Peripheral gene signatures reveal distinct cancer patient immunotypes with therapeutic implications for autologous DC-based vaccines.

Dendritic cells (DCs) have received considerable attention as potential targets for the development of novel cancer immunotherapies. However, the clinical efficacy of DC-based vaccines remains suboptimal, largely reflecting local and systemic immunosuppression at baseline. An autologous DC-based vaccine (DCVAC) has recently been shown to improve progression-free survival and overall survival in randomized clinical trials enrolling patients with lung cancer (SLU01, NCT02470468) or ovarian carcinoma (SOV01, NCT02107937), but not metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (SP005, NCT02111577), despite a good safety profile across all cohorts. We performed biomolecular and cytofluorometric analyses on peripheral blood samples collected prior to immunotherapy from 1000 patients enrolled in these trials, with the objective of identifying immunological biomarkers that may improve the clinical management of DCVAC-treated patients. Gene signatures reflecting adaptive immunity and T cell activation were associated with favorable disease outcomes and responses to DCVAC in patients with prostate and lung cancer, but not ovarian carcinoma. By contrast, the clinical benefits of DCVAC were more pronounced among patients with ovarian carcinoma exhibiting reduced expression of T cell-associated genes, especially those linked to TH2-like signature and immunosuppressive regulatory T (TREG) cells. Clinical responses to DCVAC were accompanied by signs of antitumor immunity in the peripheral blood. Our findings suggest that circulating signatures of antitumor immunity may provide a useful tool for monitoring the potency of autologous DC-based immunotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Autologous Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy, Docetaxel, and Prednisone vs Placebo in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: The VIABLE Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: DCVAC/PCa is an active cellular immunotherapy designed to initiate an immune response against prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCVAC/PCa plus chemotherapy followed by DCVAC/PCa maintenance treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The VIABLE double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with mCRPC among 177 hospital clinics in the US and Europe between June 2014 and November 2017. Data analyses were performed from December 2019 to July 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to receive DCVAC/PCa (add-on and maintenance) or placebo, both in combination with chemotherapy (docetaxel plus prednisone). The stratification was applied according to geographical region (US or non-US), prior therapy (abiraterone, enzalutamide, or neither), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0-1 or 2). DCVAC/PCa or placebo was administered subcutaneously every 3 to 4 weeks (up to 15 doses). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause, in all randomized patients. Survival was compared using 2-sided log-rank test stratified by geographical region, prior therapy with abiraterone and/or enzalutamide, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. RESULTS: A total of 1182 men with mCRPC (median [range] age, 68 [46-89] years) were randomized to receive DCVAC/PCa (n = 787) or placebo (n = 395). Of these, 610 (81.8%) started DCVAC/PCa, and 376 (98.4%) started placebo. There was no difference in OS between the DCVAC/PCa and placebo groups in all randomized patients (median OS, 23.9 months [95% CI, 21.6-25.3] vs 24.3 months [95% CI, 22.6-26.0]; hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.90-1.21; P = .60). No differences in the secondary efficacy end points (radiological progression-free survival, time to prostate-specific antigen progression, or skeletal-related events) were observed. Treatment-emergent adverse events related to DCVAC/PCa or placebo occurred in 69 of 749 (9.2%) and 48 of 379 (12.7%) patients, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (DCVAC/PCa [n = 749] vs placebo [n = 379]) were fatigue (271 [36.2%] vs 152 [40.1%]), alopecia (222 [29.6%] vs 130 [34.3%]), and diarrhea (206 [27.5%] vs 117 [30.9%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, DCVAC/PCa combined with docetaxel plus prednisone and continued as maintenance treatment did not extend OS in patients with mCRPC and was well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02111577.

Blood Pressure Recovery After Dobutamine Antagonism: Partial With Landiolol, None With Esmolol.

We investigated the hemodynamic effects of 2 short-acting ß1 -blockers, landiolol and esmolol, in the continuous presence of dobutamine in a prospective, single-center, randomized, crossover study in 16 healthy White volunteers. Dobutamine was infused at a rate sufficient to increase the heart rate by at least 30 beats per minute, followed by a 60-minute infusion of 50 µg/kg/min esmolol or 10 µg/kg/min landiolol on top of the unchanged dobutamine infusion. Concentrations of ß-blockers and their metabolites in blood, heart rate, and blood pressure were followed for 180 minutes. Landiolol reduced the dobutamine-induced heart rate and blood pressure increases better than esmolol. After discontinuation of ß-blocker administration, heart rate recovered swiftly to preinfusion values in both study arms. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure recovered partially after landiolol but showed a continued reduction after esmolol. No serious adverse events were observed. The heart rate effect is characteristic for ß-blockers, whereas the blood pressure effects are likely due to direct and indirect ß-blocker effects as well as influences on various ion channels. This may explain why landiolol that is devoid of effects on renin and sodium, calcium, and potassium channels behaves different from esmolol with respect to blood pressure recovery.

Autologous dendritic cell-based immunotherapy (DCVAC/LuCa) and carboplatin/paclitaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized, open-label, phase I/II trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of an active cellular immunotherapy (DCVAC/LuCa) and chemotherapy in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: SLU01 was a multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, phase I/II trial. NSCLC patients were randomized in a ratio of 1:1:1 to receive: DCVAC/LuCa and chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel; Group A); DCVAC/LuCa, chemotherapy, pegylated interferon-α2b, and hydroxychloroquine (Group B); or chemotherapy alone (Group C). DCVAC/LuCa was administered subcutaneously every 3-6 weeks (up to 15 doses). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). During the study, enrollment into Group B was discontinued for strategic reasons. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were randomized to Group A, 29 patients to Group B, and 38 patients to Group C. The median OS in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population was 3.7 months longer in Group A than in Group C (15.5 vs. 11.8 months; p = 0.0179; hazard ratio = 0.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.91). This OS effect was consistent across subgroups of the mITT population (females, males, current smokers, former smokers, and patients with non-squamous and squamous cell histology). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade reported in Groups A, B, and C, respectively, were neutropenia (50.0%, 29.6%, and 20.6%), fatigue (40.0%, 18.5%, and 20.6%), anemia (35.0%, 44.4%, and 32.4%), paresthesia (27.5%, 25.9%, and 17.6%), and alopecia (25.0%, 29.6%, and 41.2%). CONCLUSION: DCVAC/LuCa in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel extended OS and was well tolerated.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic behavior of landiolol during dobutamine challenge in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: To study the pharmacokinetic and -dynamic behavior of landiolol in the presence of dobutamine in healthy subjects of European ancestry. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective randomized study in 16 healthy subjects each receiving an infusion of dobutamine sufficient to increase heart rate by 30 bpm followed by a 60 min infusion of 10 µg/kg/min landiolol. RESULTS: Dobutamine-induced increases in heart rate were stable for at least 20 min before a 60 min landiolol- infusion was started. The dobutamine effects were rapidly antagonized by landiolol within 16 min. A further slight decrease in heart rate during 20-60 min of the landiolol infusion occurred as well. Upon termination of landiolol infusion, heart rate and blood pressure recovered rapidly in response to the persisting dobutamine infusion but did not return to the maximum values before landiolol infusion. The pharmacokinetic parameters of landiolol in presence of dobutamine showed a short half-life (3.5 min) and a low distribution volume (0.3 l/kg). No serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: Landiolol can antagonize the dobutamine-induced increases in heart rate and blood pressure in a fast way. A rapid bradycardic effect until steady-state plasma levels is followed by a slow heart rate reduction. The latter can be attributed to an early desensitization to dobutamine. Consequently, after termination of landiolol, the heart rate did not achieve maximum pre-landiolol values. The pharmacokinetics of landiolol during dobutamine infusion are similar when compared to short- and long-term data in Caucasian subjects. Landiolol in the given dose can thus serve as an antagonist of dobutamine-induced cardiac effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number 2010-023311-34 at the EU Clinical Trials Register, registration date 2010-12-21.

