Clinical management and discontinuation of treatment in patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis in a rheumatology consultation.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) has changed dramatically in recent years, especially with the use of disease modifying drugs (DMARDs). Data on the management of this disease in clinical trials are abundant, but not so in real life. The aim of our study is to describe the management of an early RA cohort in daily clinical practice, especially DMARD discontinuations and reasons. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patients with RA diagnosed between 01/07 and 12/14 followed up to 01/17, using >1 DMARD ≥ 3 months. VARIABLES: sociodemographic, clinical, treatment, DMARD discontinuation and reason. Descriptive analysis of sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics. Discontinuation incidence rate (DIR) due to survival techniques, expressed in 100 patients*year with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: 814 patients were included with 2388 courses of treatment, 77% women, mean age 57.5 years. First course: monotherapy (92.75%), especially Methotrexate (56.06%). In later courses there was increased combined therapy and use of biologicals (mainly Etanercept). There were 1094 discontinuations (29.5 [27.8-31.3]). The DIR was higher for adverse events (15.9 [14.7-17.3]), biologicals (49.6 [43.1-57.2]) and combined therapy. The DMAR with the lowest DIR was MTX (25.8 [23.8-28.1]). CONCLUSION: Methotrexate was the most used drug, biologicals increased throughout the follow-up, the most frequent being Etanercept. The DMARD DIR was 29*100 patients per year, mainly due to adverse events. It seems to be higher in the therapies that include biologicals and combined therapies. MTX is the drug with the lowest DIR.

Manejo clínico y discontinuación de tratamiento en pacientes con artritis reumatoide de inicio en una consulta de Reumatología / Clinical Management and Discontinuation of Treatment in Patients with Recent Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Rheumatology Consultation

Introducción: El tratamiento de la artritis reumatoide ha cambiado drásticamente en los últimos años, sobre todo con el uso de los fármacos modificadores de la enfermedad (FAME). Los datos sobre el manejo de esta enfermedad en ensayo clínico son abundantes, pero no en la vida real. El objetivo de nuestro estudio es describir el manejo de una cohorte de artritis reumatoide de inicio en práctica clínica diaria, especialmente las suspensiones de los FAME y sus causas. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de pacientes con artritis reumatoide diagnosticados entre 01/07 y 12/14 seguidos hasta 01/17, que usaron>1 FAME≥3 meses. Variables: sociodemográficas, clínicas, tratamiento, suspensión del FAME y causa. Análisis descriptivo de las características sociodemográficas, clínicas y de tratamiento. Incidencia de suspensión (IS) por técnicas de supervivencia, expresándose en 100 pacientes/año con intervalo de confianza del 95%. Resultados: Se incluyen 814 pacientes con 2.388 cursos de tratamiento, el 77% mujeres, edad media 57,5 años. Primer curso: monoterapia (92,75%), especialmente metotrexate (56,06%). En posteriores cursos aumentan terapia combinada y uso de biológico (principalmente etanercept). Se registraron 1.094 suspensiones (29,5 [27,8-31,3]). La IS fue mayor para evento adverso (15,9 [14,7-17,3]), biológicos (49,6 [43,1-57,2]) y terapia combinada. El FAME con menor IS fue metotrexate (25,8 [23,8-28,1]). Conclusión: El metotrexate fue el fármaco más utilizado, el biológico aumentó a lo largo del seguimiento, siendo el más frecuente etanercept. La IS de los FAME fue 29/100 pacientes año, principalmente por evento adverso. Parece mayor en las terapias que incluyen biológicos y en las combinadas. El metotrexate es el fármaco con menor IS.(AU)

