Preference for Cal/BDP Cream or Foam in Patients With Mild to Moderate Plaque Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: The combined use of topical calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate (Cal/BDP) is commonly used and demonstrated to be effective for the management of psoriasis and is shown to confer local anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory effects. The use of the two agents in combination is synergistic. Despite the demonstrated efficacy of topically applied combination Cal/BDP, successful management of a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disease such as psoriasis in the real-world setting may be hindered if patients do not adhere to the dosing or frequency of application recommendations from their prescriber. Patient preference for and satisfaction with the topical treatment vehicle have been shown to influence adherence. A recent analysis has determined that patients perceived Cal/BDP cream vehicle with PAD technology as having favorable characteristics. This randomized, split-body study was undertaken to further assess patient satisfaction with Cal/BDP cream and Cal/BDP foam formulations. TRIAL DESIGN: This was a split-body, subject-blind study. Study cream was administered in a single application to one side of the scalp and/or body; study foam was applied to the contralateral side. Patient self-administered questionnaires were completed before and after product application after a single site visit. RESULTS: Mean overall Vehicle Preference Measure (VPM) scores were higher for Cal/BDP cream than Cal/BDP foam (P=0.0043). Cal/BDP cream also achieved higher individual scores for ease of application, feeling to the touch, smell, and feeling on the skin (P<0.03). With regards to scalp application, subject assessments show that the cream was significantly more preferred in terms of limiting daily disruption (P=0.0008) Conclusion: Results of this study suggest that patients may prefer Cal/BDP cream over Cal/BDP foam for the management of psoriasis on the body and the scalp. Cal/BDP cream outperformed Cal/BDP foam on several specific measures of satisfaction and overall satisfaction measures. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(8):607-611.  doi:10.36849/JDD.7993.

Safety of Bimekizumab for Plaque Psoriasis: An Expert Consensus Panel.

BACKGROUND: Plaque psoriasis is a chronic, relapsing systemic illness that has a significant effect on quality of life. Bimekizumab is the first monoclonal antibody to target both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F, and recently received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Guidance is necessary regarding the safety of bimekizumab. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was completed for English-language original research articles on the safety of bimekizumab for moderate to severe psoriasis. A panel of 9 dermatologists and 1 rheumatologist with significant expertise in the treatment of psoriasis gathered to review the articles and create consensus statements on this new medication. A modified Delphi process was used to approve each statement, and strength of recommendation was assigned using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy criteria. RESULTS: The literature search produced 110 articles that met the criteria. A thorough screening of the studies for relevance to the research question resulted in 15 articles. These were distributed to all panelists for review prior to a roundtable discussion. The panel unanimously voted to adopt 5 consensus statements and recommendations, all of which were given a strength of "A". CONCLUSION: Bimekizumab has a safety profile consistent with other biologics, except for a higher risk of oral candidiasis. Its hepatic safety profile is comparable with other currently FDA-approved biologics for plaque psoriasis. In addition, the data do not support an association of bimekizumab with suicide, and the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease is not greater than the incidence of other IL-17 blockers. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(8):592-599. doi:10.36849/JDD.8246.

Selective Tyrosine Kinase 2 (TYK2) Inhibition in Plaque Psoriasis.

Members of the Janus kinase (JAK) superfamily, comprising tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) and JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3, mediate signaling by cytokines (eg, interleukin [IL]-23) involved in psoriasis pathogenesis. Binding of IL-23 to its receptor activates TYK2 and JAK2, which trigger signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) translocation to the nucleus to regulate target gene transcription, including genes of proinflammatory mediators such as IL-17. Physiologically, TYK2 solely mediates immune function, whereas JAK1,2,3 mediate broad systemic and immune functions. Inhibition of individual JAK family members is being evaluated in many dermatologic indications, including psoriasis. Selective TYK2 inhibition is therefore expected to be associated with few adverse effects in patients with psoriasis. People with genetic mutations leading to loss of function of TYK2 are protected from the development of psoriasis without an increased risk of infections or malignancies. In contrast, treatments with JAK1,2,3 inhibitors are associated with various systemic effects. We review the unique allosteric mechanism of action of the selective TYK2 inhibitor, deucravacitinib, which binds to the TYK2 regulatory (pseudokinase) domain, and the mechanisms of action of JAK1,2,3 inhibitors, which bind to the adenosine 5'-triphosphate-binding active (catalytic) site in the kinase domains of JAK1,2,3. Deucravacitinib, which is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults in the United States and several other countries, represents a novel, targeted systemic treatment approach with a favorable safety profile. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(8):645-652.  doi:10.36849/JDD.8293.

Developing a questionnaire for assessing clinician- and patient-reported outcomes in actinic keratosis: Results from an expert panel.

Background: Current assessments on topical treatment attributes in actinic keratosis (AK) do not evaluate safety, effectiveness, and satisfaction from both clinician and patient perspectives, creating an unmet need for more comprehensive AK-specific measures that fully capture the patient experience. Objective: To develop an actinic keratosis-specific expert panel questionnaire (AK-EPQ) of patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported outcomes for use in research studies. Methods: Using interviews of patients with AK and targeted literature reviews, a 9-person consensus panel of dermatologists with expertise in AK treatment was convened to develop the AK-EPQ to assess AK-specific patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported outcomes. Results: Nine expert advisers achieved consensus on 11 AK-EPQ items that encompass patient and clinician perspectives of treatment-related local skin reactions, clinical and cosmetic outcomes associated with AK, and satisfaction with treatment; the AK-EPQ will be first implemented in the Patient-Reported Outcomes for Actinic Keratosis study (NCT05260073). Limitations: The AK-EPQ does not directly measure quality of life, although it can be used with validated quality of life instruments. Conclusion: The newly developed AK-EPQ elicits insights into the patient and clinician experience with AK treatments. Comparative probing of these perspectives may help optimize precision medicine in AK treatment.

Ruxolitinib Cream in Adolescents/Adults with Atopic Dermatitis Meeting Severity Thresholds for Systemic Therapy: Exploratory Analysis of Pooled Results from Two Phase 3 Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Standard therapy for patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) typically includes topical therapies; however, patients with more extensive AD and/or AD refractory to topical therapy may benefit from systemic treatment. Ruxolitinib cream monotherapy has demonstrated superior antipruritic and anti-inflammatory effects versus vehicle in patients with mild to moderate AD, and long-term disease control with as-needed use. Here, efficacy/safety of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream through 52 weeks was assessed in a subset of patients with moderate and/or more extensive disease. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2 included patients who, at baseline, had Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 16, and affected body surface area (BSA) ≥ 10% (higher severity of disease threshold subgroup). Disease control and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1249 patients in the overall population, 78 (6.2%) met all higher severity of disease threshold criteria (continuous-use vehicle-controlled period: 1.5% ruxolitinib cream, n = 32; vehicle, n = 13); 28 and 4 of these patients, respectively, continued as-needed 1.5% ruxolitinib cream during the long-term safety (LTS) period. At week 8 (continuous-use), IGA-treatment success (IGA 0/1, with ≥ 2-grade improvement from baseline) was achieved by 19/32 (59.4%) patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus no patients applying vehicle. In the LTS period, those achieving clear/almost clear skin increased from 19/28 patients (67.9%; continuous-use: week 8) to 18/23 patients (78.3%; as-needed use: week 52) in patients applying ruxolitinib cream from day 1. Ruxolitinib cream was well tolerated, with few application site reactions, regardless of disease severity threshold. Efficacy and safety results were similar to the overall study population. CONCLUSION: Patients with AD who meet standard disease severity eligibility criteria for systemic therapy may achieve IGA-treatment success with clear/almost clear skin with continuous-use ruxolitinib cream, and maintain long term-disease control with as-needed ruxolitinib cream monotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03745638/NCT03745651.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a skin condition that causes itchy, dry, and inflamed skin. For many people AD is controlled with medication that is applied to the skin. However, for some people medication that is taken orally or injected (i.e., systemic treatment) may be needed. Systemic treatment can sometimes be challenging. Doctors use a variety of tools to measure AD severity and apply standard criteria to help determine if a person should receive systemic treatment. In the TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2 clinical trials, itch and inflammation improved in people with mild to moderate AD after they applied ruxolitinib cream twice daily for 8 weeks. When people then applied ruxolitinib cream to areas of AD only when it was needed for another 44 weeks, ruxolitinib cream provided long-term control of their AD. The aim of this analysis was to assess disease control with ruxolitinib cream in people with AD severe enough to meet the standard criteria indicating a need for systemic treatment. In this group, the majority had clear or almost clear skin after applying ruxolitinib cream twice daily for 8 weeks. After 44 weeks of as-needed application of ruxolitinib cream, most people still had clear or almost clear skin. In this group of people who may have otherwise needed treatment with systemic therapy, ruxolitinib cream twice daily for 8 weeks and then as-needed was generally well tolerated. These results show that as-needed ruxolitinib cream may provide long-term control of AD in people who may otherwise have needed systemic therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Micronized Isotretinoin Administered Once Daily Without Food in Patients With Recalcitrant Nodular Acne.

INTRODUCTION: Micronized isotretinoin 0.4 to 0.8 mg/kg/day administered in 2 divided doses with or without meals is approved for the treatment of severe nodular acne in patients aged 12 years or older. Although practitioners may suggest once-daily dosing to increase patient compliance, supporting data are limited. METHODS: In this pilot study, patients aged 12 years or older with severe nodular acne (Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] =>4 and >5 facial nodules) received once-daily micronized isotretinoin 0.4 to 0.8 mg/kg/day without food for 20 weeks. The coprimary efficacy endpoints were changes from baseline in nodular lesion count (NLC) and percentage of patients with a =>90% reduction in NLC at week 24. Secondary endpoints included percentage of patients achieving IGA 0/1; reductions in inflammatory lesion count (ILC) and noninflammatory lesion count (NILC); adverse events (AEs); and severity of erythema, dryness, peeling, oiliness, burning, and pruritus. Analyses included all enrolled patients with the last observation carried forward. RESULTS: Twenty-two of 24 patients completed the study. From baseline to week 24, NLC decreased by a median (quartile [Q]1, Q3) of 6 (5, 7), all patients experienced complete clearance of nodules, 23/24 (96%) patients achieved IGA 0/1, and ILC and NILC decreased by a mean +/- standard deviation of 97.8% +/- 5.7% and 98.4% +/- 6.2%, respectively (all P<0.0001). There were small, significant, early increases in the severity of erythema, dryness, and peeling; 2 patients experienced 3 AEs considered unrelated to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily micronized isotretinoin administered without food was efficacious and well tolerated in patients with severe nodular acne.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):423-428.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7863.

Consensus Statements on the Use of Novel Formulations of Isotretinoin: A Modified Delphi Process.

Oral isotretinoin remains a mainstay of treatment for severe, recalcitrant nodular acne. Novel formulations of isotretinoin have been developed over the past decade, including lidose isotretinoin and micronized isotretinoin. It is important to understand the differences between isotretinoin formulations to help guide clinical decision-making and selection of isotretinoin therapy. This study aims to provide evidence-based consensus statements regarding the use of novel formulations of isotretinoin for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne. The Expert Consensus Group consisted of dermatologists with expertise in the treatment of acne. Voting members met in person to conduct a modified Delphi process; a maximum of 2 rounds of voting were conducted for each consensus statement. A total of 5 statements were generated regarding the use of novel formulations of isotretinoin, addressing the efficacy, tolerability, and side effects of novel isotretinoin formulations. All 5 statements achieved agreement with high consensus. The Expert Consensus Group agrees that individualized selection of isotretinoin therapy is important to maximize efficacy and minimize side effects. Compared to generic isotretinoin, micronized isotretinoin may require lower doses to achieve sufficient plasma concentrations. With the increased bioavailability of micronized formulation, there is no need to calculate cumulative dose; instead, the general recommendation with micronized isotretinoin is to treat for at least 5 months, or longer if needed to achieve clearance. Micronized isotretinoin can be taken in the fed or fasted state and has an acceptable safety profile. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):429-432.     doi:10.36849/JDD.7971.

Topical Clindamycin in the Management of Acne Vulgaris: Current Perspectives and Recent Therapeutic Advances.

Clindamycin is a lincosamide-derivate antibiotic that has been widely used both systemically and topically for approximately 5 decades. The antimicrobial profile of clindamycin primarily covers several gram-positive bacteria and anaerobic bacteria, with multiple clinical applications supported in the literature and with widespread real-world use. Topical clindamycin has been used primarily for the treatment of acne vulgaris, with both monotherapy and combination therapy formulations available commercially. This article reviews the use of clindamycin as a topical agent with emphasis on therapy for acne vulgaris, and addresses modes of action, reported anti-inflammatory properties that may relate to therapeutic outcomes, recommendations to avoid the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, tolerability and safety considerations, and published data from clinical studies completed over a span of several years. A discussion of a newly FDA-approved triple-combination formulation is also included.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):438-445.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8318.

Triple-Combination Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% Gel for Acne in Adult and Pediatric Participants.

BACKGROUND: Topical clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1% gel (CAB) is the first fixed-dose triple-combination approved for the treatment of acne. This post hoc analysis investigated the efficacy and safety of CAB in pediatric (<18 years) and adult (greater than or equal to 18 years) participants. METHODS: In two multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 studies (NCT04214639 and NCT04214652), participants greater than or equal to 9 years of age with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized (2:1) to 12 weeks of once-daily treatment with CAB or vehicle gel. Pooled data were analyzed for pediatric and adult subpopulations. Assessments included treatment success (greater than or equal to 2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score and a score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear], inflammatory/noninflammatory lesion counts, Acne-Specific Quality of Life (Acne-QoL) questionnaire, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and cutaneous safety/tolerability. RESULTS: At week 12, treatment success rates for both pediatric and adult participants were significantly greater with CAB (52.7%; 45.9%) than with vehicle (24.0%; 23.5%; P<0.01, both). CAB-treated participants in both subgroups experienced greater reductions from baseline versus vehicle in inflammatory (pediatric: 78.6% vs 50.4%; adult: 76.6% vs 62.8%; P<0.001, both) and noninflammatory lesions (pediatric: 73.8% vs 41.1%; adult: 70.7% vs 52.2%; P<0.001, both). Acne-QoL improvements from baseline to week 12 were significantly greater with CAB than with a vehicle. Most TEAEs were of mild-to-moderate severity; no age-related trends for safety/tolerability were observed.  Conclusions: CAB gel demonstrated comparable efficacy, quality of life improvements, and safety in pediatric and adult participants with moderate-to-severe acne. As the first fixed-dose, triple-combination topical formulation, CAB represents an important new treatment option for patients with acne. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(6):394-402.     doi:10.36849/JDD.8357.

Triple Combination Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% for Acne: Efficacy and Safety from a Pooled Phase 3 Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: A three-pronged approach to acne treatment combining an antibiotic, antimicrobial, and retinoid may be more efficacious than single/double treatments while potentially reducing antibiotic resistance. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the first fixed-dose, triple-combination topical acne product, clindamycin 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 3.1% gel (CAB) using pooled phase 3 data. METHODS: In two identical phase 3 (N = 183; N = 180), double-blind, 12-week studies, participants aged ≥ 9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized 2:1 to receive once-daily CAB or vehicle gel. Endpoints included ≥ 2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score and clear/almost clear skin (treatment success) and least-squares mean percent change from baseline in acne lesion counts. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and cutaneous safety/tolerability were evaluated. RESULTS: At week 12, 50.0% of participants achieved treatment success with CAB versus 22.6% with vehicle gel (P < 0.001). CAB resulted in > 70% reductions in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions at week 12 (77.9% and 73.0%, respectively), which were significantly greater than vehicle (57.9% and 48.2%; P < 0.001, both). Most TEAEs were of mild-moderate severity, and < 3% of CAB-treated participants discontinued study/treatment because of AEs. Transient increases from baseline in scaling, erythema, itching, burning, and stinging were observed with CAB, but resolved back to or near baseline values by week 12. CONCLUSIONS: The innovative fixed-dose, triple-combination clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/BPO 3.1% gel was efficacious and well tolerated in children, adolescents, and adults with moderate-to-severe acne. Half of participants achieved clear/almost clear skin by 12 weeks, rates not previously seen in clinical studies of other topical acne products. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04214639 and NCT04214652.

Tapinarof cream 1% once daily: Significant efficacy in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adults and children down to 2 years of age in the pivotal phase 3 ADORING trials.

BACKGROUND: Tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD), a topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist, downregulates pro-inflammatory Th2 cytokines, upregulates skin-barrier components, and reduces oxidative stress. OBJECTIVE: To assess tapinarof efficacy and safety in adults and children down to 2 years of age with atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: Eight hundred and thirteen patients were randomized to tapinarof or vehicle QD in two 8-week phase 3 trials. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint, Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis score of 0 or 1 and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at Week 8, was met with statistical significance in both trials: 45.4% versus 13.9% and 46.4% versus 18.0% (tapinarof vs vehicle; both P < .0001). Significantly superior Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 (EASI75) responses were also observed with tapinarof versus vehicle at Week 8: 55.8% versus 22.9% and 59.1% versus 21.2% (both P < .0001). Rapid improvements in patient-reported pruritus were also significant with tapinarof versus vehicle. Common adverse events (≥5%) of folliculitis, headache, and nasopharyngitis were mostly mild or moderate, with lower discontinuations due to adverse events in the tapinarof groups than with vehicle. LIMITATIONS: Long-term efficacy was not assessed. CONCLUSION: Tapinarof demonstrated highly significant efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability in a diverse population of patients with AD down to 2 years of age.

Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Disease Control of Ruxolitinib Cream Among Adolescents with Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Results from Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, inflammatory skin disease, affects approximately 7% of adolescents globally. A topical formulation of ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated safety and efficacy among adolescents/adults in two phase 3 studies (TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2). OBJECTIVE: To describe safety and efficacy of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle and long-term disease control of ruxolitinib cream among adolescents aged 12-17 years from pooled phase 3 study data. METHODS: Patients [≥ 12 years old with AD for ≥ 2 years, Investigator's Global Assessment score (IGA) 2/3, and 3-20% affected body surface area (BSA) at baseline] were randomized 2:2:1 to ruxolitinib cream (0.75%/1.5%) or vehicle for 8 weeks of continuous use followed by a long-term safety (LTS) period up to 52 weeks with as-needed use. Patients originally applying vehicle were rerandomized 1:1 to 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream. Efficacy measures at week 8 included IGA treatment success (IGA-TS; i.e., score of 0/1 with ≥ 2 grade improvement from baseline), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), and ≥ 4-point improvement in itch numerical rating scale (NRS4). Measures of disease control during the LTS period included IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and percentage affected BSA. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Of 1249 randomized patients, 245 (19.6%) were aged 12-17 years. Of these, 45 patients were randomized to vehicle and 92 patients to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream. A total of 104/137 (75.9%) patients continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in the LTS period [82/92 (89.1%) continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; 22/45 (48.9%) patients on vehicle were reassigned to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream], and 83/104 (79.8%) of these patients completed the LTS period. At week 8, substantially more patients who applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle achieved IGA-TS (50.6% versus 14.0%), EASI-75 (60.9% versus 34.9%), and NRS4 (52.1% versus 17.4%; P = 0.009). The mean (SD) reduction in itch NRS scores was significantly greater in patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle from day 2 [- 0.9 (1.9) versus -0.2 (1.4); P = 0.03]. During the LTS period, mean (SD) trough steady-state ruxolitinib plasma concentrations at weeks 12/52 were 27.2 (55.7)/15.5 (31.5) nM. The percentage of patients achieving IGA score of 0 or 1 was sustained or further increased with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; mean affected BSA was generally low (< 3%; i.e., mild disease). Through 52 weeks, application site reactions occurred in 1.8% of adolescent patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream at any time; no patients had serious adverse events. There were no serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thromboembolic events. CONCLUSIONS: Meaningful anti-inflammatory and antipruritic effects were demonstrated with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in the subset of adolescent patients with AD, comparable with those observed in the overall study population; long-term, as-needed use maintained disease control and was well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03745638 (registered 19 November 2018) and NCT03745651 (registered 19 November 2018).

Patient- and Clinician-Reported Outcomes for Tirbanibulin in Actinic Keratosis in Clinical Practice Across the United States (PROAK).

BACKGROUND: The Patient-Reported Outcomes in Actinic Keratosis (PROAK) study evaluated patient- and clinician-reported outcomes (PRO; ClinRO) during 24 weeks of follow-up among adult patients with actinic keratosis (AK) on the face or scalp who were administered tirbanibulin 1% ointment in real-world community practices in the United States.  Methods: Quality of life (QoL) was assessed by Skindex-16 at week (W) 8. Additionally, effectiveness (Investigator Global Assessment [IGA]), PRO and ClinRO (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication and Expert Panel Questionnaire), safety, and tolerability were assessed at W8 and W24. RESULTS: The safety population included 300 patients; the full analysis set included 290 patients (278 patients at W24). At W8, a statistically significant difference (P<0.03) was observed for Skindex-16 domains in all assessed subgroups. Clinicians and patients reported high global satisfaction (mean [SD] scores of 74.9 [23.9] and 72.0 [24.6], respectively) at W24. Overall skin appearance improved from baseline to W24 (83.6% clinicians; 78.5% patients). IGA success (IGA score of 0-1) was achieved by 71.9% of patients at W24 with a similar % at W8 (73.8%) suggesting a stable effectiveness over time. About 5% of patients reported at least one adverse event, 4% reported at least one serious adverse event and no patients reported serious adverse drug reactions. At W8, the most frequently reported local skin reactions were mild/moderate erythema (47.6%) and flaking/scaling (49.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with tirbanibulin demonstrated effectiveness in the management of AK lesions and a favorable safety and tolerability profile. Furthermore, QoL was improved as early as W8, and both patients and clinicians reported high levels of treatment satisfaction, independently of patients' characteristics. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(5):338-346. doi:10.36849/JDD.8264.

COVID-19 Protection Strategies: Lessons Learned About Epidermal Barrier Function and the Significance of Optimized Skin Care.

Initially categorized as primarily a respiratory disease, COVID-19 can involve other organ systems and may have direct skin manifestations, including exanthems, morbilliform eruption, generalized urticaria, or pseudo-chilblains —commonly called “COVID Toes.” Frequent handwashing and prolonged wearing of face masks and shields in efforts to minimize transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus that causes COVID, has given rise to indirect skin manifestations of COVID. “Maskne” and handwashing dermatitis are particularly common among healthcare workers. Characterized by skin inflammation, dryness, pruritus, and other symptoms, these conditions are fundamentally disorders of skin barrier dysfunction. This dysfunction may result from the combination of mechanical skin damage, changes in skin pH, reductions in skin lipids attributable to protection measures, and local alterations in the cutaneous microbiome. Strategies to manage these conditions focus on reversing and repairing skin barrier damage with preventative general measures, optimized skin care with the selection of proper products, eliminating irritant exposures, and avoiding certain medications, such as topical corticosteroids, that may further impair barrier function despite temporary improvement in signs and symptoms. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(4):  doi:10.36849/JDD.7862.

INDIVIDUAL ARTICLE: Update on Combined Topical Products for Treating Acne: Leaping From Dyads.

Antibiotic resistance and treatment adherence remain significant challenges for acne treatment. Advances in topical formulations have ushered in an era of fixed combination topical therapeutics that are well-tolerated and more efficacious. In addition, their once-daily application leads to increased treatment adherence. This article discusses formulation strategies that allow for the coadministration of active drugs and reviews all commercially available fixed-combination topical acne treatments.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23:4(Suppl 2):s4-10.

Long-term safety and effectiveness of roflumilast cream 0.3% in adults with chronic plaque psoriasis: A 52-week, phase 2, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and/or safety profiles limit topical psoriasis treatments. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate long-term effects of once-daily roflumilast cream 0.3% in patients with psoriasis. METHODS: In this open-label phase 2 trial, adult patients (N = 332) with psoriasis who completed the phase 2b parent trial or were newly enrolled applied roflumilast once-daily for 52 weeks. Safety and effectiveness were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 244 patients (73.5%) completed the trial; 13 patients (3.9%) discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) and 3 (0.9%) due to lack of efficacy. Twelve patients (3.6%) reported treatment-related AEs; none were serious. ≥97% of patients had no irritation. No tachyphylaxis was observed with 44.8% of the patients achieving Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Clear or Almost Clear at Week 52. LIMITATIONS: Intertriginous-IGA and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were not evaluated in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this long-term trial, once-daily roflumilast cream was well-tolerated and efficacious up to 64 weeks in patients in the earlier trial, suggesting it is suitable for chronic treatment, including the face and intertriginous areas.

Full Guidelines-From the Medical Board of the National Psoriasis Foundation: Perioperative management of systemic immunomodulatory agents in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Systemic immunomodulatory agents are indicated in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Perioperative use of these medications may increase the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and complication. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of SSI and complication in patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease receiving immunomodulatory agents (tumor necrosis factor-alfa [TNF-α] inhibitors, interleukin [IL] 12/23 inhibitor, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 costimulator, phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, Janus kinase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, cyclosporine (CsA), and methotrexate [MTX]) undergoing surgery. METHODS: We performed a search of the MEDLINE PubMed database of patients with chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease on immune therapy undergoing surgery. RESULTS: We examined 48 new or previously unreviewed studies; the majority were retrospective studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. CONCLUSION: For low-risk procedures, TNF-α inhibitors, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, ustekinumab, abatacept, MTX, CsA, and apremilast can safely be continued. For intermediate- and high-risk surgery, MTX, CsA, apremilast, abatacept, IL-17 inhibitors, IL-23 inhibitors, and ustekinumab are likely safe to continue; however, a case-by-case approach is advised. Acitretin can be continued for any surgery. There is insufficient evidence to make firm recommendations on tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and deucravacitinib.

First Use of Combination Oral Deucravacitinib With Tapinarof Cream for Treatment of Severe Plaque Psoriasis.

Plaque psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated, cutaneous, and systemic inflammatory dermatosis. Its pathogenesis involves the dysregulation of the interleukin (IL)-23/IL-17 signaling pathway. There are a range of treatment options available, encompassing topical agents, biologics, oral systemic therapy, and phototherapy. The utility of combination treatment has also been described and is a budding field of research. Here we describe the first case of adult severe generalized plaque psoriasis treated with once-daily oral deucravacitinib 6 mg combined with tapinarof cream 1% applied once daily. To our knowledge, the combination of these agents has not yet been described in the literature. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(3):     doi:10.36849/JDD.8091.

Attenuation of Atopic Dermatitis in Newborns, Infants, and Children With Prescription Treatment and Ceramide-Containing Skin Care: A Systematic Literature Review and Consensus.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) typically starts in infancy and early childhood. The chronic skin disorder is associated with recurrent flares, pruritus, and genetic predisposition. Daily use of moisturizers that contain lipids, such as ceramides, reduces the rate of AD flares and the need for topical steroid treatment. We aimed to provide insights on AD attenuation to tailor AD prescription therapy, skin care, and maintenance treatment to improve pediatric patients with AD and families. METHODS: A panel of 6 pediatric dermatologists and dermatologists who treat neonates, infants, and children developed a consensus paper on AD attenuation for pediatric patients. The modified Delphi process comprised a face-to-face panel meeting and online follow-up to discuss the systematic literature search results and draw from clinical experience and opinion of the panel to adopt and agree on 5 statements.  Results: Understanding the functional properties of newborn and infant skin, discussing skincare product use with parents, and recommending tailored prescription and skincare routines can improve newborn, infant, and children’s skin health. Studies on the prophylactic application of moisturizers initiated in early infancy suggest moisturizers may delay rather than prevent AD, especially in high-risk populations and when used continuously. Increasingly there is evidence that moisturizer application reduces the severity of AD and extends the time to flares, which may help attenuate the atopic march. The protective effect of skin care for AD has been observed in studies where its daily use is ongoing; these beneficial effects may be lost in less than 1year after cessation. It is therefore important to emphasize that skin care should be routinely used when counseling patients and caregivers.  Conclusion: Healthcare providers can improve patient outcomes in atopic-prone infants and children by providing instructions regarding the daily benefits of applying skin care with gentle cleansers and moisturizers. Using gentle cleansers and moisturizers containing barrier lipids from birth onward may delay AD occurrence and mitigate severity in predisposed infants.J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(3): doi:10.36849/JDD.7894.