Dobutamine Alters the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Behavior of Esmolol.

Background and objective This study involved an investigation into the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic behavior of esmolol in the presence of dobutamine in healthy subjects of European ancestry. Methods We conducted a single-center, prospective randomized study of 16 healthy subjects with each receiving an infusion of dobutamine sufficient to increase heart rate (HR) by 30 beats per minute (bpm) followed by a 60-minute infusion of 50 µg/kg/min esmolol. Pharmacokinetics, HR, and blood pressure were evaluated for 180 minutes. Results In the presence of dobutamine, esmolol elimination was substantially faster than without dobutamine, Esmolol infusion reduced dobutamine-induced elevation of HR reversibly whereas the dobutamine-induced systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction did not recover after the termination of the esmolol infusion. No serious adverse events (AEs) were observed. Conclusions The accelerated elimination of esmolol was likely due to higher cleavage through tissue esterases induced by dobutamine-induced increased tissue passage cycles per time unit. The HR effect was characteristic of a beta-blocker, whereas the blood pressure effect was likely due to a mechanism other than direct beta-blockade. HR remained elevated after the infusion of esmolol and dobutamine, most likely due to persistent blood pressure reduction.

Open-Label Two-Dose Pilot Study of Landiolol for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter in Caucasian Patients.

BACKGROUND: We investigated for the first time the suitability of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting ß1-specific ß-blocker, for the treatment of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) in Caucasian patients.Methods and Results:The 20 study patients received landiolol as a continuous infusion (starting dose 40 µg/kg/min) with (B+CI) or without (CI) a preceding bolus dose (100 µg/kg/min administered over 1 min) in a prospective open-label study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained heart rate (HR) reduction ≥20% or to <90 beats/min within 16 min of starting the CI. Secondary endpoints were the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, AF/AFL symptoms, safety and tolerability of landiolol. At 16 min, HR was reduced in all patients treated with landiolol. The primary endpoint was met by 60% of patients in the CI group and 40% in the B+CI group without a significant group difference. Overall reduction of AF/AFL symptoms at 16 min was 72%. Safety and local tolerability of landiolol were excellent, and no serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous infusion of landiolol with a starting dose of 40 µg/kg/min is suitable for the acute treatment of tachycardic AF/AFL in Caucasian patients. Administration of a preceding bolus seems unnecessary.

Landiolol in patients with septic shock resident in an intensive care unit (LANDI-SEP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients with septic shock, the presence of an elevated heart rate (HR) after fluid resuscitation marks a subgroup of patients with a particularly poor prognosis. Several studies have shown that HR control in this population is safe and can potentially improve outcomes. However, all were conducted in a single-center setting. The aim of this multicenter study is to demonstrate that administration of the highly beta1-selective and ultrashort-acting beta blocker landiolol in patients with septic shock and persistent tachycardia (HR ≥ 95 beats per minute [bpm]) is effective in reducing and maintaining HR without increasing vasopressor requirements. METHODS: A phase IV, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled study is being conducted. The study will enroll a total of 200 patients with septic shock as defined by The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria and tachycardia (HR ≥ 95 bpm) despite a hemodynamic optimization period of 24-36 h. Patients are randomized (1:1) to receive either standard treatment (according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2016) and continuous landiolol infusion to reach a target HR of 80-94 bpm or standard treatment alone. The primary endpoint is HR response (HR 80-94 bpm), the maintenance thereof, and the absence of increased vasopressor requirements during the first 24 h after initiating treatment. DISCUSSION: Despite recent studies, the role of beta blockers in the treatment of patients with septic shock remains unclear. This study will investigate whether HR control using landiolol is safe, feasible, and effective, and further enhance the understanding of beta blockade in patients with septic shock. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EU Clinical Trials Register; EudraCT, 2017-002138-22 . Registered on 8 August 2017.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Dose Landiolol and Esmolol During Long-Term Infusion in Healthy Whites.

