Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Immunol ; 15: 1447991, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39136026

ABSTRACT

Background: Factor H (FH) is a major soluble inhibitor of the complement system and part of a family comprising five related proteins (FHRs 1-5). Deficiency of FHR1 was described to be linked to an elevated risk of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). As FHR1 can partially antagonize the functionality of FH, an altered FHR1/FH ratio could not only enhance SLE vulnerability but also affect the disease expression. This study focuses on the analysis of FH and FHR1 at a protein level, and the occurrence of anti-FH autoantibodies (anti-FH) in a large cohort of SLE patients to explore their association with disease activity and/or expression. Methods: We assessed FH and FHR1 levels in plasma from 378 SLE patients compared to 84 healthy controls (normal human plasma, NHP), and sera from another cohort of 84 healthy individuals (normal human serum, NHS), using RayBio® CFH and CFHR1 ELISA kits. Patients were recruited by the Swiss SLE Cohort Study (SSCS). Unmeasurable FHR1 levels were all confirmed by Western blot, and in a subgroup of patients by PCR. Anti-FH were measured in SLE patients with non-detectable FHR1 levels and matched control patients using Abnova's CFH IgG ELISA kit. Results: Overall, FH and FHR1 levels were significantly higher in healthy controls, but there was no significant difference in FHR1/FH ratios between SLE patients and NHPs. However, SLE patients showed a significantly higher prevalence of undetectable FHR1 compared to all healthy controls (35/378 SLE patients versus 6/168 healthy controls; p= 0.0214, OR=2.751, 95% CI = 1.115 - 8.164), with a consistent trend across all ethnic subgroups. Levels of FH and FHR1, FHR1/FH ratios and absence of FHR1 were not consistently associated with disease activity and/or specific disease manifestations, but absence of FHR1 (primarily equivalent to CFHR1 deficiency) was linked to the presence of anti-FH in SLE patients (p=0.039). Conclusions: Deficiency of FHR1 is associated with a markedly elevated risk of developing SLE. A small proportion of FHR1-deficient SLE patients was found to have autoantibodies against FH but did not show clinical signs of microangiopathy.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Complement Factor H , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/immunology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/blood , Female , Male , Complement Factor H/metabolism , Complement Factor H/immunology , Adult , Autoantibodies/blood , Autoantibodies/immunology , Middle Aged , Complement C3b Inactivator Proteins/genetics , Young Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Adolescent , Blood Proteins
2.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1257525, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469558

ABSTRACT

Deficiencies of the early complement components of the classical pathway (CP) are well-documented in association with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or SLE-like syndromes and severe pyogenic infections. Among these, complete C1s deficiency has been reported in nine cases so far. Here, we describe a 34-year-old male patient who presented with severe, recurrent infections since childhood, including meningitides with pneumococci and meningococci, erysipelas, subcutaneous abscess, and recurrent infections of the upper airways. The patient also exhibited adult-onset SLE, meeting 7/11 of the ACR criteria and 34 of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria, along with class IV-G (A) proliferative lupus nephritis (LN). A screening of the complement cascade showed immeasurably low CH50, while the alternative pathway (AP) function was normal. Subsequent determination of complement components revealed undetectable C1s with low levels of C1r and C1q, normal C3, and slightly elevated C4 and C2 concentrations. The patient had no anti-C1q antibodies. Renal biopsy showed class IV-G (A) LN with complement C1q positivity along the glomerular basement membranes (GBMs) and weak deposition of IgG, IgM, and complement C3 and C4 in the mesangium and GBM. In an ELISA-based functional assay determining C4d deposition, the patient's absent complement activity was fully restored by adding C1s. The genome of the patient was analyzed by whole genome sequencing showing two truncating variants in the C1S gene. One mutation was located at nucleotide 514 in exon 5, caused by a nucleotide substitution from G to T, resulting in a nonsense mutation from Gly172 (p.Gly172*). The other mutation was located at nucleotide 750 in exon 7, where C was replaced by a G, resulting in a nonsense mutation from Tyr250 (p.Tyr250*). Both mutations create a premature stop codon and have not previously been reported in the literature. These genetic findings, combined with the absence of C1s in the circulation, strongly suggest a compound heterozygote C1s deficiency in our patient, without additional defect within the complement cascade. As in a previous C1s deficiency case, the patient responded well to rituximab. The present case highlights unanswered questions regarding the CP's role in SLE etiopathogenesis.


Subject(s)
Complement C1s , Hereditary Complement Deficiency Diseases , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Lupus Nephritis , Adult , Humans , Male , Codon, Nonsense , Complement C1q/genetics , Complement C1s/deficiency , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/genetics , Lupus Nephritis/diagnosis , Lupus Nephritis/genetics , Nucleotides , Reinfection
3.
Front Immunol ; 12: 761395, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35087514

ABSTRACT

Objective: In patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) complement C1q is frequently targeted by autoantibodies (anti-C1q), that correlate best with active renal disease. Anti-C1q bind to largely unknown epitopes on the collagen-like region (CLR) of this highly functional molecule. Here we aimed at exploring the role of epitope-specific anti-C1q in SLE patients. Methods: First, 22 sera of SLE patients, healthy controls and anti-C1q positive patients without SLE were screened for anti-C1q epitopes by a PEPperMAP® microarray, expressing CLR of C1q derived peptides with one amino acid (AA) shift in different lengths and conformations. Afterwards, samples of 378 SLE patients and 100 healthy blood donors were analyzed for antibodies against the identified epitopes by peptide-based ELISA. Relationships between peptide-specific autoantibodies and SLE disease manifestations were explored by logistic regression models. Results: The epitope mapping showed increased IgG binding to three peptides of the C1q A- and three of the C1q B-chain. In subsequent peptide-based ELISAs, SLE sera showed significantly higher binding to two N-terminally located C1q A-chain peptides than controls (p < 0.0001), but not to the other peptides. While anti-C1q were associated with a broad spectrum of disease manifestations, some of the peptide-antibodies were associated with selected disease manifestations, and antibodies against the N-terminal C1q A-chain showed a stronger discrimination between SLE and controls than conventional anti-C1q. Conclusion: In this large explorative study anti-C1q correlate with SLE overall disease activity. In contrast, peptide-antibodies are associated with specific aspects of the disease suggesting epitope-specific effects of anti-C1q in patients with SLE.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies/immunology , Complement C1q/immunology , Epitopes/immunology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/immunology , Adult , Female , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Peptides/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL