Single fixed low-dose rituximab as induction therapy suppresses de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody production in ABO compatible living kidney transplant recipients.

This study was conducted to evaluate de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody (dnDSA) production leading to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) after rituximab induction in non-sensitized ABO-compatible living kidney transplantation (ABO-CLKTx). During 2008-2015, 318 ABO-CLKTx were performed at the Department of Surgery III at Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital. To reduce confounding factors, we adopted a propensity score analysis, which was applied with adjustment for age, gender, duration of pretransplant dialysis, HLA mismatch count, preformed DSA, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive treatment, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on postoperative day 7. Using a propensity score matching model (1:1, 115 pairs), we analyzed the long-term outcomes of 230 ABO-CLKTx recipients retrospectively. Recipients were classified into a rituximab-treated (RTX-KTx, N = 115) group and a control group not treated with rituximab (C-KTx, N = 115). During five years, adverse events, survival rates for grafts and patients, and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and dnDSA production for the two groups were monitored and compared. All recipients in the RTX-KTx group received rituximab induction on preoperative day 4 at a single fixed low dose of 100 mg; the CD19+ B cells were eliminated completely before surgery. Of those recipients, 13 (11.3%) developed BPAR; 1 (0.8%) experienced graft loss. By contrast, of C-KTx group recipients, 25 (21.7%) developed BPAR; 3 (2.6%) experienced graft loss. The RTX-KTx group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of BPAR (P = .041) and dnDSA production (13.9% in the RTX-KTx group vs. 26.9% in the C-RTx group, P = .005). Furthermore, lower incidence of CMV infection was detected in the RTX-KTx group than in the C-KTx group (13.9% in the RTX-KTx group vs. 27.0% in the C-KTx group, P = .014). No significant difference was found between groups for several other factors: renal function (P = .384), graft and patient survival (P = .458 and P = .119, respectively), and the respective incidences of BK virus infection (P = .722) and leukopenia (P = .207). During five-year follow-up, single fixed low-dose rituximab therapy is sufficient for ensuring safety, reducing rejection, and suppressing dnDSA production for immunological low-risk non-sensitized ABO-CLKTx.

Single Graft Utilization From Donors With Severe Acute Kidney Injury After Circulatory Death.

Chronic shortages of organs for transplantation have led to the use of marginal kidneys from donors after circulatory death with acute kidney injury (AKI), but the utilization of kidneys with severe AKI is not well established. We retrospectively analyzed eight kidney transplantation (KTx) cases from donation after circulatory death (DCD) with terminal creatinine (t-Cr) concentrations higher than 10.0 mg/dL and/or oliguria for more than 5 days (AKI network criteria: stage III). Although all patients showed delayed graft function, no cases of primary nonfunction (PNF) were found. Five patients maintained stable renal function for approximately 15.5, 10, 10, 5, and 0.5 years after KTx. Only 1 patient showed biopsy-proven acute rejection. Also, 2 patients developed graft failure: one attributable to chronic antibody mediated rejection at 11.3 years after KTx, and one attributable to recurrence of IgA nephropathy at 4.6 years after KTx. Kidneys with AKI stage III yielded great outcomes without the risk of primary nonfunction and rejection. Although the AKI kidneys were associated with delayed graft function, these results suggest that even the most severe kidneys with AKI stage III from DCD donors can be considered a valid alternative for recipients on a waiting list for KTx.

Duodenal Graft Perforation after Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation.

A 45-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes and chronic renal failure on dialysis underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation from a brain dead donor. On postoperative day 15, acute generalized peritonitis was diagnosed and emergency laparotomy was performed. Perforation of the donor duodenum was found, which had apparently resulted from duodenal compression by the tip of the intestinal fistula tube placed for decompression. The perforation was sutured and the intestinal fistula tube was exchanged. Following this, perforation repeatedly recurred at the same site and open repair at laparotomy was required a total of four times. The fourth operation involved both suturing the perforation and covering it with ileum, after which there was no further recurrence. The patient was discharged on posttransplantation day 219, with the pancreas and kidney grafts both functioning well. This report presents a rare complication of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Longterm renal allograft survival after sequential liver-kidney transplantation from a single living donor.

Combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is well established as a definitive therapy with the potential to provide complete recovery for certain liver-kidney diseases, although the results might be contingent on the cause of transplantation. The purposes of the present study were to review the longterm outcome of renal allografts in CLKT patients from single living donors and to investigate the beneficial factors, compared with solitary renal transplantation. Thirteen patients underwent sequential liver transplantation (LT) and kidney transplantation (KT) from single living donors. The indications for KT were oxaluria (n = 7), autosomal recessive polycystic disease (n = 3), and others (n = 3). The same immunosuppressive regimen used after LT was also used after KT. KT was performed between 1.7 and 47.0 months after the LT. The overall patient survival rate was 92.3% at 10 years. In 12 of the 13 surviving patients, the renal allografts were found to be functioning in 11 patients after a mean follow-up period of 103.6 months. The death-censored renal allograft survival rate at 10 years was 100%, which was better than that of KT alone (84.9%) in Japan. Immunological protection conferred by the preceding liver allograft may have contributed to the longterm outcomes of the renal allografts. In addition, the donation of double organs from a single living and related donor may have a favorable impact on the graft survival rate. In the future, investigations of factors affecting the longterm outcome of renal allografts, including details of the involvement of de novo donor-specific antibody, will be needed. Liver Transplantation 23 315-323 2017 AASLD.

Successful Long-term Graft Survival of a Renal Transplantation Patient with Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome.

Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, a rare X-linked hereditary syndrome, is characterized by immunodeficiency, thrombocytopenia, and eczema. The underlying T-cell defect renders renal transplantation and immunosuppressive treatments uncertain. The present case exhibited the mild clinical manifestation, regarded as X-linked thrombocytopenia. He successfully underwent a living-donor ABO-compatible renal transplantation and splenectomy in 2002, and thereafter experiencing no severe rejection, serious infection, or malignancy for more than 10 years. Though IgA nephropathy was detected 8 months after transplantation, the patient's renal function and proteinuria were stable without any treatment. The present case showed a successful long-term graft survival and the importance of splenectomy added to renal transplantation.

Vascular access infection: survival or mortality.

METHODS: We conducted an analysis on 11 cases of death after AVG infection that occurred between 1996 and 2013, and compared their information with those of 23 cases of generalized infection due to arteriovenous graft (AVG) infection during the same period who survived. RESULTS: The cause of death was sepsis in all 11 patients. The initial C-reactive protein (CRP) was 10.2-39.8 (28 in average) and the duration from onset of fever to vascular access (VA) hemostasis/removal procedure was 6-9 days (6.4 days in average) in the 11 cases of death. Blood culture revealed a high frequency of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in 7 of the 11 cases of death. In contrast, in 23 survivors with VA infection and generalized infection, the CRP at the initial visit was 3.2-15.8 (5.6 in average) and the duration from onset of the fever to VA hemostasis/removal procedure was 0-5 days (2.6 days in average), and blood culture revealed a high frequency of methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Among the cases of death, although VA infection in the upper extremity itself resolved after removing the artificial vessel, they died without an improvement of sepsis. The reason why the sepsis did not resolve is that infectious foci were secondarily formed in other areas than the upper extremity because the start of treatment for VA infection was delayed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for VA infection should be started as early as possible after onset to avoid the formation of secondary infectious foci in other areas.

Primary omental pleomorphic liposarcoma identified at autopsy in a living donor kidney transplant recipient.

Metastatic and recurrent tumors of the omentum are common, but primary omental pleomorphic liposarcoma (POPL) is an extremely rare type of solid omental tumor. We describe the case of a patient with POPL who received a renal transplant from a living donor. Despite good allograft function, the volume of peritoneal fluid gradually increased. An exploratory laparotomy could not be performed because the patient was obese and developed hemodynamic instability. Therefore, a shunt was placed between the peritoneal cavity and the internal jugular vein using the Denver® shunt system; however, the patient died of respiratory insufficiency. On the basis of the autopsy results, we diagnosed the patient's condition as POPL. We speculated that the malignancy did not originate directly from the donor cells. We report POPL in a living donor renal transplant recipient.

Early steroid withdrawal protocol with basiliximab, cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil in renal-transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: Adverse effects of steroids have led to efforts to minimize their use in recipients of organ transplants. This study evaluated an early steroid withdrawal protocol including basiliximab, cyclosporine (CsA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal-transplant recipients. METHODS: Between January 2001 and April 2005, our early steroid withdrawal protocol was used in 130 patients who underwent renal transplantation. Immunosuppression consisted of CsA (6-8 mg/kg), MMF (2 g/kg) and methylprednisolone (MP); basiliximab was given as induction therapy (steroid withdrawal group). MP was administered in a dose of 500 mg or 250 mg at renal transplantation; thereafter, the dose was rapidly tapered and MP was withdrawn on day 14 post-transplant. RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection in the steroid withdrawal group was similar to that in the conventional steroid treatment group (without basiliximab) (18% vs. 21%). The severity of rejection episodes was similar in the two groups. Patient and graft survivals were 100% and 97% in the steroid withdrawal group. In 80 of the 130 patients (62%) in the steroid withdrawal group, MP was successfully withdrawn, with good allograft function during follow-up. In the other 50 patients (38%), MP was reinitiated because of acute rejection or other reasons. The success rate of steroid withdrawal 12 months after transplantation in recipients of ABO-compatible grafts was significantly higher than that in recipients of ABO-incompatible grafts (66% vs. 44%). The dose of MMF during the 12 months after renal transplantation was significantly lower in steroid reinitiated group than in the successful withdrawn group (p<0.05). Patients in the successful withdrawn group showed metabolic benefits such as lower cholesterol levels as compared with the steroid reinitiated group. CONCLUSION: Although further follow-up is necessary to confirm our results, our protocol successfully permitted the early withdrawal of steroids in 62% of renal-transplant recipients, with no resumption of steroid treatment during 3 years of follow-up.

Kidney transplantation after liver transplantation from the same donor: four cases of successful steroid withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: Administration of corticosteroids to kidney recipients has hampered the complete clinical success of kidney transplantation. Because most organ transplantation in Japan is living-related, we had the experience of performing kidney transplantation (KT) after liver transplantation (LT) from the same donor in four patients and successfully withdrew corticosteroid administration. METHODS: Three pediatric and one adult patient received kidney allografts from 3 to 10 months after LT from the same donor. The immunosuppressive regimen consisted of a corticosteroid and tacrolimus. The steroid was withdrawn after KT in all four patients. After complete withdrawal of the steroid, DNA was extracted from two recipients and examined by polymerase chain reaction to detect microchimerism. A mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) and cell-mediated lymphocytotoxicity assay (CML) were performed to test for donor-specific hyporesponsiveness. RESULTS: Steroid withdrawal was successfully accomplished after KT in every patient. No steroid-withdrawal-associated complications were observed. In the three pediatric patients, remarkable catch-up growth was observed after steroid withdrawal. In the two patients tested, donor DNA was not detected by polymerase chain reaction, suggesting the absence of microchimerism. MLR and CML showed that recipient lymphocytes reacted against donor lymphocytes at the same level as against the third-party lymphocytes. CONCLUSION: Steroid withdrawal was successfully achieved in four kidney recipients who had received a liver allograft from the same donor. The MLR and CML findings indicated the absence of donor-specific hyporesponsiveness in vitro. Although the precise mechanism is not yet clear, KT after LT from the same donor should be considered as a method that allows steroids to be withdrawn from the immunosuppressive regimen of KT.