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of long-term administration of esmolol and landiolol, a new fast-acting cardioselective ß-blocker, were compared for the first time in Caucasian subjects in a prospective clinical trial. Twelve healthy volunteers received landiolol and esmolol by continuous infusion for 24 hours in a randomized crossover study using a dose-escalation regimen. Blood concentrations of drugs and metabolites, heart rate, blood pressure, ECG parameters, and tolerability were observed for 30 hours and compared. Drug blood concentrations and areas under the curve were dose-proportional. The half life of landiolol (4.5 minutes) was significantly shorter than that of esmolol (6.9 minutes). Volume of distribution and total clearance were lower for landiolol. Heart rate reduction was faster and more pronounced with landiolol and retained throughout the administration period; effects on blood pressure were not different. Landiolol turned out to be superior to esmolol with respect to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile and local tolerability.

Pharmacodynamic and -kinetic Behavior of Low-, Intermediate-, and High-Dose Landiolol During Long-Term Infusion in Whites.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of long-term administration of landiolol, a fast-acting cardioselective ß-blocker, were investigated for the first time in white subjects in a prospective clinical trial. Blood concentrations of landiolol and its metabolites, heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and electrocardiogram parameters were studied in 12 healthy volunteers receiving continuous infusions of a new 12-mg/mL formulation of landiolol using a dose-escalation regimen (10 µg/kg BW/min for 2 hours, 20 µg/kg BW/min for 2 hours, 40 µg/kg BW/min for 20 hours, 6 hours follow-up). Landiolol blood concentrations were dose proportional. Time until steady state decreased with increasing doses. Pharmacokinetic parameters were t1/2 = 4.5 minutes, VD = 366 mL/kg, and total body clearance = 53 mL·kg·min. Maximal blood concentrations of the inactive main metabolite M1 were 10-fold higher than those of landiolol, with t1/2 = 126 minutes, VD = 811 mL/kg, and total body clearance = 4.5 mL·kg·min. HR reduction from baseline was fast (significant after 16 minutes) and sustained throughout the administration period. Systolic and diastolic BP reductions and electrocardiogram parameter changes were less pronounced and became significant only occasionally. Recovery after discontinuation of infusion was fast with little (HR) or no (BP) rebound. The new formulation showed excellent local and general tolerability.

Intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke in the golden hour: propensity-matched analysis from the SITS-EAST registry.

As there are scarce data regarding the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) within 60 min from symptom onset ("golden hour"), we sought to compare outcomes between AIS patients treated within [GH(+)] and outside [GH(-)] the "golden hour" by analyzing propensity score matched data from the SITS-EAST registry. Clinical recovery (CR) at 2 and 24 h was defined as a reduction of ≥10 points on NIHSS-score or a total NIHSS-score of ≤3 at 2 and 24 h, respectively. A relative reduction in NIHSS-score of ≥40% at 2 h was considered predictive of complete recanalization (CREC). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) was defined using SITS-MOST criteria. Favorable functional outcome (FFO) was defined as a mRS-score of 0-1 at 3 months. Out of 19,077 IVT-treated AIS patients, 71 GH(+) patients were matched to 6882 GH(-) patients, with no differences in baseline characteristics (p > 0.1). GH(+) had higher rates of CR at 2 (31.0 vs. 12.4%; p < 0.001) and 24 h (41 vs. 27%; p = 0.010), CREC at 2 h (39 vs. 21%; p < 0.001) and FFO (46.5 vs. 34.0%; p = 0.028) at 3 months. The rates of sICH and 3-month mortality did not differ (p > 0.2) between the two groups. GH(+) was associated with 2-h CR (OR: 5.34; 95% CI 2.53-11.03) and CREC (OR: 2.38; 95% CI 1.38-4.09), 24-h CR (OR: 1.88; 95% CI 1.08-3.26) and 3-month FFO (OR: 2.02; 95% CI 1.15-3.54) in multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for potential confounders. In conclusion, AIS treated with IVT within the GH seems to have substantially higher odds of early neurological recovery, CREC, 3-month FFO and functional improvement.

Bolus application of landiolol and esmolol: comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in a healthy Caucasian group.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to compare in non-Asian subjects the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of two short-acting cardioselective ß1-adrenergic antagonists, landiolol and esmolol, after administration of three different bolus dosages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized study in three cross-over periods with 12 healthy subjects (7 women and 5 men, mean age of 24.5 ± 6.9 years) each receiving three doses of landiolol (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mg/kg BW) either in a newly developed concentrate i.v. formulation (Rapibloc® 20 mg/2 mL concentrate) or a lyophilized formulation, or three doses of esmolol (0.5, 1, and 1.5 mg/kg BW) in an i.v. formulation (Brevibloc® 100 mg/10 mL). PK and PD parameters, safety, and tolerability were assessed. FINDINGS: Results of the two landiolol formulations were reported previously and were similar. For the landiolol concentrate formulation and esmolol, maximum blood concentrations were rapidly reached (mean t max ranged between 1.8 and 3.0 min for landiolol and 1.8 to 2.4 min for esmolol). The parent drugs disappeared very fast from the blood stream, with a t 1/2 of 3.2 ± 1.2 (SD) minutes and 3.7 ± 2.1 (SD) minutes for the low doses of landiolol and esmolol, respectively. Despite comparable injection rates (0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg/15 s for landiolol and esmolol, respectively), the onset of significant heart rate reduction occurred earlier in response to landiolol (1 min) than in response to esmolol (2 min). In addition, significantly lower heart rate values were obtained at every dose level of landiolol, in comparison to esmolol (p < 0.05). Both compounds reduced the systolic blood pressure to a comparable degree. Especially at the highest dose, the duration of blood pressure reduction was longer under esmolol compared to landiolol. Seven mild to moderate adverse events occurred after administration of landiolol, and five occurred after administration of esmolol. No serious adverse events were reported in this study. IMPLICATIONS: Heart rate reduction induced by a new liquid formulation of landiolol occurred faster, was more pronounced, and lasted longer than the effects of corresponding standard esmolol doses. Both agents reduced systolic blood pressure to a comparable degree, but the blood pressure decrease lasted longer after esmolol infusion. The local tolerance and safety profiles of the two formulations were similar. In summary, compared to esmolol, landiolol shows a more prominent and pronounced bradycardic effect in relation to its blood pressure-lowering effect, an action profile that might be of specific advantage in the perioperative setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01652898 and 2012-002127-14. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01652898?term=landiolol&rank=7.

Incidence of Hospitalized Stroke in the Czech Republic: The National Registry of Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary stroke incidence data are not available in some countries and regions, including in Eastern Europe. Based on previous validation of the accuracy of the National Registry of Hospitalized Patients (NRHOSP), we report the incidence of hospitalized stroke in the Czech Republic (CR) using the NRHOSP. METHODS: The results of the prior validation study assessing the accuracy of coding of stroke diagnoses in the NRHOSP were applied, and we calculated (1) the overall incidence of hospitalized stroke and (2) the incidence rates of hospitalized stroke for the three main stroke types: cerebral infarction (International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision, CI I63), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH I60), and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH I61). We calculated the average annual age- and sex-standardized incidence. RESULTS: The overall incidence of hospitalized stroke was 241 out of 100,000 individuals. The incidence of hospitalized stroke for the main stroke types was 8.2 cases in SAH, 29.5 in ICH, and 211 in CI per 100,000 individuals. The standardized annual stroke incidence adjusted to the 2000 World Health Organization population for overall stroke incidence of hospitalized stroke was 131 per 100,000 individuals. Standardized stroke incidence for stroke subtypes was 5.7 cases in SAH, 16.7 in ICH, and 113 in CI per 100,000 individuals. CONCLUSIONS: These studies provide an initial assessment of the burden of stroke in this part of the world. The estimates of hospitalized stroke in the CR and Eastern Europe suggest that ICH is about three times more common than SAH, and hemorrhagic stroke makes up about 18% of strokes.

Single-Phase Versus Multiphase CT Angiography in Middle Cerebral Artery Clot Detection-Benefits for Less Experienced Radiologists and Neurologists.

OBJECTIVES: CT angiography (CTA) is recommended as a standard of stroke imaging. We investigated accuracy and precision of standard or single-phase CTA as compared with novel technique or multiphase CTA in clot detection in the middle cerebral artery. METHODS: Twenty single-phase CTA and twenty multiphase CTA with prevailing M2 occlusion were assessed by 10 radiologists and 10 neurologists blinded to clinical information (7 less experienced and 3 experienced). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated as compared with reading by two seniors. Reliability was calculated using Krippendorff's alpha (K-alpha). RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of single-phase CTA compared with multiphase CTA for M2 clot presence were, respectively, .86, .75, .90, and .67 versus .88, .82, .92, and .72. For secondary or distal clots, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of single-phase CTA compared with multiphase CTA were .41, .83, .50, and .78 versus .65, .77, .71, and .67. Agreement increased significantly in favor of multiphase CTA for detection of primary clots from moderate (.43) to substantial (.65) in less experienced radiologists and from slight (.10) to moderate (.30) in less experienced neurologists. Agreement significantly increased for distal or secondary clot detection in favor of multiphase CTA from fair (.24) to moderate (.49) in experienced radiologists and from slight (.12) to moderate (.46) in experienced neurologists. CONCLUSIONS: Multiphase CTA is a reliable imaging tool in M2 clot detection and might represent a beneficial imaging tool in clot detection for less experienced physicians.

Real-World Outcomes in Fingolimod-Treated Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in the Czech Republic: Results from the 12-Month GOLEMS Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Once-daily oral fingolimod is approved in the EU as escalation treatment for adult patients with highly active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). The efficacy and safety profiles of fingolimod have been well established in a large clinical development programme and several papers reflecting the experience with fingolimod in real-world settings have been published to date. The GOLEMS study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of fingolimod and the impact of fingolimod treatment on disability progression and work capability in patients with MS in routine clinical practice in the Czech Republic. METHODS: GOLEMS was a national, multicentre, non-interventional, single-arm study conducted to analyse the outcomes of a minimum of 12 months of fingolimod therapy on primary and secondary endpoints. The primary endpoint was to assess the proportion of relapse-free patients and severity of MS relapses in patients treated with fingolimod for 12 months. Secondary endpoints included assessment of changes in disability progression evaluated by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and work capability assessment measured through voluntary completion of the WPAI-GH questionnaire. The predictive factors for relapse-free status during fingolimod treatment were also analysed. RESULTS: Of the 240 enrolled patients, 219 completed the 12-month treatment period at the time of final analysis. In the efficacy set (N = 237), the proportion of relapse-free patients increased from 47 patients (19.6 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 14.8-25.2) in the year before fingolimod initiation to 152 patients (64.1 %; 95 % CI 58.0-70.2) after 1 year of fingolimod treatment. Of the 85 patients who experienced at least one relapse after 1 year of fingolimod treatment, 53 (62.4 %; 95 % CI 51.7-71.9) reported only one relapse, while 25 (29.4 %; 95 % CI 20.8-39.8) and seven (8.2 %; 95 % CI 4.0-16.0) patients had ≥2 relapses, respectively. No significant changes were observed in EDSS scores over the 12-month treatment period compared with baseline. The absolute number of relapses during 2 years before initiation of fingolimod treatment and baseline EDSS scores were identified as significant independent predictors for 'being relapse-free' during the 12-month fingolimod treatment period. No trend was established in work capability or number of missed days at work due to the large proportion of missing data. Of 240 enrolled patients, 27 (11.3 %) patients discontinued the study at or before the 12-month visit, 16 (6.7 %) discontinued because of adverse events related to study drug. Only six (2.5 %) patients reported serious adverse events related to the study drug. CONCLUSION: The results confirm the favourable safety and efficacy profile of fingolimod under real-world conditions, consistent with phase III trials.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two different landiolol formulations in a healthy Caucasian group.