Introduction: The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has changed dramatically in recent years, especially with the use of disease modifying drugs (DMARDs). Data on the management of this disease in clinical trials are abundant, but not so in real life. The aim of our study is to describe the management of an early rheumatoid arthritis cohort in daily clinical practice, especially DMARD discontinuations and reasons. Methods: A retrospective observational study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed between 01/07 and 12/14 followed up to 01/17, using>1 DMARD≥3 months. Variables: sociodemographic, clinical, treatment, DMARD discontinuation and reason. Descriptive analysis of sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics. Discontinuation incidence rate (DIR) due to survival techniques, expressed in 100 patients/year with 95% confidence interval. Results: 814 patients were included with 2,388 courses of treatment, 77% women, mean age 57.5 years. First course: monotherapy (92.75%), especially methotrexate (56.06%). In later courses there was increased combined therapy and use of biologicals (mainly etanercept). There were 1,094 discontinuations (29.5 [27.8-31.3]). The DIR was higher for adverse events (15.9 [14.7-17.3]), biologicals (49.6 [43.1-57.2]) and combined therapy. The DMAR with the lowest DIR was methotrexate (25.8 [23.8-28.1]). Conclusion: Methotrexate was the most used drug, biologicals increased throughout the follow-up, the most frequent being Etanercept. The DMARD DIR was 29/100 patients per year, mainly due to adverse events. It seems to be higher in the therapies that include biologicals and combined therapies. Methotrexate is the drug with the lowest DIR.(AU)

Hospital admissions in inflammatory rheumatic diseases during the peak of COVID-19 pandemic: incidence and role of disease-modifying agents.

AIMS: In this pandemic, it is essential for rheumatologists and patients to know the relationship between COVID-19 and inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). We wanted to assess the role of targeted synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (ts/bDMARDs) and other variables in the development of moderate-severe COVID-19 disease in IRD. METHODS: An observational longitudinal study was conducted during the epidemic peak in Madrid (1 March to 15 April 2020). All patients attended at the rheumatology outpatient clinic of a tertiary hospital in Madrid with a medical diagnosis of IRD were included. Main outcome: hospital admission related to COVID-19. Independent variable: ts/bDMARDs. Covariates: sociodemographic, comorbidities, type of IRD diagnosis, glucocorticoids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). Incidence rate (IR) of hospital admission related to COVID-19 was expressed per 1000 patient-months. Cox multiple regression analysis was run to examine the influence of ts/bDMARDs and other covariates on IR of hospital admission related to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 3951 IRD patients were included (5896 patient-months). Methotrexate was the csDMARD most used. Eight hundred and two patients were on ts/bDMARDs, mainly anti-TNF agents, and Rtx. Hospital admissions related to COVID-19 occurred in 54 patients (1.36%) with an IR of 9.15 (95% confidence interval: 7-11.9). In the multivariate analysis, older, male, comorbidities, and specific systemic autoimmune conditions (Sjögren, polychondritis, Raynaud, and mixed connective tissue disease) had more risk of hospital admissions. Exposition to ts/bDMARDs did not achieve statistical significance. Use of glucocorticoids, NSAIDs, and csDMARDs dropped from the final model. CONCLUSION: This study provides additional evidence in IRD patients regarding susceptibility to moderate-severe infection related to COVID-19.

Clinical Management and Discontinuation of Treatment in Patients with Recent Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis in a Rheumatology Consultation. / Manejo clínico y discontinuación de tratamiento en pacientes con artritis reumatoide de inicio en una consulta de Reumatología.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of rheumatoid arthritis has changed dramatically in recent years, especially with the use of disease modifying drugs (DMARDs). Data on the management of this disease in clinical trials are abundant, but not so in real life. The aim of our study is to describe the management of an early rheumatoid arthritis cohort in daily clinical practice, especially DMARD discontinuations and reasons. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis diagnosed between 01/07 and 12/14 followed up to 01/17, using>1 DMARD≥3 months. VARIABLES: sociodemographic, clinical, treatment, DMARD discontinuation and reason. Descriptive analysis of sociodemographic, clinical and treatment characteristics. Discontinuation incidence rate (DIR) due to survival techniques, expressed in 100 patients/year with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: 814 patients were included with 2,388 courses of treatment, 77% women, mean age 57.5 years. First course: monotherapy (92.75%), especially methotrexate (56.06%). In later courses there was increased combined therapy and use of biologicals (mainly etanercept). There were 1,094 discontinuations (29.5 [27.8-31.3]). The DIR was higher for adverse events (15.9 [14.7-17.3]), biologicals (49.6 [43.1-57.2]) and combined therapy. The DMAR with the lowest DIR was methotrexate (25.8 [23.8-28.1]). CONCLUSION: Methotrexate was the most used drug, biologicals increased throughout the follow-up, the most frequent being Etanercept. The DMARD DIR was 29/100 patients per year, mainly due to adverse events. It seems to be higher in the therapies that include biologicals and combined therapies. Methotrexate is the drug with the lowest DIR.

Efficacy of rituximab in slowing down progression of rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease: data from the NEREA Registry.

OBJECTIVES: To asses the clinical course in RA-related interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) patients with and without rituximab (RTX). The influence of other variables was also evaluated. METHODS: A longitudinal multicentre study was conducted in RA diagnosed with ILD from 2007 until 2018 in Madrid. Patients were included in a registry [pNEumology RhEumatology Autoinmune diseases (NEREA)] from the time of ILD diagnosis. The main endpoint was functional respiratory impairment (FI), when there was a decline ≥5% in the predicted forced vital capacity compared with the previous one. Pulmonary function was measured at baseline and in follow-up visits every 6-12 months. The independent variable was therapy with RTX. Covariables included sociodemographic, clinical, radiological and other therapies. Survival techniques were used to estimate the incidence rate (IR) and 95% CI of functional impairment, expressed per 100 patient-semesters. Cox multivariate regression models were run to examine the influence of RTX and other covariates on FI. Results were expressed as the hazard ratio (HR) and CI. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included. FI occurred in 42 patients [IR 23.5 (95% CI 19, 29.1)] and 50% of them had FI within 1.75 years of an ILD diagnosis. A multivariate analysis showed that RTX exposure resulted in a lower risk of FI compared with non-exposure [HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.31, 0.85)]. Interstitial pneumonia, glucocorticoids, disease activity and duration also influenced FI. CONCLUSION: RA-ILD patients deteriorate over time, with the median time free of impairment being <2 years. Patients exposed to RTX had a higher probability of remaining free of FI compared with other therapies. Other factors have also been identified.

Patient Decision Aid (PDA) for Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Reduces Decisional Conflict and Improves Readiness for Treatment Decision Making.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop and assess the effectiveness of a patient decision aid (PDA) to support treatment decision making in Spanish patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who fail to achieve the therapeutic goal with the current disease-modifying antirheumatic treatment strategy. METHODS: The PDA was developed in accordance with the International Patient Decision Aids Standards recommendations. A steering group led the project. Three literature reviews and two focus groups were performed to develop the PDA prototype. To check its comprehensibility, acceptability, and feasibility, alpha-testing was performed using the Decision Support Acceptability Scale (DSAS). Beta-testing was conducted to assess preliminary evidence of PDA efficacy using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) before and after PDA use. Readiness was evaluated using the Preparation for Decision Making Scale (PDMS). RESULTS: The PDA included (1) a brief description of RA, (2) treatment information, and (3) a values clarification section. Alpha-testing revealed that most patients considered that the information was presented in a good or excellent way and it could help clarify their values and facilitate treatment decision making. Most rheumatologists agreed that the PDA was easy to understand, to use, and allowed them to reach a shared decision. Beta-testing showed that PDA significantly reduced overall patients' decisional conflict [33.2 (DE: 21.4) vs 24.6 (23.5); p < 0.001] and prepared the patient for decision making [PDMS: 67.5 (21.0)]. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a PDA for Spanish patients with moderate-to-severe RA that reduces patients' decisional conflict and increases their readiness for decision making. The use of this PDA in routine clinical practice may improve the quality of the decision-making process and the quality of the choices made.

Indicator opportunistic infections after biological treatment in rheumatoid arthritis, 10 years follow-up in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: This research describes the incidence and factors associated with opportunistic infections in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs). METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal study was carried out from 2007 to 2018. We included RA patients treated with a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-targeted bDMARD or non-TNF-targeted bDMARD from the start of bDMARDs. An independent variable was the development of an indicator of opportunistic infection after biological (IOIb) treatment. Secondary variables included sociodemographic, clinical, and treatments. We used survival techniques to estimate the incidence of IOIb, per 1000 patient-years (95% CI). We performed a Cox multivariate regression analysis model to compare the risk of IOIb. Results were expressed as a hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS: A total of 441 RA patients were included, that started 761 different courses of bDMARDs. A total of 81% were women with a mean age at first bDMARD of 57.3 ±â€„14 years. A total of 71.3% of the courses were TNF-targeted bDMARDs and 28.7% were non-TNF-targeted bDMARDs. There were 37 IOIb (25 viral, 6 fungal, 5 bacterial, 1 parasitic). Nine of these required hospitalization and one died. The global incidence of IOIb was 23.2 (16.8-32). TNF-targeted bDMARDs had 25 IOIb, incidence 20.5 (13.9-30.4), and non-TNF-targeted bDMARDs had 12 IOIb, incidence 31.7 (18-55.9). In the multivariate analysis, glucocorticosteroids (HR 2.17, p = 0.004) and lower lymphocyte count increased the risk for IOIb (HR 0.99, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of IOIb due to bDMARDs was 23 cases per 1000 patient-years. Close monitoring should be taken in the RA patients treated with bDMARDs and glucocorticosteroids, mainly in elderly patients and those with a low total lymphocyte count at the beginning of bDMARD treatment.

Outpatient Readmission in Rheumatology: A Machine Learning Predictive Model of Patient's Return to the Clinic.

Our objective is to develop and validate a predictive model based on the random forest algorithm to estimate the readmission risk to an outpatient rheumatology clinic after discharge. We included patients from the Hospital Clínico San Carlos rheumatology outpatient clinic, from 1 April 2007 to 30 November 2016, and followed-up until 30 November 2017. Only readmissions between 2 and 12 months after the discharge were analyzed. Discharge episodes were chronologically split into training, validation, and test datasets. Clinical and demographic variables (diagnoses, treatments, quality of life (QoL), and comorbidities) were used as predictors. Models were developed in the training dataset, using a grid search approach, and performance was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). A total of 18,662 discharge episodes were analyzed, out of which 2528 (13.5%) were followed by outpatient readmissions. Overall, 38,059 models were developed. AUC-ROC, sensitivity, and specificity of the reduced final model were 0.653, 0.385, and 0.794, respectively. The most important variables were related to follow-up duration, being prescribed with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and corticosteroids, being diagnosed with chronic polyarthritis, occupation, and QoL. We have developed a predictive model for outpatient readmission in a rheumatology setting. Identification of patients with higher risk can optimize the allocation of healthcare resources.

RNA sequencing of mesenchymal stem cells reveals a blocking of differentiation and immunomodulatory activities under inflammatory conditions in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

INTRODUCTION: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have the ability to differentiate into different types of cells of the mesenchymal lineage, such as osteocytes, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. It is also known that under inflammatory stimuli or in the appropriate experimental conditions, they can also act as regulators of inflammation. Thus, in addition to their regenerating potential, their interest has been extended to their possible use in cell therapy strategies for treatment of immune disorders. OBJECTIVE: To analyze, by RNA-seq analysis, the transcriptome profiling of allogenic MSCs under RA lymphocyte activation. METHODS: We identified the differentially expressed genes in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells after exposure to an inflammatory environment. The transcriptome profiling was evaluated by means of the precise measurement of transcripts provided by the RNA-Seq technology. RESULTS: Our results evidenced the existence of blocking of both regenerative (differentiation) and immunomodulatory phenotypes under inflammatory conditions characterized by an upregulation of genes involved in immune processes and a simultaneous downregulation of genes mainly involved in regenerative or cell differentiation functions. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the two main functions of MSCs (immunomodulation and differentiation) are blocked, at least while the inflammation is being resolved. Inflammation, at least partially mediated by gamma-interferon, drives MSCs to a cellular distress adopting a defensive state. This knowledge could be of particular interest in cases where the damage to be repaired has an important immune-mediated component.

Validation of a Quality of Life Instrument in Spanish Patients With Rheumatic Diseases: The Rosser Classification System.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Rosser classification system for disease states in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: Our study was based on a questionnaire validation design. Patients were attended at an outpatient rheumatology clinic at Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain. The Rosser classification system was completed by the physician from the research team (PMQ) and by the patient (HMQ). Criterion standards: The EuroQol-5D for the HMQ and the physician global estimate (DOCGL) for the PMQ. Internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach α. Test-retest reliability and interobserver reliability were analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. The criterion validity between HMQ and EuroQol-5D and between PMQ and DOCGL was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The full analysis was based on 4 samples of patients (104 to 266 patients), most of whom were middle-aged women. For HMQ, Cronbach α was 0.70. Test-retest reproducibility was 0.7. With respect to criterion validity, significant correlations in the expected direction were observed. For PMQ, Cronbach α was 0.70, indicating excellent intraobserver and interobserver reliability. With respect to criterion validity, strong correlations were observed between the PMQ and the DOCGL. CONCLUSIONS: The Rosser classification system showed satisfactory reliability and suitable criterion validity for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The instrument seems to be suitable for clinical decision making and research.

Costes médicos directos y sus predictores en la cohorte "Variabilidad en el manejo de la artritis reumatoide y las espondiloartritis en España" / Direct medical costs and their predictors in the EMAR-II cohort: "Variability in the management of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis in Spain"

Objetivo. Estimar los costes médicos directos en los pacientes con artritis reumatoide (AR) y los factores predictores en los pacientes tratados con fármacos biológicos y sin biológicos. Métodos. Se realizó un estudio transversal en una muestra incluyendo pacientes de toda la geografía nacional. Se obtuvieron datos sociodemográficos y de tratamiento. Se registró la utilización de recursos para los 2 años de estudio y se hizo imputación de costes. Se realizaron análisis de correlación en todos los pacientes con AR y en los tratados con y sin biológicos, para estimar las diferencias entre los grupos. Los predictores de costes se analizaron mediante modelos de regresión lineal. Resultados. Se incluyeron 1.095 pacientes con AR, el 26% hombres, con una edad media de 62±14 años. La media de los costes médicos directos por paciente fue de 24.291±45.382€. Excluyendo los fármacos biológicos, el coste medio por paciente fue de 3.742±3.711€. Después de ajustar, los factores predictores de costes médicos directos para todos los pacientes con AR fueron los fármacos biológicos (p=0,00), la comorbilidad (p=0,00) y la edad del paciente (p=0,01). En el grupo sin biológicos, los predictores fueron la comorbilidad (p=0,00) y la edad del paciente (p=0,01). En el grupo con biológicos los predictores fueron el sexo del paciente (p=0,03) y la actividad de la enfermedad (p=0,02). Conclusión. Los datos muestran un notable impacto económico de la AR. Es importante identificar y estimar los factores asociados a mayor coste para desarrollar estrategias de reducción de costes y aumentar la calidad de la atención (AU)

Objective. To analyze the resource utilization in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and predictive factors in and patients treated with biological drugs and biologic-naïve. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed in a sample including all regions and hospitals throughout the country. Sociodemographic data, disease activity parameters and treatment data were obtained. Resource utilization for two years of study was recorded and we made costs imputation. Correlation analyzes were performed on all RA patients and those treated with biological and biological naïve, to estimate the differences in resource utilization. Factors associated with increased resources utilization (costs) attending to treatment was analyzed by linear regression models. Results. We included 1,095 RA patients, 26% male, mean age of 62±14 years. Mean of direct medical costs per patient was €24,291±€45,382. Excluding biological drugs, the average cost per patient was €3,742±€3,711. After adjustment, factors associated with direct medical costs for all RA patients were biologic drugs (P=.02) and disease activity (P=.004). In the biologic-naïve group, the predictor of direct medical costs was comorbidity (P<.001). In the biologic treatment group predictors were follow-up length of the disease (P=.04), age (P=.02) and disease activity (P=.007). Conclusion. Our data show a remarkable economic impact of RA. It is important to identify and estimate the economic impact of the disease, compare data from other geographic samples and to develop improvement strategies to reduce these costs and increase the quality of care (AU)

Treatment with methotrexate and risk of relapses in patients with giant cell arteritis in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence and the risk of relapses in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients treated with and without methotrexate (MTX) in clinical practice. Other associated factors were also investigated. METHODS: An inception cohort of GCA was assembled in the out-patient clinic at Hospital Clínico San Carlos, including patients from the date of diagnosis (Jan-1991 until Sept-2013), and followed-up until lost of follow up or Sept-2014. MAIN OUTCOME: relapse defined as recurrence of symptoms or signs of GCA with high ESR and the need to increase glucocorticoids at least 10mg over the previous dose. The independent variable was exposure to MTX over time. Covariables: Sociodemographic, clinical, and treatment. Incidence rates of relapses (IR) per 100 patient-year with their 95% confidence intervals [CI] were estimated using survival techniques. MTX influence on relapses was analysed by Cox models. RESULTS: 168 patients were included (675 patient-year). 31% of patients had relapses (IR of 12 [9.6-14.9]), and the median number of relapses was 1[1-2]. 65% of the patients were on MTX, (mean dose: 10mg). In the bivariate analysis, the risk of relapses in patients with and without MTX did not achieve statistical signification (p=0.1). After adjusting in the multivariate analysis, exposure to MTX had 72% less risk of relapse compared to those without MTX (p<0.05). Other variables included in the final model were: visual alterations and malaise at clinical presentation of GCA. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MTX seems to decrease the risk of recurrences. We also found other factors influencing on relapses.

Direct medical costs and their predictors in the EMAR-II cohort: "Variability in the management of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis in Spain". / Costes médicos directos y sus predictores en la cohorte "Variabilidad en el manejo de la artritis reumatoide y las espondiloartritis en España".

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the resource utilization in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and predictive factors in and patients treated with biological drugs and biologic-naïve. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in a sample including all regions and hospitals throughout the country. Sociodemographic data, disease activity parameters and treatment data were obtained. Resource utilization for two years of study was recorded and we made costs imputation. Correlation analyzes were performed on all RA patients and those treated with biological and biological naïve, to estimate the differences in resource utilization. Factors associated with increased resources utilization (costs) attending to treatment was analyzed by linear regression models. RESULTS: We included 1,095 RA patients, 26% male, mean age of 62±14 years. Mean of direct medical costs per patient was €24,291±€45,382. Excluding biological drugs, the average cost per patient was €3,742±€3,711. After adjustment, factors associated with direct medical costs for all RA patients were biologic drugs (P=.02) and disease activity (P=.004). In the biologic-naïve group, the predictor of direct medical costs was comorbidity (P<.001). In the biologic treatment group predictors were follow-up length of the disease (P=.04), age (P=.02) and disease activity (P=.007). CONCLUSION: Our data show a remarkable economic impact of RA. It is important to identify and estimate the economic impact of the disease, compare data from other geographic samples and to develop improvement strategies to reduce these costs and increase the quality of care.

Severe adverse drug reactions to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: Biological DMARDs are widely used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) but their relationship with adverse drug reaction (ADR) is important. RA is now known to increase in incidence and prevalence with age. Our objective was to assess the incidence of severe ADR in the long term, compare safety between the different bDMARDs and identify other possible risk factors for severe ADR in elderly RA patients. METHODS: A 14-year retrospective longitudinal study was performed. RA patients followed in an out-patient clinic starting bDMARDs after the age of 65 were included. PRIMARY OUTCOME: discontinuation due to a severe ADR related to bDMARDs (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, rituximab, golimumab, certolizumab, abatacept and tocilizumab). Covariables: sociodemographic, clinical and therapy. Incidence rates of discontinuation were estimated using survival techniques and comparison between bDMARDs discontinuation rates and other associated factors were run by Cox regression models. RESULTS: We analysed 286 courses of bDMARDs therapy in 146 elderly patients (604 patient-years). 78% were women, with a mean age at diagnosis of 66.5±7 years, and a median time to the start of the first bDMARDs of 6±4 years. The incidence of discontinuation due to severe ADR estimated was 10.2% patient-years, with a median survival of around 7 years. The most frequent cause was infections. Etanercept had the lowest risk of severe ADR compared to other bDMARDs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reflects the 'real world' experience in elderly RA patients on bDMARDs, with non-selected patients for a 14-year follow-up.

Long-term continuation of methotrexate therapy in giant cell arteritis patients in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the long-term continuation of methotrexate (MTX) in a cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) in daily clinical practice. Factors associated with its discontinuation rate were also investigated. METHODS: A longitudinal study from 1991-2014, was performed. GCA patients with MTX and followed-up in a rheumatology outpatient clinic of Madrid during the study period were included. PRIMARY OUTCOME: discontinuation of MTX due to: adverse drug reactions (ADR moderate and severe); inefficacy; sustained clinical response; patient decision. Covariables: sociodemographic, clinical and therapy. Incidence rates (IR) of MTX discontinuation per 100 patient-years with their 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using survival techniques. Factors associated to specific discontinuation causes were analysed using Cox models. RESULTS: We included 108 patients (244 patient-years). The IR was 37.2 [30.3-45.7]. The IR due to ADR, severe ADR, sustained clinical response and inefficacy was 20.8 [15.8-27.4]; 5.7 [3.3-9.6]; 8.2 [5.3-12.7] and 2.8 [1.3-6.0], respectively. Regarding multivariate analysis, younger patients, baseline cardiovascular disease, taking more glucocorticoids and lower initial doses of MTX were associated to a higher discontinuation rate due to inefficacy. Factors influencing the suspension due to ADRs were: older age, baseline. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, higher baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate, several specific clinical patterns at diagnosis, and higher maximum dose of MTX during the follow up. In the final model for sustained clinical response older patients and more recurrences were independently associated to less discontinuation rate. CONCLUSIONS: We provide further data of the potential safety of long-term MTX in the management of GCA. We have also found several factors influencing the continuation of MTX.

Treatment in rheumatoid arthritis and mortality risk in clinical practice: the role of biologic agents.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the mortality rate (MR) and the mortality risk of a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) inception cohort, with and without biologic agents (BAs). Other factors associated to mortality were also investigated. METHODS: Retrospective longitudinal study of RA patients, attending the rheumatology outpatient clinic of a tertiary Hospital (Madrid), collected over 5 years (2000-2004), and followed from the diagnosis of RA up to the patients' death, lost to follow-up or September 2013. The dependent variable was death and the independent variable was exposure to BAs. Covariables: sociodemographic, clinical and therapy variables. MR was expressed per 1,000 patient-years with the 95% confidence interval [CI]. BA influence on MR was analysed by multivariable Cox models. Clinical and therapy variables were used in a time-dependent manner. The results are expressed in hazard ratio (HR) and [CI]. RESULTS: We included 576 patients and 711 courses of therapy. 19.6% were taking BA, 86% disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (70% on methotrexate - MTX), and 12% were untreated. There were 133 deaths during 4,981.64 patient-years at risk. The MR for BA was 12.6 [6-26], for DMARDs was 22.3 [18.4-27.1], and for those without treatment was 89.1 [61.9-128.2]. The adjusted HR for mortality in those exposed to BA versus those not exposed was 0.75 [0.32-1.71]). Other variables independently associated with mortality were: age, rheumatoid factor, hospital admissions, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and MTX use (HR: 0.44 [0.29-0.66]). CONCLUSIONS: BAs and standard DMARDs are more effective in decreasing mortality compared to no therapy. Patients exposed to Bas were not associated with a significant increase or decrease in mortality when compared to patients with non-biological DMARDs. The use of MTX remains the only drug that has independently shown a beneficial effect on mortality.

