Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis ; 9(4): 715-724, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36281676

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a recognized risk factor for dementia. However, evidence for using antihypertensive agents to reduce the risk of Alzheimer's disease in people with hypertension is inconclusive. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between antihypertensive agents and the incidence of Alzheimer's disease in adults with hypertension and normal cognition. DESIGN: We conducted a systemic review and performed meta-analyses using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid PsycINFO, Web of science and Scopus, from inception to 18th February 2022. SETTING: Cohort and case-control studies. PARTICIPANTS: Adults ≥ 40 years with hypertension and normal cognition. INTERVENTION: Antihypertensive agents. MEASUREMENTS: We performed two separate meta-analyses, pooling the adjusted relative risk (RR) of non-antihypertensive comparator and antihypertensive comparator study design. RESULTS: We included nine studies, totalling 1,527,410 individuals. Meta-analysis of non-antihypertensive user comparator studies found that the use of antihypertensive agents is associated with a reduced risk of incident Alzheimer's disease (RR= 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.99; p=0.01). Meta-analysis of antihypertensive comparator studies found evidence that angiotensin II receptor blocker users are associated with a reduction in the risk of Alzheimer's disease compared to other antihypertensive agents (RR= 0.78, 95% CI 0.68-0.88; p< 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our review provides evidence that the use of antihypertensive agents is associated with a lower incidence of Alzheimer's disease. The use of angiotensin II receptor blockers may provide the most benefit among antihypertensive agents. Lowering raised blood pressure may not be the only mechanism for cognitive protection and further investigation of the effects of angiotensin II on cognition is indicated.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Hypertension , Humans , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/prevention & control , Alzheimer Disease/complications , Angiotensin II , Hypertension/complications , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/prevention & control , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use
2.
J Crit Care ; 30(4): 808-13, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25971871

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose was to describe clinical pharmacist interventions across a range of critical care units (CCUs) throughout the United Kingdom, to identify CCU medication error rate and prescription optimization, and to identify the type and impact of each intervention in the prevention of harm and improvement of patient therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was undertaken in 21 UK CCUs from November 5 to 18, 2012. A data collection web portal was designed where the specialist critical care pharmacist reported all interventions at their site. Each intervention was classified as medication error, optimization, or consult. In addition, a clinical impact scale was used to code the interventions. Interventions were scored as low impact, moderate impact, high impact, and life saving. The final coding was moderated by blinded independent multidisciplinary trialists. RESULTS: A total of 20517 prescriptions were reviewed with 3294 interventions recorded during the weekdays. This resulted in an overall intervention rate of 16.1%: 6.8% were classified as medication errors, 8.3% optimizations, and 1.0% consults. The interventions were classified as low impact (34.0%), moderate impact (46.7%), and high impact (19.3%); and 1 case was life saving. Almost three quarters of interventions were to optimize the effectiveness of and improve safety of pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study demonstrated that both medication error resolution and pharmacist-led optimization rates were substantial. Almost 1 in 6 prescriptions required an intervention from the clinical pharmacist. The error rate was slightly lower than an earlier UK prescribing error study (EQUIP). Two thirds of the interventions were of moderate to high impact.


Subject(s)
Medication Errors/prevention & control , Pharmacists , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Referral and Consultation , Critical Care , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Prospective Studies , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL