Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Genomics ; 116(4): 110874, 2024 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38839024

ABSTRACT

Low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (LCS) offers a cost-effective alternative for sturgeon breeding, especially given the lack of SNP chips and the high costs associated with whole-genome sequencing. In this study, the efficiency of LCS for genotype imputation and genomic prediction was assessed in 643 sequenced Russian sturgeons (∼13.68×). The results showed that using BaseVar+STITCH at a sequencing depth of 2× with a sample size larger than 300 resulted in the highest genotyping accuracy. In addition, when the sequencing depth reached 0.5× and SNP density was reduced to 50 K through linkage disequilibrium pruning, the prediction accuracy was comparable to that of whole sequencing depth. Furthermore, an incremental feature selection method has the potential to improve prediction accuracy. This study suggests that the combination of LCS and imputation can be a cost-effective strategy, contributing to the genetic improvement of economic traits and promoting genetic gains in aquaculture species.


Subject(s)
Fishes , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Fishes/genetics , Animals , Whole Genome Sequencing/economics , Whole Genome Sequencing/methods , Genomics/methods , Genomics/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Linkage Disequilibrium
2.
FEMS Microbiol Lett ; 366(9)2019 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31074797

ABSTRACT

Two DNA extraction methods, the Zirmil-beating cell disruption method (ZBC) and the QIAamp fast DNA stool mini kit (QIA), were used to extract DNA from the intestinal flora of the penaeid shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei, and their microbial communities were analyzed using 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing. Results were obtained in terms of the number of reads, alpha diversity indexes, beta diversity indexes and taxonomic composition. The alpha diversity indexes of the community, according to the ZBC method, were higher than those according to the QIA method. Furthermore, results from the three samples using the ZBC method were less consistent than those where the QIA method was used. Further, using the latter method led to substantive clustering. It is suggested that the QIA method is more stable and repeatable than the ZBC method. Although the two extraction methods shared the major abundant microflora based on 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing, bias associated with diversity analysis indexes and certain species was observed.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/classification , DNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Intestines/microbiology , Penaeidae/microbiology , Animals , Genetic Variation , Phylogeny , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL