Retrospective audit of 957 consecutive 18F-FDG PET-CT scans compared to CT and MRI in 493 patients with different histological subtypes of bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: The use of 18F-FDG PET-CT (PET-CT) is widespread in many cancer types compared to sarcoma. We report a large retrospective audit of PET-CT in bone and soft tissue sarcoma with varied grade in a single multi-disciplinary centre. We also sought to answer three questions. Firstly, the correlation between sarcoma sub-type and grade with 18FDG SUVmax, secondly, the practical uses of PET-CT in the clinical setting of staging (during initial diagnosis), restaging (new baseline prior to definitive intervention) and treatment response. Finally, we also attempted to evaluate the potential additional benefit of PET-CT over concurrent conventional CT and MRI. METHODS: A total of 957 consecutive PET-CT scans were performed in a single supra-regional centre in 493 sarcoma patients (excluding GIST) between 2007 and 2014. We compared, PET-CT SUVmax values in relation to histology and FNCCC grading. We compared PET-CT findings relative to concurrent conventional imaging (MRI and CT) in staging, restaging and treatment responses. RESULTS: High-grade (II/III) bone and soft tissue sarcoma correlated with high SUVmax, especially undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, translocation induced sarcomas (Ewing, synovial, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma), de-differentiated liposarcoma and osteosarcoma. Lower SUVmax values were observed in sarcomas of low histological grade (grade I), and in rare subtypes of intermediate grade soft tissue sarcoma (e.g. alveolar soft part sarcoma and solitary fibrous tumour). SUVmax variation was noted in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours, compared to the histologically benign plexiform neurofibroma, whereas PET-CT could clearly differentiate low from high-grade chondrosarcoma. We identified added utility of PET-CT in addition to MRI and CT in high-grade sarcoma of bone and soft tissues. An estimated 21% overall potential benefit was observed for PET-CT over CT/MRI, and in particular, in 'upstaging' of high-grade disease (from M0 to M1) where an additional 12% of cases were deemed M1 following PET-CT. CONCLUSIONS: PET-CT in high-grade bone and soft tissue sarcoma can add significant benefit to routine CT/MRI staging. Further prospective and multi-centre evaluation of PET-CT is warranted to determine the actual predictive value and cost-effectiveness of PET-CT in directing clinical management of clinically complex and heterogeneous high-grade sarcomas.

Can plasma D-dimer predict the result of a ventilation-perfusion scan?

The use of plasma D-dimer assay has been advocated for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism. We retrospectively looked at 840 patients in whom both ventilation-perfusion scan and D-dimer assay were performed within 48 h. The negative predictive value of a negative D-dimer assay was 96% for emergency admissions and 98% for inpatients. We present the cases of two patients with negative D-dimer assay results who had a high-probability lung scan, and we have found a further three patients with negative D-dimer assay results who had an intermediate-probability lung scan.

Can administration of metoclopramide reduce artefacts related to abdominal activity in myocardial perfusion SPECT?

OBJECTIVES: Myocardial perfusion SPECT is frequently affected by artefacts related to abdominal activity. Metoclopramide has been suggested to relieve this, but two previous studies have shown conflicting results. METHODS: Ninety-five patients received 10 mg metoclopramide orally after injection of 99mTc-tetrofosmin for the stress scan and 86 patients had metoclopramide after their rest injection. A control group of 82 patients did not receive metoclopramide. Scans were evaluated visually by three readers. RESULTS: Metoclopramide given before the stress scan led to abdominal activity being visually better in 16 scans, worse in 10, and unchanged in 67 scans, compared to the same patient's rest scan without metoclopramide administration. Metoclopramide administered before the rest scan resulted in abdominal activity in 11 scans being visually better, in 19 worse, and 53 scans were deemed unchanged. These differences were not significant. The number of repeat stress or rest scans was not significantly different between patients who had received metoclopramide and those who had not. The administration of metoclopramide, irrespective of whether it was given before the stress or rest scan, made no significant difference to inferior wall-to-abdomen count ratio. CONCLUSION: Neither qualitative nor quantitative analysis showed an effect of metoclopramide on abdominal activity in myocardial perfusion SPECT.

X-ray-based attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion scans: practical feasibility and diagnostic impact.

OBJECTIVES: This study describes the practical implementation of X-ray-based attenuation correction (AC) of myocardial perfusion scans in a large teaching hospital, characterizes the impact of AC on the diagnostic confidence of the interpreter and tries to predict which patients are likely to benefit from the technique. METHODS: One hundred and seven consecutive patients underwent a 2 day (99m)Tc-tetrofosmin protocol with adenosine stress using GE Millennium VG with AC and ECG-gated acquisition (ECG-g). The diagnostic impact of AC/ECG-g was judged by a panel of three observers. RESULTS: AC was not achieved in 46 patients. Individual observers rated AC 'essential' in 37 scans and 'helpful' in 68 scans. For ECG-g, this applied to 12 and 78 scans, respectively. The rating for AC was better than that for ECG-g in 57 scans, and vice versa in 31 scans. Equal ratings were recorded in 41 scans, and neither technique was needed in 54 scans. Diagnostic interpretation of abnormal scans was significantly more likely to benefit from either AC or ECG-g than interpretation of normal scans. Patients in whom AC was considered useful had a significantly higher body mass and chest circumference, but the overlap was large. CONCLUSIONS: In practice, AC was not feasible in a significant proportion of our patients. AC received better ratings from observers more often than ECG-g. Interpreter confidence with AC was significantly greater in scans with perfusion defects than in normal scans. Body mass and chest circumference cannot be used to predict which patients will benefit from AC.