Survival impact of surgical site infection in esophageal cancer surgery: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Aim: This study was performed to evaluate the oncological impact of surgical site infection (SSI) and pneumonia on long-term outcomes after esophagectomy. Methods: The Japan Society for Surgical Infection conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study involving 407 patients with curative stage I/II/III esophageal cancer at 11 centers from April 2013 to March 2015. We investigated the association of SSI and postoperative pneumonia with oncological outcomes in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Ninety (22.1%), 65 (16.0%), and 22 (5.4%) patients had SSI, pneumonia, and both SSI and pneumonia, respectively. The univariate analysis demonstrated that SSI and pneumonia were associated with worse RFS and OS. In the multivariate analysis, however, only SSI had a significant negative impact on RFS (HR, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.36; P = 0.010) and OS (HR, 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-3.01; P < 0.001). The presence of both SSI and pneumonia and the presence of severe SSI had profound negative oncological impacts. Diabetes mellitus and an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of III were independent predictive factors for both SSI and pneumonia. The subgroup analysis showed that three-field lymph node dissection and neoadjuvant therapy canceled out the negative oncological impact of SSI on RFS. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that SSI, rather than pneumonia, after esophagectomy was associated with impaired oncological outcomes. Further progress in the development of strategies for SSI prevention may improve the quality of care and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing curative esophagectomy.

Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of Wedge Resection Versus Segment 4b + 5 Resection for T2 and T3 Gallbladder Cancer: a Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Liver resection is the standard operative procedure for patients with T2 and T3 gallbladder cancers (GBC). However, the optimal extent of hepatectomy remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search and meta-analysis to assess the safety and long-term outcomes of wedge resection (WR) vs. segment 4b + 5 resection (SR) in patients with T2 and T3 GBC. We reviewed surgical outcomes (i.e., postoperative complications and bile leak) and oncological outcomes (i.e., liver metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS)). RESULTS: The initial search yielded 1178 records. Seven studies reported assessments of the above-mentioned outcomes in 1795 patients. WR had significantly fewer postoperative complications than SR, with an odds ratio of 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.26 - 0.60; p < 0.001), although there were no significant differences in bile leak between WR and SR. There were no significant differences in oncological outcomes such as liver metastases, 5-year DFS, and OS. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with both T2 and T3 GBC, WR was superior to SR in terms of surgical outcome and comparable to SR in terms of oncological outcomes. WR that achieves margin-negative resection may be a suitable procedure for patients with both T2 and T3 GBC.

Thoracic esophageal injury due to a neck stab wound: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic esophageal injury leads to severe complications such as mediastinitis, pyothorax, and tracheoesophageal fistula. Although prompt diagnosis and treatment are required, there are no established protocols to guide diagnosis or treatment. In particular, thoracic esophageal injury tends to be diagnosed later than cervical esophageal injury because it has few specific symptoms. We report a case of thoracic esophageal injury caused by a cervical stab wound; the patient was stabbed with a sharp blade. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old woman was attacked with a knife while sleeping at home. The patient was taken to the emergency room with an injury localized to the left section of her neck. She was suspected of a left jugular vein and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury from cervical hematoma and hoarseness. On the day following the injury, computed tomography revealed a thoracic esophageal injury. Emergency surgery was performed for an esophageal perforation and mediastinal abscesses. Although delayed diagnosis resulted in suture failure, the patient was able to resume oral intake of food a month later following enteral feeding with a gastrostomy. Esophageal injuries due to sharp trauma are rare, and most are cervical esophageal injuries. There are very few reports on thoracic esophageal injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of thoracic esophageal injury should always be considered when dealing with neck stab wounds, particularly those caused by an attack.

Molecular and pathological analyses of gastric stump cancer by next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry.

Gastric stump cancer (GSC) has distinct clinicopathological characteristics from primary gastric cancer. However, the detailed molecular and pathological characteristics of GSC remain to be clarified because of its rarity. In this study, a set of tissue microarrays from 89 GSC patients was analysed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridisation. Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) was expressed in 98.9% of tumour-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and 6.7% of tumour cells (TCs). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was detected in 18 patients (20.2%). Overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and deficiency of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression were observed in 5.6% and 1.1% of cases, respectively. Moreover, we used next-generation sequencing to determine the gene mutation profiles of a subset of the 50 most recent patients. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (42.0%) followed by SMAD4 (18.0%) and PTEN (16.0%), all of which are tumour suppressor genes. A high frequency of PD-L1 expression in TIICs and a high EBV infection rate suggest immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of GSC despite a relatively low frequency of deficient MMR gene expression. Other molecular characteristics such as PTEN and SMAD4 mutations might be considered to develop new treatment strategies.

Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection for patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND: Insufficient information is available about the long-term outcomes of patients with Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) who undergo laparoscopic transhiatal approach (LTH). Here we evaluated the oncological safety of LTH for patients with Siewert type II AEG compared with the open transhiatal approach (OTH). METHODS: Subjects included 79 patients with Siewert type II AEG who underwent gastrectomy combined with lower esophagectomy from 2008 to 2018 at our institution. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), status of adjuvant chemotherapy, late-phase complications, and recurrence patterns were compared between the OTH (n = 29) and LTH groups (n = 43). RESULTS: The median observation periods were 60 months (6-120 months) and 36 months (1-88) for the OTH and LTH groups, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were significantly different: 74% (95% CI 71-77%) and 98% (95% CI 97-99) in the OTH and LTH groups (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.01-0.83), respectively, though the OTH group included more patients with advanced disease. After stratification, according to pathological stage to adjust for selection bias, the 5-year OS and RFS rates were longer, but not significantly different among patients in the LTH group with pStage III (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.05-3.47; HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.10-2.12, respectively). Recurrence patterns were similar in the both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes of the LTH group were not inferior to those of the OTH group, suggesting the possibility of LTH as a treatment option for selected patients with Siewert type II AEG.

Laparoscopic appendectomy during the second trimester of a twin pregnancy.

Acute appendicitis during pregnancy may lead to increased maternal and fetal risks. Laparoscopic appendectomy is commonly performed during pregnancy. Compared with open appendectomy in pregnant women, laparoscopic appendectomy has shown non-inferior safety for pregnancy outcomes and superior safety for surgical outcomes. Over the last few decades, the occurrence of twin pregnancy has been increasing. Performing an operation on a patient with a twin pregnancy is more difficult than with a singleton pregnancy. Only a few operations of this kind have been reported. Here, we present a case of a 20-week twin pregnant woman who presented with acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed, and no maternal complications occurred. This report contributes to discussions on the safety of the laparoscopic approach for appendicitis during twin pregnancies.

Erratum: Author's Affiliation Correction. Type II human epidermal growth factor receptor heterogeneity is a poor prognosticator for type II human epidermal growth factor receptor positive gastric cancer (World J Clin Cases 2019; Aug 6; 7 (15): 1964-1977).

[This corrects the article on p. 1964 in vol. 7, PMID: 31423428.].

Clinical significance of lymphatic invasion in the esophageal region in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The lymphatic flow around the esophagogastric junction is complicated. Therefore, it is unclear whether lymphatic invasion in the esophageal region (eLI) and in the gastric region (gLI) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) equally affect the incidence of lymph node metastases (LNM), and consequently, survival. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data of 175 patients with AEG between January 2008 and July 2017. Risk factors for LNM and impacts of eLI or gLI on survival outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: eLI was identified in 34% of the patients (59/175). By multivariate analysis, eLI was associated with an increased risk of both mediastinal LNM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-7.05) and abdominal LNM (OR = 5.44, 95% CI: 1.95-15.20). The 5-year overall survival for patients with eLI (53%) was significantly worse than for patients without eLI (76%) (hazard ratio = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.37-10.01). gLI was not selected in either of these analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Positive eLI was strongly associated with mediastinal and abdominal LNM and worse survival in patients with AEG compared with gLI. In the histopathological examination, it seems to make sense to assess eLI and gLI separately.

Different risks of nodal metastasis by tumor location in remnant gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Curative surgery for remnant gastric cancer (RGC) after gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC) can be challenging. We examined the risk factors for lymph node metastasis in RGC, especially for tumors located at the greater curvature (G) or non-greater curvature (NG), to determine the appropriate indications of curative surgery. METHODS: Data from the two high-volume centers of Japan between 1998 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Among the 137 patients enrolled in this study, 34 were classified as the G group and 103 as the NG group. The incidence of lymph node metastasis and its risk factors was evaluated. RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis was observed in 21.2% (29/137), including 38.2% (13/34) in the G group and 15.5% (16/103) in the NG group (p = 0.008). A logistic regression analysis showed that tumor location of G or NG (p = 0.042), tumor size (p = 0.002) and depth of invasion (p = 0.009) were significant independent risk factors for nodal metastasis. Risk classification using these factors showed that clinical T1-T2 with a maximum size < 35 mm located at the non-greater curvature had the lowest nodal metastatic risk (4.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor location at the G or NG was a significant risk factor for nodal metastasis in RGC. When selecting curative surgery for RGC, physicians should consider the nodal metastatic risk calculated by the tumor location, size and depth of invasion.

Intramucosal-lymphatic invasion has a slight impact on lymph node metastasis in patients with early gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: Lymphatic invasion (LI) is associated with lymph node metastasis (LNM) and a poor prognosis in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). Although the impact of the LI volume on LNM has been described, no reports have assessed the impact of its depth on LNM. METHODS: A total of 360 EGC patients with pathologically proven LI who underwent radical gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy between January 2005 and June 2018 at our institution were extracted from our database. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the mLI group, in which LI was limited to the muscularis mucosae (n = 34); and the smLI group, in which LI reached the submucosal region (n = 326). Clinicopathological features, including the LNM incidence, were compared between the groups. RESULTS: LNM was recognized in 3 patients (9%) in the mLI group and 101 (31%) in the smLI group (P = 0.005). In the mLI group, LNM was not recorded in any patients who met the curative criteria of ESD other than mLI. CONCLUSIONS: LI limited to the mucosal region does not seem to be a strong indicator for LNM. When pathological findings of an endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen show only mLI as a non-curative criterion, the probability of LNM may be very low.

HER2 heterogeneity is a poor prognosticator for HER2-positive gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of intratumoral human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) heterogeneity is unclear for HER2-positive gastric cancer, although it has been reported to be a significant prognosticator for HER2-positive breast cancer, which has received trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. AIM: To clarify the clinical significance of intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity for HER2-positive gastric cancer, which has received trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer who received trastuzumab-based chemotherapy as a first line treatment were included. The patients were classified into two groups according to their intratumoral HER2 heterogeneity status examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) on endoscopic biopsy specimens before treatment, and their clinical response to chemotherapy and survival were compared. RESULTS: A total of 88 patients were included in this study, and HER2 heterogeneity was observed in 23 (26%) patients (Hetero group). The overall response rate was significantly better in patients without HER2 heterogeneity (Homo group) (Homo vs Hetero: 79.5% vs 35.7%, P = 0.002). Progression-free survival of trastuzumab-based chemotherapy was significantly better in the Homo group (median, 7.9 vs 2.5 mo, HR: 1.905, 95%CI: 1.109-3.268). Overall survival was also significantly better in the Homo group (median survival time, 25.7 vs 12.5 mo, HR: 2.430, 95%CI: 1.389-4.273). Multivariate analysis revealed IHC HER2 heterogeneity as one of the independent poor prognostic factors (HR: 3.115, 95%CI: 1.610-6.024). CONCLUSION: IHC of HER2 heterogeneity is the pivotal predictor for trastuzumab-based chemotherapy. Thus, HER2 heterogeneity should be considered during the assessment of HER2 expression.

Extra-perigastric Extranodal Metastasis is a Significant Prognostic Factor in Node-Positive Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Extranodal metastasis is an isolated tumor nodule without a residual lymph node structure and has been reported as a poor prognostic factor in gastric cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the prognostic value of extranodal metastasis, especially from the viewpoint of its anatomical distribution. METHODS: A total of 139 consecutive gastric cancer patients who underwent curative surgery with lymph node metastasis between 2008 and 2009 were included. Clinicopathological features and patient survival outcomes were retrospectively assessed. Patients with extranodal metastasis were subdivided into two groups: perigastric extranodal metastasis, located near the perigastric area (#1-#7 according to the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma 15th edition), and extra-perigastric extranodal metastasis, located alongside the major vessels (#8-#12). RESULTS: Extranodal metastasis was found in 51 patients (37%), and it was more frequent in those with bulky, ≥pT3, and pStage III tumors. All patients with extra-perigastric extranodal metastasis had recurrence, resulting in a 0% 5-year overall survival rate, which was significantly worse than that of patients with perigastric extranodal metastasis (59%), or those without extranodal metastasis (84%; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified the presence of extra-perigastric extranodal metastasis as an independent poor prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Extranodal metastasis, especially extra-perigastric extranodal metastasis, was a pivotal poor prognostic factor in node-positive gastric cancer. Recognizing extra-perigastric extranodal metastasis would help provide optimal therapeutic options to these high-risk patients.

Clinical impact of splenic hilar dissection with splenectomy for gastric stump cancer.

BACKGROUND: Splenectomy for advanced gastric stump cancer (GSC) is performed in Japan, based on the concept that lymphatic flow toward the splenic hilum is dominant following initial gastrectomy. However, little has been reported on the therapeutic impact of complete splenic hilar dissection with splenectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 184 patients who underwent R0 total gastrectomy with or without splenectomy for GSC between 1998 and 2015 were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into subgroups: patients with tumors involving the greater curvature (Gre group) and tumors without greater curvature involvement (non-Gre group), and each group was further divided into those with and without splenectomy. The incidence of lymph node (LN) metastasis, index of the estimated benefit from LN dissection in each station, and survival curves were compared. RESULTS: The incidence of No.10 LN metastasis was higher in the Gre group than in the non-Gre group (16.7% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.036). The index of No.10 LN dissection was higher in the Gre group than in the non-Gre group (6.3 vs. 0). However, there was no tendency that splenectomy was superior to spleen preservation for survival outcomes in either group, although selection bias certainly existed. CONCLUSIONS: In advanced GSC, similar to primary advanced proximal gastric cancer, splenectomy can be omitted unless the tumor infiltrates the greater curvature. Complete splenic hilar dissection may be expected to be beneficial for some patients with tumors infiltrating the greater curvature.

What are the reasons for a longer operation time in robotic gastrectomy than in laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer?

BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown that robotic gastrectomy requires a longer operation time than laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, no study has analyzed the exact reason for this difference in detail. We therefore investigated the reasons why more time is needed in robotic gastrectomy. METHODS: Ten consecutive cases of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) performed in our institution were selected to measure the operation time in detail. Ten cases of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) performed during the same period were chosen for comparison. The operation videos and electronic medical records of these 20 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The overall operation time, operation time in each step, and time required for instrument changes were measured. The number of intraoperative instrument changes and camera cleanings were also counted. RESULTS: The overall operation time (including effective time and junk time) was 56.8 min longer for RDG than LDG (273.7 vs. 216.9 min, respectively; p = 0.000). The effective time was only 15.3 min longer for RDG than LDG (145.9 vs. 130.6 min, respectively; p = 0.094). The time needed for the six technical steps was also not significantly different between the two groups. However, the junk time (instrument setup and docking or positioning of surgical arms) was 41.5 min longer for RDG than LDG (127.8 vs. 86.2 min, respectively; p = 0.001). The number of instrument changes was not different between RDG and LDG (p = 0.277), but the time required for each was longer for RDG than LDG (p = 0.000). The number of camera cleanings was lower for RDG than LDG (10.7 vs. 15.5 times, respectively; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: To reduce the operation time in RDG, a smarter and simpler system for setup should be developed to reduce the junk time. Additionally, a system for swifter instrument changes and more sophisticated energy devices are warranted to reduce the effective time.

Complications and their correlation with prognosis in patients undergoing total gastrectomy with splenectomy for treatment of proximal advanced gastric cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Spleen-preserving surgery is a mainstay in the treatment of proximal advanced gastric cancer according to the results of several clinical studies. However, total gastrectomy with splenectomy (TGS) still plays a role in the treatment of aggressive tumors invading the greater curvature line or adjacent structures, in spite of its high morbidity. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for morbidity and the association between the occurrence of postoperative complications and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 430 patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative TGS from 1992 to 2010. In total, 134 patients encountered grade ≥III postoperative complications (C group), and risk factors for morbidity were analyzed. Patients in the C group were matched 1:1 with patients selected from among 296 patients without complications (matched non-C group, n = 134) using propensity score estimation, to compare relapse-free survival (RFS) between the two groups. RESULTS: The overall grade ≥III complication rate was 31.2%. Multivariable analysis identified pancreatic resection (odds ratio [OR], 5.65), male sex (OR, 1.77), and an operation time of ≥240 min (OR, 1.69) as independent predictors of postoperative complications after TGS. The RFS was not significantly different between the C-group and matched non-C group (46.9% vs. 45.0%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic resection, male sex, and a longer operation time are risk factors for morbidity after TGS, and a precise surgical technique is required for such patients. However, postoperative complications of TGS may have little impact on long-term outcomes.