BACKGROUND: To date, no data have been reported on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of landiolol, a fast-acting cardioselective ß1-adrenergic antagonist, in non-Asian subjects. The aim of this study was to compare two landiolol formulations in healthy Caucasian subjects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized study in two cross-over periods with 12 healthy subjects (7 women and 5 men) each receiving three doses (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3mg/kg BW) of Onoact® 50 Lyophilized powder (50mg) or Rapibloc® concentrate IV (20mg/2mL) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of the two landiolol formulations. RESULTS: For both formulations, maximum blood concentrations of landiolol were rapidly reached (median tmax 2.3±0.65 and 2.8±1.13min for the high dose of each formulation). The compounds had a short half-life (t1/2=3.2±1.2min and 3.0±1.1min for the low dose of the concentrate formulation and the lyophilized powder, respectively). The results showed no statistically significant differences between both formulations of landiolol for any PK parameters, at study doses. Both formulations dose-dependently and significantly decreased the heart rate values from 62.2bpm at baseline to minimum values of 55-56, 52-53, and 50-52bpm after 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3mg/kg respectively. This bradycardic effect was achieved within 1 to 3min. The decrease in systolic blood pressure (baseline: 107mmHg, minimum values were around 99mmHg) was significant but not dose dependent, and occurred within 3 to 12min. Seven mild to moderate AEs occurred after administration of the concentrate formulation. No SAEs were reported in this study. CONCLUSION: In Caucasians, both landiolol formulations showed similar pharmacokinetic behaviours, displaying very short half-lives (3.0 to 3.6min). In addition, after administration of both formulations, the landiolol-induced heart rate reduction showed fast onset and dose dependence, whilst the decrease of systolic blood pressure occurred more slowly, was less pronounced, and dose independent. In summary, both landiolol formulations delivered comparable plasma concentration profiles and showed good local tolerability. Overall, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic reactions observed in Caucasians were comparable to those described in Japanese subjects.

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b, a novel IFNα-2b, induces high response rates with low toxicity in patients with polycythemia vera.

In this prospective, open-label, multicenter phase 1/2 dose escalation study, we used a next-generation, mono-pegylated interferon (IFN) α-2b isoform, ropeginterferon alfa-2b. The unique feature of ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a longer elimination half-life, which allows administration every 2 weeks. We present data from 51 polycythemia vera patients. The main goal was to define the maximum tolerated dose and to assess safety and efficacy. A dose range of 50 to 540 µg was tested without the appearance of dose-limiting toxicities. All drug-related adverse events were known toxicities associated with IFN-α. The cumulative overall response rate was 90%, comprising complete response in 47% and partial response in 43% of patients; the best individual molecular response level was a complete response in 21% of patients and partial response in 47%. Notably, we did not observe any correlation between the dose level and the response rate or response duration, suggesting that already low levels of ropeginterferon alfa-2b are sufficient to induce significant hematologic and molecular responses. These data suggest promising efficacy and safety of ropeginterferon alfa-2b and support the development of the drug in a randomized phase 3 clinical trial. The study was disclosed at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01193699 before including the first patient.

Validation of Stroke Diagnosis in the National Registry of Hospitalized Patients in the Czech Republic.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a common cause of mortality and morbidity in Eastern Europe. However, detailed epidemiological data are not available. The National Registry of Hospitalized Patients (NRHOSP) is a nationwide registry of prospectively collected data regarding each hospitalization in the Czech Republic since 1998. As a first step in the evaluation of stroke epidemiology in the Czech Republic, we validated stroke cases in NRHOSP. METHODS: Any hospital in the Czech Republic with a sufficient number of cases was included. We randomly selected 10 of all 72 hospitals and then 50 patients from each hospital in 2011 stratified according to stroke diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases Tenth Revision [ICD-10] cerebrovascular codes I60, I61, I63, I64, and G45). Discharge summaries from hospitalization were reviewed independently by 2 reviewers and compared with NRHOSP for accuracy of discharge diagnosis. Any disagreements were adjudicated by a third reviewer. RESULTS: Of 500 requested discharge summaries, 484 (97%) were available. Validators confirmed diagnosis in NRHOSP as follows: transient ischemic attack (TIA) or any stroke type in 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79-86), any stroke type in 85% (95% CI, 81-88), I63/cerebral infarction in 82% (95% CI, 74-89), I60/subarachnoid hemorrhage in 91% (95% CI, 85-97), I61/intracerebral hemorrhage in 91% (95% CI, 85-96), and G45/TIA in 49% (95% CI, 39-58). The most important reason for disagreement was use of I64/stroke, not specified for patients with I63. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of coding of the stroke ICD-10 codes for subarachnoid hemorrhage (I60) and intracerebral hemorrhage (I61) included in a Czech Republic national registry was high. The accuracy of coding for I63/cerebral infarction was somewhat lower than for ICH and SAH.

Safety of Statin Pretreatment in Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A recent meta-analysis investigating the association between statins and early outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) indicated that prestroke statin treatment was associated with increased risk of 90-day mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. We investigated the potential association of statin pretreatment with early outcomes in a large, international registry of AIS patients treated with IVT. METHODS: We analyzed prospectively collected data from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke-East registry (SITS-EAST) registry on consecutive AIS patients treated with IVT during an 8-year period. Early clinical recovery within 24 hours was defined as reduction in baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥10 points. Favorable functional outcome at 3 months was defined as modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 1. Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was diagnosed using National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, European-Australasian Acute Stroke Study-II and SITS definitions. RESULTS: A total of 1660 AIS patients treated with IVT fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Patients with statin pretreatment (23%) had higher baseline stroke severity compared with cases who had not received any statin at symptom onset. After adjusting for potential confounders, statin pretreatment was not associated with a higher likelihood of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage defined by any of the 3 definitions. Statin pretreatment was not related to 3-month all-cause mortality (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-1.49; P=0.741) or 3-month favorable functional outcome (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.27; P=0.364). Statin pretreatment was independently associated with a higher odds of early clinical recovery (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.92; P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Statin pretreatment seems not to be associated with adverse outcomes in AIS patients treated with IVT. The effect of statin pretreatment on early functional outcomes in thrombolysed AIS patients deserves further investigation.

Earlier identification of risks: cumulative probability analysis of time to safety alerts for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: Previous analysis of US FDA Medwatch safety alerts for monoclonal antibody therapeutics demonstrated that premarketing clinical trials can predict more than half of safety concerns. We expanded this analysis to assess whether the predictable alerts are detected sooner than the unpredictable alerts. METHODS: Times to alert were compared using Mann-Whitney test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and using curves displaying cumulative frequencies of alerts over time. RESULTS: Until December 31, 2013 inclusive, 76 Medwatch alerts for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies were reported: 43 predictable vs. 33 unpredictable. Predictable alerts were reported at a median (IQR) of 41 (19-77) months after approval vs. 53 (23-73) months for the unpredictable alerts. The mean (SE) was 52.07 (6.69) months and 55.91 (7.06) months for the predictable and unpredictable, respectively. Although the difference of 12 months between medians of time to alert was observed, the difference was not demonstrated as significant. Cumulative frequency curves show that predictable alerts were detected sooner until month 73 after approval, when ~ 80% of alerts were detected. Immunological reactions (such as infusion reactions, anaphylaxis, and reactions due to antibodies) were identified early; all 12 such alerts were released before the curves of cumulative frequencies cross at month 73. On the other hand, reactions occurring after the curves cross are predominantly late-occurring cancers and opportunistic infections. CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that focus on predictable reactions defined as potential risks may play a role in early detection of important safety concerns.