ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Live-kidney donation has a low mortality rate. Evidence suggests that live-kidney donors experience a quality of life (QoL) comparable to or even superior to that of the general population. There is limited information on factors associated with a decrease in QoL in particular for baseline factors, which would improve information to the donor, donor selection, and convalescence. METHODS: QoL data on 501 live donors included in three prospective studies between 2001 and 2010 were used. The 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) was used to measure QoL up to 1 year after the procedure. Longitudinal effects on both the mental (MCS) and physical component scales (PCS) were analyzed with multilevel linear regression analyses. Baseline variables were age, gender, body mass index (BMI), pain, operation type, and comorbidity. Other covariates were loss of the graft, glomerular filtration rate, and recipient complications. RESULTS: After 1 year we observed a small decrease in PCS (effect size = -0.24), whereas the MCS increased (effect size = 0.32). Both PCS and MCS were still well above the norm of the general Dutch population. Factors associated with a change in PCS were BMI (Cohen's d = -0.17 for 5 BMI points) and age (d = -0.13 for each 10 years older). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, QoL after live-donor nephrectomy is excellent. A lowered PCS is related to age and body weight. Expectations towards a decreased postoperative QoL at 1 year are unjustified. However, one should keep in mind that older and obese donors may develop a reduced physical QoL after live-kidney donation.
Subject(s)
Kidney , Living Donors/psychology , Nephrectomy/psychology , Quality of Life , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/psychology , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Comorbidity , Female , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pain, Postoperative/psychology , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It is important to minimize risks associated with live donor nephrectomy. In this study we evaluated the results of left-sided robot-assisted donor nephrectomies in comparison with standard techniques. METHODS: Data on perioperative results, kidney function, and recipient and graft survival were collected. All left-sided laparoscopic and hand-assisted procedures were selected as control groups. RESULTS: Fifty-nine robot-assisted procedures were performed by two surgeons. Operative time was significantly longer in the robot-assisted group compared with both control groups. However, it decreased significantly during procedures 40-59 compared with procedures 20-39 (P = 0.014) to median 172.5 (114.0-242.0) min. One conversion to the open approach occurred in the robot group due to a bleeding of the renal artery stump. No difference was found between all techniques at 3 months post-donation. CONCLUSION: Left-sided robot-assisted donor nephrectomy is feasible with over time a significant decrease in operative time with good outcomes for donor and recipient. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Living Donors/statistics & numerical data , Nephrectomy/statistics & numerical data , Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Graft Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Utilization Review , Young AdultABSTRACT
In 2006, a survey from the American Society of Transplant Surgeons disclosed significant and sometimes fatal hemorrhagic events in live donor nephrectomies (LDN) related to failure of clips, leading to the contraindication of the Weck® Hem-o-lok® clip for control of the renal artery during LDN. A survey regarding vascular control techniques, their perceived safety ratings and their failures was sent to 645 European Society for Organ Transplantation members who profiled their profession as "surgeon" and selected "kidney" as organ type. Two hundred forty-three (41%) members responded, of whom 171 (63.3%) independently perform LDN. Their responses were analyzed. For arterial and venous vascular control, the GIA™ and TA™stapler are used most frequently, and were rated the safest. Of the 121 reported hemorrhagic events, slippage and dislodgement of clips occurred at least 58 times, while stapler malfunction occurred at least 40 times. One donor death from hemorrhage related to clip dysfunction was reported. Hemorrhagic complications of LDN with fatal and non-fatal outcomes still occur. Strikingly, many surgeons do not use the vascular closing technique that they consider most safe. Failure of non-transfixion techniques is associated with greater risks for the donor. Control of major vessels in LDN must employ transfixion techniques for optimal donor safety.