Ventral hernia repair in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is an important risk factor for perioperative complications including the development of ventral hernias. METHODS: This retrospective study comprises patients who underwent abdominal hernia repair simultaneously with or following implantation of a Swedish Adjustable Gastric Band(R) (SAGB). RESULTS: 9 out of 415 patients (2.2%) who received a SAGB between January 1996 and June 2001 underwent ventral hernia repair. In 6 patients, hernias preexisted from previous abdominal surgery at the time of the bariatric procedure, and another 3 hernias occurred at the median and left upper abdominal trocar position following SAGB placement. Median BMI at time of SAGB implantation was 44 (range 35-52), and at time of hernia repair was 36 (range 25-46). 2 hernias were repaired during SAGB placement, 3 during redo surgery, and 2 during abdominoplasty. In 2 patients, significant weight loss with loss of soft tissue support of the hernia sac led to recurrent episodes of small bowel obstruction necessitating emergency repair. Repair included direct defect closure in 7 patients and sublay polypropylene net implantation in 2 patients. Recoveries have been uneventful without wound infections or recurrence in all patients after a median follow-up of 34 months (range 13-69). CONCLUSION: In morbidly obese patients, the optimal management and timing of incisional hernia repair should weigh the risk of recurrence and perioperative complications against the risk of hernia-associated complications.

Adjustable gastric banding: assessment of safety and efficacy of bolus-filling during follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Individual band-filling on demand of the morbidly obese patient is a major advantage of adjustable gastric banding. An increasing number of patients results in an enormous amount of outpatient follow-up visits, which inspired us to compare a stepwise band-filling strategy with a single bolus injection 4 weeks after the operative procedure. METHODS: 40 consecutive patients were prospectively randomized in 2 groups. 20 patients (Group A) had stepwise band-filling during 6 monthly ambulant visits. 20 patients (Group B) had a bolus-filling 4 weeks postoperatively and had the next follow-up after another 5 months. Weight loss, complications and procedural costs during follow-up were compared. RESULTS: Patients of both groups did not differ in age, gender or preoperative BMI. There was no significant difference postoperatively in excess weight lost (EWL) after 9 months. Postoperative complications did not differ significantly. By means of bolus-filling, a 60% and 53% reduction in outpatient clinical work was achieved within the 6 and 9 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Postoperative management after gastric banding takes advantage of a single bolus-filling during the first postoperative 6 months due to sufficient weight loss, low complication rate but significant reduction of personal, financial and logistic efforts.

Surgical revision after failure of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding.

BACKGROUND: This paper reports the outcome of surgical revision for complications following laparoscopic placement of an adjustable silicone gastric band (AGB) to treat morbid obesity. METHODS: Seventy-three (19.1 per cent) of 382 patients who underwent laparoscopic AGB placement between January 1996 and March 2001 presented with complications within 6 years after operation. Revision was carried out with the intention of reinstating the functional device in all patients. RESULTS: Successful surgical revision or gradual balloon deflation was performed in 53 patients (29 port-related complications, 14 pouch dilatations, 12 band leakages, three oesophageal dilatations, two symptomatic hernias, one late migration, one intracerebral bleed). Of these patients, 51 (96.2 per cent) had a successful outcome according to the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System following significant additional postinterventional weight loss. AGB removal was carried out in 20 patients (13 early or late migrations, five pouch dilatations, three port-related complications, two psychiatric disorders, one band leakage). The final failure rate for complicated AGB procedures was 30.1 per cent. CONCLUSION: AGB placement is associated with a variety of complications. In most cases surgical complications can be treated with minimally invasive surgery, which should allow further weight loss and improvement of quality of life during long-term follow-up. Alternative bariatric procedures should be reserved for patients with poor outcome after surgical revision of the AGB.

Colonoscopically placed hemoclips as treatment for massive appendiceal stump bleeding.

Massive bleeding from an appendiceal stump is a rare but occasionally seen severe complication. The bleeding may drain into the abdominal cavity, the retroperitoneum, or the digestive tract. Gastrointestinal hemorrhage may occur early or even years after appendectomy. The typical management includes ligation of the bleeding vessel or cecal resection done by either emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy. An alternative treatment option would be an angiographic embolization of the bleeding vessel. We report on a 33-year-old woman with severe lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage 1 day after an apparently uncomplicated appendectomy for acute phlegmonous appendicitis with ligation and invagination of the appendiceal stump. Hemoglobin level dropped to 6.3 g/dl and made blood transfusion necessary. The cause of bleeding was a small intramural branch of the appendiceal artery at the appendiceal stump, which was diagnosed by emergency colonoscopy. The hemorrhage could be controlled endoscopically by placing hemoclips on the distinct vessel in combination with a biological tissue adhesive. The patient recovered thereafter without further intervention. Endoscopic clipping for the treatment of appendiceal stump bleeding is a novel, effective, and safe procedure. Thereby, conventional emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy or angiographic embolization can be avoided.

Barrett's esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Medical therapy or antireflux surgery?

Barrett's esophagus is the most serious form of gastroesophageal reflux disease. It may develop due to uncontrolled chronic duodenogastroesophageal reflux and represents a premalignant abnormality. The question of the development of Barrett's esophagus and the progression to adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is addressed by comparison of the data available in the literature. A retrospective review of the literature on the outcome of GERD patients after surgical and medical therapy, is made. Surgical therapy is able to eliminate reflux of gastric and duodenal contents and therefore seems to be superior over medical therapy in the prevention of Barrett's esophagus and its progression to invasive cancer. Surgery should be considered in all Barrett's patients especially in young patients, patients with large hiatal hernia, increasing drug doses or noncompliance to medical therapy.

Pouch dilatation after gastric banding causing gastric necrosis.

BACKGROUND: Early or late pouch dilatations account for a moderate complication rate after restrictive bariatric operations. Various strategies were developed to prevent or treat pouch dilatations. METHODS: A case of necrosis of gastric wall in a concentric dilated pouch following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding is reported as a severe complication of a conservative treatment attempt. RESULTS: Emergency laparotomy resulted in band removal, partial gastric resection and prolonged hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Conservative strategies in the treatment of pouch dilatations bear the risk of complications, with both failure of the bariatric procedure and critical clinical course. Indication for early operative reintervention is recommended.