Evidence in the prevention of the recurrence of herpes simplex and herpes zoster keratitis after eye surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Herpetic keratitis, either due to herpes simplex keratitis (HSK) or herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO), can recur after eye surgery.º Prophylaxis is postulated as necessary to avoid it. The objective of this study was to review the scientific evidence on the preventive methods used in the perioperative period in patients previously affected by HSK/HZO. METHODS: An exhaustive search was carried out in the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify relevant articles on prophylaxis and risk of recurrence of HSK/HZO in patients undergoing eye surgery up to 31 December 2019. RESULTS: There is strong evidence that oral prophylaxis should be recommended after penetrating keratoplasty in patients who have previously had HSK/HZO. For other types of surgery, the evidence is less compelling. However, a latent period of inactivity should be considered between disease and oral prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating and lamellar keratoplasty, corneal crosslinking, cataract surgery, and photorefractive and phototherapeutic surgery cause an alteration of the subbasal nerve plexus of the cornea. Due to surgical trauma, as well as the modulation of the ocular immune response caused by steroids applied in the postoperative period, it is possible to induce the reactivation of HSK/HZO, which is common in some cases. Within this article, we discuss the available evidence for HSK/HZO prophylaxis in eye surgery. Further studies are necessary to define the real risk of HSK/HZO recurrence after ocular surgeries, particularly in cataract surgery, and to confirm the efficacy of perioperative prophylaxis with anti-HSK/HZO antivirals.

Evidencia en la prevención de la recurrencia de queratitis por herpes simple y herpes zóster tras cirugía ocular / Evidence in the prevention of the recurrence of herpes simplex and herpes zoster keratitis after eye surgery

Propósito: La queratitis herpética, ya sea por herpes simple (HSK) o por herpes zóster oftálmico (HZO) puede presentar recaídas tras la cirugía ocular. Se postula como necesaria una profilaxis para evitarla. El objetivo de este estudio es revisar la evidencia científica sobre los métodos preventivos empleados en el período perioperatorio en pacientes previamente afectados de HSK/HZO.MétodosSe ha realizado una búsqueda exhaustiva en las bases de datos PubMed y Web of Science para identificar artículos relevantes sobre profilaxis y riesgo de recurrencia de HSK/HZO en pacientes sometidos a cirugía ocular hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2019.ResultadosHay pruebas sólidas de que la profilaxis oral debe recomendarse tras una queratoplastia penetrante en pacientes que hayan sufrido previamente HSK/HZO. Para otros tipos de cirugías, la evidencia es menos convincente; sin embargo, debe considerarse un período latente de inactividad entre la enfermedad y la profilaxis oral.ConclusionesLa queratoplastia penetrante y lamelar, crosslinking corneal, cirugía de catarata y cirugía fotorrefractiva y fototerapéutica provocan una alteración del plexo nervioso sub-basal de la cornea. Debido al traumatismo quirúrgico, así como a la modulación de la respuesta inmunológica ocular causada por los esteroides aplicados en el postoperatorio, es posible inducir la reactivación de HSK/HZO, siendo en algunos casos común. Dentro del presente artículo discutimos la evidencia disponible para la profilaxis de HSK/HZO en cirugía ocular. Son necesarios estudios adicionales para definir el riesgo real de recurrencia de HSK/HZO después de cirugías oculares, particularmente en cirugía de catarata y para confirmar la eficacia de la profilaxis perioperatoria con antivíricos anti HSK/HZO (AU)

Objective: Herpetic keratitis, either due to herpes simplex keratitis (HSK) or herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO), can recur after eye surgery.° Prophylaxis is postulated as necessary to avoid it. The objective of this study was to review the scientific evidence on the preventive methods used in the perioperative period in patients previously affected by HSK/HZO.MethodsAn exhaustive search was carried out in the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify relevant articles on prophylaxis and risk of recurrence of HSK/HZO in patients undergoing eye surgery up to 31 December 2019.ResultsThere is strong evidence that oral prophylaxis should be recommended after penetrating keratoplasty in patients who have previously had HSK/HZO. For other types of surgery, the evidence is less compelling. However, a latent period of inactivity should be considered between disease and oral prophylaxis.ConclusionsPenetrating and lamellar keratoplasty, corneal crosslinking, cataract surgery, and photorefractive and phototherapeutic surgery cause an alteration of the subbasal nerve plexus of the cornea. Due to surgical trauma, as well as the modulation of the ocular immune response caused by steroids applied in the postoperative period, it is possible to induce the reactivation of HSK/HZO, which is common in some cases. Within this article, we discuss the available evidence for HSK/HZO prophylaxis in eye surgery. Further studies are necessary to define the real risk of HSK/HZO recurrence after ocular surgeries, particularly in cataract surgery, and to confirm the efficacy of perioperative prophylaxis with anti-HSK/HZO antivirals (AU)

Evaluación de la cirugía de la catarata asistida con láser femtosegundo tras 10 años de aplicación clínica / Evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery after 10 years of clinical application

INTRODUCCIÓN: La cirugía de la catarata asistida con el láser femtosegundo (FLACS) se ha considerado un avance tecnológico en la cirugía moderna de la catarata. Tras los años de experiencia, se ha observado que los resultados clínicos presentan más complicaciones de las esperadas al inicio. Con este estudio queremos comparar los beneficios e inconvenientes de la técnica FLACS con la cirugía de catarata convencional. MÉTODO: Utilizamos las plataformas PubMed y Web of Science para la búsqueda de la literatura científica. RESULTADOS: Actualmente, el FLACS ha mejorado la técnica quirúrgica en cuanto al menor tiempo de ultrasonidos empleado y a la menor pérdida de células endoteliales. Asimismo, el centrado de la capsulotomía y la corrección del astigmatismo con las incisiones arqueadas han mejorado. Como inconvenientes destacan el alto coste del láser, las complicaciones intraoperatorias sobre la cápsula, la inducción de miosis intraoperatoria y la curva de aprendizaje de la técnica. CONCLUSIONES: Consideramos la técnica FLACS beneficiosa para casos concretos como pacientes con cirugía premium programada o con bajo recuento de células endoteliales. No obstante, creemos que, dado el coste tecnológico, no es una técnica rentable para la mayoría de los casos de nuestra práctica clínica diaria, que son casos estándares

INTRODUCTION: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) has been considered a technological advance in modern cataract surgery. After years of experience, it has been observed that clinical outcomes had more complications than expected at the beginning. The aim of this study is to compare the benefits and disadvantages of the FLACS technique with conventional cataract surgery. METHOD: The PubMed and Web of Science platforms were used to search for scientific literature. RESULTS: The FLACS has currently improved the surgical technique in terms of the shorter ultrasound time used and the lower loss of endothelial cells. Likewise, the centration of capsulotomy and the correction of astigmatism with arcuate incisions have also been improved. As disadvantages, are the high cost of the laser, the intraoperative capsular complications, the induction of intraoperative myosis, and the learning curve of the technique. CONCLUSIONS: The FLACS technique is considered beneficial for specific cases, such as patients with scheduled premium surgery, or with low endothelial cell count. However, it is believed that given the technological cost it is not a cost effective technique for most standard cases in our daily clinical practice

Evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery after 10 years of clinical application. / Evaluación de la cirugía de la catarata asistida con láser femtosegundo tras 10 años de aplicación clínica.

INTRODUCTION: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) has been considered a technological advance in modern cataract surgery. After years of experience, it has been observed that clinical outcomes had more complications than expected at the beginning. The aim of this study is to compare the benefits and disadvantages of the FLACS technique with conventional cataract surgery. METHOD: The PubMed and Web of Science platforms were used to search for scientific literature. RESULTS: The FLACS has currently improved the surgical technique in terms of the shorter ultrasound time used and the lower loss of endothelial cells. Likewise, the centration of capsulotomy and the correction of astigmatism with arcuate incisions have also been improved. As disadvantages, are the high cost of the laser, the intraoperative capsular complications, the induction of intraoperative myosis, and the learning curve of the technique. CONCLUSIONS: The FLACS technique is considered beneficial for specific cases, such as patients with scheduled premium surgery, or with low endothelial cell count. However, it is believed that given the technological cost it is not a cost effective technique for most standard cases in our daily clinical practice.