPro and displays higher halofuginone tolerance than canonical E-type ProRS. However, these two isozymes recognize the primary identity elements of the P-type tRNAPro-G72 and A73 in the acceptor stem-through distinct mechanisms. Moreover, BtProRS2 exhibits significantly higher tolerance to stresses (such as heat, hydrogen peroxide, and dithiothreitol) than BtProRS1 does. This study underscores how an E-type ProRS adapts to a P-type tRNAPro and how it may contribute to the bacterium's survival under stress conditions.

Adaptive evolution: Eukaryotic enzyme's specificity shift to a bacterial substrate.

Prolyl-tRNA synthetase (ProRS), belonging to the family of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases responsible for pairing specific amino acids with their respective tRNAs, is categorized into two distinct types: the eukaryote/archaeon-like type (E-type) and the prokaryote-like type (P-type). Notably, these types are specific to their corresponding cognate tRNAs. In an intriguing paradox, Thermus thermophilus ProRS (TtProRS) aligns with the E-type ProRS but selectively charges the P-type tRNAPro, featuring the bacterium-specific acceptor-stem elements G72 and A73. This investigation reveals TtProRS's notable resilience to the inhibitor halofuginone, a synthetic derivative of febrifugine emulating Pro-A76, resembling the characteristics of the P-type ProRS. Furthermore, akin to the P-type ProRS, TtProRS identifies its cognate tRNA through recognition of the acceptor-stem elements G72/A73, along with the anticodon elements G35/G36. However, in contrast to the P-type ProRS, which relies on a strictly conserved R residue within the bacterium-like motif 2 loop for recognizing G72/A73, TtProRS achieves this through a non-conserved sequence, RTR, within the otherwise non-interacting eukaryote-like motif 2 loop. This investigation sheds light on the adaptive capacity of a typically conserved housekeeping enzyme to accommodate a novel substrate.

Recognition of tRNAHis in an RNase P-Free Nanoarchaeum.

The 5' extra guanosine with 5'-monophosphate at position -1 (G-1) of tRNAHis (p-tRNAHis) is a nearly universal feature that establishes tRNAHis identity. G-1 is either genome encoded and retained after processing by RNase P (RNase P) or posttranscriptionally incorporated by tRNAHis guanylyltransferase (Thg1) after RNase P cleavage. However, RNase P is not found in the hyperthermophilic archaeum Nanoarchaeum equitans; instead, all of its tRNAs, including tRNAHis, are transcribed as leaderless tRNAs with 5'-triphosphate (ppp-tRNAs). How N. equitans histidyl-tRNA synthetase (NeHisRS) recognizes its cognate tRNA (NetRNAHis) is of particular interest. In this paper, we show that G-1 serves as the major identity element of NetRNAHis, with its anticodon performing a similar role, though to a lesser extent. Moreover, NeHisRS distinctly preferred p-tRNAHis over ppp-tRNAHis (~5-fold difference). Unlike other prokaryotic HisRSs, which strongly prefer tRNAHis with C73, this enzyme could charge tRNAsHis with A73 and C73 with nearly equal efficiency. As a result, mutation at the C73-recognition amino acid residue Q112 had only a minor effect (<2-fold reduction). This study suggests that NeHisRS has evolved to disregard C73, but it still maintains its evolutionarily preserved preference toward tRNAHis with 5'-monophosphate. IMPORTANCE Mature tRNAHis has, at its 5'-terminus, an extra guanosine with 5'-monophosphate, designated G-1. G-1 is the major recognition element for histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HisRS), regardless of whether it is of eukaryotic or prokaryotic origin. However, in the hyperthermophilic archaeum Nanoarchaeum equitans, all its tRNAs, including tRNAHis, are transcribed as leaderless tRNAs with 5'-triphosphate. This piqued our curiosity about whether N. equitans histidyl-tRNA synthetase (NeHisRS) prefers tRNAHis with 5'-triphosphate. We show herein that G-1 is still the major recognition element for NeHisRS. However, unlike other prokaryotic HisRSs, which strongly prefer tRNAHis with C73, this enzyme shows almost the same preference for C73 and A73. Most intriguingly, NeHisRS still prefers 5'-monophosphate over 5'-triphosphate. It thus appears that the preference of HisRS for tRNAHis with 5'-monophosphate emerged very early in evolution.

Gain of C-Ala enables AlaRS to target the L-shaped tRNAAla.

Unlike many other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, alanyl-tRNA synthetase (AlaRS) retains a conserved prototype structure throughout biology. While Caenorhabditis elegans cytoplasmic AlaRS (CeAlaRSc) retains the prototype structure, its mitochondrial counterpart (CeAlaRSm) contains only a residual C-terminal domain (C-Ala). We demonstrated herein that the C-Ala domain from CeAlaRSc robustly binds both tRNA and DNA. It bound different tRNAs but preferred tRNAAla. Deletion of this domain from CeAlaRSc sharply reduced its aminoacylation activity, while fusion of this domain to CeAlaRSm selectively and distinctly enhanced its aminoacylation activity toward the elbow-containing (or L-shaped) tRNAAla. Phylogenetic analysis showed that CeAlaRSm once possessed the C-Ala domain but later lost most of it during evolution, perhaps in response to the deletion of the T-arm (part of the elbow) from its cognate tRNA. This study underscores the evolutionary gain of C-Ala for docking AlaRS to the L-shaped tRNAAla.