A double-blind comparative study of the safety and efficacy of caspofungin versus micafungin in the treatment of candidiasis and aspergillosis.

The safety and efficacy profile of caspofungin and micafungin in Japanese patients with fungal infections were directly compared in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. The proportion of patients who developed significant drug-related adverse event(s) (defined as a serious drug-related adverse event or a drug-related adverse event leading to study therapy discontinuation) was compared in 120 patients [caspofungin 50 mg, or 50 mg following a 70-mg loading dose on Day 1 (hereinafter, 70/50 mg) group: 60 patients; micafungin 150 mg: 60 patients]. The overall response rate was primarily evaluated in the per-protocol set (PPS) population. The proportion of patients who developed significant drug-related adverse events was 5.0 % (3/60) in the caspofungin group and 10.0 % (6/60) in the micafungin group [95 % confidence interval (CI) for the difference: -15.9 %, 5.2 %]. The favorable overall response in the PPS population for patients with esophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis, and chronic pulmonary aspergillosis including aspergilloma was 100.0 % (6/6), 100.0 % (3/3), and 46.7 % (14/30) in the caspofungin group, and 83.3 % (5/6), 100.0 % (1/1), and 42.4 % (14/33) in the micafungin group, respectively. In Japanese patients with Candida or Aspergillus infections, there was no statistical difference in the safety between caspofungin and micafungin. Consistent with other data on these two agents, the efficacy of caspofungin and micafungin was similar.

Efficacy and safety of caspofungin therapy in elderly patients with proven or suspected invasive fungal infections.

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are serious complications in elderly adults. Caspofungin may provide a useful therapeutic option for elderly patients with or at high risk for IFIs. We retrospectively compared efficacy and safety outcomes in elderly (> or = 65 years of age) and non-elderly patients in three clinical trials of caspofungin: a double-blind, randomized trial versus amphotericin B for documented invasive candidiasis (IC); an open-label, non-comparative study of definite or probable invasive aspergillosis (IA); and a double-blind, randomized trial versus liposomal amphotericin B as empirical therapy (ET) in febrile neutropenic patients. A total of 159 elderly patients with a median age of 71 years (range, 65-84) received caspofungin in these studies. The median duration of caspofungin therapy was 12 days for IC and ET, and 28 days for IA. Point estimates for the favorable response rates to caspofungin were numerically higher in elderly versus non-elderly patients with IC (83% vs. 68%) or IA (64% vs. 44%) and were similar in patients receiving ET (36% vs. 34%). Adverse events related to caspofungin occurred in generally similar proportions of elderly versus non-elderly patients with IC (clinical, 33% vs. 27%; laboratory, 17% vs. 29%), with IA (clinical, 7% vs. 13%; laboratory, 13% vs. 14%), or receiving ET (clinical, 47% vs. 47%; laboratory, 24% vs. 22%). Nephrotoxicity and infusion-related toxicity developed in comparable proportions of elderly and non-elderly caspofungin recipients in all three studies. In this post-hoc analysis, caspofungin appeared to be as efficacious and well tolerated in elderly patients as in non-elderly patients.

Clinical monitoring of HIV-1 infection in the ERA of antiretroviral resistance testing.

Viral replication of HIV-1 in the human body is a dynamic process. Incomplete suppression of replication during antiretroviral therapy ultimately selects for resistance that imparts an adaptive advantage to HIV-1. Therefore, the goal of antiretroviral therapy is complete suppression of viral replication. Viral suppression to below the lowest possible limits of detection has been associated with an optimal clinical response and delay of drug resistance. An ultrasensitive viral load assay with a very low threshold of detection remains our best laboratory tool to monitor the response to therapy. Patients may fail HAART for many reasons. Only when other potential causes of treatment failure are excluded should antiretroviral resistance testing be considered. Genotypic and phenotypic assays for assessing resistance are now available, and recent retrospective and prospective data support their use in clinical management as an adjunct to helping to choose among different antiretroviral drugs. Despite the growing enthusiasm for these tests, improvements in sensitivity, turnaround time, and quality control are still needed. A practitioner's decision about when to initiate or change therapy in an HIV-infected patient should depend primarily on viral load results, and not on antiretroviral resistance test results. Moreover, resistance testing is no substitute for a thorough clinical and drug history. As we approach the third decade of the HIV epidemic, we will learn how to use antiretroviral resistance tests in conjunction with (not in lieu of) proven clinical and laboratory tools.

Identification of RFamide neuropeptides in the medicinal leech.

Using a four-step reverse phase HPLC separation and RIA, five RFamide peptides were purified from CNS extracts of the leech Hirudo medicinalis. YMRFamide, FMRFamide, YLRFamide, FLRFamide, and GGKYMRFamide were identified by a combination of antiserum specificity in RIA, Edman degradation, and mass spectrometry. At least three of these five endogenous peptides can modulate neuromuscular interactions in the leech (38). FMRFamide-like immunoreactivity was selectively released from neural processes on isolated heart tubes in the presence of calcium and depolarizing levels of potassium.