Dose down-titration of biological DMARDs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over time and in daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare dosing optimisation in biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) and relapses after that, in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during clinical practice. METHODS: Observational retrospective longitudinal study of RA patients taking bDMARDs from December 1999 to November 2013. Optimisation was defined as a 15% decrease in dose either reducing single dose or separating dose interval administration, for at least 4 times the recommended period between dosages. Relapse was defined as suspension or starting again with the recommended dose after optimisation. Incidence rates (IR) per 100 patient-years were estimated using survival techniques. Cox multivariate models were conducted to compare bDMARDs expressed in hazard ratios (HR) and confidence intervals [95%CI]. RESULTS: 443 patients and 752 different courses of bDMARDs treatments were included. We observed 146 optimisations with an IR of 8.1. The HR of optimisation in: a) adalimumab, etanercept and rituximab compared to infliximab was 1.56 [1.01-2.4], 1.5 [0.9-2.4] and 0.6 [0.3-1.4], respectively; b) adalimumab, etanercept compared to rituximab were 2.3 [1.2-4.5] and 2.2 [1.2-4.3]. There were no statistically significant differences between adalimumab and etanercept. Following optimisation, 36% relapsed (78% due to disease activity). The IR related to disease activity was 6.3, and was lower for adalimumab and etanercept compared to infliximab (HR: 0.42; [0.19-0.94]; HR: 0.34; [0.13-0.89], respectively). There were no statistically significant differences between etanercept and adalimumab. No patients on rituximab relapsed. CONCLUSIONS: Optimisation was similar between adalimumab and etanercept, and was lower for infliximab and rituximab. After optimisation, rituximab did not relapse, but infliximab did with the highest hazard.

An early intervention program for subacute physical disability related to musculoskeletal diseases in the elderly: a pilot study.

To evaluate the efficacy of a program for subacute physical disability due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in the elderly. We carried out a randomized controlled evaluator-blinded intervention study in a health district (October 2005 to April 2008). Subjects older than 64, starting a subacute MSD episode of physical disability-defined as moderate disability or higher in the Rosser classification-and identified by general practitioners, were randomized into standard care or an early specific program. The program was carried out by rheumatologists following detailed proceedings. Efficacy was defined as the difference between groups in the duration of episodes-time from onset until an improvement larger than a point in the Rosser classification). Hazard ratios (HR) to recovery of the program over standard care were obtained from Cox regression analyses. One hundred and twenty-three patients were included, generating 244 episodes of subacute MSD. Mean duration of episodes was 5 months; 14.5 % of them were chronically disabled throughout follow-up. The program was associated with shorter duration of episodes compared with CG analyzing just the ended ones (p = 0.004). The HR to recovery between groups did not achieve statistical differences. Nevertheless, recovery rate at 12 months and HR from those with moderate physical disability at the inclusion period (Rosser disability level 4, n = 84) were superior in the IG (HR 1.9, p = 0.03; HR 1.93; p = 0.03 respectively). An early intervention program for subacute MSD-related disability in elderly has partial efficacy; the program benefited patients with moderate physical disability and after a year of follow-up.

Consensus statement on a framework for the management of comorbidity and extra-articular manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis.

The objective of the study was to develop evidence-based and practical recommendations for the detection and management of comorbidity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily practice. We used a modified RAND/UCLA methodology and systematic review (SR). The process map and specific recommendations, based on the SR, were established in discussion groups. A two round Delphi survey permitted (1) to prioritize the recommendations, (2) to refine them, and (3) to evaluate their agreement by a large group of users. The recommendations cover: (1) which comorbidities should be investigated in clinical practice at the first and following visits (including treatments, risk factors and patient's features that might interfere with RA management); (2) how and when should comorbidities and risk factors be investigated; (3) how to manage specific comorbidities, related or non-related to RA, including major adverse events of RA treatment, and to promote health (general and musculoskeletal health); and (4) specific recommendations to assure an integral care approach for RA patients with any comorbidity, such as health care models for chronic inflammatory patients, early arthritis units, relationships with primary care, specialized nursing care, and self-management. These recommendations are intended to guide rheumatologists, patients, and other stakeholders, on the early diagnosis and management of comorbidity in RA, in order to improve disease outcomes.