ABSTRACT
Valvular heart disease creates an important barrier for orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with end-stage liver disease and increases mortality. Selection of the appropriate surgical scheme and adequate postoperative management can be lifesaving in these cases. This study presents a 32-year-old man diagnosed with hepatitis C-associated cirrhosis and severe aortic regurgitation due to subacute bacterial endocarditis. Initially, simultaneous aortic valve replacement (AVR) and live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) was planned. However, intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography revealed an additional atrial septal defect (ASD) and AVR, ASD repair, and LDLT surgery were performed. During the 2-year follow-up period, there were no early or late complications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first patient to have simultaneous AVR, ASD repair, and LDLT surgery. Additionally, the present case is also unique in being the first person in the Republic of Azerbaijan to undergo concomitant cardiac surgery and LDLT.
Subject(s)
End Stage Liver Disease , Heart Septal Defects, Atrial , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Liver Transplantation , Male , Humans , Adult , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , End Stage Liver Disease/complications , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Living Donors , Treatment Outcome , Heart Septal Defects, Atrial/complications , Heart Septal Defects, Atrial/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a rare disease that causes serious cardiovascular problems and may be fatal even at an early age. Because this disease variant is rather aggressive, the effect of lipid-lowering agents and lipid apheresis remains inadequate in most cases. In patients who are not responding or tolerating available treatments, liver transplantation (LT) is the last and definitive solution. In addition to LT, the need for cardiac surgery is often substantial. CASE REPORT: This study presents the first pediatric case of FH who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) surgery concurrent with live-donor LT (LDLT). The early postoperative period was uneventful. After a 1-year follow-up period, the patient is alive and well with normal liver functions and cholesterol levels remaining within the normal range without any lipid-lowering medical therapy. CONCLUSION: Performing simultaneous coronary bypass and LT may be safe and feasible even for pediatric patients.
Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump , Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II , Liver Transplantation , Humans , Child , Child, Preschool , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Living Donors , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/complications , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/genetics , Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II/surgery , Coronary Artery Bypass, Off-Pump/adverse effects , LipidsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: We compared, through the European Liver Transplant Registry, long-term liver transplantation outcomes with prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-T) versus immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-T)-based immunosuppression. This retrospective analysis comprises up to 8-year data collected between 2008 and 2016, in an extension of our previously published study. METHODS: Patients with <1 month follow-up were excluded; patients were propensity score matched for baseline characteristics. Efficacy measures included: univariate/multivariate analyses of risk factors influencing graft/patient survival up to 8 years posttransplantation, and graft/patient survival up to 4 years with PR-T versus IR-T. Overall, 13 088 patients were included from 44 European centers; propensity score-matched analyses comprised 3006 patients (PR-T: n = 1002; IR-T: n = 2004). RESULTS: In multivariate analyses, IR-T-based immunosuppression was associated with reduced graft survival (risk ratio, 1.49; P = 0.0038) and patient survival (risk ratio, 1.40; P = 0.0215). There was improvement with PR-T versus IR-T in graft survival (83% versus 77% at 4 y, respectively; P = 0.005) and patient survival (85% versus 80%; P = 0.017). Patients converted from IR-T to PR-T after 1 month had a higher graft survival rate than patients receiving IR-T at last follow-up (P < 0.001), or started and maintained on PR-T (P = 0.019). One graft loss in 4 years was avoided for every 14.3 patients treated with PR-T versus IR-T. CONCLUSIONS: PR-T-based immunosuppression might improve long-term outcomes in liver transplant recipients than IR-T-based immunosuppression.