Evaluation of the prognostic factors in patients with pT3N0 or pT1N2-3 gastric cancer: a single institutional retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the survival of patients with the pT3N0/pT1N2-3 subset of Stage II gastric cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival rate of pT3N0/pT1N2-3 patients who were treated by surgery alone and to identify a high-risk group within this cohort. METHODS: A total of 258 patients with pT3N0/pT1N2-3 gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy alone in our hospital between January 1992 and December 2012 were enrolled in the present study. Their medical records were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the survival rates and investigate prognostic factors. RESULTS: The 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of this cohort were 84 and 80%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 89 and 83%, respectively. A multivariate analysis revealed that pathological venous infiltration was an independent prognostic factor. The survival of patients with pathological venous infiltration was significantly worse than that of those without (5-year recurrence-free survival, 75 vs. 90%, p = 0.0005; 5-year overall survival, 78 vs. 91%, p = 0.0062). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of pT3N0/pT1N2-3 gastric cancer patients treated by surgery alone was relatively good; however, patients with pathological vessel infiltration may be at high risk of recurrence and could be candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Short-term outcomes after laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection of Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction.

BACKGROUND: The potential advantages of laparoscopic surgery (LS) compared with open surgery (OS) for Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) have not been fully clarified. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of the laparoscopic transhiatal approach for Siewert type II AEG, and compare the short-term outcomes of LS versus OS for Siewert type II AEG. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 87 consecutive patients with Siewert type II AEG who underwent curative surgery from January 2008 to November 2016. Surgery-related short-term variables were analyzed in LS versus OS. RESULTS: Forty-five patients underwent LS, and 42 underwent OS. Compared with OS, LS was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss (11 vs. 408 ml, p < 0.001) and extended operation time (256 vs. 226 min, p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between LS and OS in postoperative hospitalization duration (9 vs. 10 days, p = 0.193) or rate of surgical morbidity (≥grade 3) for complications such as anastomotic leakage (4.4 vs. 4.8%, p = 1.000), or pancreatic leakage (4.4 vs. 9.5%, p = 0.423), and there were no pulmonary-associated complications in either group. There was no difference between groups in total number of harvested lymph nodes (24 vs. 29, p = 0.502), but the number of harvested mediastinum LNs was larger in LS (2 vs. 1, p = 0.002). There was no difference between groups in the length of the proximal margin (9 vs. 10 mm, p = 0.246), and the margins were negative in all cases in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic transhiatal resection for Siewert type II AEG is technically challenging, but appears feasible and safe in technical or short-term oncological aspects when performed by an experienced surgical team. A large-scale prospective study is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes.

Educational system of laparoscopic gastrectomy for trainee-how to teach, how to learn.

The feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) has been gradually proven by several scientific works, however, proper training method for this kind of surgery are still under investigation and debate. Here we report our educational system of LG to enhance the skill of young surgeons in our hospital. Our training program for trainee consists of 3 years of junior residency and 2 years of senior residency programs, requiring 5 years in total. In order to master LG, three following factors seem to be essential: learning, practice and experience. Learning means that trainee study techniques and concepts by educational materials, such as operative videos, lectures, or textbook. Practice means animal laboratory training or dry box training to acquire hand-eye coordination or bi-hand coordination, leading to precise movement of surgical devices. Experience means actual on-site training, participating in clinical LG as scopist, assistant or operator. In the actual surgery, we have some common principles for scopist, assistant and operator, respectively, and these principles are shared by entire surgical team. These principles are transmitted from trainer to trainee using simple keywords repeatedly. In conclusion, combination and balance of the three factors, learning, practice and experience are necessary to efficiently advance education of LG for trainee and may leads to benefits for gastric cancer patients.

Prognostic Factors and Recurrence Pattern of Far-advanced Gastric Cancer with Pathologically-positive Para-aortic Lymph Nodes.

BACKGROUND: The role of para-aortic lymph node (PALN) dissection for far-advanced gastric cancer is controversial in patients with clinical PALN positivity who have responded to chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed long-term outcomes of patients with pathologically-positive PALNs who underwent radical gastrectomy. RESULTS: The 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of 65 pathologically PALN-positive patients who underwent PALN dissection (n=704) were 33.8% and 21.2%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed the following poor prognostic factors: nodal involvement around the celiac axis (hazard ratio (HR)=4.04, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.55-9.63), tumor diameter of ≥120 mm (HR=3.37; 95% CI=1.18-9.63) and ≥3 PALNs involved (HR=2.24; 95% CI=1.21-4.15). Patients with none of these factors survived significantly longer than those with any of these factors (5-year OS=87.5% versus 9.3%, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pathologically PALN-positive patients achieve long survival; however, the indications for PALN dissection should be carefully considered.